by pkvi
2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your guess couldn't be more wrong.

I accept your response.but I.have lost any sense.of desire.to be humorous. I am not claiming this is good.

by pkvi
1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can I ask why is this still an important issue to discuss here?

4
Ajax23 4 points ago +4 / -0

www.bbc.co.uk and www.cnn.com

Full of conspiracy theories and tinfoil hat people.

Come.check it out bro

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is a poor response but at least one answered.

There is already technology out there ready to be used.

Would you mind DMing me about this?

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man you said that before in another thread. Could you please elaborate on a new thread and provide some science, facts and data for us?

by pkvi
16
Ajax23 16 points ago +16 / -0

I see no conspiracy theories in this group. I only see research and facts. No one is theorizing.

by pkvi
1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whose flag?

by pkvi
1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

I cannot.

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Audio in French. Notes below

Pfizer Vaccine More Deadly Than The Virus In Young In a shocking new piece of research by Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit's Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ it is being claimed that mortality from the Pfizer Vaccine is hundreds of times greater in young people compared to those young people who suffer from SARS-CoV-2 without the Vaccine.

The report initially appeared on the front page of the French publication FranceSoir[1]. Since its release the World has scrabbled to try and debunk the claims, which Seligmann and Yativ are actively working to respond too[2].

Here are some of their findings:

German journalist Alice Echtermann published data apparently obtained from the Israeli Ministry of Health , cumulative from December 20 to March 10, on patients vaccinated and unvaccinated against COVID-19.

His interpretation of this data, in response to a post from nakim.org, is that vaccination decreased deaths, from 1566 (unvaccinated) to 709 (between doses), to 84 (within 7 days after the 2nd dose). ) and 105 (7 days after 2nd dose) (Table 1). This is misleading because vaccination statuses differ in duration and sample size. Adjusted for time, there are 20 (= 1566 deaths / 80 days), 34, 12 and 4 deaths / day for the different vaccine statuses, in the same order as above. Adjusted for the total number of patients with COVID-19, deaths / day per person increase from unvaccinated to fully immunized (Table 1) and are multiplied by 11.65, 27.92 and 15 (390-7.49 ) compared to unvaccinated (Table 1).

This confirms a threefold increase in detection rates of COVID-19 in the first 7 days after the first dose, compared to the initial levels of COVID-19 on the day of the first injection. - FranceSoir[1]

We see this time and time again, misleading interpretation of data to produce the positive outcome required. For those struggling to process the information stated above, the authors made this statement on their website:

Our reanalyses of these data explain why during the massive vaccination project initiated mid-December 2020 during a confinement, daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases failed to decrease as they do during confinements, and, more importantly, why numbers of serious, critical, and death cases increased during that period that covered at least one month.

From mid-December to mid-February (two months), 2,337 among all Israeli 5,351 official COVID-deaths occurred. Our analyses indicate orders of magnitude increases in deaths rates during the 5-week long vaccination process, as compared to the unvaccinated and those after completing the vaccination process.

Presumably, asymptomatic cases before vaccination, and those infected shortly after the 1st dose, tend to develop graver symptoms than those unvaccinated. - Nakim[3]

Dr Seligmann and Haim Nakim also found that the percentage of asymptomatic cases decreased in the unvaccinated when compared to the vaccinated population. The believe this to be because the vaccinated population have had their natural immune response weakened.

Make of this what you will, the authors claim to have no conflict of interest, but time will tell. Certainly their findings require consideration.

Whichever way you look at it, vaccinating the younger population, the very population that is at virtually no risk from dire consequences from the COVID-19 is a counterproductive operation. What need is their for this group of people to be vaccinated?

There is an argument to be made for the vulnerable populations to be vaccinated, if you believe in vaccines that is. But vaccinating a population sub-set which have virtually no risk from the thing the vaccine is alleged to protect them from is just ludicrous, particularly when you consider the fact that the vaccine does not stop the receiver from spreading the virus.

So the argument that the young need to be vaccinated to protect the older and more vunerable is not even valid.

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

NQTHING CAN.STQP THE NQTHING THATS.CQMING

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am pro vaxx because muh President told me to have it

by pkvi
0
Ajax23 0 points ago +2 / -2

God? Oh you mean.Rockerfeller. Gotcha

by pkvi
6
Ajax23 6 points ago +6 / -0

What if.AI.has taken over?

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK there is this guy in.the UK called Matt Hancock. He is the Health Secretary something like Dr Fauci? Or maybe. Anyway big government dud pushing the vaccines.

Lurk on Twatter until you see a tweet so you are on the first responders. Usually twats mornings UK time.

Respond to him with the same question.

Please report results back to us.

For bonus points you can repeat with Dr Fauci.

Id be very interested in the results.

3
Ajax23 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe you should sue your relatives because excluding you from events is considered violence these days

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK I double dare you. Go and post this on Twitter but I will tell you where to post it.

Then you report back to us your results.

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

What was the objective and want was your hypothesis? Come on man. Spill it out

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man I must be thick. What was the objective of the psyop? What were the success criteria? Was your study randomised and if at what ratio?

by pkvi
2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will get DNA from my shithole. But it may be a bit smelly

by pkvi
5
Ajax23 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or perhaps this is where we start swabbing bananas.and avocados and publish the results

by pkvi
3
Ajax23 3 points ago +3 / -0

So by reverse psychology. To help continue the lockdown. No thanks

by pkvi
2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yaaaaaaaaaaas Queeen. Inclusion and diversity of swabs.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›