a) Thanks for the pdf
b) Virology aka LOGY (logic/reason; logos/words) implies VIRO (venom/poison)...if one consents (vector) to the suggestion (injection) thereof.
Technically...is
a) Natural was perceivable before one can suggest what technically is.
b) TECH'NICAL, adjective (Latin technicus; Gr. art, artifice; to fabricate) distracts from natural.
c) Only within production (inception towards death) can there be fabrication (life).
fighting fire with fire
Inception towards death implies from heat towards cold for the life within...fighting fire with fire tempts one to ignore that, hence "burning down the house"... https://genius.com/Talking-heads-burning-down-the-house-lyrics
changing my DNA.
A nucleus can only exist at the center (life) of change (inception towards death)...others tempt one within suggested changes of DNA to ignore being the nucleus aka nut, aka body of comet; surrounded by light... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/nucleus
NUT COMET...
cancer is the only reason
Reasoning about suggested implies cancerous growth of conflict contained within self. Ones consent to hold onto suggested implies the claw of the crab/cancer.
a) Others suggest chance (effect of unknown cause) to distract one from being effect (perception) within known cause (perceivable)...ignoring that tempts one to stake ones life on a gamble.
b) Chemistry (to discover the nature and properties of all bodies by analysis and synthesis) aka analysis (resolve) and synthesis (composition) aka need (resolving) and want (composing).
Ones consent to suggested chemism implies composition, which tempts perception (life) to ignore that perceivable (inception towards death) implies resolving.
c) The longer one holds onto suggested composition, the quicker perceivable resolves one.
Suggested composition (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable resolve (inspiration)...being implies CHEM within AL aka alchemy.
a) Trust (credit given without examination) associates (joins together)...nature sets each one within apart from one another.
b) George Soros aka György Schwartz (black; absence of light), hence SOR'ROW, noun - "uneasiness or pain of mind which is produced by loss".
c) Those who wield sorrow suggest delight beforehand...
injun
Aka injunction (direction of a superior vested with authority)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Injunction
Why utilize a label implying superiority for something inferior?
indian
Aka IN (within) DIA (through) aka being within (life) while moved through (Inception towards death).
From IN (within) DUS (duco, to lead) aka being led from inception towards death while living within.
american
Aka I CAN AMER aka AMERCE, verb - "to inflict a penalty at mercy; to punish by a pecuniary penalty; to punish in general"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Amerce
text and image generation
a) How does one generate text without shaping symbols out of symmetry, and how does one shape images (captured moments) without doing it from within momentum?
b) Generation aka generated by tion/action...what if that implies reactions?
c) What if action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life)?
d) What if one cannot generate anything, only regenerate (temporary growth) within generation (ongoing loss)?
e) Can any "generator" be build without utilizing motion to build? If one uses motion as the generator for "generators", then that implies re-generator aka reactor.
Who's suggesting the Generator label? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry#/media/File:Square_compasses.svg
- Generative (inception towards death) - Re-generative (life)
- Artificial (suggested) - Natural (perceivable)
- Intelligence (understanding suggested) - Knowledge (growing within perceivable).
What is...
Energy (internal/inherent power) "was" before those within could suggest what "is"...
influences the way
Way implies fluid (inception towards death) one exists within (life)...suggested the-ism tempts one to ignore that. Within fluid = Influence.
It's called schema
Suggested schematism tempts one to hold onto it by consent, which permits others to establish schematics within ones mind/memory.
Perceivable sound isn't called anything; suggested words are tempting one to CALL, verb - "Heb. to hold or restrain". Think before taking a call...
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Blondie-call-me-lyrics
The French "appelle-moi" (call me) implies APPEL'LATE, noun - "a person appealed, or prosecuted for a crime; appellate jurisdiction" https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Appellate
media
Suggested media (Latin medius; middle) tempts one to ignore being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
Matter implies medium (life) of motion (inception towards death). Ignoring self by choosing to consent to suggestions by others contradicts that.
delivery mechanism
All -isms are delivered by the suggestions of others towards ones consent. Machine (Latin machina) implies artificial work, which tempts one to ignore natural work.
No machine works without nature working beforehand, and the foundation of work implies energy (internal/inherent power). Others tempt one to build machines to generate energy; when it's energy which generates the partial units one collectivizes into machines.
Only within natural can one shape artifice, and the latter tempts one to ignore former. Doing so implies idolatry aka worshiping anything made by hands.
Inception towards death generates life, which implies deliverance - "release from captivity", hence being set free (will of choice). Consenting (buy) to suggested (sell) artificial -isms (mechanisms) delivers one into captivity to another...into bondage to chosen ones.
turn off
Only within motion can matter turn position...no matter how often one turns over; motion cannot be turned off.
The monkey opening coconut experiment proved collective consciousness
a) Awareness implies within a moving surrounding. Its that motion which collectivizes faster if individuals ignore resisting.
b) Being implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)...collectivism tempts being to ignore self sustenance.
c) The individual monkey chooses the path of least resistance when joining collectives. Now look at humans...the weakest part of humanity are the collectivized many, which are willingly submitting to domination by a chosen few.
d) Whole (perceivable) sets apart (perception)...partials tempts each other together (suggestion).
television
Telling a vision implies suggesting others to ignore what's visible aka perceivable.
Example...TREE implies a vision told. Why? Because if you look at one, then the letters T_R_E_E aren't visible. Television isn't just a screen in front of ones eyes, put a fabric of suggested fiction over ones view of perceivable reality. Every word suggested by others implies a told vision, upheld within ones mind/memory, which distorts ones view.
Matthew 7:3: "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"
The key here...re-mote control.
It's still on jewtube... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHBoTuGNxyQ
it's like the left peddles the right....maybe they secretly help each other
Secret aka Latin secretus - "set apart". Same (inception towards death) sets differences (life) apart from one another or same (left/right balance) sets differences (choice) apart from one another.
For a chosen one its very helpful if many ignore one's choice for the suggestions of others.
a) Fear implies towards outcomes....so does overcoming.
b) Adapting to origin (need), while resisting outcomes (want or not want) builds constitution aka courage.
Flat implies even, and only within even (balance) can there be odds (choice) aka only within horizontal (inception towards death) can there be vertical (life).
Helios aka sun. Guess what else represents sun? Ba'al... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Baal
Putting ba'al (helios) at the center (suggested heliocentricism) gets one bend out of shape...
try harder at understanding
a) The harder one tries to understand, the harder it becomes to grow out from those who one "stands under"...
b) Does it really matter how soft or hard one summits to others, when those others only require ones consent to submission?
c) What's the difference between understanding suggested and comprehending perceivable?
burn it down and kill everyone inside
What if natural order (inception towards death) kills everyone (life) inside, and what if being moved from inception towards death implies life burning out?
What if all the "cold" blooded genocides simply distract many from being inside an infinite heat generator?
Sleight of hand: "You're cold as ice...willing to sacrifice...I've seen it before, it happens all the time...You're closing the door, you leave the world behind".
https://genius.com/Foreigner-cold-as-ice-lyrics
What if opening that door stokes the flames? Hence..."The heat is on... Inside your head...Deep inside...Just to stay alive"?
As with all Big Lies, they're kept simple and repeated over and over (and over).
Over what? Affixed truth? Where is that truth affixed upon? Why is it so simple to change truth with repetition of lies?
What if the interweaving of truth vs lies implies complex; while "change" implies simple? How simple could it be for few to distract many from perceivable change, by suggesting them truths and lies until they weave a complex fabric of definitions; revisions, and contradictions upon their eyes?
current thing
As in current (all perceivable) things (each ones perception)? Why do many accept "current things" suggested by few over and over again?
we are never given any reason
a) What if consenting to suggested (houthis) establishes conflicts of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad; us vs them; rich vs poor; current thing vs ancient thing etc.)?
b) What if many react by reasoning to whatever few give them by suggestion?
c) What if wanting reasons from others implies ones ignorance of implication (if/then), which would allow one to discern the "why" of everything?
any sort of "coalition" is falling to bits...
...yet, when using "WE are never given any reason"; one (singular) positions self into a coalition (pluralism)...why are "we the people" always falling apart or being ripped to pieces after being amalgamated?
Meanwhile... https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-jews-of-germany-a-people-apart/2021/10/10/
Could it be that the natural order of CHANGE sets each one within apart, hence also taking apart any coalition of partials?
a) William (will I am) Shakespeare (shake spear) aka masturbation; self-stimulation; defilement by hand etc.
b) Bard (to favor) of Avon (water) aka praising fluid (inception towards death) over solid (life).
c) Suggested "to be or not to be" tempts one to ignore "being within", while "not to be" implies suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing); which tempts others to consent to denial of everything perceivable. Nothing towards being also implies creationism aka something out of nothing.
d) Only within drama (inception towards death) can comedy (life) make errors, hence "comedy of errors". Error; to err; to mistake implies taking suggested misses perceivable.
a violation of the establishment clause?
Clause aka Latin clausa - "conclusion" tempts one to ignore being (life) in-between introduction (inception) and conclusion (death). Furthermore...a clause implies within a mutual contract, and contraction tempts one to ignore expression.
Any suggested clause establishes ignorance within ones mind...if consented to.
religious discrimination
a) Natural law (inception towards death) dis (sets apart) crime (life) through ac-tion.
b) Discrimination implies setting apart; religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies binding together.
c) Ones consent to suggested religion permits others to discriminate in the name of natural law.
cross
Look at any cross...vertical (inception towards death); horizontal (growth within loss) and across (intercourse). Each one has to bear that cross; while others tempt one at the crossroads to hold onto suggested, which nails one to the cross.
menorah
Aka phonetic MEN O RAW... https://biblehub.com/hebrew/4501.htm
Raw implies natural; hence in its natural state (perceivable); instead of artificial (suggested). Others suggest fabrications to distract men-o-raw aka men of raw...
As for lightning candles..."we didn't start the fire; it was always burning...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
a) If "not real" implies "something that does not exist", then how could "Bot. Not real" be spamming anything?
b) BAN, noun - "curse; excommunication; anathema" aka a sorcerer's hex. Why are the few suggesting many to banish each other? Does having "free" will of choice sound like a banishment?
c) What's more of a conspiracy...tunnel-jews or utilizing twisting (turtle); splitting (splinter); fragmenting (shredder) and bending/turning (krang) on the minds of children?
a) Motion implies leading cause of death...choosing to ignore this by consenting to suggested fentanyl implies suicide.
b) Suggested drug - "to dry" tempts one to ignore that fluid (inception towards death) keeps solid (life) wet...hence thirst forcing adaptation.
c) Ignoring perceivable fluid (inspiration) for suggested drugs (information) dehydrates one aka de (separation from) hydro (water).
d) Waters above/waters below? Being implies within hydrogen aka as solids generated within fluid.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQW7I62TNOw (notice the background; the towers, the pyramid; the x...)
a) Turtle aka Tortoise aka tortus - "to twist" aka forming threads by convolution of filament (fill-a-mind)...like a spider's web.
b) When shredder attacks aka shred - "cutting into pieces; fragmentation"...Turtles don't cut him no slack!
Twisting (turtles) prevents decrease of tension, which in return makes shredding (shredder) harder....in other words...ones consent to those who twist suggested information, makes it harder for anyone else to take that information apart. Consent increases tension of suggested. Being one also implies being split (splinter) apart from one another, hence off-spring.
Meanwhile, having "free" will of choice implies being set loose, and whole (inception towards death) cuts partials (life) "into pieces, cause this is my last re-sort".
c) Ninja aka Shinobi aka SHIN (shine) OBI (obire; to die; go forward) aka light-bearing.
a) To be represented by another implies ignoring to resist as self.
b) Political circus (kirkos; circle) implies circular reasoning, so whenever sides are suggested (us vs them, great reset vs great resist; die with nothing vs live with everything etc.) circular reasoning continues.
Only oneself resisting suggested maintains one as core (life) in-between sides (inception/death).
a) Each one is lower than all aka all-low-ed as partials within whole.
b) Screen; verb - "to shield from punishment, protect from inconvenience or danger; to conceal"...looking at a screen punishes; endangers and reveals one to others.
Whatever is suggested on a screen is only about tempting others to look, not whatsoever about content of suggested.
Being implies power...consenting to suggested theism (the); substitutes (that) or pluralism (us) tempts one to ignore self, which empowers others.
Mockery implies mimicry...does it look like as if few mimic many or is it many mimicking whatever pretense few are suggesting?