Ridiculous. Bots, algorithms. Recruited trolls. Same on almost all social dystopia.
Keep running into these entities. Their only function is troll or ban. If you run into the trolls they're dumber than shit. Literally like speaking to the intelligence of a monkey. The ban has no appeal. It's under the same programming as the troll. Attack your reasoning declaring it anti the narrative. But they don't discuss the narrative apart from the print which is wrong. They have no other knowledge apart from the scripted narrative. It's akin to an idiot wearing sunglasses telling you what that colour is. No it's not, take your sunglasses off. Never. Because I am wrong. No. Banned.
They hire monkeys. No other life experience. Most of the press they generate is such obvious lies. Anybody could write it. It's not even graduate level. It has no common sense. But it's a fact because it's the narrative. Then they fill the comments with monkeys. No other experience.
Social dystopia today is such a fraud.
You're still arguing. Have you used Google to look. Now I have to repeat myself to a very dumb troll.
When the immediate Sanctions bit, losses to Macdonalds staff as an example. But it got turned into something else. But example. Restribution. Okay that's happening to a host of those likewise corps selling Western brands. Or consultation trading back and forth under sanction. Perhaps even in areas of tourism and hospitality.
Except fucko, plain stupid. There's this big war on. Suddenly it is redistributing on a home front, and on a war front needing conscripts, tech, supply chains, weapons, ammo. Jobs are massively created. Not the opposite. Even if currency becomes tight, it starts ticking over because of a bigger effort from a war front.
Now fuck right off. You're plain stupid.
Respond to me here again, you're blocked. I gave you a chance to use that dumb melon. All you've done is troll.
I am not Russian at all. Simple economics. Not bullshit.
Stop arguing. I told where and when the remark came from. Have you looked. No you're dumb.
Real simple fact. Are jobs created in war? They are when there are losses. More so when sanctions have caused a huge redistribution.
Can you stop and think of all those immediate jobs being created?
No you're airing propaganda. It isn't very factual, apart from the previous immediate run off being restributed.
Now stop bothering me with crap.
I can bring up him saying it under immediate sanction. Suddenly the Blog is reposted? Or what by opposing propaganda projecting sanctions are biting from a paper fired.
Today dumbass there is a huge redistribution of jobs, going towards an active war. Recruitment. Supply lines. Tech for weapons. Never mind any basics sanctioned. Redistribution into factories and labour. Speculation I am not Russian. I don't care. Except there's an even bigger loss of Western jobs. Look at that figure in inflation and loss of fuel and gas.
Stop airing shit. Stop being such a dumb shill. You clearly are too stupid to communicate too.
No it isn't. It's whatever they claim it is. Opposing propaganda. Yes, perhaps immediately under sanction, he said it a month ago. I can bring it up. Not today. Today that's bullshit.
Why are you airing now. Projection. It isn't factual. It isn't based there. It isn't from there.
I don't care. Except anybody with a brain faster calls out bullshit. Only you're full of it. New multiple account. You're such a dummie.
A paper based in Amsterdam is not Russian is it? It's opposing propaganda. Dumbass.
It's not factual. It's projecting. It lost its job.
Objectively who cares how they restributed those jobs in a war. But in speculation they would. Especially on generating new weapons and the tech needed. Never mind committing to simple supply lines. I'd sooner speculate quite the opposite.
Stop posting dumb threads.
https://nltimes.nl/2022/04/16/russia-blocks-website-moscow-times-now-based-amsterdam
Clearly it lost its job
This article doesn't claim that nuclear weapons aren't real but speculates that certain fallout and contamination has been projected in order to cost even more on a bill payer. Where the regulations imposed are a money maker.
The war was inevitable. How it finishes still remains questionable. But it's not going to be over soon. Unless nukes are deployed before then. That risk is quite real.
https://quemadoinstitute.org/2017/08/18/new-us-naval-base-on-ukraines-black-sea-coast/
https://en.usm.media/two-naval-bases-are-being-built-in-ukraine-at-once/
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/04/15/tanks-heavy-weapons-ukraine-russia-nato-putin-offensive/
https://eurasiantimes.com/us-could-now-supply-its-most-lethal-attack-drones-to-ukraine/?amp
https://www.hsmilitary.com/2022/02/UK-donates-100-cruise-missiles-to-Ukraine.html?m=1
This press hasn't even scratched that surface.
Simple probability. Using the above. What's in there, as arm sales increase.
Simple probability of what escalation means? How likely will nukes be deployed?
I could add strategies, where 1000s of Nato troops have been readied to enter. Outside of a number of clandestine operating already. But there's no point currently. Suggesting the war will be over soon is dubious. How it progresses can only escalate.
Not if Nato keeps supplying more weapons and starts inserting more troops. Weapons like German tanks, and more advanced mobile artillery units, it might not give F16s, but other nations are sooner supplying older Soviet MiGs, but it is supplying drones, and these might become more advanced. It is increasing in foreign troops, some nations are even committing their special ops.
Russia can win certain objectives, undoubtedly.
But it's back to square one if it escalates further. Because if Russia fully wins the contested regions, and then it wants a peace deal. But why would Ukraine reach it. It keeps getting armed. What peace deal will lose its coastline. Meanwhile Odesa is faster being reinforced. Regions claimed are under attack and in resistance. But bigger losses commit more Nato. Look at that outcry, daily calling on warcrimes, on support, on whatever.
A few nations are also at that point. The longer this plays out. War could even save their face. Otherwise that witch's cauldron brewing, bubbling, and stewing of austerity and protest and hyper inflation will sooner start to catch up. Into you tell me?
The latest from Russia, it will directly attack any new armaments, and possibly even the foreign troops deploying and supplying. Tanks get supplied along with mobile artillery etc, guns, arms, and drones. These get hit. Doesn't it escalate.
It could end with nukes much sooner. At the going rates of escalation. Nothing would surprise me.
Besides if it goes worse more proxies will flare.
If you think nukes are off the cards. Russia has that approval for use in the Ukraine. It might be a later resort.
Could Russia chance it, remains a bigger question. How would Nato react if nukes are deployed to a localised conflict? They are massively arming with their troops partially involved. In probabilty it escalates. But it has. Therefore further escalation remains inevitable.
Of course there are peace deals but these aren't favourable to either. What happens. Russia won't withdraw from the Crimea, and the Separatist republics. If pressed pulls the trigger. Ukraine won't ceed them either.
Reiterate what happens?
Yawn then you're not objective. What, where is the Palestinian population. How is that statistic made into what. It's not where you choose, ignoring a counter claim.
Yes of course propaganda is bias. It was airing some of those 13 children were killed, the loss, and again of the other 8. Ironic.
Not the point of the example of that box theory. Or the human rodent. Where we find that irony all accross the third world. And we sooner find the other mammals not breeding. Or the welfare babies. Until they're even on hunger strike turning into vegans, cannibals, and queers.
It's not genocide if the population is gaining. But of course the metaphorical box is breaking.
I have seen recent BBC documentaries and reports. Interviews of large families. Family of 13, another of 8. This was Gaza. A larger population area. The West Bank is spreadout thinner. Farms and smaller towns, few cities, etc. Not one area. Where statistically that population has exploded within the last few decades immensely. They cannot claim genocide when it has gained increasingly more than it has ever has in history under Israel.
Again clarity on your statistics. Where suddenly you're comparing the Jewish population. It is not relevant to discussing Palestinian population.
Except perhaps to the factors of conflict and expansion.
That is nonsense. Palestinian families average 7 or more. Seen interviews with 13 children being a norm. They interbreed.
Have you seen the box experiment. Simply done with rodents, you add more numbers into a box than perhaps that environment can sustain. Suggest 2, but you put 8. What often happens is that population explodes. The rodents will breed ramptantly turning both gay and cannibalistic. But the numbers will keep expanding until the box breaks, or they die off by a few factors like disease and starvation.
Humans aren't much different. The population explodes. Most mammals are quite similar. Except solitary mammals who can even hunger strike or refuse to mate.
But look at it, the Palestinian population has boomed and not decreased. It has rampantly gained population. Those families average a lot more. They also marry into kin increasingly expanding it more.
I have seen some shit. Seen this bird of prey a few times, same one, different places, hovering there. I actually thought damn that's a fake bird. It's just hovering there like a spy drone. Maybe it's a spy bird. This bird of prey was hovering above my head, and spying.
No, but spy birds are real, seen them on a documentary. The bird spied on other birds, and they're definitely perguine falcons.
Of course birds are real. Spy birds aren't. Birds can be trained, so they can become drones and deliver messages, or be fit with cameras so they take pictures. There was also a plot in the war to make bomb birds. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon
There was another crude project to manipulate flight patterns to down planes, and obviously their use under radar. Drones have changed all of this, birds are unreliable. But is there imaging that can hide low flying drones? Yep stealth drones are real, but they aren't birds. So what was that spy bird doing hovering there. Hahaha.
Look now you're being gay. You're trying to tongue my asshole because you're so full of shit. Offer it to your muse. I am not amused.
I have a gift called common sense. I factor the probability. You however only read shit, until it has clouded your judgement, so keen to whip your wormy tongue out, and shove your nose in it.
I am not Russian. I asked for a debate you clearly are far too dumb to provide, but there you are with a tongue up anus. Fuck off gayboy.
You're dumber than a sack of shit.
Read the wiki, P-1000 Vulcan anti-ship missiles. Read your own report linked P-1000 of them supposedly being nuke tips. Read. I am not linking again. I did, you dumb fucking nigger. You linked it as well. Only you're such a fucking nigger you didn't read it. Instead you don't understand shit. Because you cannot process.
At what point are they even onboard? They're not needed. They fire at ships, specifically they're called anti-aircraftcarrier killers. Directly before the conflict Russia hosted Naval exercises, in a few places like the Atlantic, and the Black Sea, where the Moskva fired it at a range exceeding 900km. Hence the speculation.
It is engaged in active conflict where Ukrainian navy posed no real threat. It was destroyed practically immediately. Except for any ports still being contested, but they otherwise have no boats. That ship was resupplying from its Dock in Svestapol around a day or so away. It would logically carry what it needed for any immediate threats, loading the munitions and armaments for its active combat role in a conflict. The other two crusiers of similar class are locked out of the Black Sea because the Bosphorus Strait is closed. The only threatening Nato Navy nearby is Turkish. It however isn't sailing up the Black Sea to Russian waters, which have blockaded the Ukrainian Coastline. And it would take some time for them to get near it. Any other strike groups, like the Americans in the Med, are a lot further away.
Where perhaps the Northern Fleet have them onboard.
You're parroting a profile. I explained its insinuating conjecture. It is tabloid sensationalism. Oh look it sunk with broken arrows taunting and blaming their accident. It is conjecture based on that past Naval exercise, without it logically concluding ships supply for their active role. Especially when that dock is right there. It isn't sailing around the planet. It is in a conflict where they're not used currently. Like bombers and fighters which can carry nukes, were they in Syria? Of course you have permanent defenses which do. But that ship wasn't firing them at land targets, read its description.
You stupid nigger.
Stop repeating my words and filling in the blanks with your nonsense.
I shouldn't need to link. You're grown up and can use Google yourself.
You've created a supposition that they're nuclear tipped. P-1000 antiship missiles. Vulcans.
At what point did it need nuclear tipped supersonic antiship missiles. Read the past wiki and the paper with its armaments. Find it on Google if you need too.
Because you're claiming they were for ground targets. You're claiming they got hit. And now Russia has created a nuclear disaster. On par with all the other chemical weapons it uses. See the profile you're parroting. See why you're parroting it. Now do you understand that it is practically baseless? But it makes a good tabloid. OMG the irradiation is going to be killing fishermen for years. Better get the UN hazmats to broken arrow them first.
You're talking about nuclear weapons onboard a ship which had no reason to carry them in this immediate conflict. In escalation perhaps. If it needed them it would dock and fit them. Sevastapol is right there, it takes about a day to Dock off the Ukrainian coastline. Where it would be actively resupplying in a conflict. If a Nato ship or threat went through the Bosphorus Strait, it would have time to rearm. At what point did it need nukes onboard for this conflict? The nuke tips it carried were supposedly an antiship based supersonic. Are they for ground based targets. It has planes and silos and mobile launchers for that. Or even other ships and subs.
The Bosphorus strait is closed to Russian ships. It might not be to Nato, but it could provoke all out war, if other threatening navy went through it. The Black Sea has largely non threatening navies nearby like Bulgaria and Romania. There is Turkey and Greece with far more battleships, not much match to Russia navy, more than Ukraine, but I didn't think they're sailing up the Black Sea through the Black Sea Fleet. At what point did the Moskva need supersonic antiship nukes?
Or do tell me they're for land targets. Now you're claiming they're leaking, because its nukes were hit. What are you talking about?
Do you understand the odds of your claim they're marginal. Highly improbable. Because of its range, and the active demand for them in this conflict. It test fired that weapon of a range of more than 900km recently. Okay perhaps rather than resupply it carries. But if a strike group went through the Bosphorus, would it race there to face, or would it shell? It would shell next to its Sams at Svestapol, firing from range. In which case wouldn't it rearm. Strike group would also use planes. It's hypothetical. Speculation. More erratic claims of OMG Russia's nuking the ocean.
It's laughable because when nukes fly they aren't flying like that either. That ship didn't have much immunity regardless. Nevermind to a squadron of planes.
I am drinking reading a tabloid, remembering the exocets.
The Bosphorus Strait is closed. Russia knows this. What immediate threat is there.
It had test fired at a daring range supersonics which can be outfitted tipped with nukes. Prior to the conflict. Showing capability. These are primarily antiship weapons.
The other two in the Med, I would be far more worried about. The Northern Fleet.
But okay you have this ship in conflict. It's going to prioritise immediate need. It will resupply and outfit accordingly. Its docking Port is right there. Not hypotheticals.
Of course a gunslinger carries everything but why are you bringing it to that fight when you're resupplying at your Dock less than a day away.
Marginal odds. If something else entered the strait. You'd know about it. Then you'd regroup and refit to match.
Explain, because it doesn't make sense? Antiship weapons are suddenly hitting land targets. It didn't have that role.
When the spyplanes pick up the diving operation, recover the broken arrows, everybody can stop guessing. So many erratic claims.
At what point did the Moskva have that capability?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_cruiser_Moskva
https://english.pravda.ru/news/hotspots/151161-moskva_cruiser/
Here from the Daily Mail. Sounds like projection. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10721351/Ukraine-war-Fears-Moskva-warship-carrying-nuclear-weapons-sank.html
But because it fired during a test exercise prior to conflict, there is the possible speculation with its anti aircraftcarrier missiles, ship destroyers. Were they nuclear tipped? Why would they be if it was immediately deployed in the Black Sea. It outfits at Sevestapol. No immediate ship threats to use nuclear tipped supersonics.
It always has them? When it's resupplying regularly in an active conflict.
Odds aren't entirely there.
It has become far more tracked. And it is unreliable, fluctuating on the demands of yet another stock option and form of investment, like shares. Bitcoin, rigging and racketeering any gains. Until every other huckster is selling their own monopoly. Buy a shitcoin, because it has Doge wiping his ass. The energy needed to mint stuff like bitcoin is a disgusting planetary fraud. Faster becoming susceptible to hack. Without tracking it more, have a Govcoin instead, even more monitored. Certain nations have adopted it, trading around current methods and restrictions hoping to gain value from it. They were often in heavy debt. Often using it to swap sanctioned currency.
Perhaps it can provide something to cashless society's needing another tech gimmick. But all it really brings is debt. Without cash, inflation soars. Imagine it. What's that price. The price of another credit card. It adds debt for you to credit because you didn't have cash.
Collapse doesn't serve the status quo until it often happens as a last resort. There are more seasonings needed before this gets there.
Currency as we speak of it in value and demand needs collapsing in order for another method to become that standard. Sure it's another form of profit. But how are you buying it. Existing currency. Without it, any gimmick doesn't exist. You bought a GOV coin at what price. The value of currency traded.
Gradually won't overtake the existing value of currency. Curiously this article serves others adopting it more, they gain value from it becoming the standard. There are also tech companies pushing it for their own gains. What's it do, another form of credit. Nothing you cannot already, often easier without it.
Reddit is garbage. Pure bot, shill, algorithm.
R/conspiracy was always a filter. It required 2 months on Reddit before posting. They already had your profile. Anybody generating an account with no history cannot post. Anybody posting only conspiracies faster got banned across Reddit for political views, or anti establishment comments/posts. The mods changed into shills filtering bias. They would ban you for disagreement of any topic they generated.
The rest of Reddit is far worse. The bots, and people posting are bias to all disagreement of every topic generated. The jannies it has operating its site are some of the dumbest on the planet. No experience outside of the topic. Uneducated in everything except liberalism, and it means they're right no matter what. But the bots they use break all their rules, they downright attack any account for generating disagreement, spamming down votes, while attacking your account for its creation, calling you Russian, or far right, simply for disagreeing. They attack English when they cannot string two words together grammatically, or in any other speech apart from insults, goading further attacks to cancel you. The entire site echoes in almost every topic generated. The comments written are autistic or out of context with reality apart from blind obedience to the topic. Anybody smart enough to divert a topic with clear questions, the topic is overrun with bots and shills promoting its narrative again, giving fake Reddit currency. Or it is removed, and often reposted with smaller variations correcting its print.
It's the Planet's shithole. There are only idiots on Reddit.