Problem, Reaction...
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
There are ways to defend your argument without resorting to attacking the person.
If I was refuting the comment you are I'd say something like: "the natives have the right to defend their homeland, the immigration is at a point of replacing the native people and demolishing the culture on which the country was founded. Have you seen violence be used righteously in the bible? Is all violence of the devils? How does one use violence righteously?"
Does this get your point across while not personally attacking the person but rather their argument, which you disagree with?
Kind of acceptable but I’m still hung up on why we should not be calling cowards cowards, if their argument is cowardly in nature. Would you entertain wordplay about morality by LBT people instead of just calling them out for being degenerates?
I think people are allowed to think differently and attacking a person and not their argument tends to stifle discussion where other ideas meet and minds have the opportunity to change, or not but the odds are at least better.