▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha, it was an obvious joke. Hilarious in fact. Sour puss.

Yea Musk is probably a feminist anyway. If he isn't he'll buy some.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

There has been humanism putting us here, and it provides their dumb sense of optimism which is nothing other than a justification for their greed.

Humanism empowered global numbers, and then their greed tips them. There is nothing humane about it. Did you think that rockstar singing about Bandaid cares about anything else except greater profit. You think that moviestar is different. No matter the blowhard. Look at that Clooney. What about that other NGO investing into Palm Oil while championing the climate. Wait they profited to collapse it to profit more. Or they just profit off your naivety. Because they played on your innocence, perhaps they were also innocent at one point believing it was from their soul, thinking of charity, until all it did was put the taxes up.

Or prior to Woodstock was society more unified than it is today? It had a sense of nationalism at least. Even if the same powers lie regardless. But it had national services that ran better than almost anything does today, they didn't cost as much either. Perhaps there were less rights. What really? That's a joke when all rights did was call you racist or intolerant. No seriously sure you must have something better now, more consumption, and it means buying more bullshit I suppose. Inflation, and even greedier Rockstars. It pays them to care about your gullibility, until they faster sing get taxed get jabbed and go fight in Ukraine. They must have really cared about something? Profit, it's the only charity.

Not a great comparison but war then wouldn't be the same disaster it is now. At least you'd still be producing 80% of everything from your own nations, having a sense of dignity. Instead of these other shitholes where almost all they want to do is destroy any culture, nationalism, and unity, inserting another globohomo taxing you more. All they do is collapse their supply chains, populations adding more, in order to sell you more of their bullshit. At this point it's practically another war, or it's more debt and then the cuts, inflating and tipping the numbers into suppression and tyranny.

Humanism causes Hitler. Optimism grants humanism.

Look at the ignorant down vote. Obviously a tribal, they believe in humanity. They believe a bunch of idiots don't put their heads together and invent profit. Yea for sure. Because if one finds a solution the other sells it. Until the one selling it, is paying for the solution. It means profiting off it. No other humanity, just profit and control. Until any ideas and solutions are stiffled, and they've sold their souls. It simply means profiting off of more idiots, or killing or suppressing any others not buying their solution. No other rights, buy it or die, or it pays more too care. Worse it's no longer humans thinking. They've become dumber than their machines calculating greater profits.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it's all bullshit is where we are at right now.

The growing divide has become catastrophic. A gaping abyss of deepening rifts. There are only those profiting off of chaos. They continuously heap laying more dystopia protecting their profit. Any other partisan, or opposition side profits for their own power structures and control. Until mud and blood is thrown back and forth and there is no unity, it might as well be driven straight into war. War the greatest leveller, and the only unifier. Middle ground has been purged into greater taxation, inflation, and more suppression. Rights, and freedoms are being stripped away. Constantly caring about somebody or something else more to add greater dystopia, and taxation by. Until false messiahs, tyrants, and despots continuously empower depravity and more opposition simply further suppressing the masses even more. There is no solution apart from ignorance, it offers greater taxation and dystopia promising unicorns and baubbles profiting those who profit regardless and care about nothing else. They have created nothing but their greed, and it devours everything.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

By removing the feminist bots off twitter?

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a fetish. Nothing more. Plenty of people bite in sex, some draw mild blood. Others suck hickies until mild blood. There's pain and scat shit disgustingly heavy.

Airing it as a ritual, makes her weird, crazy Jesus, or vampire, or bound eternally, but nothing nobody else hasn't experienced in some form. Like a blood brothers handshake, communion, vamprism. A kink. It gets people talking, giving her publicity. But I doubt it's much else.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

How has it passed the Supreme Court?

At what point has that executive order made it passed Congress and been put into law?

Surely there's still hope for humanity.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jettison her into Mars.

There is literally nothing worse than that managing disinformation. She is disinformation. A beacon of nothing but planetary ineptitude. She's also closet nazi.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks. Don't understand much of that other poster. It wasn't about me. I create the topic to align into the present reality of the globe. Although I admit I also used it to question something that occurred. They kept saying you, and your, and giving definitions to words with many other meanings. Words don't break down like that. Some do hence his obvious affect. But they're quite different, often requiring direct knowledge of them. Not by rewriting their content into otherwise assumptions. Many have changed descriptions into different languages away from their source, often having different definitions into the languages present. It's like hieroglyphs, or an emoji, one word or an entire phrase. Yes he gets them right occasionally, and an interesting read denoting words. But tediously unanswered. Yawn.

An act of God. About the only thing I could read on it. Or an outside force. There have been plenty of these from the Greek mythology it was largely adapted from, but the concept goes back to the Egyptians. In Greek mythology the journey into Hades, where they rescued the dead or communicated with them. Again having layers into the Afterlife and what it meant. Same as the Egyptians prior. Until adapted by the Romans. Elysium was underground but it was a better death. Probably like the field of reeds on that Moon Knight episode. Then it became hell with Christianity and also Buddhism. Both have huge layers to it. Where Purgatory is like that waiting area before the ferryman takes them into the beyond. But no it's worse because if they couldn't pay the toll they're stuck or go to hell. Like NEO being stuck in the train station. He had to have outside help otherwise it was permanent. He could be waiting forever. Of course he was aware. But a lost soul isn't. Perhaps it leads to ghosts trapped between, awaiting forgiveness, or passage. Sometimes poltergeists angry spirits. Again this has changed over time. Shintoism prior to Buddhism has Kami, good and bad spirits inhabiting almost everything.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pointless.

It was simply a topic, where I used a concept to apply into our current World. It is going to hell. Alarmingly so. Up to the point something isn't right. It keeps getting worse. Perhaps on a scale of incoming disasters.

Where seemingly no matter how it proceeds, it is becoming limbo.

Personally away from this I watched Dante's Inferno anime the other other night. It was cheesy, more like a computer game, despite its deeper sub layers. But it got me thinking, dunno why, was watching it in the background. Tried to read up on it. Watched the Moon Knight. It's been one of those weeks.

The current state globally where probability is almost becoming inevitable that a much larger conflict crash and dystopia occurs. It feels ominous. Like all that shit you knew about stuff is occurring and you cannot do anything about it because it's that rollercoaster ride to hell. Of course there's the same World outside. Like a bubble. It just go on often becoming worse. All nice an insulated wrapped in its increasing dystopia.

But I was hit like a tonne of bricks before making this topic. Tried to write shit. Tried making it a conspiracy. Saw a woman who reminded me so much of an old flame. Remarkably so. It was haunting. It wasn't her but why did she feel the same. Kiss, touch, height, tits. Not the eyes, per say, just the way they looked, or colour of hair. Song playing in the background, same, same. The way she felt. No it wasn't them because there's no other way in hell. It would be like some of that doppelganger shit, like twin peaks. That memory is too much. It wasn't at the time. Her time, perfect. I won't, can't go back. Have to make up an excuse or something. Because that's how it is. That other feeling. After I left, I saw how I would feel, everything in the interactions around me. I couldn't escape them. It felt crushing.

Dunno what I am escaping from. Why I had a second chance. The odds of my survival were less than 1 percent. Car crash at over 100 mph, they reckoned it was closer to 120 mph, the skid marks and doughnut were for a huge distance about something like a 100 meters. Impact on the driver side door into a lamp post, lamp post destroyed, but the driver door was bent in by one foot, the car was wrapped into a U, the steering wheel was more or less crumpled into the middle of the car, the driving seat was bent on the passenger seat, every single window shattered, the boot ripped off, the front was buckled in somekind of triangle.

Myself no real injury, minus a tendon in my leg, a few minor scars, no stitches. No recollection of it. Nothing. Just the anger and rage before it and waking up in hospital after it. Broke up, whose possessions are whose, police were involved, it was ridiculous. Party pals, chug chug, and the rest, it would have been enough to kill a horse. I shouldn't have drove. Mates shouldn't have let me. I remember saying shit, stupid shit to them. Anger, can't remember. Turned up, is all, hit the booze, and the rest. 90 minutes drive away, unless I drove like a cunt from hell, then I did it in 50 mins. Bam. She visited in hospital but gone. Years decade's have gone by.

Nothing, has been the same since. Not the World I knew. It has gotten worse. Keeps getting worse. Not my life in that way. It hasn't changed much. Just age. But no matter how I've aged there just seems to be this other background. It isn't good or bad, but limbo.

Drunk, said too much. Don't care. It doesn't matter. I just make shit up anyway.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Neo freed them from purgatory. It takes an act of god. They had their memory's, but kept looping, haunted, trapped in limbo, they were vaguely aware that something was up. You would right in that scenario. You'd know it was wrong. Or you'd comply. Because you want to remember what steak taste like instead of seeing the machines, or demons.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the explanation.

But it's a theoretical concept to what the Internet is turning into with the ministry of truth.

Perhaps even the ripples of a future war. Where any matrix simply keeps reseting, everything gets inverted into an Internet, and it's groundhog day over and over, except it just keeps getting worse.

Look at it. This future doesn't end well

Or let's entertain the concept. Where perhaps somebody remembers dying, somehow they're still alive, but stuck inside of purgatory.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

See how dumb you are. How as an example are naked children playing pedo. You are that mirror. You are thinking those thoughts.

That is because you were dumb enough to call them Asexual. When our species isn't at all.

It was quite clear they were developing. It isn't your bullshit description or your vile thoughts.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

See look at your ignorance. I am not the subject. I offered a hypothetical. I was correcting your misconceptions. And debating the topic.

But the best you can do is call me names. Or down vote. Break a mirror. Go on. You're dumber than the shit you spew. But look at that projection. Vile. Ignorant. Absurd.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are born without sexual preferences. But as a species what are humans? They're not Asexual. You're dumb to have suggested it. Why did you try to correct it. Because read your bullshit. I read clearly. You read like an asshole taking a shit. I know what I said. But I sure as hell cannot understand your bullshit. Because you're literally insane.

If you put two naked children together what happens? Children developing instinct. Let's suggest those children had been exposed to their parents, accidentally. Or even TV, or the internet. Or older children, prior to puberty. Would it be a fair assumption that they could explore without understanding, or perhaps even in some other kind of sense of sex. No they're not Asexual. You dumb asshole.

Nature vs Nuture. Solved. This is hypothetical. But you have made an incorrect assumption.

Your stupid down vote is pathetic.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't say being born, repeat it. I said a fair assumption would be to conclude all humans are bisexual. But it isn't the case at all, after developing preference.

I have argued as a species humans are bisexual. Comparing with mammals.

Although I hinted that children are without experience developing instinct as a result of experience and environment.

Sure okay let's try a Lord of the Flies scenario. Let's lock a bunch of males, and females separately into prison, or boarding school, a convent, or monastery, an island, at various ages and what occurs?

Prepuberty is nonsense, sexual behaviour can occur far younger.

Pheromones are again prevalent in all species. Humans being attracted by them is subjective. Hormones play a much larger role. So do our other senses.

Yes I have refuted as a species we are Asexual. We develop preferences. We aren't garden plants.

Nature vs Nuture. Solved.

Or please try to argue the rogue genes. How you grew an ingrown tentacle birthing an octopus? Or perhaps you simply developed a preference because your hormones flared. Where any choice simply adapted to their environment, and experiences?

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a flaw. You're saying we don't have sexual preference, because we are born Asexual. Wrong try again. We have developing reproduction. It perhaps advances differently. 90 year old crustacean, chopping off your garden plant. Perhaps we are innocent until we develop. But we developed how?

Suggesting we are Asexual is wrong. We simply cannot reproduce if we are, despite having hormones and reproductive organs developing into sexual instincts, and choices. Therefore as a species we are as stated.

Believe it or not, Humans have pheromones. How attracted we are to them is subjective.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nuture is a separate debate. But preference developed how. Environment and experience, developing.

All species have pheromones. Including our own. Although we tend to rely mostly on a combination of all our senses, and we are also driven by our hormones.

I am not debating my preferences, it again is hetero. I don't care about how you developed your choices, or what they are. I am debating this topic, and rationalising why as a species there are increasing preferences?

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

No my debate is solid. The nature is that you have reproductive organs and hormones. It leads to sex by nature from reproducing, adapting, and surviving. The choice by nature is therefore bisexual. It is with every mammal, and many other species. But specifically our species. Sex is a product of environment and experience, leading to instinct or preference.

Science would argue unbalanced rogue genes. But this isn't factual when regardless of hormone levels your biology will always be bisexual, choosing how you have sex and any preferences towards it.

Or please try to argue otherwise. Asexual is contrary to our species reproduction. But sex becomes a preference.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then you're dumb, far too dumb to have a conversation with.

You have proved beyond all reasonable doubt that you have had no idea what you're talking about. So why are you attempting a debate. It's because you're dumb. Cannot read. Responds in giggles.

See how that works. Go be Asexual all by yourself, and try birthing. You'll faster turn into a cannibal. Chop chop snip snip. There it's the embodiment of another plant, or crustacean. Asexual.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF. I am educated. You have produced an absurd argument.

Humans are born how. No they're not Asexual. Because they cannot reproduce.

Sex is involved, causing their preference. Because sex is involved, it causes them to be Bisexual. They have equipment to reproduce. Being born without experience, it sooner develops into preferences or choice.

Idiot.

Like every other mammal they're born Bisexual. No experience causing their hormones to react and seek sex. Of course you get 90 year old virgins too. But they're not Asexual.

I am sure somewhere your education has faltered. It was trying to include rogue genes, it is selling. You have a dick or a cunt. Those hormones produce testorone or oestrogen, despite of any other accident, environment, diet, hazard, and unbalance.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

No Bisexual. I have no idea what Asexual is? I think it means, not having sex, or can reproduce by themself. Humans cannot survive as a species without sex, they cannot reproduce. So they're Bisexual, like every other mammal.

What caused their preference is the only question, experience and environment.

I am not debating my heterosexual preference. Simply the topic.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are born without sexual preferences, it's through environment and experience that they gain instincts.

It would be a fair assumption to conclude all humans are Bisexual. Upon developing preference, it is not the case at all.

Humans cannot reproduce from the same sex. They were born how. But in an environment of choice, instincts are created. Experience causing differing choices.

People aren't born gay, they're born without experience. Hormones often drive sex.

Stupid topic. Ridiculous comparison. But okay choice. It doesn't quite cause instinct, or preference. Somebody could force you to eat onions, and unless you died from it, you might sooner be eating them. What actually caused your distaste of onions. I am sure you eat them anyway. They're in everything you haven't read the label.

If by listening to bullshit science of otherwise assumptions. They're trying to convince us of rogue genes. Where in random occurrence, neutral organs are created. I severely doubt this, because it is science simply trying to develop them, and increasingly today. But it's for you to decide your choice. You weren't born with it. Born without experience. You develop it, causing your preferences.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jettison him into Mars. There was a block feature for users. Nobody else demanded his expertise. It's irrelevant.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Come on, simply cleaning up a rat infested house.

Where did the bots come from in the first place. Largely the trolls it has operating. Corps and GOV. Also Twitter's middlemen. There have been quite a few of these selling likes and bots. Operating troll farms to ram advertising and narratives. Everybody else was being quite monitored.

Why is there the pushback? Hissy fits from frothing mouths, slavating their freedoms are awry. Obviously they aren't completely infecting the programming anymore. It's a spring clean up. Rat infested dung hills, which have also had China and others being deceitful.

I am sure they'll figure it back out by calling on GOV again. They better lay into with another law to troll speech with, because the press cannot purvey their fact checkers. A bunch of bots silencing opposition.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›