question who created religion

Religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...asking a question binds one to answers. Nature implies solution (inception towards death) setting problems free (life)...no questions or answers required to come in; sustain, and go out of being.

Who created all

a) ALL wasn't created, because a creator would contradict ALL by implying more than ALL.

b) All transforms into each one by internal division/separation/analysis etc.

c) All was before anyone within can suggest to one another that all was created.

Creation doesn't analyze whole...it tricks partials to synthesize consent and suggestion into an artifical whole (egregore; system; arrangement; organized whole; belief etc.)

Consenting to any suggestion implies religion.

by a group of followers from ground up.

Being implies apart (seed) from ground (soil)...grouping together prevents each part from growing.

A jew suggests gentiles to group together, which establishes conflict aka "survival of the fittest" aka "battle royale" aka "society" aka "civilization" aka a coliseum where two sides collide against one another... https://www.etymonline.com/word/amphitheater

Three sides

There can be only one's sight...any suggested side tempts one to ignore that.

Does nature show sides or does it give each being sight in-between left/right + front/back + up/down position?

Can one's sight (life) perceive ones sides (inception/death)?

same beast

Beast aka "being astute" implies each beings different discernment within the same nature.

What's the nature of BE (ing) AST (ute)? https://crossidiomas.com/nature-of-the-beast/

only one goal

a) How could only one have three sides?

b) What if start (inception) and goal (death) of being (life) aren't the start and goal of nature?

complete

Being within nature implies an internal separation of whole into partial..."complete" represents the inversion of that; suggested by others as tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together), hence com (together) plete/plere (to fill).

oblivion

Filling ones memory with suggested information makes one oblivious to perceivable inspiration moving through one.

The more ones memory holds onto; the less awareness one has.

civilization and its descent into becoming livestock

Nature privatizes being...beings civilize each other into public livestock. Civilization implies domestication, hence the descent of FREE will of choice to DOM-inance by a chosen one.

Public descent or private rise...it's ones free will of choice.

jew; muslim; christian

a) Different sides (muslim; christian) within same origin (jew)...whatever side one chooses tempts one to fight the other, while ignoring origin.

b) Notice that a muslim and a christian choose to join; while a jew was selected to be aka if many join together, then few remain apart.

c) A jew doesn't choose a side...a jew protects SIGHT by tempting gentiles to choose a SIDE. Sides put blinders over sight, while permitting an outside overseer.

Sephardic aka se-phar aka "seeing far"...a narrow mind cannot discern this.

how do you know there is an outer

By discerning self to be within (perception) an outer (perceivable)

beyond the realm we call Earth

Call implies crying outwards aka ones articulation within all sound.

How can an all-powerful and benevolent God allow...

Benevolent implies "being will"...that's the god given allowance to each being. Choosing to ignore all given by taking from one another implies malevolence aka "ill will".

One Ring to rule them all

That ring implies circular thinking (logic) inwards turning into outwards conflict (reason) aka a ring binding one within all, while ignoring that all rules/reg - "to move in a straight line".

to find

To find implies towards outcome, which tempts one to ignore that find implies foundation aka origin.

One within all doesn't need to find anything...only to discern self within everything. Finding implies seeking to gain (synthesis); discernment implies within given (analysis).

to bind them in the darkness

Consenting to any suggestion...binds one to another, while keeping ones perception in darkness (ignorance).

brain centers that can pick up electrical activity

a) Center implies choice; elect implies ones choice selecting.

b) Activity cannot be picked up, since it's active aka in motion. Sense doesn't pick up...all perceivable moves through ones perception.

low resolution

Ones response (re) to whole (solu) of action (ion) is pretty low if ignoring perceivable for suggested. Notice also that resolu/resolve implies a loosening aka a setting free, while low vs high reasoning implies binding ones free will of choice to one side, while turning against the other one.

sensors in devices

a) Sensor/sense - "to perceive"...not what others are suggesting.

b) Sensor (phonetic censor)..."Roman magistrate who took censuses and oversaw public manners and morals"

Ones consent to any suggestion permits another to magistrate manners and morals for one, while roaming through ones mind.

c) Device aka to divide (de) desire (vice)...hence tempting perception (need) within suggestion (want).

Imagine being limited to

Imagination implies a limited set by a being upon self...others utilize suggestion to tempt ones imagination. Nature sets each being free (life) within limitation (inception towards death).

only 2

Only implies one....there can be only one.

Almighty Creator

What could ALL create that ALL not already implies?

10 dimensions

Aka the division (di) of mind (mens) during action (ion) in-between 1 (everything) and 0 (nothing).

Notice also...suggested pluralism (dimensions) contradicting the division of ones mind (di-mens) during action (ion).

to hide this divine

Divine implies division...how could division be hidden? By using synthesis (put together) to hide analysis (set apart).

divine truth

Truth implies versus lie, hence not a division, but a unification of truth and lie turning against one another.

from us

How could anything be from us (plural) when being comes from God (singular)?

is very real

There's a difference in-between what was perceivable; ones perception thereof, and what others suggest it is.

uni/multiverse

a) Only within uni (sound) can multi (words) be shaped...yet only if ONE consents to the suggestion thereof.

b) Verse/versus/wer - "to turn"...sound implies linear procession. Only one within all sound can choose to turn against one another, which is called "reasoning".

Being implies uni; reasoning implies multiverse...

nonsense

Non aka nihilo (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable. One cannot sense "nothing"...only deny everything perceivable moving through ones sense/sentire - "to perceive".

2D

Dimensional implies division (di) of mind (mens) within action (ion) of all (al); hence from all into each one...not into 2,3,4 etc. which implies mentally counting one another aka a reckoning; enumeration; calculation aka holding onto what nature sets apart within motion.

secret inner knowledge

Knowledge implies the internal separation of all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...not a concealed secret; but revelation by secret/seco/sek - "to divide".

that elevates you into the next level

a) EL in elevate implies ALL (God) + levate/levar/levis (light) aka the enlightenment of each ONE within.

From all (whole) to one (partial) implies a lessening process (inception towards death) to allow the rise of potential (life).

b) Level/libra - "balance" implies all balance (inception/death) for each ones choice (life) in-between.

There can be no "next" level...only next choice coming into being within balance. The next level deception represents a pyramid scheme.

Verstand and Vernunft

a) Ver/verto/vers - "to turn"...nature implies linear procession (inception towards death) of potential (life). A jew suggests logos to tempt each gentile into circular logic, which turns into mutual conflicts of reason.

b) Verstand (standing turned) implies understanding aka "standing under" another, when consenting to a suggestion. Nature moves all perceivable through each ones perception, hence setting each ones sight free from one another.

The German saying "Hast du den Verstand verloren?" (Have you lost your mind?) includes the word lost/loss (inception towards death), within which one grows (life). That's what one ignores when trying to understand one another.

c) Vernunft (reason) aka ver (to turn) + nunft/numþi (to take) implies taking turns against one another within conflicts of reason.

That's yet another jewish trick to tempt gentiles to turn inwardly (logic) and outwardly (reason) from the linear procession (perceivable) of potential (perception).

In simple...nature gives; beings tempt each other to take, while ignoring all given.

d) Vernunft (reason) isn't level (balance) but uneven (imbalance), hence tempting ones free will of choice to bind itself to a side within a conflict.

alfhaben

As in having (haben) Gordon Shumway (alf) living with you? Whatever German word you tried to use...it ain't "alfhaben".

Did you meant "aufheben" as in rescind; abrogate; annul etc.?

Gnostic. 100% Hegelian Marxism.

That's a synthesis of suggested Gnosticism; Hegelianism and Marxism within the confines of numerology. Nature sets each being free by analysis (setting apart), not synthesis (putting together).

A jew suggests -isms to synthesize consensus among gentiles...consenting to it permits a jew to shape numerology aka arithmetic (artificial magic).

As for gnostic/gno (to know)...consenting to any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore knowing to be (perception) within knowledge (perceivable).

How could a suggestion help ones perception within all perceivable to grow self discernment? Consenting to a suggestion implies synthesis; dis-cern-ment implies analysis. Synthesis inverts analysis...if one consents.

Nature moves sound; beings shaping words within nature represents the articulation of sound aka an artificial concept within actual nature.

Others don't take words from one...others tempt one to hold onto words, while ignoring that all given sound simultaneously takes back any words shaped within.

The elimination of words represents shortening the supply-chain of fiction during the demanding freedom within reality.

Nature doesn't chain a being to supply, it demands aka de (to divide) mandare (to order), hence setting each being free within de (life) mand (inception towards death).

those who keep God's law

God implies all giving...trying to keep tempts one to ignore all given.

I am clearly an enemy of Israel

a) I AM aka je suis (jesus)

b) Enemy implies "within me", hence not clear, but obscure.

c) Israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies struggling with clarity (perception) to prevent obscurity (suggestion).

d) The sustenance of each anointed one (Christ) implies striving within (isra) all (el)...that's the status quo of each being within nature.

I've often read things like

Nature neither writes, nor shapes any being alike one another.

Because it had to be light.

How much does a golf-club weigh? https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/articles/2021/02/shepard-moon-club-50th-anniversary-usga-museum.html

Notice... "Alan Shepard used this makeshift club to hit two golf balls on the Moon" aka Tūḇal Qayīn (tubal-cain)...salty and spicy.

As for the relation of club and cane... https://www.caneclub.org/ (stickmaking is one of the oldest crafts known to man, dating back to shepherds tending their flocks of sheep)

Man should be oriented towards God

God implies origin...towards implies outcome. Who inverts the mind of man and how?

creator...not the impersonator of the kabbalah

Creation implies creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo

God implies everything dividing/divining into each thing within...a transformation; not a creation.

Space/spatior - "to wander"...that's real. Preventing ones mind from wandering, by wondering over what others are suggesting about "space"...that's fiction.

Notice that those who suggest that space implies infinity...are getting very finite about questioning it. Ask yourself if following a mainstream narrative restricts infinite possibility?

jews make up...percent of...

A jew makes up percentages within the art of computation aka arithmetic/arsmetrik - "tell-craft". Nature implies singularity (one) for each unit (one) within...an ongoing process of internal separation (analysis).

50% of a being does not imply 0.5 of 1, but being one within all of nature.

• List/leizd - "border, band"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/list

Free will of choice can only work within borders. Seeking who's ON it binds ones free will of choice WITHIN it.

Palantir aka palan (far) tir (to watch over) aka far-seeing" or "watching from afar"...guess who's seeing far? Each se-phar-dic jew.

childish

Adulterate; verb - "debase by mixing with foreign or inferior material, make corrupt"...each of God's children needs to resist the temptation of adulteration/adultery.

Neither male; nor female realize that only during the process of adulteration (inception towards death) a child (life) can come into being.

short sighted

a) Short vs long implies versus/verto - "to turn" aka turning against one another within a conflict of reason aka debasing by mixing.

b) All perceivable moving through each ones perception generates ones SIGHT; which one ignores when choosing a SIDE (short or long).

manipulative

Aka mani (manual; by hand) pula/pele (to fill) tion (action) implies manual reaction (life) during the fall/fill of action (inception towards death).

Without growing the above by self discernment...one can be manipulated by one another.

governed by instinct

Instinct implies ones perception prompted by either all perceivable (reality) or one another's suggestions (fiction). Ignoring the former for the latter permits another to govern ones mind (government).

Government in regard to male and female is about tempting the gentiles to choose a side, which turns them against one another.

In reality...motion (male) > momentum (female) > matter (transformed off-spring)

A being cannot be male or female...only a transferred form (life) in-between the momentum (inception towards death) of motion.

"But I have a penis"...which without being put into a vagina, and vice versa cannot sustain self. That's each ones choice (matter) balancing (momentum) within all (motion).

incapable of rationale genius

Gen-i-us implies "generation within us"...a crafted spell; tempting the generated (life) during generation (inception towards death) to mix within a conflict of reason (genius vs idiot).

Idiot/idiota - "ordinary person, layman; outsider" implies one ignoring to be (life) within sides (inception/death) with ignorance corrupting sight. And since one chooses a side from the suggestion of another, one becomes a layman (ones choice) under the authority (chosen one) of another.

schopenhauer

Noumenal (perceivable) generates phenomenal (perception)...something like a phenomenon (suggested) tempts one to ignore that.

Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics (say what you want, but keep your lips sealed)

Why are they doing this?

a) Many mixed together permits few apart to purify...

b) "They" implies many mixed together...each chosen one operates apart from one another. Remember the Rothschild story about sending his five sons to five different places?

a) How does one protect the chain of command above? By taking a fall...

b) Knowledge moves through one...a chain of command is based on chaining self (consent) to the command (suggestion) of another.

thesis-antithesis-synthesis / problem-reaction-solution

a) Problematic reaction (life) during solution (inception towards death), hence the struggle to sustain self.

b) Thesis vs antithesis implies a synthesis (coming together), which distracts one from analysis (being set apart from one another).

process philosophy

Only sophy/sophia (knowledge) implies process. LO (logic) implies a circular shape within a linear process, hence turning into a philo (love) vs miso (hate) conflict of reason.

A jew tempts gentiles to fight each other, while ignoring Sophia...who's then being abused by a jew for as long as the gentiles keep fighting each other.

Kabbalistic origin

Kabbalah/cabbala/qabbalah - "reception" implies receiving from origin.

creative destruction

a) Destruction implies division of structure (life) within action (inception towards death). Only during destruction can one build...a jew suggests con-struction to tempt gentiles to build together aka a synthesis distracting from analysis.

b) Creation aka creatio ex nihilo implies "out of nothing", which represents the inversion of being "within everything". Nature implies all separating into each being within...a jew suggests creationism to tempt gentiles into nihilism (nihilo; nothing) aka into denying everything perceivable for suggested nothing.

c) Nature destroys, which allows each structured being to analyze the process of separation from within. A jew tempts gentiles to view anything constructed as a creation out of nothing, while ignoring that natures ongoing procession destroys any temporal shape within.

Holding onto a construct (synthesis), while ignoring process (analysis) destroys being, which is how each jew can exterminate any collective of gentiles simultaneously by tempting ignorance with any suggested construct like words; ideals: truths; beliefs; names; numbers; stories; religions; politics; entertainment; education; information etc.

What does your frequency look like?

a) Frequency implies differentiation during sameness...not a "look a like". It's the manufactured bowl which tricks each diverse being to perceive one another's suggestions as "look alike" aka to mentally draw comparisons among separated beings.

b) Frequency as in FREE; look as in LOCK...

we have no Rights. Yet Rights are unalienable.

Being implies one apart from one another. Alien/alius - "another" implies any other to ones being. We implies joining one another while alienating self.

Right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies nature separating each being (life) from one another within a straight line (inception towards death).

martial law

Being implies mortal aka MORT (life) within ALL (inception towards death) hence sentenced towards death within natural law.

Mart/mars - "war" implies mortals in conflict within one another aka Mortal Kombat.

a violation of Common Law to try to push Communism

COMMON implies COMMUN...natural law doesn't COM (assimilate together); it separates apart, hence each off-spring COM-ming into being through a process (inception towards death) of separation (life).

loophole

Whole/hole (perceivable) separates each partial (perception) within a straight line...others shape suggestions to tempt consensus into a loop aka into internal circular thinking (logic) and external conflict (reason).

While within a loop (circular)...partial ignores whole/hole (linear). A circle can only be drawn within a line.

Logic/reason (vs) represents the loop; implication (if/then) implies the whole/hole/holos/holistic/sol/soul/sole for each partial being within.

DO NOT APPROVE

a) Do implies nature doing, re-do implies each being within responding to all nature does.

b) Not implies a beings de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of all nature does for consent given to suggested nihil-ism by another being.

c) Approve vs denial implies a conflict among beings over another beings suggestion, while ignoring to respond (perception) to all nature does (perceivable).

d) Using the word "not" implies ones denial of what nature "does", while "approving" what others tempt one to do to self (logic) and each other (reason).

Rights are unalienable. They cannot be volunteered away or taken away.

a) Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right

Each being implies native (perception) within right (perceivable), while alien (suggested) to one another. Consenting to any suggestion implies alien abdication (leading away from action).

b) AWAY isn't something being taken away, but A WAY of loss (inception towards death) giving growth (life). Nature doesn't give or take away...it is the way giving (inception) and taking (death) being (life) simultaneously.

One needs to adapt to the way...not hold onto anything while being afraid of it being taken away.

c) Sleight of hand for "away"... https://genius.com/Styx-come-sail-away-lyrics (notice the river styx aka the passover of life towards death).

And here's how a jew rubs it into millions of gentiles faces... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOWK7Tam01M

True vs false reasoning implies the artificial matrix shaped within mother (matrix) nature...not imposed by force...but by ones consent to hold onto either suggested side.

45 (9) 47 (11)...