https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_B._Hinckley
A relative of the mk'd assassination patsy John Hinkley.
The Hinkleys entered into a six generation business/family relationship with the Bush family.
Re: "The "Speaking Head":
Allow me to help. On my grandmother's side is Von Haderschot, one of whom was one of the 12 original founders of the Ordo Templi Orientis of Bavaria, aka 'The Bavarian Illuminatti'. A provable claim. A lifelong study of the tenets and history of this organization, along with it associates and affiliations was an eye opening experience, pun intended.
From that, I can advise you that it can be shown that every ritual used by secret societies, the OTO notwithstanding, is material signal towards a spiritual principle. This principle is lost upon 'The Profane', and so a physical example performed as routine until the principle is discovered.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places"
Good principles. Bad principles. Good powers. Bad powers. Good teachers. Bad teachers. And then there are preachers.
Those who either don't understand or misuse, intentionally or not, use the bad/dark, generally will rule by force, exerting their half-understood principles by force of will. This has been the case throughout most of history, with the principles profaned by this half or misunderstanding, with the result becoming 'Do what thou wilt is the entirety of the law.' As expounded by one of it's poobah's Aleister Crowley. Crowley rewarded himself with a title after doing extensive work in his life, attempting to find order in the chaos. Yet they seem to prefer chaos as the field to work in, do they not? Their sayings all about 'the light' and illumination and yet they hide in dark places and do dark things. Interdasting.
I say this 'Darkness' is of course an ignor-ance of higher principles that even the large segment of their 'elite' have not successfully worked to solve. An interesting fact is that Crowley gained prominence largely due to his assertion that he'd discovered that the Tarot deck of cards had been shuffled to confuse 'the profane' as 'Tsaddi is not The Star'. Of Sephira, 16 is not 17.
17 is 17. It's gematria equivalent Q. The Star ( A new outpouring...or shall we say, great awakening).
So there are two who know things.....are on a 'high place' of understanding of the principles which move the physical object on the lower plain (field). One of them continues to look 'upwards' to the highest possible Source. The One Source. The other stops that, and looks down...to use as power. De-evolution is a dark force, gravitating into 'self' and selfishness with will to power over others. Do what THOU WILT. I find it a tell that Crowley felt it necessary to add the qualifier '...is the entirety of the law.' I say that is true but missing a principle. Of course. 'The Law' is for those who need it. A lower level of operation made necessary by misunderstanding and evil will as result. These misunderstandings become bad 'principaliTIES'... existing as political/militant movements
The spirit IS the principle behind the thing. Repeat that. What does it mean?
Q/17/The Star are principles that conjoin for example. You've probably heard of gematria. This is its foundation. Have you discovered 'Divine Geometry'?
Divine Geometry is a rarified subject. Few find it. Fewer understand.
These principles are eternal and so their discovery by those with both good and evil intent became an issue of life or death in times when any variation from the norm was considered politically incorrect. Interesting that one's punishment was usually either death or exile, or perhaps becoming a consultant to the King. One of my ancestors did just that in the reign of Charlemagne. Was this due to the quality difference of the information? Some of it was. But all, used in power, become dark.
What is the Higher Principle then, that one gnostic knows, but not the other? The one that the dark one ignores?
Re: The 'Talking Head'.
The body exhibits principles by its nature. Proportions are principles.
Why? Discover it if you haven't.
The Al-khem. Al chemist Alchemy. Was an attempt to discover all possible combinations of material things, breaking apart and conjoining or 'sewing and tearing', becoming the father of science. Like science (and Scientologists) it is about 'laws' again. Good medicine/ bad medicine. But medicine is for the sick.
The head, in comparison to the body is of a certain proportion which exhibits a principle. The skilled artist knows this. How is he skilled? By this knowing. The head is the 'highest' and connected to mind/conciousnous which receives the principles, so this is used as the example. Alchemists dabbled in transmutation of metals and so brass was used to fashion the head, as again, proof of the understanding of what creates brass or bronze. (Yes other material is historic, including crystal skulls, but that's a separate but related story as is the mention of brass and bronze being used for ark and throne. Not understanding the principle of electricity, one would be shocked what they'd find in attempt to 'take the bull by the horns'.
So being both high learning and needing to be Clandestine (think of that word)....the art school needed to teach principles to its subject if it were to be successful. The proportions between certain segments of the body correspond to the proportions of the face. So as brass and bronze was being casted...into proper proportions as proof to the students of its principles...in THIS way, the head was said to 'talk to' the student. The public could only be told that this was art..and it was....sculpture in the making.....but misunderstanding, once again rears its ugly head. The public found many villains and scapegoats in the secrecy and during trials, every imaginable explanation was posited. There were the magi, and there are magicians. Some say both black and white, but that's up for debate.
One who knows does, knowing why and how, and the result is 'good'. No magic required. The Spirit as force.....positive angles/angels and negative ones ....daemons..... are forces that move things.
Why is man said to be made 'a little higher' than the angles, yet is material? The magician attempts to FIGURE that out, working withing the material (looking downward upon the plain).
So finally, I'd like to add that the Great Awakening its to be a 'taking back' of the true understanding of the principles, with a new outpouring of spirit aka Q/17/The Star.
The Talking Head. It says one thing to the profane, and another to the one who looks to the Divine.
It's our place and choice to understand. The Source.
Sauce for the Source: https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
A single instance of transposing to similar names would be understandable in any case whether it happened or not. I know the fucking difference peabrain. YOU. DON'T. Understand how they correspond by principle, shit for brains.
You assume I assume and I understand you to be a literalist assumer rather than a knower. You 'know' that I transposed two names inadvertantly and so you win a stupid prize right?
What do you win when you GET the point made because you haven't and won't.
Pan represented the head of the hierachy of pantheism, ....dude. In other words, he was the Zeus to the region and their lesser 'gods' also corresponded to the principles shared by other ancient religions, now lost on morons like yourself. The very KEY to understanding how all religions are deviations and can be brought back together over the actual principles they misrepresent to the detriment of all souls. This will be the Great Awakening, not a lulling back to sleep with idolatry.
How does this lame history lesson advance the would-be discussion on gnosis of principles? It sure doesn't. And your argument is dependent on your faulty view.
Have some bread and ichthys and be on your way. I'll provide, you can deny. That way we're in our proper place.
I may have inadvertantly transposed Elisha and Elijah, as to a certain 'story' reference? I don't know, I don't recall, if so, that is a clerical error if so and means zero, zilch, nothing ....is a diversion to the point..which was and still is, in the meaning of the names. And the characters were back-named by historians to account for the principle the names represent. . They were both 'AN Elisha/Elijah from different eras. and this is the deeper meaning to the statement: 'Some say you are (AN) Elisha' which proves that there also existed the belief in reincarnation as you admit when you say that the Pharisees believed. Which then counters your moronic attempt to discredit the same.
Why the term 'Son of Man' rather than 'Son of God'? Care to venture?
Re: "\Were the people of Caesarea Phillippi Sadducees or Pharisees? The people were the people with all their varieties of beliefs. That variety exemplified in the same tired in-fighting that plagues the region to this day. Phillip was Greek and Ceasarea the Roman continuation of his empire. The Helenized jew was never the same was he?
Re: 'They worshipped Pan'. What a moronic over-statement.
I'm sure many did end up 'worshipping' an idol called Pan, and all his subordinates due to the loss of the understanding of the deeper meaning and source for the myths. That same source that created the numeric and alphabetical systems and subsequent religious offshoots/imitations/. However, to understand Pan is to understand the principle behind.....yes even in, or especially in mythical character names (gods to the profane). Yes there was a profane class of 'believers' who sacrificed, and another elite class who understood the concepts for what they were. The book linked EXPLAINS in great detail, SPELLING IT OUT and showing the significance with Divine Geometry. Please attempt to shit on that by ignorance and see where it goes.
The vocabulary stolen, the characters becoming human and even god incarnating into a man, this is idolatrous anthropromorphism and you don't get to ride that beast in victory. This is partly how we got here. BAD RELIGION from blackhat magicians who fool all but the Elect. And how are the Elect determined? There would be a criteria. The inner sanctum is for the one who can 'take the bull by the horns'. B'aal is the god of religious denominations (numbers) AT THE TOP, same as it ever was. Q as 17, you don't know why.....and The Star....and you don't know why.....is Divine Inspiration ....and you don't know why. This is your savior in reality whether you accept or not and comes as AN Elisha/Elijah.....and you don't know why. You swallow the Roman hyperdispensation which is idolatrous anthropromorphism.
Until you accept the Great Awakening.
You speak of 'things' as if they are the same as the principles behind them. Things can't be revealed and tested either, only 'beliefs about them' Principles are the source of both formation and information. They just ARE. "I AM". Feel free to test it. Test the info Fiedler reveals and get back to 'us'. But only after.
Is Ra El
Saving 'it' for last.
You seem to be coming to the rescue of one who failed. I was responding to someone who took a false position. I state the existence of eternal principles. That's a pretty solid position that renders guesses moot.
The A.I. style 'take' on Fiedler in place of the information provided is a tell.
So I'll let A.I. respond to the term 'gilgul'.
Gilgul (gilgul neshamot) is the Jewish concept of reincarnation, a cyclical process where a soul is reborn into new bodies to complete its tikun (rectification) and atone for past transgressions before reaching its ultimate spiritual level. This esoteric doctrine is central to Kabbalistic Judaism, particularly Hasidic Judaism, though it is not considered essential to traditional Judaism and was historically rejected by some prominent Jewish thinkers. The term originates from the Hebrew word for "wheel," reflecting the cyclical nature of the soul's journey.
Actually 'glagal' - (h(wei) - Circle/wheel/rotation association to Yahweh
https://communities.win/c/Unspoil/p/142AwNU9UH/unspoil-part-1-yahweh/c
https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/141YkrZ2mH/testimony-13-feb-22/c.
You'd ridicule someone who said they'd 'take a look' at the bible and leave it open, but pretend to be able to understand and critique it anyway.
Now read the book so that where we go one, we go all.
You correctly appoint the resurrection confusion to the Canaanite religions, which is line of orthodox history...that is to say that the Canaanite sacrificial religions that Goliath represented was the actual continuation in the later Roman religion while the 'Line of David' was to represent gnosis. No, it isn't about an actual genetic line to a guy named David.
All A.I. and its false histories aside:
The names of the old testament bible are analogous names, not names of actual characters given this name at birth. What an impossible coincidence that would be.
Resurrection was NOT a thing until the messianic hyperdispensation had began during the Maccabean period regardless of attempts at backdating by more recent writers. The multi-varied semitic religions were all influenced by Egypt and later modified.. Hence the names Ra-moses (sic) and moses being concurrent with Moses being said to carry 'the ark' out of egypt. No, this was not a literal boat.
'As primitive Christians, we have enough knowledge to get past that..." This word primitive isn't correct as used here. No, the chrism was not a translation of mashach...mashach was a ritual of annointment, while the chrism was the word for the result of the process that produces the 'christ' or one who takes the chrism. This was lowered to 'annointment' due to lack of understanding of the difference between esoteric spirit and literalist, exoteric ritual. Try annointing yourself and see if you become christ or a christ or if any change occurs whatsoever. It won't. It's just oil....an imitation of the spirit. Like holy water sprinkled on a sinner. It changes nothing. That's called 'magic' which is indeed the religion of primitive man. More importantly, the story of Jesus annointing the maid servant's feet was to show that this ritual is to be RAISED to apply to this woman who seemed to 'know' what it was about as she served without asking. It's not about annointing one man to make him a god. This is covered in the link I include. From whence the word 'annoint' if it means exactly 'christ'? You misunderstand by missing information.
You tell me that Rome changed things, and then use those changes to argue against the reality. The contingencies of Judea were in total chaos and disagreement as to what their actual history and cosmology was and this is what allowed Rome and others to create their own per-version. Watered down dogma to 'agree with' rather than 'finding the christ in you'. Both 'sides' rule by magick until one knows the trick.
Yes you need to discover something more. You diligently look and search for answers, right? You want to know how names were chosen? Would you rather KNOW how and why? Take a look here and get back to me. It isn't enough to be a little smart and a little not.(sophomoric).
Because......the name Sophia.....it meant something to some people. Those people who knew it, knew it as principle, not a literal physical god. That would be error. Sophia is unknown now to modern roman christianity as a result. The fact that she represents spiritual knowledge makes her removal totally understandable as that is exactly what was removed to create a sacrificial messiah movement to solidify Roman rule.
Feel free to pass that around. Send it to your A.I. program of choice.
They said to Jesus: 'Some say you're Elisha'.......showing the common belief in reincarnation. The subject was NOT 'resurrection' which would have been ridiculed as it was later when introduced by hyper-dispensational writings.
It was the introduction of the writings of the new testament of Rome that established 'resurrection' as a new form of reincarnation. You conflate the two, but that's the result of the Roman hyper-dispensation to co-opt and replace the former beliefs of 'the profane'. The gnostic however, understood the difference, as the hero is made to state that he existed as in eternal state before he was born, or even before Abraham. These words all have meaning. A to B is 'all things. Ra is the emanation of life, and ham is protection. God is the protector of the life of all things. But before this.......was 'The Word'.....the meaning precedes the thing that it 'carnates' into. If it comes back, it re-incarnates.
By the definition of resurrection, one who comes back on an operating table after heart stoppage qualifies as resurrection, or the widow of Zarephath’s son, or The Shunammite woman’s son (2 Kings 4:18–37), or The widow of Nain’s son (Luke 7:11–17). Or airus’ daughter (Luke 8:40–56). Lazarus of Bethany (John 11). Or Eutychus (Acts 20:7–12). Various saints in Jerusalem (Matthew 27:50–53). Tabitha (Acts 9:36–43). T
As luck would have it, there is a huge tell in the story of the raising of the man raised out of Elisha’s grave (2 Kings 13:20–21). Elisha is connected with another miracle that occurred after his death. Sometime after Elisha had died and was buried, some men were burying another body in the same area. The grave diggers saw a band of Moabite raiders approaching, and, rather than risk an encounter with the Moabites, they threw the man’s body into Elisha’s grave. Scripture records that, “when the body touched Elisha’s bones, the man came to life and stood up on his feet” (verse 21).
It's too bad Elisha didn't stand up to tell him he was confusing reincarnation with resurrection. So Elijah was 'reincarnated' as Elisha and some were wondering if 'that same spirit' was present in the Christ.That spirit of correction of the errors of the would-be church IS the meaning of the word Elisha. Is the spirit of Elisha. My own name breaks down to this same 'namenumber' in gematria and I take up the challenge as should all who would know the 'secrets' that have been hidden. As long as these secrets stay 'hidden (occult), the corrupt church will rule by it.
What is/was the CHRISM that existed as a word before the character known as 'Jesus Christ' which takes it's name and stead? It isn't a term that originated in the middle east or Arabic lands. It has been 'resurrected' improperly by Rome.
Reincarnation was a common belief at the time. The story in the bible where it is stated to Jesus : "Some say you're Elisha..." shows the common belief in literal transferal of souls. However, even then, there existed another concept to explain by using the name Elisha. The first up-braider of the church was Elijah to be repeated another generation by Elisha. The name signals....sig-nifies the very concept of 'correction of error' in the concept of godhood. One who knows the significance of the letters can 'spell it out' and see it plainly. God's principles are ingrained in number and letter and names were 'cast' to reflect. Let he who has ears, hear.
The Essenic fathers were killed after Ecumenical councils for saying that the Roman orthodox religion taking form as the official religion of Rome was putting the Demiurge (a 'lessor' consciously aware creator god) in the place of the one true god representing eternal concepts. (God's name has changed continually according to changing concepts and cultures).
Eternal Concepts are Principles, the source of all thought. Not to be known as entities in physical terms, as this would be anthropromorphism, an error.
Finally Saving Israel for last by 'coming to terms' with past lies.
You ignore the answer by asking the question. This is the exact point to Pilot washing his hands and asking 'What is Truth?' The story has pilot asking the Nazirite (gnostic )the moot question. This story shows how the 'orthodox' has no answers, only questions, and doesn't really believe such things exist.
It would take a lifetime to answer those question and then the knowledge isn't transferable is it? A person would have to do the hard work in many subjects which I've done both academically and independently.
You refused to actually visit the material presented and instead attempt to narrate by ignorance. Now you deflect by asking 'What is Truth'? as you wash your hands of 'gnosis'.
I'd rather not give an account from 'my' worldview, that's the problem with the world to begin with. There are knowers and there are believers who the gnostics called 'seekers after smooth things.' Prove them wrong.
Gnosis is 'hidden' in plain sight. It is only hidden from the one who refuses to look and see. Gnosis is doctrine when made into a religion. This explains the varied forms of gnosis. Cultural differences will always manifest and distort.
Do a search using the terms hypnosis or hypnotism and Parker to find how that name seems to dominate the field. 'Colonel Parker' as Elvis' handler was trained by a Parker in hypnosis in a circus and took his name. It was said that Elvis was under when he signed his lopsided contract. Parker Bros. Games (Game Theory) logo is the hypnotic swirl. They created the popular version of the Ouija board.
As a side dish, search Harris/Voodoo for similar results. 'They wrote the book'.
I get a Miles Mathis vibe here. :) You know him?