loot...with no fear of accountability
Those who consent to count, burden themselves with debt, while those who suggest others to count represent ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit".
Counting charges accountants; while discharging self. What's missing? Ones comprehension about the difference between perceivable current and suggested currency...the former needs to be resisted; while the latter tempts one to want to hold onto. Ignoring to resist current spends ones resistance on currency, hence charging accountants.
Edit: LOIS (to furrow; track; dig out) FRANK (free, liberal, generous) aka digging for generosity (within the pockets of others)...while looking like Dan Lauria in drag.
we were...beings
How could one (singular) be we (plural)? Does being imply apart from one another?
Messing up our communication mechanism
Nature communicates whole (perceivable) towards partials (perceiving)...suggested -isms by others tempt one to ignore that.
genetically engineered
Motion (inception towards death) GENErates engines (life)...others suggest geneticism to tempt one to ignore perceivable origin.
human
AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]...flowing animation (inception towards death) specifies form (life).
breaking down bias
a) BI'AS, verb - "to give a particular direction to the mind"...motion (inception towards death) directs momentum aka momentary memory for particulars (life) within. That's why one perceives the ever changing moment (um) of "now".
b) being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies a breaking down of base into ingredients.
The few suggest "breaking bad", while inverting it with tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka suggested collectivism over perceivable apartheid. Furthermore...ones consent to the suggestions of others shapes a bias within perceivable, hence tempting one to follow suggested orders (progressivism) instead of being resistance (life) within natural order (inception towards death).
around bias
Aka kike (circle) aka one ring to bind all aka ouroboros aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka chain of command aka collectivism aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united nations; united states; uniformity; unicode; unicef; european union; unilever etc.
Why does no other group feel the need to indoctrinate children?
a) DOCTRINE, noun - "to teach; whatever is taught"...perceivable inspiration teaches one to learn self and vice versa; while suggested information tempts one to understand (stand under) a teacher (suggesting) as a student (consenting). That represents ones submission to another, while ignoring to learn/teach by oneself.
Indoctrination implies being with-IN whatever is taught (doctrine) aka within perceivable inspiration.
b) others suggest groups (plural) to tempt the perceiving one (singular) to ignore self, hence the suggesting few gaining control over every group the many are consenting to be part of.
c) suggested "need to" aka need towards tempts one to ignore being (life) within forwards motion (from inception towards death), hence IN need to resist perceivable, while being tempted TO want suggested.
Moody's, Standards & Poor's, and Fitch
- FITCH (to incise; to carve) POOR (being destitute of) STANDARD (sort; kind) MOOD (form of an argument)
Let's put it into perspective...consenting to suggested allows others to make incisions within ones mind/memory; ignoring perceivable for suggested implies being destitute of comprehension; ignoring the designated unit (Latin unus; one) aka one-self for suggestions by others; allows others to sort ignored units like this... https://www.usdebtclock.org/ and while the many are arguing against each other about it; the few can effortlessly form their mood by suggesting inflation or deflation...
Experian, Equifax, TransUnion
EXPERIAN (expressing temptation aka to attempt) EQUI (equity; equal) FAX (facsimile; exact copy) TRANS (transmutation of ingredient out of base) UNION (unus; one).
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tempting tempting different ones into an equal union by transmuting perceivable (reality) into an exact copy (fiction) therefore...a copy controlled by those suggesting it, while representing an inversion for those consenting to it.
I wonder who owns these rating agencies?
a) agent (inception towards death) owns regent (life)...others suggest prices to tempt one to want to pay for ownership, which in return gives everything ignored into the hands of the few who resist ignorance.
b) RATE, [Latin ratus, ratio; reason] ...it's the consenting many who're reasoning against each other over the suggestions of the few.
c) those who wonder about suggested are ignoring to wander within perceivable, which allows others to direct them with suggested.
adopting the solutions
Being IN (life) SOLVENT (inception towards death) or ADOPT', verb [Latin adopto, of ad and opto, to desire or choose.] suggested solutions. The former implies resistance (need); the latter represents temptation (want)...ones free will of choice.
Who controls the credit?
Who gives creed (consent; belief; faith) to suggested credits? Bank (credit) and trust (creed)...
How many
Suggested many (plural) tempts perceiving one (singular) to ignore self for others; hence shaping the "chosen ones" as the suggesting few over the consenting many.
they certainly have the resources to do so.
RE (response to) SOURCE (origin of being) implies perceiving partial to adapt to perceivable whole...not to suggested "resources" by others.
The currency suggested tempts one to ignore the current (inception towards death) one exits within (life)...current requires one to resist; currency tempts one to follow towards exponential growth, while burdening self with exponential debt, while drowning within ongoing loss.
score rewards
REsponding to suggested WARD (protection) tempts one into SCORE (debt; account kept) by others. Self sustenance implies ones choice to sustain self within perceivable; while resisting the suggested temptations by others.
ESG aka Environmental; Social and corporate Governance
a) perceivable represents surrounding (environ) for ones perceiving mind (ment) at the center...suggestions by others tempt one to ignore that, hence luring one into a controlled environment.
b) suggested social-ism (togetherness) tempts one to ignore being apartheid (perceiving partial) within wholeness (perceivable whole).
c) perceivable sound generates life; suggested words aka corpus oration (voice of the death) tempts life towards death aka ones ignorance representing an unsound mind.
d) input (perceivable or suggested) controls (governs) mind (ment) depending on ones choice. If one chooses to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want), then others are given control over ones mind/memory through ones consent to the suggested.
pushing agenda
Agent (inception towards death) pushes regent (life)...one needs to resist wanting to be tempted away, while being pushed.
trans agenda
Agent (male motion) towards regent (female momentum) implies trans-mutation of flow (inception towards death) into form (life).
Trans-form represents FE-minine MALE + WO-mb MAN + S-plit HE. Nature produces SEX (Latin seco; to divide) - "distinction between male and female".
Suggesting "got it right" tempts others to reason (got it right vs got it wrong) against each other, while giving those suggesting the power to control both sides of the conflict, which they use to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will to keep the conflicts going.
Whatever others are suggesting represents an impotent temptation...only if one consents to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) does impotent temptation receives fuel by potent consent.
Consent closes circuit with suggested, which allows those suggesting to harvest everything invested by consent.
dracula speaks...
Listening or reading suggested speech represents consensual invitation for the bloodsucking by others.
fuck with other people...so fragile
The few fuck with the many through suggestions...consent by the many represents the "sturdy" foundation for that.
Still consenting to sit down and look up to the suggestions of others...no matter the consequences.
hello mr bot
Trying to brand natural expression as artificial repression...a last ditch effort before the era of logic/reason collapses upon itself.
If suggested labels struggle to find consent required for attachment; then ones mind will choose detachment...
falls into pieces
From whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...falling into pieces aka whole departs internally.
to be re-membered
a) being implies RE (response) aka choice within MEMory; mind; moment; momentum aka balance.
b) others suggest memory to represent recollection, hence tempting one to accumulate suggested information within mind/memory; instead of adapting as choice to the perceivable inspiration of ongoing momentum.
Nature teaches need to let go of want (need/want - balance) to each one willing (free will of choice) to learn.
Why?
Sustenance of whole (action) through each partial (reaction) representing internal/inherent power within energy.
Key is symbol of something leading to a 'locked treasure'.
a) ones consent to the suggestions by others gives others the key of ones consent to lock the suggested away...lock (suggested information) tempts key (consenting choice) to ignore ones unlocked position as "free" will of choice.
b) suggested symbolism (affixed) tempts one to ignore perceivable symmetry (in motion).
c) others suggest progressivism to tempt consenting ones to follow leaders towards suggested outcomes. Being implies resistance (life) within being led from inception towards death, while being tempted to ignore resisting.
What is this treasure?
Naturally...energy, for all represents one in energy. Artificially...whatever those suggesting shape it to be for those consenting to want it. Not only can it be everything...it can even be nothingness (suggested nihilism).
symbol
a) SYM'METRY, noun - "proportion of several parts of a body to each other", which implies apart from one another within wholeness.
b) BOD'Y, noun - "frame of an animal; material substance of an animal"...animation represents frame (surrounding) for each one within (center). Animation (inception towards death) frames center (life).
one must...we are
Suggested we (plural) tempts perceiving one (singular) to ignore self. It's called "wegotism" aka we + egotism aka one suggesting in the name of (in nomine) others.
slaves for artificial
Ones consent to artificial (suggested) over natural (perceivable) implies ones willing submission to another. Slavery represents ones choice, and the consequence thereof elevates others as masters.
single eyed
Aka "all seeing I" aka each one perceiving all perceivable...unless ignored for suggested.
always above... Ones willing submission to stand under (understand) the suggestions of others, keeps others always above oneself...unless chosen otherwise.
were not created
Suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything) aka from whole (perceivable) transmuted into each partial (perceiving).
autismobot
a) as partial (perceiving) within whole spectrum (perceivable) one represents temporary chaos (life) within ongoing "natural" order (inception towards death)...suggested spectrum disorder (autism) tempts one to ignore that.
b) BOT; ROBOT (Latin roboro, from robur, strength)...as strong as a lion (Aryeh Yehudah)?
This is the first time you've made a lick of sense.
It's ones free will of choice to discern what ones senses perceive...suggesting judgement towards others tempts one to ignore that.
Nihilism; communism; extremism; leftism; fascism and rightism are suggested by the few; while the consenting many are reasoning against each other about what it is vs what it isn't...
Everything perceivable "was"; before one can shape suggestions about what it "is" or "isn't"...
fascism is extreme leftism
Only those suggesting fascism; extremism and leftism can define what it is; while all those consenting to it can only reason (want vs not want) against each other about what it means.
It's state control of culture
Statism and culturalism are suggested by others to tempt one to ignore dwelling/cultivating (life) within a controlled (inception towards death) environment, hence within motion...not affixed (state).
internally "liberal"
Only within (internally) balance can one be free (liber) will of choice...
know nothing
Knowing implies perceiving everything...suggested nothing tempts one to ignore that.
about tyrannical control over people
a) ones consent to suggestions gives those suggesting control over oneself.
b) TYR'ANNY, noun - "arbitrary exercise of power" + 'ARBITER, noun - "a person appointed or chosen by"...one chooses ones tyrants.
Sleight of hand: "evil" of "resident" attracts persecution by "tyrant". Ignoring perceivable (bio) shapes suggested (hazard) into an "umbrella" for ones ignorance. "I hope this is not Chris' blood" aka blood of Christ...
There's nothing you can do to stop baal.
a) BA'AL (Hebrew: בַּעַל ) - "owner"...the ongoing process of dying (whole) owns each one temporary life within (partial). Motion cannot be stopped by those within.
Whole owns; partial prevails...
b) nothing represents ones consent to ignore everything perceivable for the suggestions by others.
naturally left...right
If one chooses to step left, then that implies coming from right...yet if one chooses to step left again, then it still implies coming from right.
Choice can only exist within balance aka in-between left/right...not on either side. Then again...free will of choice includes ones choice to ignore natural for artificial.
Those who consent to a suggested -ism are willingly putting themselves under those suggesting it.
"Louie Louie you're gonna cry...Louie Louie you're gonna die"...if you're tweeting the 3 letters (J.E.W).