Lol true! They will never give us real data.
Thank you!
Chomsky? If you have to bring a commie into the picture, you're going to a very bad place.
There's an entire .win dedicated to the topic of FE, moving it there isn't censorship. By definition. That point is moot anyway, voting is over 61 to 44. There are 105 active people here left.
I think a much more salient issue is how many active contributors were here in October 2020, and how many of us left because FE was brought into everything unrelated, with its attendant shit show? This would be one very likely place for those from TD disillusioned by politics; huge numbers of people left which is understandable. Why no spike here after that?
👍
Become ungovernable? Lol
Do we know the vote results?
I do. c/FlatEarthResearch exists, with no attempt to squash it.
But azimuthal!
The ball in this case is the lunar lander and the MITT is the space shuttle
Please look into when the space shuttle first flew. You shouldn't be conflating this with the lunar lander.
People could say that IS censorship.
Yes. Except the mods. Constant changing of diapers is not only tedious, but not always possible.
This is why I think moving the topic to c/FlatEarthResearch makes the most sense.
Not just hidden for 500 years, ancient Greece calculated the diameter of the earth millennia ago, and was surprisingly accurate.
I think another layer of nuance needs to be introduced: if somebody has reason for "vaccines cause autism" to be the only topic they want to discuss yet can keep their comments in discussions where it belongs, I don't think they should be banned even if they aren't supporting every comment with links.
OTOH if they're injecting that everywhere, it's just spam at that point.
That's what FE has been here, although I can't speak to recently.
Admin is adamant that there will be no reddit style power mods on .win. That takes priority over other concerns.
I think this has been what mods have tried to do all along. I've seen this topic turn uncivil more than any other. I suspect mods are tired of changing diapers, but would like to see what they have to say about this.
This is the first good faith discussion I've seen here on the topic, and notice that FE itself isn't even being discussed.
I'd be interested in reading about that! I know free masonry was being corrupted at that time, and preachers were warning about those evils. Other than that I don't know much about the era.
they would rightly think the entire sub was batshit insane. But again - so what?
I think this is really important.
Kookifier is a term that needs to come into play here. I'd hope everyone here agrees that there are nogoodnicks in the world? Further, that WEF is a central hub of them and Klaus Schwab is not acting alone? Further yet that all such tyrants need to be killed and there is no political solution; ok some may not realize that yet but we can't just continue to gawk at the problem and do nothing.
So alienating people from the larger cause has dire consequence.
I think the very best solution is to organize info and discussion by topic. Most topics here can't be organized any way better than simply being here. FE has a dedicated .win, c/FlatEarthResearch
People interested in it can explore to their heart's content. People who don't want to engage in that topic at all don't get bombarded with it in unrelated conversations, which was my experience back when I used to try to engage here.
That's the exact opposite of censorship.
Reptilian overlords operating 711 and poisoning us by slushy!
Very good. c/FlatEarthResearch exists, and is run by a guy who's serious, knowledgeable, and passionate about the topic. Doesn't it make sense to have those discussions there?
You and OP make a good case for reasoned discussion. I've never seen that happen here on this topic. All I've ever seen is monkeys flinging poo.
Maybe mods don't want to be kindergarten teachers.
Enoch and the watchers, possible.
In the US, illuminati was replaced by CFR which was created in 1921 with funds from the father of apartheid.
I don't know about the origins of the illuminati but depending on how you want to define it it must predate Sabbateans, they started in the middle ages whereas ancient Greek philosophers could be said to have been the original illuminati or at least the forerunners of them. They wanted to rule everyone else with secret knowledge. I have no idea if this was ever connected to gnosticism.
Sabbateans should be better known. Also, in the US, illuminati was replaced by CFR.
The good news is many more vaxtards will continue to die.
Your entire "point" is that you don't know the first thing about .win. Your fear is misplaced.