Just look up Occam's razor principle. It says a scientific and philosophic rule that entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily which is interpreted as requiring that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex, or that explanations of unknown phenomenon be sought first in terms of known quantities.
How could one (singular) be we (plural)? Does being imply apart from one another?
Nature communicates whole (perceivable) towards partials (perceiving)...suggested -isms by others tempt one to ignore that.
Just look up Occam's razor principle. It says a scientific and philosophic rule that entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily which is interpreted as requiring that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex, or that explanations of unknown phenomenon be sought first in terms of known quantities.
How be we be le re see ve tea glee?
When we see (perceive) we look (see) and we (me) be tea lee re gee vee bee