▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know what I am talking about because you believe in this shitty press. Look at what you write. You believe in fiction, and it must because I'm Liberal? How does that work. It doesn't. It's the dumbest. It's more shit coming out your mouth because you opened it, and swallowed all the bullshit.

Stealth against real radar. Um no. It's actually got a name. Look up that Sat coverage. Just went up recently. Real radar. Unlike that other poor launch. Oops. It doesn't mean it will stop hypersonics. They're mutually assured. Now look up those defenses. They have improved to stop hypersonics, although I wouldn't hedge it. But lasers are going on every carrier group and most current ships, and into missile defense. Plus plasma counter measures on flight, and ships. There are drone defense being toyed with as well. But again they're more of a countermeasure.

We were doing real radar. Whoops what happen with that Neptune? That's inside shitty Ukraine. Okay you wanted mutually assured. But we weren't doing that because Russia's winning? Or you're scared?

Hypersonics are tactical, dumbass. Their payload is limited. You clutz. They're an advanced cruise using hypersonic glide, and it doesn't leave orbit. ICBMs are hypersonic on re-entry, but they're more easily detected, due to leaving orbit. Therefore they have better defenses against them. These are now seeing railguns, and lasers outside of just former missile to missile. These have advanced into multiple warheads to combat current defenses.

But more is conjecture, I agree. Nobody can stop MAD doctrine

Go back to bullshit school. Read your toilet paper, learn more propaganda. But wipe your damn ass before you spew Bullshit.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any objective?

Tell me when they cut, how does it run off. Let's say if the market wobbles, who does it also affect. If they develop something, who else buys it?

What is the strategy? What are they even selling? Isn't it your answer. Except nothing comes cheaper, it comes at even greater price. What does it mean.

Russia beating a field they had? Ironic. But okay they're reclaiming it back. Not from somebody else who didn't have it either. Wanted it. Why not there's always more. But it affects trade. Why? Who is it fully affecting. Why?

Easier to assume it's just for a few of their citizens paying more for it.

And perhaps it hasn't even started being fought over yet.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're so up your asshole, it's coming right out of your mouth.

I rarely enter a topic to agree with it. Because that's what idiots do. Either I enter to make a joke, or too challenge it. If I agree, I upvote it. It doesn't need me saying much more, unless I am questioning something else in it, or further adding more too it.

You however open up your mouth and swallow. No wonder you wallow in it. Then you had to go and get all petty about it. Literally crying to me about it, like that emotionally challenged kid, how it's so unfair that nobody else understands you, and you'd better attack them for not understanding you, wahaaa. You didn't make sense earlier, please go back and read what you typed. Look, you've shat your asshole out of your mouth, and it stinks. It all stems psychologically from believing in the bullshit.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I call out comments that are insane. You're obviously emotionally challenged.

First of all who cares. I don't. Ukraine means nothing to me. You obviously care even more. Fetch. I simply challenged the topic. All of sudden you're crying about it. That's insane, right.

No Ukraine hasn't been anything else for 75 years. It changed about 10 odd years ago. Prior, yawn, that's hearsay. 75 years ago the CIA fermented a coup today. Let it brew, for the correct vintage. No, you're doing the CIA's job. That's some manoeuvring, 75 years ago, Ukraine has a coup today. How much money did it cost in the last 75 years? But suddenly a few billion today costs more than it did for last 75 years? Emotionally insane. It's like the aliens ate your brains.

Nato has ICBMs. These can breach Russian defenses. It has far more stealth fighters carrying them. It has more ships, and subs. It has far more combined troops. It has far better coms, satellites, and infrastructure. It is developing hypersonic, but any smart cruise missiles also come in stealthed, or they're fired from stealth drones and stealth planes, and as the former treaty with Russia was withdrawn, they can even equip cruise with nuke tips if needed. America's hypersonic tests are a success. Same with many other experiments like with lasers, and plasma. Watch that tech hit Nato as quickly. Defenses it has anti missile defense, these are supposedly better than their counterparts. Although nothing stops everything. But Nato has a linked Sat network covering all of Europe for early warning detection and counter attacks.

Hence there is this war. Let's all hope it doesn't become a larger conflict.

I made a comment. I expected clever, and not whatever you are.

▲ 11 ▼
Ep0ch 11 points ago +11 / -0

Reddit is this planet's asshole. The comments it shits out, aren't worth considering, because they stink. They're spoken in a different language, the language of echoes. One big human centipede. First guy feltches, it funnels down. Anybody calling bullshit, gets shat on.

No such thing as a Gates fanboi. Who. Nobody today. It's the same mod group, entering a spreadsheet checksum, enter x amount of upvotes, insert 500 etc, while spamming 10 replies of nothing but echo. They've all got their mouth on the same asshole, finishing each other's sentences off. Then it blocks by entering another checksum of minus 500 down votes on everybody else. Try it, go on that AMA and say Gates stinks. You'd get upvoted by almost the entire population, you'd even get gold. Except there's this platform called Reddit and it's bullshit.

Reddit's only motto, karma or die. To get Karma means eating shit, or whatever the advert tells you too, and If not, die.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Turkish drones are being supplied to the Ukraine by the drove. The same Turkish drones being supplied in the Azerbaijan Armenia conflict. Not as good as American counterparts but still active on the battlefield.

Few key things. Didn't Turkey prevent the Russian Northern Fleet passing through the Bosphorus, in this Ukraine conflict. Wasn't a Russian ambassador to Turkey assassinated in Turkey? Tell me about Turkish involvement in Syria, isn't it also fighting pro Assad forces as well as any Kurds? Of course there are a few more opposing considerations.

Because there's a bunch of games within games and sides playing on the fence. It's called not miscalculating, or getting what you want.

But alignment is often where the money flows. It means what today? What does it mean? Art of negotiation, or the winner's strength. What strength is there in hyperinflation. Does it force alignment. Or does it protest it? No what. Because the only guarantee is that it doesn't get easier today.

Who knows who cares, but this article reeks of wishful propaganda. It isn't very accurate. The only certainty is that there will be escalation.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Adversaries. Turkey holds the Bosphorus straight. Russia most of the Black Sea. Historically. Opening the straight means everybody else gets through. No wonder Ukraine wants its coastline. Tell me who are Turkey arming?

There are a host of the grievances Turkey has had, increasing recently. But they're still in Nato. If they aren't, there is much bigger problems. But until then, you're offering a lot more conjecture. Price. Look at that inflation. Tell me what fixes it? Bartering correct?

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you stop and use your dumb brain. Instead of wishful fantasies. All you're spewing are the emotions of ill informed and the deranged.

NATO isn't finished without war. It is becoming entrenched. More nations want to join it. It means exactly what? It's finished? No. Quite the opposite. It is stronger now than it was prior.

Ukrainian situation has caused increasing problems for Europe. But who cares about Ukraine. I am being harsh. Not really. Russia does even more. It was catalyst that prompted an agenda. An agenda of developing technology, energy, and a host of other concerns like security, supply lines. It further cements Nato back into the field. Look how that worked. Nato is now trading right through the EU binding it. It has its old foe. They're rallying.

The problem becomes when its citizens can't pay. Then what happens? But Nato doesn't go anywhere.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

As well as possibly a few others. Who knows. It's just bartering. What do they get. Never the EU potties. Because Swedish SJWS aren't their crown. Although, Turkey has other concerns.

Regardless Ukraine was simply a catalyst. The way things are shaping it's Wildfire. Inflation soaring, drums beating. Who knows how the deck plays and where the chips fall. If it settles, or provokes. What policy comes out of it. Although any citizens are paying more for it. They are often pawns simply aligning.

But this other article is conjecture. Laughably, inate, contrary opposing propaganda flinging mud and hoping it sticks.

It isn't like that and not to those who hold the deck of playing cards.

Go on, and convince otherwise. The EU won't buckle apart. It just entrenched Nato, if it does, it goes to conflict, or simply realigns. Besides they're greasing Opec, and releasing Venezuela. And it'll probably backfire. Who fully knows what becomes of this, except it won't get better. Not today.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhm no. The EU is different to Nato. Nato however isn't fracturing if it's gaining new members. It is selling more arms and partnerships. While the EU pays for it. This is where it gets ironic. See the EU makes trade deals. But Nato cuts out their bullshit. Although American and British brands might not be in European shops. All that security and infrastructure and military are happily moving back and forth increasingly committed to any Nato partnerships, selling its other brands.

Ukraine who cares, it's done the above in any event. When Europe was less keen on trade deals, and more committed to who knows what their activists wanted. They get something else.

Military still needs gas and oil. You dumb EVs. If it's not Russian, where are they buying from.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

A) It's not called Moloch. Laughable translation.

B) They do it for power. Becoming a ritual, and ceremony. Membership, into part of their club. It probably has traditions and rights of passage going back much further. That looks mild, it looks absurd. A consecration of a frat house celebrating their opening night.

C) Other founders, have done largely the same into some of their quite notable orders. Some have had grueling rituals, into their rights of passage, it wasn't simply about making a grade, but an initiation, or worse, even possible human sacrifice, of physical pain, or pleasure, commiting or blackmailing.

Making up hyperconjecture of some other diety, named wrong, providing this other background of laughable horrors. Not the way that works there. Not like that. If it goes darker, and it does with idiots, it's far more exclusive.

https://www.abandonedspaces.com/mansion/the-initiation-well-at-quinta-da-regaleira-near-sinta-portugal.html?andro=1&chrome=1 What do you think they did there? How exclusive is that? But if that still exists, you won't even know about it, if it does. Those people pop on a plane today, meeting up at some other Island, castle, or campsite.

Or the Hellfire Club. Which some say the Bohemian Groove emerged from turning into another yearly Scouts camp? But the Hellfire club didn't go anywhere. If it exists, this topic isn't fully it.

Yes, I am guessing as well. I look at shit and put together a logical assumption based on limited research. The Bohemian Groove today, isn't that place.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

First rule of fight club.

I think they just like being smacked in the face.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

He didn't write that crap. Put it that way. It's the same tired narrative used for its agendas.

Figure out the math. It's simply impossible. Anybody else would have more creativity. Nobody apart from somebody with a signed confession. Sign it or else. Because it's another woke movie. Those scriptwriters have gotten so lazy. They keep flogging dead horses.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yawn the one who holds the gold sets the terms of trade and further meddles them. Nothing more nothing less. They all want the gold, and because they do it favours and fancies for even more influence. If all you're buying is gold with your what not. It can simply buy or sell to another what if, playing y'all off. Does it get any deeper. Nope. Greed rues the day like every other. I am sure it exploits even further. Not much.

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Press and Government agencies have their own bots following him. They make up the rest of his followers.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pig was a good film. Definitely worth it. Stillwater was also worth it. Reminiscence, was good, been done a few times, but unique in its telling. If you want fun blockbuster, Monster Hunter, the only one I enjoyed. 2021, oops it was 2020, I watched 2021 like in January. No other titles. If there was then I well no won't. So many I turn on and I watch 5 minutes. Ugh. They're just lame woke bullshit like The Last Duel. No it wasn't the last Duel either. Dueling happened with Pistols at Dawn. Nevermind jousting with Nostradamas. She probably made it all up anyway if the husband raped her, like when did she get pregnant. She was after his estate anyway. Woke. Stop it. What was with those Fremen? Cringe. Cringe. Hate Craig, officially the worst Bond.

Sonic ugh. Yuck turned it off. Don't know why I turned it on. You might like it. Some do. The first was better.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I haven't seen much in the last few years that has made me look forward to anything being released.

The last film I liked was that Hugh Jackman film Reminiscence. The critics hated it because it didn't have a good ending. It's been rerun a few times like Source Code type of movies. But more enjoyable than a heap of shit hitting the markets. As soon as there's a 2020 onwards film I cringe. No. Don't. Pick something anything from previous decades. Because it will stink. For that one film there's literally a heap of shit. Can't watch it. It's dreadful. Okay Stillwater wasn't bad, decent, but it was about Amanda Knox? Pig was reasonable. Monster Hunter. Last year. Only titles I liked. But fuck you assholes.

Woke cinema stinks. Who is your market.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

You pay them double in fact you pay them triple.

So you buy subscription or a movie ticket. They declare whatever they make is a loss, no matter the profit they generate, even if it's the most successful film, just to loophole the tax, plus they have a bunch of subsidies from governments hosting them.

They've been making crap recently pure propaganda, it's no longer entertaining. The Northman was a propaganda piece for guess what, and it stunk on ending, one of the laziest in the entire universe. It was supposed to be a better film. What about Uncharted, Sonic 2, the new Batman, Morbius? Anybody watch the new Avatar trailer, it was like pouring vomit into your eyes.

They have fucked up cinema. Fucked up the Blockbusters now.

And look at these new series, no don't, like another woke Star Trek, join Nato. What about Tokyo Vice, what market is that for, it's almost offensive? Moon Knight stunk on its ending. Halo is quite bad as well. Any others this year? Last year was worse. They're rewriting novels and drawing little moustaches and dreads on the Mona Lisa. Calling art graffiting the crap out of something else with their only idea on how they can go and fuck it up.

No they won't go broke. Hollywood has been through much worse, World Wars etc. But it seems today that thinking is flawed. It takes the money reruns it through a franchise,10 ways and inside out, and then it slaps itself stupid for a narrative where it wants bigger numbers from attempting to sell it too somebody else. Who the fuck are they today? It's some other stupid narrative where they think everybody agrees its best because they programmed them too say so.

You'd think they're on strike. The lack of effort going into this shit today is cringe. But the narratives are far worse.

▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's a lot higher depending on what they're selling. It reaches 50% and above. They've been manipulating both algorithms and polls to project advantages of volume for advertising. Ultimately just to pummel support.

It's a disgusting operation. You won't get to the bottom of that iceberg, because it compromises a lot more than Twitter. It's Google, most social media, and a lot of the Internet today. What comes up on searches, twitter does, what is advertising twitter, advertising the searches. Bots. So Disney or whatever want to sell the next gay superhero movie. What have they done? This is tied right into funding advertising. But it gets much deeper when it's a news feed, like COVID. What have those bots done to anybody else disagreeing. They've outlawed them, destroyed them. Anybody with a following is faster being deciminated. Replaced by outrage or whatever. Until there is only a secular narrative. Social media simply a means of controlling and rigging the searches and volume.

It's a virus like agent smith. They program a narrative, it literally seeks and destroys, replicating copy after copy, manipulating searches, spreading itself over and over again.

Good luck with that. No wonder the Ministry of Truth stepped in. Linked right into a few intelligence agencies often funnelling it through mainstream media, they're doing elections, outside of just advertising. You're also talking stocks and shares if you manage to penetrate it further.

Gut it like a kipper. Thanks for proving to the World what it is. What's it worth now. Nobody will trust a GOV run platform. Nobody will trust it again. It deserves collapsing, get rid of the virus. But the problem is those bots won't go anywhere.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

For all the gay liberals, turning fascist to sell more gays? Troongraphy.

Undoubtedly it's the propaganda. If you can convince them they were queers, you can convince they are queers. Fear porn.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope so. Wasn't he kicked out of it for exposing his magic to the World. It goes back to dark arts, despite of any healing ability. But those belief systems have largely changed. More is superstition. Not everybody can train. In fact that is a cult and sect of far older beliefs, and they largely don't exist in the same way they did. If they do, you wont find them. Because it's blasphemy to the largely different religious populations. Buddhism is also different to what was practiced. Didn't they have skin changers as some of their most popular folklore changing into birds and leopards. Also huge on the spirits, good and evil. Prior to Krakatoa human sacrifice and cannibalism existed all over Indonesia.

If indeed that still exists.

I am quite unconvinced on some of that stuff seen.

▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

They loved that shit in the 70s and the 80s the hopeium. It sold by the barrel full. The quest for mysticism. Until all it made are woke queers. It sold even more if they used a foreigner from bugaboo. It convinces. They strap him up with their bag of dicks. Presto, it's a sorcerer of the 9th Dan. He can perform miracles.

Or it's that Russian video. God damn that was gay.

I am skeptical. There's often a trick too it.

But okay on the off chance forgive me. There's ghosts and goblins and ghouls. More tiger benis is needed.

Yes there is the unexplained and there is mind over matter. There is Eastern healing, using different medicine techniques, and there used to be entire schools dedicated mediation and even darker arts. But there is a hell of a lot more bullshit. For the one rare healer, or that magi, trick or real, there are a million more selling tiger benis.

▲ 6 ▼
Ep0ch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yawn that looks fake and gay. A magic trick. Little fire underneath paper, hand with combustible. Whoosh powerful.

Ultimately it was a form of sorcery in times past. Wielding fire conjuring the elements causing flame. Perhaps there is the occult dedicated to it. Harry Potter and the quest for the mythical Greek fire. Today there are a million combustibles, caused from chemicals reacting with each other. Slight of hand combines one on the paper and the other dropped from hand whoosh pyromania.

Perhaps there's more. There always the unexplained, often it's just fake and gay.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

They keeping filming from studios and sets. While they keep using outrage as a narrative. Can't even watch it.

It's whatever they say it is. At that point it's time to turn it off.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›