Currency is national, there's a host of reasons for this like its national resources, trade, and tax, etc.
Why did you need more currencies in your nation, operating on just its currency? God damn it. It would be utterly ridiculous. More ridiculous than a single global currency.
Do you realise how much you'd get screwed, imagine those conversion rates. You'd sooner be hung drawn and quartered by a very angry mob, and being retarded wouldn't help.
Money buys stuff, stuff doesn't make money. Damn it. Don't have time for this. If stuff made money, how much would that cost. Crap. Now that everything is making money for its stuff. Damn it. How much crappy money have you got. It's freaking worthless. Not that stuff making money. Your dumb money, what does it even buy. Not that other stuff.
Yea. Didn't ask for it. I know what stuff means I typed it. But I don't think he does. I honestly don't.
Going back to Bhudda they still had currency. China supposedly invented it. It's real old. The origin of the Silk Road, almost 10,000 years, but it has Indian seashells in Siberia, and Mongolia. All the way up the steppes. Dating right back to when they were mummifying things. Look at those mummies with the red hair in China, one of their first dynasties. No wonder they don't want to disturb them. Better insert some dinosaurs instead.
Buddha wasn't such a great master either. The amount of invasions his followers led on India. Oh well. One god changed into the next, it just took some beating over the head, and currency. Burying the other markings and temples, because of course they worshipped different Kami, elements, and gods.
There are huge debates in how that pantheon changed. Easier saying it was all Bhudda later. But his footsteps are along a prior trade route, worshipping something else.
Back to the topic. I honestly don't know what he saying. It must be drugs. Currency buys stuff, stuff doesn't mint currency otherwise there are bigger problems on price. Yes it would be nice if there was no currency, but what happens when your stuff isn't trading because you don't have currency. God damn it's like speaking to retards.
There are places you don't need currency. You just hunt, gather, farm and labor in a cult or some other remote place where they live off the land. But it simply isn't civilization. Not even when Bhudda was god.
Nation (a living people) implies within current (process of dying).
host of reasons
Ones choice to want vs not want represents the host of reason (conflict).
Suggestions tempting one to want or not want represents the vector into the host.
Others using suggestions as the vector to gain access to the host represent the parasitic reaction to a host weakness.
national resource
NATIONAL (a living people) RE (responding to) SOURCE (origin aka the process of dying).
Inception towards death represents the baseline for the living ingredients fluctuating within.
More ridiculous than a single global currency.
Take the suggested globalism out there and question the single current (dying) for those living within it. What if perceivable value (process of dying) causes perceiving evaluation (living) through conversion aka from flow (inception towards death) to form (life)?
Money buys stuff, stuff doesn't make money.
STUFF, noun - "a mass of matter, indefinitely; or a collection of substances"...that implies matter (living) within immaterial (dying) aka indefinite (perceiving) within definite (perceivable) aka sub (choice) within stance (balance) with the choice to collect (temptation of want over need).
Money...It's freaking worthless
If the few suggest M-ONE-Y aka MY ONE (an ownership claim) and the many consent to it; then they ignore being the highest value in existence...evaluation (perceiving) at the center of value (perceivable).
This allows the few to define the ignored worth for the many lessening their own evaluation within through ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
Yawn. WTF. My explanation was so simple even a retard could understand it. Never a dictionary. What are you trying to say.
Money buys stuff. Stuff doesn't and I should have coined, mint, money. If it minted money, what price is that stuff. It is now charging what it wants, but what value is your money on any other stuff trading. Umm conversion is now charging far more, making your money worthless, it isn't buying the other stuff, and you're paying far more.
Being a dictionary doesn't help. They'd string you up by your definitions, burning them. So instead we have a system where we have a specific currency, our national currency. It isn't always fair, but it's fairer, rather than a bunch of different stuff minting money. It has legally worked out what that stuff more or less costs, subjected to the laws and taxes in your nation.
Of course if you live in a corrupt nation relying on everybody else providing your stuff. Yea you want, God only knows, probably different money, but a stronger currency. It doesn't come from stuff minting money. Need one banana for, no you're not buying the cheese. What, okay, easier bannana buys cheese, but it's not buying the gas. Damn it, all you got are the bananas. Not taking them for this gas, monkey. Shucks. Worthless.
What makes stuff? Can we create anything out of nothing or does our choice allow us to shape what's already there? What if the few suggest the many to buy what already freely exists? What if suggestion (fiction) represents the sales-pitch for those who consent to ignore perceivable (reality)?
Is there anything nature doesn't offer to those within?
to mint
Aka "coined by public authority"...AU'THOR, noun - "one who produces, creates, or brings into being". What if the process of dying represents the author of all life growing within? If life is authorized (with free will of choice); then that implies in response to origin...not to each other.
now charging what it wants
"now" aka the ever changing moment (um).
"charge" aka the flowing process of dying charging the formed life within.
"want" aka the choice of suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
your money
M-ONE-Y (my one) implies the ones suggesting it to others; hence them being able to claim those who consent to suggested money. The few suggest a fictitious price tag upon freely perceivable reality; which allows the few to devalue the many from accessing reality with suggested fiction.
Being a dictionary doesn't help. They'd string you up by your definitions, burning them
I don't use 1822 definitions to define anything; but for others to notice the revisionism done since. What I add is my comprehension about the perceivable foundation which predefines everything aka DEFINE (to limit) -ATION (through action); hence the living reaction being limited within the enacting process of dying.
Nature already is (perceivable); those within are tempting each other to ignore this for suggestions (fiction) about what the perceivable (reality) means instead of adapting to it.
As for burning definitions..."library of alexandria" + "tower of babel" represent sleight of hands for the accumulation of suggested information turning into a burned offering (holocaust). All the suggested words used are in the process of being destroyed by the perceivable flow of sound underneath...the one the many ignore to adapt to; when consenting to suggested words (idols; brands) by others.
legally worked out what that stuff more or less costs
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...that's the work, and the flow-state within represents the natural order; which for the form (life) within the natural order (inception towards death) represents the perceivable laws of nature.
"more/less" represents growth/loss aka living/dying. All the suggested laws; work and costs represents the temptation to ignore the above, and what did that ignorance let to? The lawless dictate the laws; the many work for those who don't work; and all costs are defined by those who don't make money.
probably different money, but a stronger currency
What if you represent the difference; living within the strongest current (process of dying), and what if your choice to adapt to it represents the source of strength?
What are you talking about? God damn it.
Currency is national, there's a host of reasons for this like its national resources, trade, and tax, etc.
Why did you need more currencies in your nation, operating on just its currency? God damn it. It would be utterly ridiculous. More ridiculous than a single global currency.
Do you realise how much you'd get screwed, imagine those conversion rates. You'd sooner be hung drawn and quartered by a very angry mob, and being retarded wouldn't help.
Money buys stuff, stuff doesn't make money. Damn it. Don't have time for this. If stuff made money, how much would that cost. Crap. Now that everything is making money for its stuff. Damn it. How much crappy money have you got. It's freaking worthless. Not that stuff making money. Your dumb money, what does it even buy. Not that other stuff.
Never mind this guy. It's Buddha, Savior, Lord, Messiah under OP name number 12.
Back with their nonsense.
Yea. Didn't ask for it. I know what stuff means I typed it. But I don't think he does. I honestly don't.
Going back to Bhudda they still had currency. China supposedly invented it. It's real old. The origin of the Silk Road, almost 10,000 years, but it has Indian seashells in Siberia, and Mongolia. All the way up the steppes. Dating right back to when they were mummifying things. Look at those mummies with the red hair in China, one of their first dynasties. No wonder they don't want to disturb them. Better insert some dinosaurs instead.
Buddha wasn't such a great master either. The amount of invasions his followers led on India. Oh well. One god changed into the next, it just took some beating over the head, and currency. Burying the other markings and temples, because of course they worshipped different Kami, elements, and gods.
There are huge debates in how that pantheon changed. Easier saying it was all Bhudda later. But his footsteps are along a prior trade route, worshipping something else.
Back to the topic. I honestly don't know what he saying. It must be drugs. Currency buys stuff, stuff doesn't mint currency otherwise there are bigger problems on price. Yes it would be nice if there was no currency, but what happens when your stuff isn't trading because you don't have currency. God damn it's like speaking to retards.
There are places you don't need currency. You just hunt, gather, farm and labor in a cult or some other remote place where they live off the land. But it simply isn't civilization. Not even when Bhudda was god.
Nation (a living people) implies within current (process of dying).
Ones choice to want vs not want represents the host of reason (conflict).
Suggestions tempting one to want or not want represents the vector into the host.
Others using suggestions as the vector to gain access to the host represent the parasitic reaction to a host weakness.
NATIONAL (a living people) RE (responding to) SOURCE (origin aka the process of dying).
Inception towards death represents the baseline for the living ingredients fluctuating within.
Take the suggested globalism out there and question the single current (dying) for those living within it. What if perceivable value (process of dying) causes perceiving evaluation (living) through conversion aka from flow (inception towards death) to form (life)?
STUFF, noun - "a mass of matter, indefinitely; or a collection of substances"...that implies matter (living) within immaterial (dying) aka indefinite (perceiving) within definite (perceivable) aka sub (choice) within stance (balance) with the choice to collect (temptation of want over need).
If the few suggest M-ONE-Y aka MY ONE (an ownership claim) and the many consent to it; then they ignore being the highest value in existence...evaluation (perceiving) at the center of value (perceivable).
This allows the few to define the ignored worth for the many lessening their own evaluation within through ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
Yawn. WTF. My explanation was so simple even a retard could understand it. Never a dictionary. What are you trying to say.
Money buys stuff. Stuff doesn't and I should have coined, mint, money. If it minted money, what price is that stuff. It is now charging what it wants, but what value is your money on any other stuff trading. Umm conversion is now charging far more, making your money worthless, it isn't buying the other stuff, and you're paying far more.
Being a dictionary doesn't help. They'd string you up by your definitions, burning them. So instead we have a system where we have a specific currency, our national currency. It isn't always fair, but it's fairer, rather than a bunch of different stuff minting money. It has legally worked out what that stuff more or less costs, subjected to the laws and taxes in your nation.
Of course if you live in a corrupt nation relying on everybody else providing your stuff. Yea you want, God only knows, probably different money, but a stronger currency. It doesn't come from stuff minting money. Need one banana for, no you're not buying the cheese. What, okay, easier bannana buys cheese, but it's not buying the gas. Damn it, all you got are the bananas. Not taking them for this gas, monkey. Shucks. Worthless.
What makes stuff? Can we create anything out of nothing or does our choice allow us to shape what's already there? What if the few suggest the many to buy what already freely exists? What if suggestion (fiction) represents the sales-pitch for those who consent to ignore perceivable (reality)?
Is there anything nature doesn't offer to those within?
Aka "coined by public authority"...AU'THOR, noun - "one who produces, creates, or brings into being". What if the process of dying represents the author of all life growing within? If life is authorized (with free will of choice); then that implies in response to origin...not to each other.
"now" aka the ever changing moment (um).
"charge" aka the flowing process of dying charging the formed life within.
"want" aka the choice of suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
M-ONE-Y (my one) implies the ones suggesting it to others; hence them being able to claim those who consent to suggested money. The few suggest a fictitious price tag upon freely perceivable reality; which allows the few to devalue the many from accessing reality with suggested fiction.
I don't use 1822 definitions to define anything; but for others to notice the revisionism done since. What I add is my comprehension about the perceivable foundation which predefines everything aka DEFINE (to limit) -ATION (through action); hence the living reaction being limited within the enacting process of dying.
Nature already is (perceivable); those within are tempting each other to ignore this for suggestions (fiction) about what the perceivable (reality) means instead of adapting to it.
As for burning definitions..."library of alexandria" + "tower of babel" represent sleight of hands for the accumulation of suggested information turning into a burned offering (holocaust). All the suggested words used are in the process of being destroyed by the perceivable flow of sound underneath...the one the many ignore to adapt to; when consenting to suggested words (idols; brands) by others.
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...that's the work, and the flow-state within represents the natural order; which for the form (life) within the natural order (inception towards death) represents the perceivable laws of nature.
"more/less" represents growth/loss aka living/dying. All the suggested laws; work and costs represents the temptation to ignore the above, and what did that ignorance let to? The lawless dictate the laws; the many work for those who don't work; and all costs are defined by those who don't make money.
What if you represent the difference; living within the strongest current (process of dying), and what if your choice to adapt to it represents the source of strength?