5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Looks like enhanced and more degenerate version of what we had in Russia 10 years ago and was condemned by "civilized world" for. In the same way people who have to do pills doing laws instead, and about things they know nothing about.

In Russia, as usual, nobody give a fuck, and all that crap is mostly on paper, along with every noob knowing how to circumvent any restrictions.

Wish fellow Americans to do the same if that crap will be eventually passed.

One thing looks strange - NWO run tests in Russia before rolling it out to the West. But tests obviously failed. Then why they are trying to do it on the West? Or they just not aware that this failed because corrupted Russian bureacrats falsely reported a full success to their bosses to cover their asses? :)

I began to think that corruption is not that bad all in all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everybody have future. The question is only what future. And if you take a look at the past, China is definitely not among those who will have the worst.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

They already solved potential problems with oil, and I think they will solve potential problems with food without much problems. Really, US will be just excluded from equation on the China side. US as a market will be exchanged to the markets of all other countries that will become available as soon as US stop extract wealth from international trade using US dollar as currency. World will buy China goods, China will buy food and resources providing money to others to buy Chineese goods.

From technical side, for China it does not matter, what smartphone to assemble - iPhone, Xiaomi or Huawei or other Chineese brands. For South America, Africa, Russia, India and Middle East does not matter what smartphone to buy iPhone or Chineese brands. But chineese smartphones will be cheaper for buyers and China will get more profit assembling them. There is no any sense for some unknown reason pay a huge part of phone price to US for manufacturing and consuming iPhones. And both parties of that smartphone trade will be wealthier just because US will get nothing.

And don't even begin with IP and patents crap. Nobody cares about that US scam.

So no, China will have enough food oil and jobs. May be even more than they have now.

US is only 300M customers. There are much more in the world, but it is US "dollar tax" that make the world too poor to be as good as 300M US customers. Getting rid of dollar will create much more wealthy customers around the world than this limited 300M US customers. So it is very profitable for the China to destroy US dollar and kick US out of world trade.

by pkvi
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK, started the fire at backyyard fireplace. I know it's a tiny bit of that gigatons, but that's my ivestment into the making the Earth green form pole to pole again. :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine the price of garbage bin or a tee cup will cost if something happen with China economy. Then imagine how much any paper assets will fall when everybody will began to sell them to get money to buy stuff they need. And so on.

When your country is not self-sufficient then real things skyrockets and all virtual things plummet if something happens with the source of real things.

Meanwhile China have T-bills too. Guess what they will do if they will need money to fix their economy.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the same paper shit, no any difference.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are right, then, I hope you already get rid of any savings nominated in dollars and converted them in something really valuable.

by WoodDoe
1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Adverse reaction databases could show that some batches are deadlier than others, but that does not prove that other batches are safer.

There is additional factor that heavily influence the data in such databases - was it allowed to create a records for adverse effects or not.

If different batches had different ingredients and so different outcomes, it is certainly a factor too.

So you have at least two unknown factors that could interfere with results to produce results you observe.

If we suppose that they know which batches are more harmful beforehand, then why they need multiple different batches at all?

And if they need different batches to find out most harmful, they obviously couldn't know beforehand what batch will be more harmful and couldn't administer them accordingly.

I think they didn't know outcomes, all experiment was about finding them, so average distribution of harmful and not so harmful results among the batches is constant, but in some places it was prohibited to even admit officially a possibility of adverse effects while other places post them into database. Obviously different batches was distibuted to different places.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait a second. Why does it matter what is approved or not by FDA bribe-takers? FDA (as any other "food safety" state agency) should not have any authority over you in the first place. It does not matter what they approve or not approve. If you delegate the power to decide what is safe for you and what is not to some third party, than you are a slave of that third party.

Enjoy your cup of fresh raw milk right from the cow, honey from neighbour hive and vegetables from your garden and don't give a fuck to that shitty agencies. And if you are not shure what is really in some corporate food - just don't buy it. You don't need any state agency to make the right decision at all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it is relevant to understanding what is going on.

How exactly? Please be more specific.

Your logic tells you that you are correct, because you think it "didnt work"

So, what's your point? It did work? How?

You assume you know their objective.

Who told you that? Did you read my TLDR or just saw the word "virus" and triggered? Words "for whatever reason" repeated many times somehow means that I know their objective, or what?

You behave like someone who is cog dis and heard something

Looks like it is you who read something, somehow triggered and trying to switch the topic to some irrelevant issue.

I'm not interested in discussing your topic- which theory, germ or terrain is correct, since it is absolutely irrelevant to the question of my topic. If you are interested in your topic, you are free to create your own post and discuss the question you are interested in.

by WoodDoe
3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Food corporations like to roll out a relatively normal product at first, with normal ingredients, and when people began to buy it silently replace normal ingredients with chemistry.

Also such things happens when manufacturer tries to keep the same price in times of inflation. Replacing pork and beef in sausages to chicken, shugar with sweeteners, natural juice with artificial flavorings and so on.

If manufacturer is old and had stable quality for years, it is a second case - hiding inflation. There still stocks of normal product in your grocery, but already new batch in town you visited.

If you like that candies, fill your stocks with candies from your town, because very soon they will be replaced with new batches with aspartam.

by WoodDoe
3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could it be that based states just reported more about injuries and woke states hide numbers of injured?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are absolutely right, I just didn't get into much details for simplicity. Of course it will be sane to throw out sequences that express nothing on assays to cut down the number of sequences to test.

From the other side, shortest known RNA that encodes protein is 7 codons long (don't remember does it include start/stop or not). So it is combination of 22 aminoacids in group of 7 when order is improtant and with allowed repetitions. It is 22 power 7 or nearly 2.5 billion. So technically even raw human bruteforce is possible.

With optimisations you describe, much larger sequences, so more complex proteins or even proteins groups could be bruteforced.

Thank you.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

where do you get the idea Zuckerberg worked on lifelog pre-facebook?

Where did you get that I get an idea that Zuckerberg worked on lifelog pre-facebook?

DARPA launched tender on the surveillance project with internal name LifeLog. Zuckerberg applied, obviously before June 23, 2003, with his proposal. DARPA choose Zuckerberg proposal. Zuckerberg get financing from DARPA and began to implement his proposal. Zuckerberg launch Facebook on February 4, 2004. No any contradictions at all. Everything is sequential and pretty logical.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you understand that your question is completely out of scope of that theory? It is absolutely irrelvant here, since their virus approach didn't work. So it does not matter what theory of real ilnesses is correct. There was no real ilness, there was no any real pandemic, so question "what cause illness" just does not matter.

You behave like a person who run into discussion about algorithms of breaking passwords with something about bigfoot.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Viruses are not alive. They are basically chemicals, not living beings. But that does not matter at all in case of above theory.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

From the Orthodox view repentance is important part of self-improvement. Repentance is just an acknowlegement of your own mistakes. It sometimes very hard to do for people. F.e. vaxxers nearly physically can't acknowledge that they was fooled by BigPharma and did the wrong thing. And if they eventually don't repent for believing BigPharma and don't stop doing it in future, they will have no chance to improve their physical lives. Same with spiritual part of human being. Simple as that.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If all they wanted was to test out batches they could have done it without all of this fuss

As I see it, from the point of view of that theory, globalists prepared everything for their pandemic, but scientists failed them, so they didn't want to throw out all their huge preparations and roll out fake pandemic with all that shit obtaining nearly unlimited control over population. Then, they just use that nearly unlimited control over population to force scientists eventually finish their job.

I see it much worse than just implementation of some evil plan of killing/subdueing people or whatever. They just used humanity not even like lab rats, but like laboratory equipment in attempt to achieve their goals.

What if we are wrong in assuming that they in the war with population or account people as their cattle, what if humanity is just a tool for them like mill or printer? It could be interesting to examine their other things like climate change or wokeism from that point of view.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, but what do you believe?

Being Orthodox Christian I believe only in God. All pther things I know.

Show how there were Russians 4500 years ago. Your claim. You show the evidence.

Read all tons of anthropologists and archaeologists studies, along with historical chronicles, including Western ones like "Letter of Alexander III of Macedon on the Slavic people". Somebody banned you from that info? Or it is all banned by BigBrother on the West to not disturb peasants minds? Or may be it is only Jews allowed to have long history of existence on the West now?

Why you are so incurious? Why do you think all other people have to believe in some info like you do, instead of knowing facts? Fascinating, how screwed and servile your way of getting info about world around. You used to believe in what you was told, and can't explore the world by yourself. I'm sorry for what your government did with once great nation of explorers and inventors.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Redacted is fake. Ex Fox, trained in Virginia, shady businessman. Came out of nowhere. Guy glows. Anyone still on YT you should be really careful of.

I know and I don't really care while they have interesting info and guests. I also like his English, pretty clean and understandable. Meanwhile they present most interesting info on Rumble, because YT banned them few times. Clayton also a friend of Tucker Carlson, who also not a saint. I care about information, not about who bring it.

They could easily do a actual super potent pathogen

No, they obviously can't. Having all the money on the earth does not make you omnipotent.

AI/Neuralink how to interact seamlessly with the biological self

AI does not exist, thing they name "AI" is a very dumb and very simple ANN which is just a system of equations. There is no any intelligence in that dumb thing and never will be.

Neuralink have same problem - they do not know how to encode or decode information in brain encoding.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not them.

Here they are:

https://whois.ipip.net/AS46997

Click on "whois" tab,

OrgName: Black Mesa Corporation OrgId: NRL-25 Address: 720 University Ave Address: PO Box 35765 City: Syracuse StateProv: NY PostalCode: 13235 Country: US RegDate: 2017-04-24 Updated: 2021-09-21 Comment: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comment: + Black Mesa Corporation Comment: + Comment: + Black Mesa Corporation, a.k.a. Nato Internet Service is a Comment: + non-profit project for learning, education and research. Comment: + Comment: + Our goal is to support the ever-growing internet community Comment: + that wants to experiment and gain hands-on experience with Comment: + the real world BGP. Comment: + Comment: + Network Information: Comment: + https://internet.nat.moe Comment: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://internet.nat.moe redirects to https://apernet.io/ with description of some BGP research group for some reason having "Nato Internet Service" as a second name.

However, it is not clear why Starlink have an upstrem connection to them.

May be they just have one of Starlink ground stations on their property connected through their network, or may be they are something else, or may be Musk like to have an upstream connections of Starlink to the students campus clubs.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Michael and Jesus are part of Islam too. As archangel and great prophet.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a practical sense, it makes no sense

I don't know answer too. May be some clue could be found in one of that upstreams in the list?

Per sat connectivity, you are thinking in terms of internet usage while ayh am speaking in terms of small packets of eID permissions and CBDC data.

Then it looks overengineered. You could transmit that tiny bits of control info even inside GPS signal or through something like ORBCOMM. Applying permissions is one-way thing, and there is always will be some ground cellular network nearby and within at most few hours of time, if phone commanded to send some data to BigBrother.

Hardly there is exist a task where they need two-way realtime communication in the regions without cellular network. Not many people live in such places today and hardly they use latest phones.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›