3
Beaustrodamus 3 points ago +3 / -0

His point isn't nonsense to those who have studied genealogy. I've researched my own family lines, and I'm related to over 30 former US Presidents, and I come from a family that has spent most of the past 200 years in poverty on both my paternal and maternal sides. I'm third cousins with James Madison, and 15th cousins with Princes William and Harry of England. I would wager that most natural born US citizens are related to at least a few Presidents regardless of race. There's a website called familysearch.org that has a feature that shows you which famous people you are distantly related to, including Presidents. All you have to do is build your family tree and connect it to the site's master family tree database. (It's run by the Mormons, but free to use for all. I'm not Mormon, but had a good friend who was and he led me to the site)

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give em 2 stars then

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is to say that they likely destroyed both the Woods Files for the initial FISA warrant, as well as the 1st renewal, and then manufactured them based on what could not incriminate them after the fact...

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the first renewal. Per the interview with Supervisiory Special Agent 1 Pg 43

MR. Berger ... So we don't have that original file and that's what creates the problem here, because at the heart of this entire matter and personnel law is notice. Right? Notice, what is expected of him. You're demanding an accounting. How is he to know what he's supposed to do unless he's told per policy what he's supposed to look at? We don't know what that original file alerted him to. So I'm reluctant to have him answer those questions.

MR. BAKER: I'm still confused who this reconstructed one, who reconstructed it. Did he go back in and redo it?

MR. BERGER: We learned and I believe I learned and we learned on Sunday, August 24th that the file that the OIG relied on and the file that we were being shown by the Bureau of Internal Affairs Unit was reconstructed by the case agent. There is a note in the file indicating that it was reconstructed from the original file on May 18, 2018, and where is the original file? We asked. No one knows. That's the one we want to look at.

MR. BAKER: So it was reconstructed from the original file?

MR. BERGER: There is a note. It's a non-sworn note saying this file was reconstructed from an original file. That's what it says in so many words, the same for Renewal No. 1, by the way, which is not involved here, but they run into the same problem. The thing is it was reconstructed. So it really is a hearsay document. So we have Case Agent No. 1 who is saying this is what the original document says and we're supposed to accept that as hearsay with no reliability factor whatsoever.

MR. BAKER: I understand the evidentiary problem. What I don't get is why is somebody reconstructing something from the original when you have the original?

MR. BERGER: That is a mystery that is yet to be resolved.

4
Beaustrodamus 4 points ago +4 / -0

I agree. We have got to have more scruples than the followers of the MSM echo chamber. That being said, you can only be shown a peach and have someone tell you it's a pineapple so many times. Distrust everything the MSM says and take everything else with a grain of salt. It doesn't do any good to just tune out the MSM while believing everything you hear that appeals to you. No source and anonymous source information is undoubtably fake 99% of the time. Doesn't matter who it's coming from.

While the MSM is mostly run by the intelligence community, the CFR, corporate executives, and China; sadly much of the alternative and/or conservative media is operated by the intelligence agenies of nation's that are most fearful of China's resurrgence, like South Korea, Australia, and Japan. I would wager the foreign interference attempts were likely coming from these countries vs China, not Russia (which is actually pretty much debunked aside from a few facebook posts by now) in 2016 and 2020.

10
Beaustrodamus 10 points ago +10 / -0

Social media and covid fear mongering already turned all Democrats into snitches

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I live in one of those states. The state has mostly been turning blue because of three factors.

The first is super low corporate taxes bringing in tons of businesses, and then those businesses bringing in out of state workers who fit their corporate culture. I was at a coding bootcamp in a podunk town near where I live a couple years ago when I first noticed this. I couldn't believe how openly political everyone was there, and that they were all, not just left of center, but Clinton/Obama style corporate neoliberal Democrats. I'd never worked any place where politics was even a regular discussion, but here it was just everywhere.

The second reason is middle class white women have basically been brainwashed in this state by the mainstream media to a ridiculous degree. Many of them cannot discern the difference between propaganda and news. They don't notice the bias that has become layered into all reporting in the past 6 years or so.

The third factor is that there a lot of African Americans in the state and they are voting more, and while I think more of them are becoming Republicans than ever before, the majority have been led to believe that all Republicans are racists because the handful of racists left in the state are mostly Republican and that has historically been the case.

But I still think there was fraud going on the election that was responsible for the results. Biden is everything they accuse Trump of and worse, and I can't believe that most people would vote for the party of lockdowns, censorship, and race riots in a state that really has avoided having many of these issues so far.

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah it's a tweet and thus comes with a limited amount of characters. What percentage of tweets would you wager provide sources for their claims? i.e. your concern is special pleading. If you have an issue with the veracity, then the ethical reaction would be to ask him for his sources on twitter, not to come here throwing shade on it where he can't respond to your challenge. You are acting in bad faith.

5
Beaustrodamus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, that much of this is being orchestrated by the 5 eyes, the banks, and China is pretty obvious, so I agree with much of what you've said. All the freemasons I've ever met are fierce patriots though, so I don't think they are actually a part of the cabal's hierarchy. I mean, I'm sure there are good lodges and bad ones, but my grandpa was a mason, and all the ones I've met were decent men who loved their families, freedom, and their community.

2
Beaustrodamus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey man, I appreciate everything you did over there. We didn't 100% agree all the time, as I was more of a Berner in 2016, (though I have now come to realize that anyone associated with the DNC is actually unredeemably corrupt and fascist) but the MSM has been so awful the past 5.5 years or so, and all the "newsy" subreddits were so partisan and neoliberal that, for a time, you were basically in charge of the largest open source news media think tank in the english speaking world. You prevented them from solidifying their echo chamber bubble by creating a space for counter narratives and rebuttals.

On a side note, whatever happened with creq? Was he another MaxwellHill? I saw that he utlimately got removed sometime in September or so from the mod team, maybe a couple months after I'd messaged you regarding my suspicions.

5
Beaustrodamus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fascism is essentially identity politics. The Germans scapegoated the Jews just like the Democrats scapegoat white cis males, and before that they were scapegoating black men.

There are no good or evil races. Nobody chooses their own race or sexual preferences, so if your ideology is built upon such ideas then you might just be a fascist, particularly so if your actions and words facilitate oppression or ill will towards any other biological demographic.

The Squad is the epitome of fascism if we are being honest, and so are most of the rest of the Democrats, and many of the Republicans are fascists as well.

Fascism is strong in America, especially among those who feel most comfortable calling others fascists.

3
Beaustrodamus 3 points ago +3 / -0

It sounds like a fake news story. Why mention the gender of the officer? That's something that only a wealthy neoliberal identitarian would care about.

"People are suffering. One is a woman, so you should care."

Political Programming

8
Beaustrodamus 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah this is the thing I hate most about New Reddit, almost every subreddit is run by people who hate the subreddit. The college football subreddit is entirely populated by covid bros who hate football. The Joe Rogan subreddit is 90% people who think Joe rogan is alt right and transphobic. The conspiracy subreddit is flooded with people who trust the media. Reddit claims to be against hate subreddits, but literally every sub is controlled by haters.

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pelosi likely woudn't have anything on her laptop anyway. Maybe a handful of emails, but cmon, she's ancient and probably doesn't even know how to use spreadsheets.

1
Beaustrodamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

This country needs a civil war. It's the only avenue left since there's apparently no way to usefully audit US elections.

view more: ‹ Prev