Also, clearly it DOES matter what it (they?) were designed to do.
We don't know any of this. You're presenting what seems plausible to you, nothing more. Be honest about it. I merely presented a range of possibilities, including that this could have been a test run.
For a balloon to be an effective delivery system for a bioweapon, which is NOT anything I claimed this was, it should descend a great deal before releasing its payload. Balloons can do that and the weight requirement for this is minimal. Presumably that could be controlled remotely. I expect the ideal altitude for such a purpose is known. Far greater dispersal like this than from a bomb hitting anything solid. Lightweight payload that multiplies is ideally suited to a balloon, which has certain obvious advantages you pretentiously thought you needed to introduce.
That's only one possibility, which could be eliminated by recovering the electronics.
Yawn yawn. Mirror strawman. Look in the mirror there's the scarecrow. With the chemicals. They need to glide right, glide, land on a course, hit a target. Or they're doing what. Blowing the WMDS everywhere. So your balloon needs. Thrust.
Balloon can carry how much weight? Science. Like math equation. Tell me. You could put an elephant into upper orbit. There is this cartoon. At least there is of the child and the clown floating. Balloons simply need?
These balloons aren't those other countermeasures, you know they release a bunch of balloons to decoy the SAMs into firing at the balloons now they launch the missiles destroying the SAM. Those balloons blow everywhere. They are very cheap.
A spy balloon on recon, needs what? It needs to take pictures and readings. So it needs a course. It doesn't want to get found either. Or what happens? Therefore it needs, like your first strike biological weapon, tell me this word? Thrust.
No, I don't care what it was, if it was spying. It was spying. Entering another's nation's airspace without permission. Spying. Makes no difference. It's hostile.
But you needed too look at its camera and instruments and vehicle to tell me this? Good for you. I didn't care. It's hostile. Pop it.
They are being used as a countermeasure right now. Ukraine. And they were used in recent conflicts, Iraq and possibly Syria. Look it up. They attach reflectors on them for want of better word like jammer similar thing. Now you launch your strike, because the SAM is targeting balloons, and the clown attached to them.
Exactly, long established feature that you're now claiming. Previously you said any glide was a diriguble, or a blimp. How you couldn't put an elephant into upper orbit. Because you wanted to blow the payload everywhere.
Tedious, at least we've done the steps and you're getting somewhere. Don't worry. He can change. Thank God.
The use of specific balloons in the US is the topic. Not Ukraine or other wars. The overwhelming assumption is that China doesn't want to get into a kinetic, hot war. At least not here. Taiwan maybe, but not now.
Enough thrust to have some control over your route is far different from unlimited LIFT, or enough for any payload you want which is what you started with. Using a balloon in the first place suggests light weight, and that seems to be the case.
None of this should be surprising to you, you're failing the Turing test.
You persist with a strawman of your own creation.
In fact your whole spiel is dishonest.
Also, clearly it DOES matter what it (they?) were designed to do.
We don't know any of this. You're presenting what seems plausible to you, nothing more. Be honest about it. I merely presented a range of possibilities, including that this could have been a test run.
For a balloon to be an effective delivery system for a bioweapon, which is NOT anything I claimed this was, it should descend a great deal before releasing its payload. Balloons can do that and the weight requirement for this is minimal. Presumably that could be controlled remotely. I expect the ideal altitude for such a purpose is known. Far greater dispersal like this than from a bomb hitting anything solid. Lightweight payload that multiplies is ideally suited to a balloon, which has certain obvious advantages you pretentiously thought you needed to introduce.
That's only one possibility, which could be eliminated by recovering the electronics.
Yawn yawn. Mirror strawman. Look in the mirror there's the scarecrow. With the chemicals. They need to glide right, glide, land on a course, hit a target. Or they're doing what. Blowing the WMDS everywhere. So your balloon needs. Thrust.
Balloon can carry how much weight? Science. Like math equation. Tell me. You could put an elephant into upper orbit. There is this cartoon. At least there is of the child and the clown floating. Balloons simply need?
These balloons aren't those other countermeasures, you know they release a bunch of balloons to decoy the SAMs into firing at the balloons now they launch the missiles destroying the SAM. Those balloons blow everywhere. They are very cheap.
A spy balloon on recon, needs what? It needs to take pictures and readings. So it needs a course. It doesn't want to get found either. Or what happens? Therefore it needs, like your first strike biological weapon, tell me this word? Thrust.
No, I don't care what it was, if it was spying. It was spying. Entering another's nation's airspace without permission. Spying. Makes no difference. It's hostile.
But you needed too look at its camera and instruments and vehicle to tell me this? Good for you. I didn't care. It's hostile. Pop it.
Scarecrow.
Thrust is a long established feature on a balloon. We don't know if these had it, according to the official narrative that they destroyed everything.
Nothing was launched at whatever we destroyed it with.
I wouldn't think a balloon would be a useful countermeasure, no; you seem to be throwing buzzwords around without purpose. From the beginning.
They are being used as a countermeasure right now. Ukraine. And they were used in recent conflicts, Iraq and possibly Syria. Look it up. They attach reflectors on them for want of better word like jammer similar thing. Now you launch your strike, because the SAM is targeting balloons, and the clown attached to them.
Exactly, long established feature that you're now claiming. Previously you said any glide was a diriguble, or a blimp. How you couldn't put an elephant into upper orbit. Because you wanted to blow the payload everywhere.
Tedious, at least we've done the steps and you're getting somewhere. Don't worry. He can change. Thank God.
The use of specific balloons in the US is the topic. Not Ukraine or other wars. The overwhelming assumption is that China doesn't want to get into a kinetic, hot war. At least not here. Taiwan maybe, but not now.
Enough thrust to have some control over your route is far different from unlimited LIFT, or enough for any payload you want which is what you started with. Using a balloon in the first place suggests light weight, and that seems to be the case.
None of this should be surprising to you, you're failing the Turing test.