2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eh, a "peace" prize that's been awarded in the past to Kissinger, Arafat, Yitzhak Rabin, and 0bama isn't really worth much anyway.

6
BeefyBelisarius 6 points ago +6 / -0

Rabbinic judaism wasn't even founded until the 6th century AD, when a bunch of pharasees wrote the talmud. Modern jews and israelis are not the same thing as Old Testament Israelites.

8
BeefyBelisarius 8 points ago +8 / -0

I dont quite get it either. My first thought was the same, you think moms are killing their babies out of post partum depression?

The top political issue women care about is being able to kill their kids before birth. Considering that, is it really that unbelievable that sometimes they might change their mind after birth and grab a pillow when nobody's looking?

7
BeefyBelisarius 7 points ago +7 / -0

That or the ridiculous infant vaccine doses.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

This site's been slowly dying since the URL swap after January 6th, but it noticeably slowed down more than normal this week.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll take that as a no. You've never fired a gun, you've never even handled a gun, but apparently watching Hollywood misrepresent how guns work makes you an expert.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about the fact that cellphone guns are about the size of an old Nokia brick? The theory wasn't just wrong, it was retarded on multiple counts. Have you ever even fired a handgun?

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right back side would mean the bullet passing through the spine without deflecting or blowing chunks of bone out the front. If there was a 2nd shooter, they'd most likely be be front left or directly behind.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

He? Isn't it mostly women who believe in horoscopes?

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

The last war America fought for the interests of Americans was the Indian wars, without securing all that new land to grow into we would never have had the logistical ability to impact any of the post Civil War wars anywhere near as much as we did. Nobody ever recognizes the importance of the Indian wars.

Also, the Cold War against communism was far more important than bailing out the commies in WW2. They'd have rolled all over Europe, Asia, and the southern hemisphere if we hadn't changed our foreign policy from helping them to hindering them.

5
BeefyBelisarius 5 points ago +5 / -0

You skipped the war of 1812, Barbary Wars, Mexican-American War, multiple Indian Wars, Boxer Rebellion, multiple South American wars on behalf of fruit companies, Spanish-American War, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panema, both Iraq wars, Afghanistan, and more.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lugenpresse fearmongerers are at it again.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's easily three times as thick as the phone in OP's video. No assumptions needed, I literally held my phone next to a pistol and could see it wouldn't work.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems im the only one in this thread with any actual firearms experience, which is what my opinion is based on.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

People sitting right by the guy still would have reacted. And there's still the fact that the guy isn't holding anything large enough to fire the shot.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

There wouldn't be the crack from the bullet breaking the sound barrier, but there would still be a loud bang from the powder going off.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm assuming you never fired a lightweight, compact pistol. The recoil from an actual gunshot would make a phone fly out of your hands. The dude is clearly startled.

Silencers do not work the way hollywood shows. The sound is reduced below the threshold to cause instant hearing damage, but is still very loud. Also, silencers are extremely bulky.

And the fuck do you mean, no posts? I've been here since day one, back when this site was just a lifeboat and the various communities were still on reddit. https://communities.win/u/BeefyBelisarius/

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, go grab a bullet, hold it next to your phone, and compare the thickness. Any bullet capable of that damage is simply too thick and even silenced guns are very loud. It's hard to believe a full powered rifle didn't make a bigger hole, but claiming there was a phone gun off to the side is ridiculous.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was how they gained power in Russia and China, but they used a different method in the West. So why would they start a revolt in a country they already converted into a controlled economic zone and are actively looting?

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +2 / -1

Modern smartphones are far too thin to contain a gun barrel. Maybe if the guy was carrying something chunky like a 1st gen iPhone. But even then, where's the recoil? Lightweight pistols are very snappy. And why don't videos from the front show a would on the other side of his neck? Also, short barreled guns are extremely loud. If that guy was the shooter, it would have been deafeningly obvious to everyone nearby and people in the video would have been turning to look where the nearby bang came from.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

When we laid off the old White male rocket scientists and replaced them with diversity hires.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›