You could have an object using part balloon, upper atmosphere, stealth, and part thrust
You skip over lift. That's not something you can skip. If you've got mechanized lift it's not a balloon, it defeats the whole purpose of using a balloon.
There is no blind spot, just a question of recalibrating radar for what they weren't used to picking up.
Who knows what it was doing. Except it shouldn't be doing it. Even as a weather balloon wasn't permitted access.
Obviously it was. From Alaska to off the S Carolina coast. And bioweapons have the problem of concentration. 125,000 feet is enough of a problem, around the world would either dissipate to not a problem at all or a massive error in planning. After turning wuflu loose your idea is hilarious..
You are a monkey and your brain works like a fucking retard. Everything you said is gibberish.
I don't need an explanation from a monkey. I didn't ask a dumb monkey.
What radar recalibrated? It's like a lil dumb monkey wrote that. Okay guys time to recalibrate the radar, and it takes a bind spot. You autistic monkey.
As far as balloons went, go read the description, before stating it cannot be balloon. God damn it.
Zee bioweapons again, what. You think like autistic monkey. The atmosphere destroys them before they, glad to hear how they don't work. Dumbass. You have brain like monkey. Nothing you wrote is clever. It sounded like onk onk onk.
You have attacked everything I said. Personally downvoting it, being rude. I have tolerated your gibberish and bullshit and hostility enough. You are a monkey.
I don't want to repeat those points. Detected in atmosphere is nukes returned against biological warfare. Not to mention their own citizens hit in an attack from where. But aside any contaminates are in the streams. Unless they're detected by nukes.
Balloon description can cover almost anything. It simply needs a ballooning hallmark.
Radar blind spots are outwitted by a number of stealth systems. But the debate becomes tracking hypersonics moving so fast, even if detected has to intercept and in what time frame. Much less than an object observed and re-entering. The speed in atmosphere forms a layer of plasma beating most radar systems until it's too late. Same as other cruise missiles beating older systems. No reaction time. Better systems are adapting. But the hypersonic is beating most missile defenses currently, and most radar. As far as upper atmosphere objects go they have much less detection, and there are jammers. Without saying. But there is radar tracking everything from asteroids to spy satellites.
Don't you dare mince my words into that other gibberish again.
Aw dito. You can't read is like speaking in a different language.
It was all rather simple until you started muddling it up. If you can't figure that out. Well then.
Zee bio weapons, float balloon full of zee chemicals. Best balloon. Tell me how many do they lose. These balloons blow everywhere, yes. So they have, but according to you, it's not balloon if it doesn't blow everywhere. But you wanted zee balloon with zee bio weapons. Go figure that out dumbass. Tell me if balloon has the spyware, it needs stability, yes, it needs a course. But oh no it's not balloon, because it has got the thrust. At what point. Meanwhile you wanted to land the chemicals, so they didn't hit you in the face. You need very secret balloon for this yes, attempting to beat the radar, you're constantly recalibrating.
Tediously. Still you can't be civil. I haven't attacked your bullshit, with down votes. There you are onking at me, flicking the feces.
Also, clearly it DOES matter what it (they?) were designed to do.
We don't know any of this. You're presenting what seems plausible to you, nothing more. Be honest about it. I merely presented a range of possibilities, including that this could have been a test run.
For a balloon to be an effective delivery system for a bioweapon, which is NOT anything I claimed this was, it should descend a great deal before releasing its payload. Balloons can do that and the weight requirement for this is minimal. Presumably that could be controlled remotely. I expect the ideal altitude for such a purpose is known. Far greater dispersal like this than from a bomb hitting anything solid. Lightweight payload that multiplies is ideally suited to a balloon, which has certain obvious advantages you pretentiously thought you needed to introduce.
That's only one possibility, which could be eliminated by recovering the electronics.
You skip over lift. That's not something you can skip. If you've got mechanized lift it's not a balloon, it defeats the whole purpose of using a balloon.
There is no blind spot, just a question of recalibrating radar for what they weren't used to picking up.
Obviously it was. From Alaska to off the S Carolina coast. And bioweapons have the problem of concentration. 125,000 feet is enough of a problem, around the world would either dissipate to not a problem at all or a massive error in planning. After turning wuflu loose your idea is hilarious..
You are a monkey and your brain works like a fucking retard. Everything you said is gibberish.
I don't need an explanation from a monkey. I didn't ask a dumb monkey.
What radar recalibrated? It's like a lil dumb monkey wrote that. Okay guys time to recalibrate the radar, and it takes a bind spot. You autistic monkey.
As far as balloons went, go read the description, before stating it cannot be balloon. God damn it.
Zee bioweapons again, what. You think like autistic monkey. The atmosphere destroys them before they, glad to hear how they don't work. Dumbass. You have brain like monkey. Nothing you wrote is clever. It sounded like onk onk onk.
You have attacked everything I said. Personally downvoting it, being rude. I have tolerated your gibberish and bullshit and hostility enough. You are a monkey.
I don't want to repeat those points. Detected in atmosphere is nukes returned against biological warfare. Not to mention their own citizens hit in an attack from where. But aside any contaminates are in the streams. Unless they're detected by nukes.
Balloon description can cover almost anything. It simply needs a ballooning hallmark.
Radar blind spots are outwitted by a number of stealth systems. But the debate becomes tracking hypersonics moving so fast, even if detected has to intercept and in what time frame. Much less than an object observed and re-entering. The speed in atmosphere forms a layer of plasma beating most radar systems until it's too late. Same as other cruise missiles beating older systems. No reaction time. Better systems are adapting. But the hypersonic is beating most missile defenses currently, and most radar. As far as upper atmosphere objects go they have much less detection, and there are jammers. Without saying. But there is radar tracking everything from asteroids to spy satellites.
Don't you dare mince my words into that other gibberish again.
No need to mince your words, you can't write. If you can comprehend, you can't convey that.
Aw dito. You can't read is like speaking in a different language.
It was all rather simple until you started muddling it up. If you can't figure that out. Well then.
Zee bio weapons, float balloon full of zee chemicals. Best balloon. Tell me how many do they lose. These balloons blow everywhere, yes. So they have, but according to you, it's not balloon if it doesn't blow everywhere. But you wanted zee balloon with zee bio weapons. Go figure that out dumbass. Tell me if balloon has the spyware, it needs stability, yes, it needs a course. But oh no it's not balloon, because it has got the thrust. At what point. Meanwhile you wanted to land the chemicals, so they didn't hit you in the face. You need very secret balloon for this yes, attempting to beat the radar, you're constantly recalibrating.
Tediously. Still you can't be civil. I haven't attacked your bullshit, with down votes. There you are onking at me, flicking the feces.
You persist with a strawman of your own creation.
In fact your whole spiel is dishonest.
Also, clearly it DOES matter what it (they?) were designed to do.
We don't know any of this. You're presenting what seems plausible to you, nothing more. Be honest about it. I merely presented a range of possibilities, including that this could have been a test run.
For a balloon to be an effective delivery system for a bioweapon, which is NOT anything I claimed this was, it should descend a great deal before releasing its payload. Balloons can do that and the weight requirement for this is minimal. Presumably that could be controlled remotely. I expect the ideal altitude for such a purpose is known. Far greater dispersal like this than from a bomb hitting anything solid. Lightweight payload that multiplies is ideally suited to a balloon, which has certain obvious advantages you pretentiously thought you needed to introduce.
That's only one possibility, which could be eliminated by recovering the electronics.