I have a creeping suspicion that many of my real life acquaintances do not actually read my emails and messages anymore. They just feed it to the AI and reply with whatever AI comes up with.
Also, messengers and email providers have started to integrate that shit in their apps, so very soon it actually might be harder to write or read something by yourself, than simply click the AI icon... or maybe there won't even be any icon at all. Just already generated reply with Send button... or even just automated AI slop reply without any button whatsoever.
This realization, of course, gives heavy incentive to do the same. Why would I read or write anything if another party doesn't? Why bother when no one is reading it anyway? This way it is only a matter of time until everyone becomes a mindless button clicking zombie unable to read anything longer than few words and watching anything longer than a minute or so.
So, the plan, apparently, is to turn us all into some kind of collective borg. Where no one thinks for themselves anymore and everything (everything!) is being mediated by the system, humans becoming only a kind of a meatsack appendages to the system.
Well, guys, if this is not the end of human race, I don't know what is. No wars or political shitstorms can come even close to AI in terms of threat to human existence. Especially when this is heavily promoted by the powers that be.
This is most definitely part of the plan.
It plugs into transhumanism, which is to get people to behave as predictably as machines. That couples with technocracy, which is where society is run by experts as if they were programming a machine. The combination produces and in fact originates from cybernetics, which is to control human society as if it were one giant machine.
Most people already appear to think like machines, but this is somewhat deceptive. Left to themselves, people can figure out much of what's going on but it is overridden by those they accept as "authorities".
If an authority other than one controlled by "Them" appears and starts telling the masses the truth, then the masses will believe the truth. This is why "They" are so shit-scared over Trump. It's also why Trump still bothers appearing with all the lying liars on mainstream TV: to get in front of the masses.
An alternative vector of attack is to get people to accept AI as the authority. Then "They" can simply control the AI. This is what's happening now and They are having some success:
I had a terrifying conversation with an 11-yearold today (r/conspiracy 9/25/2025)
Note: If anyone was wondering, all of this indeed comes originally from the Salem Witches. The birth of the push for cybernetics can be traced back almost a century to the Macy conferences. Yes, that's "Macy" as in both the department store and William H., but more importantly it traces back over three centuries to Thomas Macy, one of the original proprietors of Nantucket. That island is and was probably the most important outpost of the Salem Witches. Also note:
I think "cerebral inhibition" is pretty much exactly what we have on our hands a century later.
Yep, seems like it. Another detail here is that it makes everyone write in the same style, with same structure of sentences, using the same words and same definitions.
True. This homogenisation of human thinking has been going on for a while now. I'm old enough to remember time before the internet and I can tell with certainty that people were much more original back then. Ways of thinking, of approaching things and viewing the world in general were much more varied back then.
If this continues, then the end result will be something closer to ant hill or bee colony than to human society as we know it. I guess that is precisely what they want to create.
You find researchers talking from time to time about the unusual amount of "bee" symbolism that comes up, particularly in ancient cultures of the Middle East. They just mark it as notable because, you know, why would people get hung up on bees?
Personally, I agree 100% that a bee colony is what "They" are intent on creating, with everyone transformed into mindless workers of the various required classes (see "Brave New World").
The symbolism survives to the modern day, although few recognize it. We get this from "Deseret (Book of Mormon)":
Shit, they really kind of spell it out when you recognize what you're looking at.
Yes, they use this kind of symbolism in movies as well. If you pay attention there's a lot of beeswax type hexagonal pattern appearing in movies. Usually it's in the background, environment design, some logos and such. I mean it's rarely in your face, but it is very prevalent. Especially in modern movies.
Speaking of which, it seems that there are several such symbols and patterns that appear in movies and other media over and over again. Some call them markers or programming markers. Most visible ones are hexagons, globes, dinosaurs and (for some reason) stags with antlers.
I'd say the stags are good old Cernunnos.
When you look up the history of CERN, there came a time in the development when they should have changed it. The acronym originally referred to the "Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire". That organization went defunct and the one that runs the collider now is the "Organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire". So they should have changed it, right? Nope, they kept the old one (for some reason, eh?).
I got some bad news for you.... that's already happened for most people. AI not required.
Well, yeah, kind of, but people are at least being forced to think once in a while. Even if they don't want to. Now, if this borg thing continues, then at some point you'll be able (and even encouraged) to live your life without using your brain at all... and that is where our humanity stops and meatsack appendage existence begins.
May be that's not the real life acquaintances you really need?
Why do you write them emails and messages in the first place?
Because I'm not next to them or even in the same city as them at that moment. My point was that those are people I know in real life. I know that they are not bots, shills or whatever.
Then why communicate with such people who disrespect you to the level of using AI™ in communications with you? Send them GTFO (better with a punch into face) and find normal buddies, who will never even think about doing such disgusting things.
I think if people began to use violence against those who dare to use AI™ on them, then life could become much better.
Such people, who use AI™ in conversations with you are no different from those who spread lies about you behind your back, who ready to stub you in the back at the first opportunity, who smile in person and spit in your food when you don't see. They are scumbags, never make friends or business with scumbags. If you find that someone around you is a scumbag, break any relations with him. That simple. It's basic social hygiene.
I see your point, but I suspect that those people do not think they're doing something wrong. They do not see AI in the same way as we do. For them it's just this new fun tool that makes things easier. Like spell checker.
The problem is that most people are unable to connect the dots and think in perspective. It's like they simply do not have this concept that A leads to B and B leads to C.
You can see this phenomena all around us. People treat each event, each technology, each media talking point just as single isolated entities, but they cannot connect them and make some kind of logical conclusions. Even if someone has managed to see through one particular lie it doesn't mean that they'll be able to see through the next one.
Would you be a buddy with somebody who do not think he is doing something wrong using his subordinate to communicate with you instead of himself or reporting on you to law enforcement if you don't wear mask during coronahoax?
It is not that different, really. If people do not understand that it is just disgusting to not reply personally to other people who want to talk with him, then they definitely don't understand many other, much more important things and will behave accordingly.
Don't interact with such persons, not even talking about any closer relations.
I don't understand you, really. Circumstances show you the true muzzle of those who you thought was your friends/colleagues/neighbours/etc. It's a very good thing, because those who don't understand that using AI™ to reply you is a disgusting thing, will certainly betray you in other much more serious for you circumstances, just for fun or profit. Take a note, get rid of such friends, and thank God for showing you real muzzles of that bastards beforehand. And all this come to you for free.
Ellul's The Technological Society, the book Ted Kaczynski called "his bible" - describes who this trajectoy needs no plan. The pursuit of "efficiency" is built into the techno prison we have made for ourselves.
It needs no cabal.
Could be. At the end of the day is it really that important whether it is all being driven by some kind of cabal or just an idea? It could be real people (or entities), making real plans... but it also could be something like an idea or a mind virus that has infected our civilisation. We can call it The System. The System does not work by itself. It has to have at least someone to make plans and supervise execution. So, I'd say it is not fully automated. The power pyramid exists. However, we might never know what is at the top of this pyramid. Is it some kind of supernatural being, Baal, Moloch, some powerful people, secret societies, or just an idea that is corrupting us from top to bottom?...
That said, Kaczynski was right. He might have chosen wrong methods to express his opinion, but in general he was right.
Cabal aka cab (cube) al (all) aka all giving cue to being. This gives being the choice in-between needing to adapt to cue or wanting a clue from one another.
Being implies in-between cue (perceivable) and clue (suggested).
I asked grok and he said everything's fine except I really shouldn't trust you anymore.
You better listen to it, then!
Honestly I don't think you'd be wrong in guessing it'll condition us to step forward when we hear a ding, then line us up along a cliff and ring the bell.
Except instead of a literal cliff it will be unsustainable strangling treaties that cause each of us to police each other's self-destruction.