Saddens me how programmed most people are, even here as a supposed conspiracy forum.
Most people live and die in the heliocentric deception. It's highly unlikely that Mars is a giant rock than can be landed on. Mars, the moon, and every star and planet are likely to be plasma.
There's enough evidence to prove beyond any doubt that Mars is just Greenland with a red filter
Bible is a difficult source to use, it's not logic based.
If we think, the stars and wandering stars move in a circle above us in a celestial day, they move quite a long distance at a high velocity, so it's unlikely the mass is substantial because it would take so much energy to move a giant rock or ball of gas that fast over such a distance.
Plasma makes sense. Its bright, it moves like excited energy when you zoom in, it can move through dense media without much friction, and there are probably some other reasons not related to "because god said so..."
Any artificial place of assembly (forum) puts many at odds with one another.
the heliocentric deception
Each being represents the center (centric) of light (helio)...the more beings incline towards another; the more deceptive appearances become.
enough evidence
Evidence aka ex (outwards) videre (to see) implies ones perception within all perceivable...enough aka en (within) nough (to reach, attain) implies the suggestions of one another tempting one to reach outwards from center into circumference, hence off-center and away from ones helio-centric position.
Being implies one within all...enough represents a measurement taken by one while ignoring all given.
If hunger and thirst implies all moving through each one; then eating and drinking can never be "enough"...
to prove beyond any doubt
Holding onto proof casts doubt over ones mind/memory. Proof is in the pudding/putting aka within motion putting matter into being.
Beyond (on the other side) tempts one to ignore being (life) in-BE-tween sides (inception towards death)...looking for beyond casts doubt over ones sight.
it's highly unlikely that Mars
Is vs isn't aka high vs low aka likely vs unlikely...that's mars; the god of war aka mars/mar - "to deface, disfigure; impair in form or substance".
Facing another within any conflict of reason defaces oneself.
Love vs hate represent the artificial borders ones free will of choice marks if choosing a side. As long as one holds onto a side...so long does one remain marked. Analyzing this shapes clarity within oneself.
Saddens me how programmed most people are, even here as a supposed conspiracy forum.
Most people live and die in the heliocentric deception. It's highly unlikely that Mars is a giant rock than can be landed on. Mars, the moon, and every star and planet are likely to be plasma.
There's enough evidence to prove beyond any doubt that Mars is just Greenland with a red filter
According to accretion theory in stochastic electrodynamics, plasma is indeed their source, called mayim (waters) in Gen. 1.
Bible is a difficult source to use, it's not logic based.
If we think, the stars and wandering stars move in a circle above us in a celestial day, they move quite a long distance at a high velocity, so it's unlikely the mass is substantial because it would take so much energy to move a giant rock or ball of gas that fast over such a distance.
Plasma makes sense. Its bright, it moves like excited energy when you zoom in, it can move through dense media without much friction, and there are probably some other reasons not related to "because god said so..."
Any artificial place of assembly (forum) puts many at odds with one another.
Each being represents the center (centric) of light (helio)...the more beings incline towards another; the more deceptive appearances become.
Evidence aka ex (outwards) videre (to see) implies ones perception within all perceivable...enough aka en (within) nough (to reach, attain) implies the suggestions of one another tempting one to reach outwards from center into circumference, hence off-center and away from ones helio-centric position.
Being implies one within all...enough represents a measurement taken by one while ignoring all given.
If hunger and thirst implies all moving through each one; then eating and drinking can never be "enough"...
Holding onto proof casts doubt over ones mind/memory. Proof is in the pudding/putting aka within motion putting matter into being.
Beyond (on the other side) tempts one to ignore being (life) in-BE-tween sides (inception towards death)...looking for beyond casts doubt over ones sight.
Is vs isn't aka high vs low aka likely vs unlikely...that's mars; the god of war aka mars/mar - "to deface, disfigure; impair in form or substance".
Facing another within any conflict of reason defaces oneself.
Be respectful. Address the argument. Make coherent statements.
You love marking the descending views with this shit eh
Mark/merg - "boundary, border"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mark
Love vs hate represent the artificial borders ones free will of choice marks if choosing a side. As long as one holds onto a side...so long does one remain marked. Analyzing this shapes clarity within oneself.