3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not rocket science, dude. You said, "Jesus was jewish" without any acknowledgement in that post of how vastly different the modern people claiming that label are from 1st century Judeans. People who don't know their history are going to see that and think it means Christ is the same as Christ-deniers like Netanyahu.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

And here comes the wall of sophistry. Do you keep txt files full of pre-written heathen apologetics ready on your desktop or something?

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

There you go again conflating modern rabbinic judaism with 2nd temple religious practice. Never mind that there were five main sects then the temple was destroyed, one of which was Christianity, and that the foundational documents of rabbinic judaism were written by pharasees. Nah, keep conflating the Messiah with the people who explicitly reject Him.

7
BeefyBelisarius 7 points ago +7 / -0

90s Clinton is with 2016 Trump and there's a 80s camcorder-style timestamp. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say it's AI.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hilarious how you keep insisting on preserving women's independence.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you knew how incompetent the average woman was, you wouldn't want them anywhere near the job market. Plus, after women are shoved back in the kitchen and the labor force halves, guess what happens to men's wages?

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, we're going to go back to the 50s

Try 1750s.

They need to be put in a worse position, and that position is pure meritocracy

Impossible. Meritocracy doesn't exist for women; she can simply spread her legs to avoid any need for hard work or talent.

0
BeefyBelisarius 0 points ago +1 / -1

You still aren't answering the question, catamite.

They are in the same position they were before

No, they aren't. Do you not understand the concept of removing rights?

0
BeefyBelisarius 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice strawman, retard. Now try answering the question. How is removing someone's rights an exoneration? The robber in your example also has rights removed when imprisoned, are you going to call that an exoneration too?

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ironic choice of phrase, since muhammad was a faggot and so were most muzzies through the centuries.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ttJ24ADsPOE

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +5 / -1

Counterpoint: https://youtu.be/t_Qpy0mXg8Y?si=psRIglyepUibtQCD Muzzies have always been enemies of Whites and of Christians.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

How exactly does ending so called women's rights exonerate them?

0
BeefyBelisarius 0 points ago +1 / -1

As if (((Hirschfeld))) the genital mutilation pioneer was any less of a subversive, destructive influence than mr continous revolution trotsky.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

That ignored queue must be so backed up by now. Makes me feel sorry for whoever the admins give the job to when they finally get around to it in a few months.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +3 / -2

Brownoids don't do maintenance. The conspiracy wasn't targeting that specific bridge, it was putting incompetents into positions where they will inevitably cause a ton of random damage. AKA, the competency crisis.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eh, there's worse ways to die.

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you even read your own links? It mostly talks about what that pedo did after the war, only briefly going into her being fired from teaching and becoming a collaborater at a radio station. Not one mention of her even being arrested, even though Beauvoir and her entire gay marxist social circle should have been lined up in front of a ditch and shot.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

He also told us to buy a sword.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you confusing her with some other feminist retard? All I see is that she was fired and stripped of her teaching license for grooming students in occupied France and that she was allowed to go back to teaching and grooming after the war ended.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_de_Beauvoir

https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/long-reads/simone-beauvoir-philosophy-occupied-paris-b1927492.html

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Our fat man and little boy bombs respectively weighed 10,300 and 9,700 lbs and took up the entire lifting capacity of our heavy bombers. The V2 carried a 2,200 lb warhead. It wouldn't have worked even if they had nukes. None of their aircraft had the capacity or range either. More likely, those circles were where they estimated the not terribly accurate rockets would be likely to hit.

6
BeefyBelisarius 6 points ago +6 / -0

Admins don't care about ban evasion. The poster you're talking with was nuked sitewide twice for doxxing, but the admins ignore obvious alts as long as they don't repeat whatever their previous account was banned for.

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +6 / -2

This trap is the Dome of the Rock, one of the holiest sites in Islam, located precisely on the site of the Temple.

No, it's located on Fort Antonia, the only building the Romans didn't destroy when sacking Jerusalem. The wailing wall is fake. Christ prophesied and Roman historians confirmed that not one brick of the temple complex was left atop another. But the jews will destroy the dome and try to build a temple there anyway, and then things will get interesting as you said.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›