The ignorance of that comment is staggering.
Why aren't we in a hot war? Why since World War 2, has it never been won? All those multiple times since, has hot War been averted. Why today aren't Europe, just Europe alone, destroying Russia? It is because it's staged? Yea fucko nuclear weapons aren't real it has all been staged. Nothing to see everybody can go home and buy an EV instead.
You are beyond help, you literally need to be target practice. Off you go.
You are very stupid.
A) Why haven't we had a hot war. Despite multiple times where we could have, and it would've been far less deadly then today. Like Korea, Vietnam, Pakistan - India, Cuban Crisis.
B) It must not be according to yourself why we are not having a hot war now. They could easily engage Russia currently. How many nations would overpower Russia. If it weren't for nukes.
You are braindead if you think there isn't nuclear weapons and if they haven't made every kind imagineable. Weapons of mass destruction. Planet killers, MAD, mutally assured destruction, enough to cause disaster big enough to be unpredictable. Try to imagine faultlines being hit. Arctic installations. Weather effects blocking out the sun. As well as the fallout.
Oh no it's just because you haven't seen them. Is this why we all need their reminder? It's because Chode thinks they make more money suppressing the truth. Not because why aren't we in a hot war, it could even be won? And it would've been a lot less painful then today, nukes in the 50s. Today that population is vastly more, it has tripled, and it's far more advanced. It can even bunker out the next 1000 years. But Chode thinks charge. Go on, off you go.
Without nukes we would be in WW3, why not. Let's all sign up. Killing some Commies and Nazis and Chinese. On your bike.
It's from Ukraine. Sigh.
The Pro and the Con.
Pro; More lethal aid coming through. Closing borders.
Con; Does it draw anybody else in. Are they even enough to secure borders. Without firing on somebody else.
At this point they haven't engaged militarily. Does Russia need them outside of hosting Russians and offering airspace and mercs? It might draw more into it.
Anything from Ukraine is kill the Russians and allies. Quick charge, the Belarusians are coming.
On a ratio of pro and con. There is perhaps a greater pro, timing, but the con still hasn't been used. Who knows? Except take a guess. It's still a No. Unless Russia's desperate, bad propaganda is bad. And until somebody else like Romania gets real frosty. Then they'll eye of the tiger. But those damn Russian are singing bear songs. There's only Ukraine propaganda, like charge, kill, sanction, help .
Yawn, you are a grade A idiot.
You cannot understand the concept. I don't want to explain it. Your head is stuck up Santa's ass of which makes the better promises.
Look at the globe and it had nothing to do with domestic tantrums. There is literally a big huge geopolitical board in WW3. You stupid mutt. What was the play? Why?
Have you worked it out yet? Or are you still believing in Santa, Q, or some other Bullshit.
Whatever I am not here to repeat myself. Or be insulted because you don't understand an occurrence, going back for much longer. No, it isn't hindsight. Either.
They are already. No. Once Russia takes. It will at this rate. Iron Curtain goes up. Like the old Cold War.
Or they deal. But I don't think they get it. There is no middle ground. All their demands, Russia has been sanctioned, it won't change unless to warcrimes, or nothing. In that case all the CIA can do is incite later revolt. Or send weapons and mercs now.
The alternative is nuclear war. Or a peace deal where they understand what it means. Don't get me wrong. I am not in this situation. Not my words. But they're quite obvious.
No. Petrol didn't warm the planet. Mass population booms did. What is it, in any event. Conjecture. It could it might. It should. It will. Guesswork.
But the planet is on a cycle. Where shit happens, it would always occur in any event. Despite being sped up by dumb people and their greed.
You're one of those who buys EVs. Thinking they aren't another generic con. They don't fix climate change, they increase it. They fail in climate. They cost x3 more resources. The only strategy behind them is energy independence. A failed strategy, when the products are still made from oil and gas, and electric planes run out of charge before they get there. But they're the next model a railway mogul can charge double for. Everything on the same source how much does that increase in cost. Hyperinflation. Renewables have lobbied the weather. Absurdly.
But the greatest concern is the population exploding. There isn't a solution for. Neither is there a strategy for a cycle occurring when it is conjecture on what actually occurs. It definitely isn't buy more shit before you die. You'll die anyway. It's simply about profits. Not that they can do shit about it. Why would they, except profit first. Worse case they could survive underground indefinitely without a population of assholes. Best case it is just a blimp, a hot spell, then a cold spell, sooner.
I am obviously being shadowbanned?
Tactics with tanks I'll explain in a minute. ICBM's aren't hypersonic until re-entry. They leave orbit align and re-enter. Effectively there are better defenses, but freaking nukes with multiple warheads, not much defense. Those Hypersonics are cruise. Almost impossible to detect. Cruise don't leave atmosphere. They stay in orbit. Detection is much harder and that speed unmatched. But there are perhaps some defenses largely in development and being fitted. Like Lasers.
Tanks are needed. Autonomous tanks sooner. But are simple tactics. Why couldn't they largely surrender like some places perhaps like Kherson. They wouldn't be complaining about huge causalities. In which case tanks often beat a standing army on the field. Trenches bunkers opposing tanks. Urban environment there is far more ambush. Unless they cut off any access further surrounding a city, backed by artillery, inch forward, bombarding. They are used in cities but much harder with anti tank and drones. But they're an integral part of warfare, not going anywhere.
Satellite weapons haven't been admitted but there are rumors, and any treaty arming space was cancelled by Trump. There are anti satellite weapons. Although attacking them has huge consequences for space, it causes debries, also potential war. Satellites can spy and with increasing precision, penetrating cover.
Russia will upgrade its entire army next. And they haven't lost, far from it.
But it's remarkable the fake news and the propaganda. Decrying the Russians as capitulated. Obviously the only argument becomes, if Ukraine weren't armed there wouldn't be refugees. If they choose peace, why did they want war. Pathetic they thought somebody else should rescue them, and fight their war, and give them guns to die, and not make peace. But it's Ukraine. It's only objective was a human shield, dent Russia, bog them down, and swamp them into surrender, as any sanctions bite. Hold out for Custer you dumb Alamo. He's not coming.
It really doesn't if an Aircraft carrier uses laser, microwave, or deploys insect drones flooding the sky full of much smaller drones, or plasma countermeasures.
But unless tested against. Could be in for trouble.
N.K, and China also have. USA was developing.
Against Ukraine they have no defenses.
The problem is tracking it. If it can be tracked it can be stopped. But that mach is hypersonic, about 8-10k MPH? On a cruise missile, trouble.
A bunch of actors write another movie. Omg they're a coven of closet cannibals. Look at how easy they play your script. Surely they must be cannibals. Get the pitchforks and torches and let's have pot roast all around. Comic relief.
Obviously there is darkness. Real darkness. The stuff of real cruelty and macabre intent beyond your most vivid imagination. But it ain't silly little narratives providing indigestion.
For example that Fetish listed by the other poster was geisha were historically children like 12 maybe younger, being served as yet another dish to be consumed. Perhaps they were stuffed, and then cooked, and wasn't food eaten directly out of them as another delicacy. Instead of just another lewd display. Hell no it's unthinkable. Because everybody writes fiction.
If we go back to cruelty didn't the French boil people alive as capital punishment for something like fraud all the way up to around the like 80s?
You have no idea the extents of depravity. But it ain't another movie. Or another dress rehearsal. That's comic relief. Mocking and roasting actors. Joke is often on you. They're paid either way.
Yawn. Why did America do it. Why did they act? Like a B movie. What did it actually cause.
It's not to keep the dumb population choosing which Santa offers better taxes. That happens naturally all by itself where they never keep any real promises. They simply use the same slogans of build back great again. But all they gift is more debt, and higher taxes, as inflation cripples. Don't worry they're promising much harder.
Literally a bunch of idiots who believe in Santa. I like that one best. It promises better taxes. It's funniest. And we've been really good this year. We voted for Santa.
What did it cause then and why. But your argument is the deep state stopped Trump from building the Great Wall of China. And it turned him into a Russian double agent because it confused you more?
It's a ball thrower. Like a dog walker has. Seriously.
Okay no. It sets it in the ground simply to fling it. How does a chainsaw get up a tree, firing the drop line. Not quite like that. But similar. Sets it in the ground and fires.
That's redundant on the battlefield, unless it's a block formation slowly advancing. Bow and arrows have equally been around since the dawn of mankind and they fire further inflicting better penetration, but the slingshot is quicker. Except it has no real use against armour.
You have killed the mobility, and the speed of its use. Favoring longer range and bigger projectiles.
Your parable about David and Goliath. Is another common story. They all had them. Greek, Summerians, and etc, like good giant slayers. Did it happen probably not. Undoubtedly the slingshot killed.
There is not one shred of evidence, king David existed or even Solomon. Belief gives power. Israel existed after the fall of Babylon. Prior the rest is often common conjecture, rewritten, reshaped, and relayered into a founding narrative.
But you wanted agreement because you didn't understand me. You had no idea about slingshots either. Instead downvotes on me. Not once returned.
No apology if I don't. They are very powerful, they are accurate.
You wanted a mortar. Using a slingshot technique. How does a chainsaw get up a tree. They use a slingshot, firing their line and dropping it over the upper branches. Did they pelt the black power, or the greek fire. Perhaps. You can probably get customized exploding pellets. By why bother. Other weapons are far better.
No I don't understand what you meant by a trebuchet and confusing the lethality of a traditional weapon. Where they employed entire battalions of slingshots on the battlefield if we are talking ancient history. It was also a Shepherd's traditional weapon prior to the gun in many places around the globe. Bolas have also been around for a long time. In fact in colonisation native African tribes used the slingshot in warfare. It is still used today in Palestine as a weapon.
But you wanted a mortar. Or a catapult. Comparison to a chainsaw getting up a tree. Except you wanted it to fire the Greek fire.
Lever sling weapons I had compared to the javelin throwers. But they're more like a ball thrower.
Or explain?
What????
A black widow, they use to sell for 10 bucks, search it, will kill. It will easily shatter many windshields, smash right through them. They move up to more powerful slingshots at about 50 bucks. Up to being used to fire grappling hooks up mountains. Or sling grenades.
Progressing to wrist mounted launchers. But those are largely crowsbows.
If you're talking about the Palestinians using the traditional slingshot. They can kill. But aren't very effective without lots of practice. Not as effective as the above. Although various methods and means have been around for thousands and thousands of years. It is far more powerful than a stone throw. How does Olympic shotput throw, spin spin spin pivot volley. Except it is in a sling further faster deadlier. Similar sling techniques are used to throw ancient Javelins. Look at what I think it's native Aborigines, or American Indians use for spear throwing. A simple sling technique but accurate further deadly.
Question is almost as dumb as which dog walker throws their ball further. The ball thrower, or the person throwing their ball.
True. I cannot be bothered either. Easier to turn it off. God forbid they actually said anything Non Politically Correct. Oh wait they did. But any sensible person to the regulators, maybe. Why are they answering questions, live? A different reality. It was a bad show. It has been terrible for about a decade. It is just worse today when they have the Ukrainians on. The bar drops lower.
No, the state of TV and the Internet today.
Seriously stop the false flag Russia might create on the nuclear reactors. Just imagine that disaster. It must be stopped immediately before it can happen. Think of the children you would be saving. She said this. Hang on. You want a nuclear war to prevent a false flag from not happening?
A lot of ass kissing. Mushroom clouds everywhere.
But nobody complains, why does nobody complain?
No it really isn't. Try it.
Faultlines getting hit cause Earthquakes. It's a matter of fact. Bomb, sets off tremors. A building blocks away getting bombed causes damage to other buildings. Like, shattered glass, shelves falling, cracks, damages. Do it on a faultine, with nukes, what happens. There are devices like thumpers that can set off tremors, drilling, oscillating, etc etc. Fracking on a faultline can set off tremors.
The dust off of cities being obliterated in a nuclear explosion causes nuclear winter and it blocks out sunlight. Like a Volcano can on a major eruption.
Arctic bases being hit, go on, and have a think what that causes.
You are the epitome of the dumbest of zoo animals. An animal that cannot be trained, because it does not think. It's livestock. It gets kept in a cage. And the only use it has is sustaining the other animals that devour it. If you try to teach this animal, it literally does the opposite, and it pisses and shits everywhere. Monkeys are smarter. Mules are smarter. You aren't. It's because you have zero intelligence and belong inside of a zoo feeding all the other animals who are smarter.