contradiction to destroy shilling for control?
a) Contro = contra
b) A shill tempts many into conflicts of reason against (contra) one another, while contradicting both sides (talmudic reasoning) to tempt opposite reactions.
c) Con (together) trol (to roll) implies circular thinking internally (logic) turning into external conflict (reason).
israel
Yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each ones struggle within all...not against one another.
Anything taken misses everything given for free. Taking implies missing.
admits to chemtrails - but call them contrails
Chem implies the al-chemical process setting apart (analysis); Con implies putting together (synthesis) what the al-chemical process sets apart from one another.
It's ones consent to suggested calls, which represents a) artificial synthesis during natural analysis and b) the synthesis of reason (admission vs denial) among those who consented.
Few tempt many together into an admission vs denial conflict of reason, which contradicts that nature separated each being from one another.
Preaching to the choir
a) Choir/chorus/khoros -"round dance"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/chorus implies ones circular logic turning into a conflict of reason against others aka a dance of consent; regulated by the suggestions of another.
b) Preach/predicar aka prae (before) dicare (to proclaim; to say)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/preach implies the forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) claiming (consent) what others say (suggest).
Another word for preach...sermon/sermun - "speech", hence "sermon on the mount" representing the use of speech (suggestion) to amount listeners (consent)...an inversion of sound separating instruments from one another.
Democracy is fake.
a) Democracy aka dēmos (common people) + kratos (rule; strength)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/democracy
Few suggest common-ism to tempt many people together, which in return permits few the strength (life) to rule (inception towards death).
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
b) If ones perception ignores that all perceivable WAS for what another suggests IS, then one ignores kratos for dēmos aka ones strength for shirking response-ability onto others.
c) Fake vs real implies turning against one another within a conflict (reason), based on ones circular thinking (logic) about a word (logos) suggested by another...in this case "democracy".
d) CRACY (crazy) was before DEMO (demon) can be summoned...think about that.
Voting doesn't matter
a) Voting implies ones free will of choice selecting the free will of choice of another as representative for ones free will of choice aka one's choice selecting a chosen one above self, while willingly submitting under.
b) Matter (life) requires free will of choice to adapt to motion (inception towards death)...
c) Nature does, which allows being to re-do, while nature does. Others suggest "doesn't" (doing nothing) aka nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial what nature does, when consenting to artificial suggestions shaped within nature by one another.
People don't decide who is in charge
Person implies per sonos (by sound), hence each instrument being charged by all sound. Others suggest pluralism (people) to tempt one (singular) to ignore self discernment.
Motion (inception towards death) charges, which allows matter (life) to re-charge...or ignore it for dis-charging into one another, hence the energy harvesting.
a guy who's continuing the status quo
Status quo implies "unaltered condition"...being implies altering reaction (life) within stable action (inception towards death).
Trump as a representative conditions voters into an unaltered status (i.e. ignorance) by pretending to alternate (democrat vs republican).
MAGA movement
"Making again" implies repetition, hence ones mind being tempted with circular logic to move in artificial counter-rotation during the linear progression of nature.
party
Suggested party (plural) tempts one to ignore that ones perception within all perceivable implies A-PART (singular). Joining a party (consenting to a suggestion) inverts being a-part from one another (perception within perceivable).
Bacteria from Greek bakterion - "small staff" aka "unicellular microorganisms which lack an organized nucleus/kneu - "nut".
The word bacteria implies a hidden insult...small dick; lacking nuts...it's acknowledging that which gets under ones skin.
Benny aka benjamin aka ben (son of) yamin (right hand)...the right hand sows; the left hand reaps.
"But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth" ~Matthew 6:3
Benjamin (right) + Levy (left), hence "levying, a raising or collecting of anything" (a tax, debt, fine, etc.)"
Sleight of hand: "don't fear the reaper" + "it's all about the benjamins"
influencers
Influencing by information inverts being formed (life) within flow (inception towards death)...
steer them towards peaceful solutions that never work, are just as much a part of the problem.
a) Being implies problem (life) within solution (inception towards death)...
b) Problem/proballein aka pro (forwards) ballein (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/problem implies the status quo of being (life) thrown forwards (inception towards death).
working with the feds
Federal/ foedus/bheidh - "to trust"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/federal
It's ones consent to information suggested by influencers, which represents the trust/faith/belief/creed/credit given willingly by ones choice to a chosen one.
Those who bank ones trust are hiding under the label "fed" to prevent one from discerning self as that one and only trustee.
a) Does God share contact information?
b) Persecute aka per (by) sec/seco (to divide)...does God divide/divine being?
c) Does natural law work systematic aka by standing (ste) together (sys)?
TAX-US...if ya drowning in debt it's harder to notice a flood.
DNA
Double (twofold) + Helix (to turn)...
a) There can be only one...
b) What happens if one turns twice?
c) Does turning energy double energy?
d) Test/teks - "to weave"...like weaving together (logic) a two-folded (consent + suggested) turn (away from perceivable).
"Sweet Dreams are made of these..." https://img.gvid.tv/i/NfAy5HE3.png
It's a bot.
Can you prove that? Which bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
- Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Why do you think that's the first rule, and does dehumanizing each other as bots breaks it?
OP questioned the "bullshit" of all, yet nature doesn't bullshit anyone within. It's those within bullshitting each other, while ignoring nature, which is what I'm writing about.
using A.I.
Nature uses; being re-uses...artifice abuses being.
using A.I. for
Nature forwards (inception towards death) being (life)...artifice distracts from that by forwarding alternative outcomes and origins.
you'll get more
All (perceivable) was given before one (perception) came into being...more vs less implies circular logic distracting from linear progression.
The area of a circle...
a) A circle can only be shaped within a line...measuring the circle (logic) tempts one to ignore thinking straight.
b) A'REA, noun (Hebrew) - "to reach, stretch, lay or spread"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/area
Measuring a circle implies reaching for space from within an enclosure... a metaphor for ones mind reaching for the suggested information by another, while closing self off from perceivable inspiration.
is bigger than
Aka a mind measuring from the eye of the beholder, while ignoring that all allows each one within to grow (life) during loss (inception towards death).
Drawing comparisons equalizes differential growth. One can grow the ingredients of any pizza at will, while others suggest medium and large sizes to standardize growth among many.
to think it's all
One (perception) within all (perceivable) cannot think all...only a fraction thereof. Whatever others are suggesting artificially distorts natural fragmentation.
We live in a world that's been captured by a group of psychopaths.
a) Nature moves and cannot be captured from within...ignoring this by holding onto what others are suggesting keeps self captured.
b) Suggested pluralism (we; group) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self discernment.
c) Psycho/psyche (animating power) and path (way) implies way (inception towards death) animating power (life).
A jew utilizes psychoanalyses to tempt gentiles to brand each other as "psychopaths", hence establishing a synthesis as the artificial inversion of natural analyses.
entire world has been turned
Entire (all perceivable) moves linear through each partial (ones perception)...consenting to suggestions by one another establishes circular logic within self, which turns many against one another within conflicts of reason.
The entirety wasn't turned; each partial within thinks inverted.
they constantly change decorations
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies change...holding onto suggested tempts one to ignore reality for fictitious decorations.
Example...suggested words represent a decorum (artistic composition) within perceivable sound.
same scripts are being reused
Same nature (inception towards death); different beings (life)...consenting to suggested scripts makes differences "alike" one another.
next week or the week after
Days of the week aka DAZE of the WEAK...nature doesn't take measurements; it moves. Taking measurements tempts one to ignore being moved.
And so on, and so on, ad infinitum...
Being within nature implies temporal growth (finite) within ongoing loss (infinite)...few suggest ad infinitum to distract many from being finite.
We should not look at things they differ on
To look implies to lock onto, hence ignoring that differentiation implies separation during motion.
We should look at things they all agree on
All separates each one from one another...reasoning (agree vs disagree) keeps many united in conflict about suggestions by few.
Hold your breath and wait for nature to force adaption upon being...notice that agreeing or disagreeing doesn't affect force; only corrupts adaptation.
who's in charge
Nature charges being, which allows being to re-charge by adapting to nature. Putting each other in charge...discharges self by ignoring to recharge within natural charge.
we should focus
Focus narrows sight...nature offers all (perceivable) towards each ones (perception) sight.
mainstream
Main/magh - "to be able, have power"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/main
Being implies main (life) within stream (inception towards death)...others suggest "mainstream" to tempt one to follow along any given narrative, instead of resisting as main the temptation of stream.
At least put in the effort to tie the writer Donatien Alphonse François, Marquis de Sade (1740-1814) to the House of Rothschild branching into France during the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815). Gotta corrupt the moral fabric before a people become ready to rumble...
Pasolini's version is btw heavily editing and censoring the books contents...especially pederasty; sodomy and violence, and the whole concept of the story being narrated in chapters by different prostitutes, during different layers of orgies and recuperation.
bad-jacketing
Bad implies a conflict (bad vs good) within the mind of each gentile (logic) turning them against one another (reason).
Logic implies the turn-coat (jacket) preventing one from thinking straight. Another word for turn-coat...traitor, hence becoming a jack of all trades/traits.
planting doubt on the authenticity of an individual's bona fides or identity.
a) Both doubt and indivi-dual are based on the root dwo - "two"...distracting one from discerning oneself among one another.
b) If being implies ones perception within all perceivable, then ones consent to any suggestion plants the seeds of doubt/dwo (two) within one by another one.
c) Authentic aka autos (self) + hentes (being) implies ones self discernment, which authentication by one another contradicts.
d) Bona (good) fide (faith) implies ones consent (faith) in the suggestion of another, establishing a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Faith implies a contract between one's choice consenting and a chosen ones suggestion aka religion/religio (to bind anew) aka bondage of FREE will by choice.
e) Identity/identicus/idem - "the same" tempts one to ignore being differentiated from one another, hence having a unique perspective (perception).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt many into consenting, which equalizes differences into "likeness", hence the like-minded behavior among many being controlled by a unique few chosen ones.
creating suspicion
Suggested creationism is based on creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
It's gentile consent given to -isms suggested by a jew, which tricks gentiles to be suspicious/suspicere (to look up) while understanding (standing under), which once again implies the self inflicted bondage of slave to master.
If one chooses to let go of creationism, then ones perception will notice that all perceivable was there before each ones perception could come into being within it, which implies transformation (within everything) instead of creation (out of nothing).
The origin of nothing implies nihilo aka suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
party
Joining a suggested party tempts one to ignore being a part (perception) within whole (perceivable) separated from one another.
It's each jew who tricks gentiles together by distracting from the natural separation of being, and the ignorant gentiles keep desperately trying to come together in hope to overthrow the few, while ignoring that nature continues to separate whatever those within hold together.
The status quo of a gentile implies wasting ones existence by holding onto, while ignoring that nature sets apart. A jew simply exploits this ignorance by "selling" gentiles what to hold onto, while controlling the resulting conflicts from both sides.
Perceivable inspiration moves through ones perception and cannot be held onto...suggested information tempts ones consent to hold onto it mentally, while ignoring physical movement.
activists divide
Action (inception towards death) divides reactions (life)...a jew pretends to be an activist, while tempting gentile reactions to artificially unite in consent, while ignoring natural division.
leader
If being (life) follows nature (inception towards death), then it dies faster...that's why a jew suggests leaders to tempt consenting gentiles to follow. It doesn't matter who the leader is...following motion destroys matter.
FBI
a) Notice in-VEST-igation...there's the JACKET for those with eyes to see. Thinly veiled.
b) Vest/vestire/wes - "to dress"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vest
Ones consent to any suggestion implies ones in-vest-ment (mind dressed within) aka taking the suggestion of another into ones possession, thereby becoming possessed by it.
pulling fiat
Fiat/fieri/bheue - "to be, exist, grow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fiat
Current (inception towards death) pushes fiat (life)...suggested fiat currency pulls consent along. Few don't have to pull fiat...it's many, who by consent, are attaching themselves to suggested fiat aka to the hope that fiat currency grows being.
none of the homeless people want to use it
Because a home implies ones shelter from one another...a homeless shelter exposes one to one another.
0 degree
De (to divide) + ghredh (to walk)...one can only walk divided from one another. Zero implies ones denial thereof.
Can ONE show zero degree within nature...to another ONE?
Keep in mind
As long as nature moves...whatever ones keeps cannot be kept for long.
so free will of choice isn't so free will of choice isn't thinking or willing but feeling??
Consenting to a suggestion...wills consent; thinks about suggested, and feels the emotion of conflict (is vs isn't).
Consent binds what was FREE. WILL/want distracts from need. From suggested inverts OF perceivable. Conflict imbalances CHOICE.
thinking or willing but feeling?
Feeling implies emotion/emotio - "to move from". Being implies within (life) motion (inception towards death). Emotion implies moving from one another, while ignoring to adapt to being moved.
Motion generates matter by internal separation from one another...emotions tempt matter to and fro one another, hence turning against one another, while ignoring that nature sets beings apart from one another.
Resisting the conflict of to vs fro aka debate over an issue aka reasoning about suggested aka vacillation implies being free will of choice at the center of balance, while being tempted with imbalance from the circumference.
The sentence you wrote starts with OK, which implies a to vs fro conflict between OK vs NOT OK within your mind aka circular logic. Same with IS vs ISN'T. You are being tricked to position your free will of choice into an imbalance, while ignoring balance.
IS vs ISN'T represents an artifice tempting you to ignore that nature WAS before you came into being. Only if you...by free will of choice...choose to let go of IS or ISN'T will you perceive WAS. Otherwise circular logic prevents you from thinking straight.
a) Mean/men - "to think"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mean
Asking for the meaning of anything implies thinking...no matter the answer.
b) Think/tong - "to think; feel"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/think + Feel/pel - "to thrust"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/feel
Thrust implies being (life) thrust (inception towards death) aka the motion tempting ones e-motion to respond to, which implies...
c) Free will of choice aka free emotions within the dominance of motion aka will/want within need aka of motion into emotion aka choice within balance.
d) Ones free will of choice needs to respond to what all motion makes perceivable to each ones perception...others utilize suggestion to tempt ones emotion to want to ignore that.
e) Thinking straight implies ones perception adapting by free will of choice to all perceivable moving through as inspiration, while holding onto suggested information tempts one to think circular (logic).
This circular thinking is why you asked for the meaning of something, hence submitting your free will of choice to whatever my free will of choice answers or not.
In short: Nature doesn't give meaning...it thrusts all through each ones free will of choice for adaptation. One wants to think; one needs to adapt...
Ask yourself...how often have I mentally thought about something instead of physically doing it? Meanwhile...your heart doesn't think; it adapts to whatever goes through it.
Next...what if the words I think in represent the information suggested by others to tempt me to ignore adaptation to perceivable inspiration?
Thinking about what others are suggesting binds ones "free" will of choice to the suggested...
a) Cater/captare - "to take, hold"....suggestion tempts consent to cater, while ignoring that perceivable cannot be held onto.
b) US aka united states implies a synthesis. To be aka towards (inception towards death) being (life) implies an analysis.
Each being using a different perception of all perceivable nature implies solution (inception towards death) of a problem (life) by analysis. Many consenting to suggestions by few implies a synthetic commonwealth under a chosen sovereign, with the power to utilize pluralis majestatis aka the royal we (us) when speaking in the name of others.
Mossad/mosád (Hebrew מוֹסָד ) - "institute” aka in (within) statuere (cause to stand) aka effect (life) standing within cause (inception towards death) aka regent within agent.
What's a regent? One who rules (chosen one) during the absence of a sovereign (ones choice). What's absence? The state of not being present aka ones denial (nihilo; nothing) of pre (before) sence/esse (to be) when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Why "former" mossad agent? Because agent implies flow, and each institute within implies form.