2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nature implies procession. Being implies potential during procession. Storage implies stagnation of potential during procession...not preservation.

As long as one ignores this; so long can others write and rewrite history.

record

Re (to respond) cordis (heart)...how could that be preserved?

television

To tell a vision implies suggesting another what one sees...consenting to that corrupts ones sight.

constantly erasing

Erase implies "to remove" aka ones response (life) to being moved (inception towards death). Few tempt many to ignore this by suggesting to save artifice, while nature erases con (together) stance (to stand).

Many watching television by few implies a constant/consonance/consensus...nature erases that synthesis by breaking apart for analysis. Each being within nature has to analyze ones position (self discernment)...not synthesize with one another (common consensus).

A jew establishes common consensus among gentiles as a hivemind for storage of ignored potential aka loosh/loose (to set free) farming.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Ritual implies rite/reg (to move in a straight line) + al (all), aka the essence of each being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death).

The issue with suggested rituals...observance aka safekeeping aka holding onto artificially what nature moves. Holding onto straight motion shapes circular rotation aka circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason).

b) Being "happy" implies happenstance (come by chance), which inverts being (come as choice). Choice was given by balance; chance is taken by choice within imbalance (happy vs sad reasoning).

c) Birth (to carry forth) implies nature carrying forth being...not being carrying on tradition/traditio - "a delivering up, surrender, a handing down, a giving up".

Holding onto the birth-days tradition establishes a berth (keep well away from) daze (to be stunned)...which is how a jew poisons the well-being of gentiles.

d) Age/aiw - "vital force" implies nature vitalizing being by force aka the process of dying forcing each living being into potential.

Suggested "age" implies a measurement taken by those consenting...taking ignores given.

e) Essence aka to be (es) send (sence)...

f) Number/nombre - "designation of a unit" from unitas/unus - "one"...one implies singularity aka all of nature sending, and each being send. The enumeration of one another contradicts singularity (1) with denial (0); dualism (2), and pluralism (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9).

Nature doesn't enumerate...it adds one (inception); subtracts one (death); multiplies one (intercourse for off-spring) and divides one (from one another) simultaneously.

g) I AM (je suis; jesus)...happy birthday to YOU (phonetic jew)

h) Happy birthday DEAR/diuri - "expensive; precious"...tempting ones evaluation (analysis) into mass consensus (synthesis) aka one word hiding an alchemical process.

i) Sleight of hand by Tavistock for breaking free... https://genius.com/Queen-i-want-to-break-free-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Absorption and reflection implies one within all absorbing and reflecting...either all (perceivable) or one another (suggested).

b) To come into being as one within all...all light (motion) has to establish a visible spectrum of light (momentum) for each ray within (matter).

c) Within this spectrum of visible light (color), a being (ray/race/radius) can choose aka alternate between light (discernment) and dark (ignorance) simultaneously.

d) A jew suggests white (pure light) and black (absence of light) to distract gentiles from discerning to be within the visible spectrum of light, hence not able to perceive pure light or the absence thereof.

Consenting to it establishes the black vs white conflict of reason, which keeps both sides in CHECK...notice also that chess (German Schach) from Persian shah implies "king" aka "kin".

In short...reason represents birth control by gambling (choice for chance)...a zero-sum game.

physical realm

Realm/real aka ones response (re) to all (al)...as choice within balance (mental/physical) aka as mind of all (ment-al) and body of all (physic-al).

guess

One takes a guess...which tempts one to ignore all given.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

black goo

a) Black implies the absence of light, which one within the spectrum of all visible light cannot see...yet ones senses can be darkened by ignorance, hence ab-sence/sense.

b) GOO-gle + GOO-d...the former implies the spectacle (goggle) over ones eyes, while the former implies ones circular thinking (logic) trapping one within a conflict of reason (good vs bad).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you may have some things twisted. ...will be thrown in hell

The will of being in-between heaven vs hell implies a twisted mind aka twist/twis/dwo - "two".

All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies a straight mind; circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason) over suggested implies a twisted mind.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know about only one millennial

a) How could one perceive (know) a thousand years (millennial)?

b) If it's only one, then why are there three zeroes attached to the one (1000)?

I'm watching for it to arrive.

a) Arrive implies "reaching the end of a journey"...being implies one's path in life (journey) within origin.

b) A jew suggests arrive aka ad (to) ripa (shore; bank) to bank the trust of gentiles aka getting an a-shore-ance (assurance) aka establishing off-shore accountability.

As christ (anointed one)...one was formed (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka in-between the waters above/below...not off-shore.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the First Millennium

First implies cause...only a secondary effect within can take measurements.

undeath

Being implies living within process of dying (walking dead)...UN- represents suggested nihilism and ones consenting denial of perceivable for suggested.

god knows what happens at the second one

a) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable. God moves all known so that each Christ within can know...or ignore, which prevents self discernment.

b) Separating all into each one implies from first cause into second/seco - "to divide" effect, hence to divine (proceed from God).

c) A jew suggests HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" as the inversion of "to come as choice" within a consenting gentiles mind.

Consenting to any suggestion establishes a circumstantial happenstance (logic) which turns gentiles against one another (reason) for the chance of winning in return for the price of losing choice. In short...gambling.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

second Millennium Kingdom

a) Second/seco - "to divide", hence the division of king (choice) and dominion (balance)...only within a dominion can each king come into being, and "king of kings" implies being one among one another within all.

b) Millennium aka mille (thousand) + annus (year) implies the revolution of being one (1) within a circle (0) with "year "representing the whole circle.

The zeros behind the one represents ones denial of self for layers of deception by another, hence zero; noun - "the arithmetical figure which stands for nought; the absence of all quantity considered as quantity".

A jew suggests gentiles to consider (affix the mind upon); which when consented to establishes a zero aka cipher aka nothing aka nihilo aka suggested nihil-ism and consenting de-nial of perceivable for suggested.

Notice also CONSENT/CONSIDE...that's the wanted temptation one needs to resist.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Psyche (animating spirit) + delic/dēloun (to reveal) implies all perceivable animating each ones revealed perception...the suggested artifice by others tempts one to ignore that.

b) Guide/witan/weid (to see) implies ones perception...not the suggestions by another.

c) Trip/trap aka "to stumble so as to lose one's balance"...that's why others suggest one to take a trip down memory lane for entrapment.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

People need to wake up

a) Being implies person (per sonos; by sound), hence sound awakening being unless ignored for one another's noise, like for example suggested pluralism (people).

b) Read this... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we aka nosism (the use of a we, us, or our to refer to oneself) and then notice who makes suggestions in the name of "we the people"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Then notice that suggesting nosism implies "uniting states" from natural separation (analysis) into artificial unification (synthesis)...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

censorship against thing I don't like is good actually

a) Reasoning (for vs against; I vs you; do vs don't; like vs dislike; is vs isn't; good vs bad; actual vs hypothetical) implies censoring of implication (if/then).

b) Ones consent to any suggestion of another implies censored choosing censure.

c) Censor/censere/kent - "to speak solemnly, proclaim" + Heretic/hairetikos - "able to chose"...suggestion and consent represent censor and heretic.

If one ignores perception for suggestion, then that becomes a heresy censored by others.

they offer

Offer implies all perceivable offering each one perception..."they" implies suggested pluralism tempting one to ignore what singularity offers.

6
free-will-of-choice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Something about Austin Powers being Dr Evil all along...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

commonwealth forcing

Sovereign + commonwealth aka jew + gentiles aka mono + poly...nature implies the force separating each one apart from one another.

A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to consent...mass consensus among gentiles represents commonwealth for any suggestion by each sovereign jew.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

God (motion) brings forward (momentum) christ (matter)...few suggest theism (god), progressivism (support), and christinanity (christ) as spell-craft to distract many from discerning self as to be matter within momentum of motion.

Asking others for support tempts others to ignore origin of being aka all bringing forth each one within.

you

a) Christ implies anointed one; you (phonetic jew) implies chosen one...

b) The origin of YOU implies one within all choosing to take possession over self as "me; myself or I", which brands every other one into a YOU (phonetic jew).

c) God generating Christ implies procession generating potential by internal separation...few suggest "god" + "christ" to tempt consensus among many who take possession of potential within procession.

To answer..."I support or I didn't support" christianity inverts god-given into christ-taking, which implies ones denial (the nail) of being moved across (a cross), hence god giving (inception) and taking (death) each christened being (life).

Religion/religio aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...joining any religion implies binding ones free will of choice within all to another one...a chosen one.

Plural (christianity) cannot support singular (christ)...all singularity (god) internally separating into each singular unit (christ) implies support.

All perceivable supports each ones perception...any suggestion by one another tempts one to deny support by burdening self with "forbidden knowledge".

genocide continues

Genocide was coined by a jew named Rafał Lemkin to establish the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG)

Gentiles using the suggested word genocide supports each jew perpetuating it...christianity represents another such word for the collectivization of gentiles, which artificially brings together what nature sets apart from one another.

Gen (to generate) cide (to kill) implies all generating each one, which gives each one the free will of choice to kill one another. Furthermore kill/kvelja/gwele - "to throw" implies all throwing each one apart from one another. A jew inverts this by suggesting gentiles that killing implies turning against one another. Notice also that gentile implies a generated tile/tegere - "to cover"...

If one joins christianity or any other religion, then discerning any of this becomes an issue, since binding ones free will of choice corrupts self discernment.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

mentality claims that nature

It's mentally claiming which represents the artifice shaped while being moved by nature.

no purpose

Purpose implies position (life) put forwards (inception towards death) which one ignores when mentally claiming anything.

the elite

The implies suggested the-ism...elite implies ones choice selecting it.

Ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion implies an artificial inversion of nature.

for a profit

For implies forwards, hence profit/prophet aka pro (forwards) phanai (to speak)...

there's no value in things

The differentiation of everything (whole) into each thing (partial) implies all value generating each ones evaluation.

Holding onto what others are suggesting implies the devaluation of ones evaluation by ignoring all moving value.

modernity

Modern/mode/med - "to take measure"...that implies taking artificial possession of natural procession.

post-modernity

Being implies post-procession of potential...few suggest "modernity" as an affixed post to invert procession, and thereby curtail potential.

nature contains as its essence

Essence implies each being released from one another within nature...few utilize suggestion to contain consensus among many.

will becomes secondary

Become aka coming into being implies seco - "to divide", hence will/want coming being within need. First there was all needed, which divides into each ones want.

discover...not control

Putting a cover over anything implies outside control over inside/insight...

norminalism in assuming that nature...

Consenting to any suggested -ism establishes a sum (assume) aka consensus among many under few...that's artificial.

ideological justification

a) Any suggestion implies an ideal, which becomes an idol once consented to. Holding onto an idol establishes a conflict (holding onto vs letting go)...that's logic/reason aka circular thinking internally (logic) turning into external conflict (reason).

b) Justification implies odd fiction shaped within just action. Odd because justice vs injustice are at odds with one another once one chooses to hold onto one side.

to dominate

To be implies free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...dominating each other requires many to ignore being free by freely choosing to submit to a chosen few.

Domination is the given purpose of nature...

Suggesting what nature IS implies taking and selling for a price what nature gives towards free will of choice.

Consenting to any suggestion implies submission to an artificial master while ignoring natural domination.

claiming that nature...is to give

Claiming implies taking.

telos

Telos/kwel - "to move around"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/telos

Nature implies linear progression (inception towards death) of potential (life)...few invert this by tempting many into circular thinking (logic), which turns them against each other (reason).

Consenting to logos establishes telos...an artificial construct.

mass-production

Nature produces being by setting each unit apart from one another...a singularity. Few suggest pluralism to tempt many into consensus, which in return permits a selected few to mass-produce; mass-mediate; mass-market for the masses.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

your own currency

Current implies a procession; owning a possession...possession contradicts procession.

making

Aka making others want to hold onto (possession) what needs to be let go (procession)...

Stop being delusional.

Procession cannot be stopped...delusion takes possession over those who ignore procession.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

losing the game

Reason aka winning vs loosing implies a zero sum game, because it tricks each one to turn against one another.

Reason implies game theory...

steam removing smut

Aka distillation...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

If God is for us

a) If implies then, hence for-warding, not a conflict between for vs against.

b) Us implies plural; God implies singular forwarding each unit of being by separation from one another. This process of separation implies christen (to anoint)...

who can be against us

US positions being against THEM...if being chooses a side.

He who didn’t spare his own Son

Spare implies "allow to go free"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/spare hence God christening each being as free will of choice.

Claiming ownership tempts one to ignore being free...

God’s chosen ones

God gives each one choice...a chosen one implies ones choice ignoring all given by taking from one another. Chosen one implies the inversion of ones choice.

It is God who justifies

Suggesting to one another what IS tempts one to ignore that all justice WAS before one came into being.

Putting "it is" before God ignores the first commandment.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

oath of loyalty

Using free will of choice to consent to any suggestion shaped by the free will of choice of another...adjures aka binds one by oath to another.

Loyal/legal/lex - "law" implies natural law separating each being within from one another, hence into each dis-loyal (separated by law) position.

Few suggest ROY-AL (synthetic unification) to distract many from LOY-AL (analytic separation)...

republican party

Republic implies commonwealth under sovereign, hence a synthetic unification of many into a "party" (plural); while distracting from nature separating being into each "part" (singular), which allows each one to analyze one other.

Each being implies a part within nature...any party implies an artificial distraction thereof.

Nature implies singular...plural implies artificial. Ones self discernment within nature is based upon resisting the temptation of artifice shaped by one another.

CHOSEN ONE implies the artificial inversion of nature giving each being ONE'S CHOICE...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Humans have not evolved, we are going backwards.

The hue of man implies the momentum of linear motion for any matter within, so one can only progress forwards...it's ones movement during linear progression which can be evoled/wel - "to turn" into inwards circular thinking (logic),which turns into outwards conflict (reason).

Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) into such a conflict of reason (we vs them).

Living within process of dying implies forwards (living) + backwards (dying) simultaneously, hence as above/so below...a balance for each ones free will of choice.

Instead of creating, we are just destroying.

Destroy/destruere implies division by spreading...the status quo of coming into being. Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transformation (within everything). It's transformation aka form transferred within action which spreads by division.

Intercourse for off-spring implies spreading (stroy) by division (de). What's the opposite of destroy...build/bheue - "to be,exist, grow". One can only build (living) during destruction (dying)...

need to look back to move forward.

Looking/locking contradicts forward motion, yet forward motion allows movement in any direction, which others exploit by tempting ones mind to move backwards (nostalgia); forwards (progressivism) and circular (logic/reason).

There's a difference between motion and movement...the former differentiates the mind of latter into being.

biochar

Check out the BIOCHARisma podcast by Christopher Gardner...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

fair banking

Nature giving being choice implies fair...choosing to trust a bank puts ones choice into an unfair position.

For the law to have value, it needs to do

Natural law implies moving value; each being within a moved evaluation aka a want within need.

First, it must create a federal civil relief with statutory damages for lost opportunity

a) Loss (inception towards death) generates opportunity to rise (life). Being implies statutory damage (living) during regulatory relief (dying).

b) Federal/bheidh - "to trust" implies trusting one another; being implies unitary/unit - "one" aka apart from one another.

United States aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) implies unitary federation aka utilizing trust to bank units together. That's the inversion of being, and who's at fault for that...the one ignoring being or the one tempting another one to ignore being?

payment

a) Pay/pax (peace) + ment (mind)

b) Peace/pais - "permission; pact; to covenant or agree; binding together"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/peace

c) Any payment aka consent given to any suggestion...binds ones free will of choice (logic), while permitting others to put one into war (reason).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get it partly now. We are in an enclosed system

Partial within whole; set free from one another...WE aka suggested pluralism represents the enclosed system others designed to herd many together.

it's enclosed

Is energy closed to any power within? Is motion closed to any matter within? Is flow closed to any form within? Is sound closed to any word within?

Why do you view "close" as the foundation? Doesn't that imply a closed mind?

pressure must be involved

In (within) volvere (to turn)...what if that implies matter turning against each other, while being set apart from one another within motion?

What if only during relief (inception towards death) pressure can come into being (life)?

What if impression (perceivable); expression (perception) and suppression (suggested) imply ongoing pressure differentiation?

fall down to the point of equilibrium

What if falling equal (inception towards death) generates diverse rise (life)?

What if equilibrium balances sentence/sentience (living) during pointing (dying)?

weight is actually a push from above!!!!

Weight implies a measurement taken from within. Being implies push (inception towards death) to shove (life), hence as above/so below.

What's the weight of sound? If sound doesn't have a weight; then why do the words shaped within feel like such a burden to carry?

Through the interaction of the dielectric plane and the magnetic torroidal field pressure is created

a) Through implies motion through matter aka plane through field aka action through reaction.

b) Interaction implies the temporal interim (reaction) of ongoing action...not a creation, but a transformation aka transfer of formed reaction within action.

c) Dielectric..DI (two) EL (one). "You shall have no other gods before me"...that's what one ignores when putting two before one.

d) Torroidal/torrid/ter - "to dry"...being implies solid (life) struggling within fluid (inception towards death) aka dry (torroid) within wet (al).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"prognosis" for existing later in the future.

Pro (being forwarded) gnosis (to know) aka ones presence "now"...others suggest sooner vs later and past vs future to distort ones sight from both sides.

what does a jew do about homelessness

A jew having more homes implies gentiles having less homes. If many have less homes, then few have more homes...that's how balance works.

Notice furthermore the proverb "home is where the heart is" and calling one another "homies"...

hasidic + haredic

a) Hatred (German Hass, hence hasse dich) + heretic (phonetic haredic)

b) What's hatred? Ill will aka free will of choice within imbalance (love vs hate), and a heretic (one who holds a doctrine) implies ones free will of choice holding onto either suggested side (love or hate).

c) The HA within hasidic and haredic implies hah-LAW-khə (הֲלָכָה) aka to go (life) with law (inception towards death), hence within linear progression...not circular reasoning (love vs hate).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

whistle-blower

a) Noise implies "sound of a musical instrument" aka instrument shaping natural sound into artificial noise.

b) Blowing a whistle makes noise, which distracts from the sound of silence. Those one tries to wake up by making noise are ignoring the sound of silence, which is why blowing the whistle only ever agitates ignorance.

c) "Sprechen ist silber, Schweigen ist gold" (speech is silver, silence is golden)...think about that.

ALL the media

Media/medius - "middle"...ALL the middle of what?

part of the revelation of method

a) Whole reveals partial...partials cannot reveal to one another without ignoring what whole already revealed.

b) Method aka meta (in the middle) hodos (way) aka revelation of meta (life) hodos (inception towards death).

they all do their specific puzzle piece

Each ones perception within all perceivable implies specification by separation (analysis)...puzzling pieces together (synthesis) inverts this.

Viewing suggested information as pieces of a puzzle implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic (pieces inlaid to form a pattern) law aka abrahamism (father of multitude).

about Michael Jackson...they'll take somebody's idol and go, oh they were "bad", the whole time.. so it's ok if you're bad too.

Read the lyrics again... https://genius.com/Michael-jackson-bad-lyrics

"Gonna hurt your mind...shamone (sham-one)...I'm tellin' you, just watch your mouth...you have seen nothin'...just wait 'til I get through...I'm bad...Just to tell you once again...Who's bad?"

In short...Who's bad? I'm bad! So it's ok if you're bad too.

turn christian

To christen implies to anoint...a linear process; not a turning.

The Jesus thing though, they don't like that

Je suis (I AM)...If one could take possession over self; then others couldn't shape ones potential alike one another.

Few don't like "I AM" only "YOU ARE"...because that implies the power to define others as one sees fit.

Je suis vs C'est toi...the versus/verto - "to turn" in-between turns ones mind from being anointed (christened).

know the Bible

To know implies ones perception; bible implies the suggestion of another.

those "pastors"

Pastor leading sheep out to pasture...

what's the message they're trying to relay.

Message aka messianic age aka transmission by messenger.

a) All perceivable transmits each ones perception...others utilize suggestion to become messengers for ones perception if consented to.

Even simpler...message/mittere - "to release". Nature releases inspiration; beings tempt each other to retain information.

b) Natural relay (inspiration perceived) or artificial relay (information suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.

Nobody's really telling you the entire

Entire differentiates internally into each body...few externally suggest tales to unify consensus among many.

Nobody doesn't describe a body that doesn't exist, but no/not/nothing (Latin nihilo) aka suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of being a body within entire.

absolutely corrupt

Only during absolution can corruption be shaped...holding onto while ignoring to let go shapes corruption during absolution.

Corruption (life) needs to resist the wanted temptation of absolution (inception towards death).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›