We're not arguing white man's burden. I agreed with you that genocide including children is permitted in the Bible in certain very regulated cases. Obviously you don't want the cases drawn so loosely that it justifies the next idiot who decides on his own recognizance that he can commit "genocide" against any individual of his choosing without reason. That would be murder. So let's find out what crimes your avenging by your genocide, you haven't said.

If you get 4.5 votes for, and 1 vote against, on some binary proposition that contradicts the prior vote, that would indicate that the prior voters had become passive so it might be a start on new consensus. However, if you don't get a margin of 3.5 it would be a less conclusive total. Plus, just as last time, it's not on any of us to interpret results finally but only on admin. Admin didn't announce how they would implement the vote in favor of a generic mod, instead they approached TINAE rather than anyone else and negotiated a plan and let her publish it. So please feel free and see what the community does and what the admin does.

You can do all this without namecalling, which is still a Rule 1 violation.