No. The grid is everywhere. Farmers are simple automation. You can remote control tractors, combine harvesters today. You can run them from a phone. Not quite, takes some big investment. But they're automating. All they do is go up and down. It gets better in the new space age hydroponic farms. They're fully automated. Fully robotic, like an amazon depot, growing heaps of vegetables and plants. They cost energy, a lot of energy, like automated tractors.
Animals need welfare, unless they're the battery farms. Where they've got matrix cows, and chickens. Popping out, automated, eggs and milk. Literally you get static cows today. They intravenously feed them, and they stay in a milk factory, they're static cows. They've even started putting VR glasses on them, so they think they're out in a field. They just stand there shitting milk, like the battery hens shitting the eggs onto conveyor belts, fully automated. But pigs, sheep, pasture cows, you need better development than just the robots. Hence a big attack on meat. They've automated pig farms as well, but it needs a lot more work.
However, yes rurally they're under assault. Another banana boatload of refugees sets up another awful estate of gypsies. Hahaha. No. It's services becoming increasingly online closing the few remaining community centers they have. Funding for public services, as the economy wobbles closes schools, post offices, and the rest, forcing them to commute even further.
But the ghost town is huge in America regardless, until all that's left are the cannibals.
But nobody wants to live in cities. Except the refugees. Because they all plan on moving somewhere nicer, preferably without the cannibals.
You can go to Antarctica. There are tours. You have to book them, book them on a waiting list. They cost a lot. But they'll get you to it. https://www.auroraexpeditions.co.uk/antarctica-22-23-special-offer/?msclkid=0cc8d611226b18ddbaa6b51be01d35ee
An example of a tour operator. It runs it frequently, but it costs. Tours also get booked years ahead. Due to when is best for animal sightings, and temperature, etc. Because capacity is limited. But there are a number of them operating.
https://www.nomadasaurus.com/travel-guides/travel-to-antarctica/
My Dad was thinking of going, it's on his bucket list.
As far as this dumb thread, it's dumber than shit. Freezing conditions in heavy minuses they often place stuff on stilts. It could be any number of towers, coms, observation, storage, etc.
Thanks.
Until today it is the cause and source of almost all our problems.
The irony is they still think it's the solution. Why. Because they want to impose it and control it more.
But it's our Babel. To turn it off is ruin. And to continue with it is ruin. Or convince me it will last. I can probably think of more scenarios where it won't. Outside of its bullshit advancement. Advancing into further control. Where these people are literally selling themselves physically plugging into it. It's no longer a tool, it's slavery.
Not if it's a bottleneck. Simply pop the bottle open. It all floods out.
So there is this dam in the way. It's holding up a huge area of your regional coastline, but you don't control it. It is becoming increasingly unaligned. Something is gonna give. At some point. Otherwise that dam blocks progress.
Wargames aren't just for show. You gotta play war at some point, or your soldiers could turn on you.
But who knows. Not my business. Although this issue is bound to occur. When, not my place to guess.
Yes I hate nukes more. But even then they're an inevitability. They will get played at some point. Because they're there. If that's the winning move you assume. Not moving. Because there's some other notion of deterrence. Although they haven't deterred. There are more nukes today. I wonder what happens next decade. Like previous. Oh look there's more. Prior what went wrong. Look there are even more. Until what happens.
But they're moving. It's inevitable Taiwan becomes a country of its own sovereignty. It is therefore inevitable China tries to reclaim it. How remains questionable and to what extent does everybody else become involved.
What fake bullshit. How exactly has the Internet improved your life. I am actually very curious? How today in rapid inflation, increasing living costs, overpopulation, mass consumption has the Internet improved your life? I am absolutely curious.
But it's never the Internet's fault. It's the cows and automobiles fault. Better connect the cows into the Internet, they're doing this, entire milk farms with static, or matrix cows, they've hollowed out their backs and drop the feed directly into them intravenously, battery cows, and they started putting VR glasses on them, so they humanely think they're out the green fields, when they're in a factory, milking them, and now the cars, so you can pay for even more electricity. Literally it is ridiculous, charging from those lamp posts, or your house.
What has the Internet done for you? Today it's an oxymoron you dumb cow.
No. By then we are talking nukes. If America or allies rally to defend it. Because it goes naval. And they get hit. Warfare, human rights on an insubordinate population, China has shown it isn't much of a concern. So yea it would German the crap out of it. Blitz it. It would encompass it and cut off supply lanes. While blotting out the sky with arrows, missiles. Literally it has been amassing these with its airforce. In reverse it would be that other war they lost against Japan. Japan filled the sky with arrows on a drowning fleet. Here there's no need to D-day until they commit to terms. On a relatively small densely populated, fortified Island they target population to make them yield. Does it draw unconventional warfare into it. By then it's a superbowl. NK lights up SK, and etc. Now everybody is firing
Invading I just don't see it happening until it has been isolated. Of course it shows these amphibious transports in its exercises, nobody does that anymore until you have crushed your opposition into yielding. There are far easier ways to do that, by air, sea, and missile. Of which China has thousands.
The biggest questions remains, does it. If it does to what extent does everybody else defend it.
No, I don't agree with an assessment of it cannot. When the population gets hit, and hit real hard, what happens.
Why would they invade? I struggle with that logic. It's an obstacle in the way of expansion. Remove the obstacle. Conventionally there is political, economic, or an invasion. But unconventionally there are nukes. Would China nuke doubtful.
But it could rein thousands and thousands of missiles on it. While bombing it into oblivion. Until it capitulates. If America and others don't defend it. This is still very debatable and to what extent. The problem is the limited return from Taiwan, who has some capability to fire back within extents. But by then it is virtually levelled.
We aren't talking WW2 here. Notorious Islands and invasions Britain, Sicily, Iwo Jima, D-day, etc, etc which were hell. There are missiles today. Thousands and thousands, backed by bombers, drones, and an encompassing navy. Where as soon as population centers get hit, it will strain that population, as China seiges it out. Unless it is supported by other Navy, Airforce. It will fall hard fast.
That's if it comes to it. If China wants to lose whatever image it has made, and any other economic ties globally.
No, I don't agree with that assessment. They have the manpower to throw at it. But why would they. It's an obstacle. Obstacles are easier removed. If they cannot be coerced.
You can see the ISS. I have seen the ISS without a telescope. Like I have seen satellites without a telescope. They move. They are often far more visible in light pollution. They're identified by their movement.
Stop telling me what I have seen flathead. That's just rude.
You started mouthing off about how I need to find a particular satellite. I wouldn't know where it is, without looking it up. I suggested going to a dedicated observatory set up to pinpoint it, there are a few, because it feeds them observations. Then you went haha it doesn't exist. You really are that dumb.
I link you shit. Now you're claiming it's not real. Simply look at the night sky. You see satellites with or without a basic telescope. You can often see the third brightest object in the night sky. The ISS.
But you stupidly need to prove the Earth is flat. It means there no orbit.
You fucking dumbass. I even linked your genetic defect. Flathead syndrome. Cranium damage by being dropped on your head. Call the round Earth hotline. It offers victim support. I don't, I'd drop you on the head again, and then maybe it would reshape it.
Thanks. I got an attack by people believing that the Internet had improved their life instead of it improving the WEF.
I am under the very distinct impression today that the Internet hasn't improved life. It has worsened into the extremes it is now facing.
It has increased mass consumption until the price has rocketed on everything, it has siphoned wealth offshore, but has rapidly increased immigration, it has generated services into a quagmire where service has become much worse on every utility and most hospitality. It has compromised security and identity, but has provided government exclusive options to spy on their populations absolutely. It has provided adverts instead of information. It has decreased national birthrates. It hasn't made people smarter, they're factually getting dumber. Crime has increased.
I am sure somebody will convince me how the connectivity has really helped? China? No, who. Elites primarily. The hit rate today, is far higher, on football, music, movie. Etc. On a Corp selling more subscriptions into a service connecting online. Amazon Facebook. Etc. The price and debts are higher keeping the WEF pleased. They're moving more money. Everyday life nope. Unless you consider crap is best. Literally crap. Higher prices and living costs, services, and infrastructure swamped into ruin. Mass consumption on the crappiest devices made, electronics changing daily. Until the trend is on everything produced clothes, furniture etc.
But has it improved life. Contrary. I struggle to think it has. Information passed around the globe more easily hasn't improved anything but greed. Until it's the greediest who have exclusively gained.
Dumbass thread is dumbass.
What do black billionaires do? There are heaps of them in Africa and would you look at those statistics. The majority of Africa is. Tell me. Love to hear the statistics. But look at all those Billionaires. What about India, where 22 families have 90% wealth. Latin America. But it's all White people's fault. Such a dumbass. How about you go back to where you identify with and go and blame them. It's clear you aren't white and are quite impaired.
You can see the ISS.
https://www.space.com/6870-spot-satellites.html
https://earthsky.org/space/how-to-see-satellites-your-night-sky/
Third brightest object in the night sky.
I didn't admit shit. You fucking dumbass. In fact I said where is its location I have no idea. Not looking it up online either. Go to an observatory with a bigger telescope.
You are a peak retard. literally you are all fucking dumb. Every damn flathead earther. You try putting words in my mouth. I didn't say shit you did. All dumb people do. Say shit. It's their genetic disposition saying shit. Because they're dumb. Being dumb comes from having a flattened head. Everybody else has round heads. Not flat earthers. They're born dumber. You can't make them smart either. Their heads are flat. Sometimes they develop flathead later in life, they were smarter suddenly they're so much dumber. It must be hard on them, real hard.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiocephaly
Flathead syndrome. In adults, it's generally the result of cranium damage. They got knocked on their head. Babies it's a defect, where they have huge development difficulties sometimes causing death, similar with Zika. But it all stems from the very sad fact they've got a flathead.
If you've been a victim of flathead, please call the Earth is Round hotline immediately.
These people are the worst that have ever existed in history. They are contrary to every democratic law and principle. They are not our elected choice. The key word choice. Information isn't there's to usurp. It is our choice in what we deem to be informative. It shouldn't be restricted because it undermines them, or any other challenges to what they're promoting. At what point did the Internet become Tyranny, the day they assumed control over it.
Until today it had done society no favours at all. Look at the cost. Still they insist on restricting it. Because that has worked. No. Not one single solution using the Internet more has worked better. Not even email. Seriously mail was often far more secure. Argues it improved times. At what cost to society, how much more crap does it take to get your mail, secure, laughs, hell no. It bombarded you with worsening services. Look at them now. Connected. Haha society was before. Now it's in protest. Instead there's a society hellbent on inserting it more and it controlling every aspect of our lives. Wrong.
Every single Flat Earther has been dropped on their head. It has been flattened with their stupidity. Not one claim they've made is factual from simple curvature, to no satellites in space. These people are literally the dumbest to have ever existed. Every single proponent of their absurd claims comes from a lack and refusal to study anything else.
I suggest jettisoning them all into space, or impaling them in Antarctica, preferably on a mountain they call a pyramid, so that the penguins can feast on their flattened brains. It is the only solution for their insanity.
Yawn I doubt it. What value is it in a crash. That's not that thinking surely?
Pull all the money into Vatican bank and it won't fail even if the Eurozone or the Dollar does.
What other reasons are there? Although you could be right. But it seems odd that any value would be the same or safer in that scenario. It's got to be something else.
I can think of a few reasons from audits, where he sacked the treasury guy, compensation Canada or others, other housing keeping like exchanging bonds, and halting certain investments, making other investments, he could be mad and is giving it away. Or you could be right. But Italy and Europe are in a pickle. What value is it in that crash. Much less. It's the same currency or any others which would be subject to that status. So no there is likely another explanation here.
What? Add
Faith in what. Religion has a use. It teaches people morales and principles. It provides guidance where educatuon cannot. It has value over greed. Except it is often corrupt, any hierarchy is seaped in hypocrisy and sin. But society was often better than today when it was a ritual.
I don't need faith in it. I have had a background. But do I believe in it. No. Not specifically. I don't believe in anything. There's nothing believable.
You prove that as fact, it is laughable. So these people later writing the scriptures simply didn't insert it. Hahaha. Pulling a simple Q on you. Look it's prophecy. We add a passage 408 years B.C, now look, we rewrite again. Magic. Literally. Although there was just a touch more magic to it. Because of the conjuction that occurred. Star in the night sky when he was born. So they foretold of greater happenings. Regardless. It doesn't mean much else. It's a simple Q. They wrote both, rewrote both. The Talmud source is different to their version.
But the dates are still out. They had to be refitted around it. There is debate on just how that worked. But yea it was astrology giving any prediction. Conjunction occurred. They knew this year's ahead because it was how they Summerians were taught.
No. But you can look at satellites, pin pointing hubble you'd have to be in an observatory knowing its exact location.
Either you're trying to be clever. But it ain't if you don't believe satellites are real.
Here is a supposed ancient satellite. https://www.gaia.com/article/black-knight-satellite-mystery-decoded
Here is the Wiki attempting to debunk it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Knight_satellite_conspiracy_theory
As far as real satellites go look at that press.
No, Israel had nothing to do with India. India like Summeria have some of the oldest records on this planet. India had the spice trade, and it traded with Egypt. But India is very very old. Like Egypt and Summeria. 10,000 years and older.
The story is actually a little different in Indian, I have to look it up but I don't want too, but again the river, becomes king, and kingdom. If memory serves, his mother conceived by a god, she dropped him into a river, then he gets taken in by the god, and becomes a king. He weren't called Moses neither. Japan it was the Ocean or something. There's another place or two with similar stories. They had nothing to do with Israel stealing its stories. But it was a common origin story.
Read that damn Wiki. At what point are you still arguing your status? The bible didn't exist then. It the old testament formed on the rebuilding of Jerusalem and that happened in 408 BCE. Dumbass.
No India worshipped mainly Ganesh, and it goes all the way into Indonesia before Buddha ever came along burying it. Haha. The route found, old trade routes, marked by Ganesh. They're cutting through jungles, using yea you got it. Elephants. Buddha scrubbed over it you know. India also had a Pantheon of gods and stories. Many are very very old.
There's only so many explanations for it. Only so many possibilities. It ain't out of Africa either. But I will leave it to more active imaginations to puzzle over. Because I don't know. The narrative is out of Africa. But the craddle of civilization isn't Ethiopia. And it isn't Israel either. Summeria had the flood so did a number of other recordings. But then again how was astrology used. How did they make their gods. What is the origin.
Stop being so utterly superstitious. They were the first code of laws. They're not a false set of laws when they're the basis of laws. They were carved into stone tablets.
Moses again didn't exist. He is 100% mythology. Or tell me why the same origin story is India? Because India uses Sanskrit like the Summerians.
Here is the wiki https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi
Look at that where the laws came from, God. The Sun. The God of justice. Understanding it yet. It's really rather obvious.
Here read how Sargon of Akkad became king
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_of_Akkad
Birth legend. See, his mother drops him into the Euphrates hiding him in a basket, and he gets taken in and made into king.
Similar in India. Hell even Japan has a story like it.
Now we're done. Stop being so utterly contemptible. Both those tablets existed long before Israel did. Israel formed when Babylon was destroyed by Persia. Nehemiah built it. Before that the only real evidence is a copper mining town. It was largely an Egyptian protectorate. Or tell me why Babylon sacked it. It refused to align, why. But mysteriously later, look it's carting off with Babylonian history.
There are huge questions on this. Those questions beg our own planetary origin. I don't really want to discuss because your mind is made up as you squabble over the bible and its record. How did a number of cultures share the same tale, so similar, so identical, dropped into a river, gets taken in and becomes king founding kingdoms, it's in a number of places before the bible ever existed. Why is that? Strange right.
No, Egyptians gave the concept of sin. Heart for the feather weighed on the scales of justice. It a pure heart, balanced with the feather, granted passage into the afterlife. A heavy heart went into the depths of God forbid. Justice being the code of laws.
What are you talking about? God damn it.
Currency is national, there's a host of reasons for this like its national resources, trade, and tax, etc.
Why did you need more currencies in your nation, operating on just its currency? God damn it. It would be utterly ridiculous. More ridiculous than a single global currency.
Do you realise how much you'd get screwed, imagine those conversion rates. You'd sooner be hung drawn and quartered by a very angry mob, and being retarded wouldn't help.
Money buys stuff, stuff doesn't make money. Damn it. Don't have time for this. If stuff made money, how much would that cost. Crap. Now that everything is making money for its stuff. Damn it. How much crappy money have you got. It's freaking worthless. Not that stuff making money. Your dumb money, what does it even buy. Not that other stuff.