I bought a racehorse from a guy in Florida. Its name was DeSantis. I was so disappointed.

Hey investors! Please put money into a promising shithole! After that we'll take you to see the Titanic.

Would you advocate doing medical science based on probability of death from a treatment method, or upon certainty that it will not harm? "Mr. Smith, there is a probability of 20% you will die from this hangnail treatment, 34 percent you will be crippled for life!"

"Do you find vaccines only acceptable if they are completely harmless?"

Thanks for declaring your position on the left.

Predicting that an outcome will be uncertain may be a valid model but is hardly useful since the causality is random.

I predict that you will spout blather but I cannot be certain what you will spout. It may be a function of how many empty open cans of Bud Light are lying on your floor.

Would you advance medicine by promoting a vaccine whose effect is random, ranging from harmless to killing the recipient? Hardly scientific.

Well, it may do both - but it certainly opposes the process of science, which depends on making conclusions about causality. If we cannot depend on cause and effect producing consistently reliable results, then we lack a means of reliable reasoning.

For example, with the two-slit experiment, it has been shown that we cannot predict exactly where a single photon goes. Therefore we cannot formulate a predictive equation, only a statistical one. But if we use only a statistical prediction, that result is not repeatable. This says we have to change the fundamental way we do science to include accepting different results each time we run an experiment. But that breaks ability to trust hard value predictions.

In the history of science, every maybe 50 to 100 years we undergo big changes in our models of reality. For example, in classical physics roughly 90 years ago they discovered that accepted theory couldn't explain some key things. Then quantum mechanics came along and overturned models and theory and we advanced. In chemistry less than a century ago they didn't even know about neutrons in atoms! Right now we have plenty of open areas in physics, controversy over string theory, dark matter, weirdnesses in quantum mechanics. This all says we don't truly understand the universe and there are still going to be surprises. A century from now we will be much more advanced, and able to deal with the climate in far better ways; the current bullshit about banning gas cars will be seen as stupid, maybe even unnecessary change to society and the economies by political morons and powerhungry elite.

The way it works in science research is, they look for one of a couple of things:

1. experimental error. Then they either excuse it with statistics theory, or
2. They look for overlooked factors. These days, with so many mediocre people in science, there are plenty of cases of published papers wherein the experimenter failed to know enough about his field to catch where he had a poor model. This happens especially in biological areas and particularly in medicine. They are finding so much bullshit in papers these days, the editors of journals are shaking their heads.
3. Sometimes that 1% leads to discovering a flaw in the model or the theory and then it has to be reworked. This happens a whole lot in astronomy.

Yeah, quite possible. For example, if QM is more than three dimensional, it might be able to do things we cannot yet comprehend. Quantum connectivity implies some things happen instantaneously as far as our 3D view is concerned. But if QM operates also in a 4th dimension, that can explain such connection. 'Magic', parts of old fashioned primitive notions might well have bases in super science, things we do not yet understand properly. That doesn't mean the old mysticism and supernatural theories are correct, it just means our science views have holes in them.

A problem with all the chatbot technology is that it is in some ways a cult. The technology is productive in some ways but terrible flawed. yet the tech groupies who worship a tech priesthood don't quite understand how it is flawed. They are naive people who obey their professors but don't quite think enough for themselves. And so if the prof is wrong, they blindly march to his drumbeat anyway.

Now a problem with Microsoft's AI techies and Bing is that the techies are blindly going with the herd and using this tech without understanding that it is really only a simulation of true human thinking, it is not a fully aware AI that could identify where it goes astray. It's just a complicatef machine. So when they merge the AI with Bing, they install a flawed puppet. They do this because right now the big companies are all competing quickly so they don't get left behind in the market. But doing it quickly does not leave time to do it well. AI guru Geof Hinton quit Google because he realizes this is all wrong and marching off a cliff.

We are not there yet with truly self-aware minds, we only have productive but stupid machines. It is a big mistake to assume we can replace many people with these flawed systems but the lemming execs are scrambling to use it. It's going to backfire eventually.

Northern California right now is a mix of technology capitalism in SF and Silicon Valley, and outright communism in SF and the rulers in capital Sacramento. Clear clear clear evidence of Soros installations intended to transform society to a controllable socialist state. Facade slick hair Governor Newsom is controlled by the WEF and the Dem elite, doing what they want like ban cars and ban gas to make citizens dependent on electricty which the state cannot guarantee supply of. Thus making people dependent on state support when things go down.

Have. They. No. Shame.

This site appears to be left wing masquerading as conservative. And this article is a hit piece.

Why is it so many politicians are sexual deviates? Might that be because they are driven to make society accept their abnormality?

Actually, it was early stage of his learning his craft. It was okay and used horror implication instead of blood and gore, then at the end turned gory.

Interesting but one thing stands out - the object is half buried yet leaning against a tree; no direction of impact could have placed it that way, even a sideways 'rolling' entry. There are cracks in the ground as we see to the left of the buried object but that seems incompatible, as the object could not have entered from the tree direction and a rolling entry would have kicked up visible debris from the force of that.

I own a copy of Cavalier which carried the first publication of Lawnmower Man. The print story is completely different from the movie btw, and features a god Pan-like menacing gardener.

I'm not a King collector, I just like pornography. Wait - is this mic on? Shit.

The Harvard professor spouts bullshit. Being a specialist in astronomy does not qualify one as expert in social behavior of cognitive entities. He's equivalent to someone saying aliens will contact dolphins before contacting humans, because of all the bright lights from dolphin cities, and their tall buildings, and all the dolphin pyramids. Er, 42.

I'd be happy to debate this idiot on stage any time.

There are two parts to this, HAARP-like installation, and jet spraying particles to help the HAARP operate on atmosphere. Operators of such installations include the US, Russia, China, and Israel. Yeah, Jew weather control too.

But the thing is, since chemtrail spraying takes place around the world, and over other countries, it is NOT just the US doing it. My vote is it is a globalist operation.

Also, about time they admit it. There have been leaks like videos of commercial pilots too, forgetting to turn off the spray, so they land at airports and fog them up big time. lol. My point is it is both military and commercial, and has been pushed into the entire transport system, and they have lied massively about it for a long time.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but hiring DEI sub engineers might not be a really great plan.

So, none of the US food plant fires were terrorism, because no one claimed to have done them. Riiiight. And in WWII, Nazi terrorists all wrote to the newspapers and proudly claimed they were there to contribute to making people feel unsafe and scared. Riiight.

However, we will know whether random accident or otherwse, if there is only this one and no more.

Of course they have retrieval programs. They would be stupid to not have them. And if they have retrieval programs obviously they will have analysis programs. And if they do analysis, they're not ever going to talk about it.

Tnere seems to be some flakiness in the company execs, and there was outright fraud in the certification claims. I read about the lies made by the execs trying to outdistance the coming storm. I cannot understand why the passengers, who don't seem to be stupid people, accepted the risks of this.

I'm surprised they didn't have a tethered rescue signaling float. Thing like this needs a chaperone surface boat.