What? God is just a western man made explanation for the spiritual phenomenon we feel. I don't trust any of the many various bibles or clergy to tell me what God is. I can just connect with the all, the knowing, the love, whatever. No one fucking knows what it is. That's a problem, but it's also a promise
Not much for labels as they are insufficient way to understand the world, but for those who depend on easy-think, I'm a millennial. Sorry if that doesn't jive with your simple classifications of people
I don't trust any of the many various bibles or clergy to tell me what God is
Throw out such bibles and punch such clergy in a face. They are not bibles and clergy at all, but some enterpreneurs, artists or sects. At least in normal Christianity God is unknowable by definition, so nobody could say you "l know what God is." :) Those who say you that they know what God is are liars. Avoid them.
Feeling refers to the emotions in-between the material, while spiritual implies the animation (zoe) of each material (bio) from one another.
Phenomenon (that which can be seen) can be manipulated as artificial (suggestion) within natural (perception).
I don't trust any of the many various bibles or clergy to tell me what God is.
God WAS before anyone within can suggest what IS...what is requires trust; what was doesn't. Trust implies holding onto one another aka ones consent to any suggestion of another. God implies all separating each one within from one another.
"In God we trust" implies within (in) singularity (god) plurality (we) is held together (trust)...
I can just connect with the all
Before one can claim self as "me; myself or I"...all separates one from one another. All implies procession; each one within implies potential..."I" implies possession, which diminishes potential if held onto.
No own fucking knows what it is.
a) No (nihilo; nothing) implies suggested nihilism tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
b) Own implies taking into possession what procession gives.
c) Fucking/fuck (from German Fuge) implies "masonic joint" and it's being used as a rhetorical profanity to artificially join together potential within the process of nature. That's why the English (angular; by angles) language uses masonic joints for manipulation.
d) To know implies each ones perception within all perceivable, which among one another's suggestions, puts one at the edge of knowing.
a) NO (aka nothing) can't be sensed, yet using it to discredit the senses of others seems to be fair game. Why is that?
b) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder aka the being holding onto it aka the one who chooses to take a measure of another into mental possession as a measurement.
That's not how sound works. Sound moves through each instrument and cannot be taken. Any instrument responds to given sound.
c) An edge implies a separation of for example everything perceivable and each ones perception thereof. Only in-between flow (inception towards death) can form (life) come into being, hence living on the edge.
What's the difference between EDGE and LEDGE? Edge implies the being in-between; ledge/leggen (to place; lay) implies nature laying being. That's how knowledge works.
d) Notice that you began with ugly (shit) and ended with beautiful...
a) Bridging the gap between rendering (suggestion) and reality (perception)...oneself represents the gap; ones consent to another represents the bridge.
b) Notice that "photo-realistic lightning" uses light twice (lightning + photo). Why? Because photo-realism represents the fictitious filter shaped within real light.
c) DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling)...a sample aka "something which confirms a proposition or statement, an instance serving as an illustration" represents a beings consent to the suggested illustrations of another, which in return permits another the deep learning from above (super) each sampled one.
d) What's "visual fidelity"? Ones faithfulness; devotion; trust in suggested visuals by another, which implies a "breakthrough" of perception by suggestion.
e) Requiem aka "mass for repose of the soul of the dead". Soul implies the process of dying animating each life within...few are amassing many by reposing each into consenting to join a consensus with one another.
f) What's a "resident"? An inhabitant. How could one inhabit "evil"? Inversion permits one to LIVE within EVIL...
h) What's "bio"? To live! What's "hazard"? To take a chance in life! Taking a chance inverts being given choice, which is how evil resides within live/life.
Not only does this word salad make no sense but that image looks very dull and depressing. It also looks like a video game not totally realistic.
“I love AI. I love being tricked by my eyes and ears, living in a false reality commanded by a false god. I hope Nvidia makes GPUs out of my corpse.”
“Yeah, same, bro.”
What? God is just a western man made explanation for the spiritual phenomenon we feel. I don't trust any of the many various bibles or clergy to tell me what God is. I can just connect with the all, the knowing, the love, whatever. No one fucking knows what it is. That's a problem, but it's also a promise
Wow, an actual flower power child is still alive?
Not much for labels as they are insufficient way to understand the world, but for those who depend on easy-think, I'm a millennial. Sorry if that doesn't jive with your simple classifications of people
You’re the reason we’re in this mess.
Removed for rule 1, will be approved with edit of ending sentence.
No. It's me saying you both violated rule 1: be respectful, attack the argument, not the person.
This comment is also removed for rule 1.
Hey, that’s a label! How dare you use a simple classification to understand the world!
Fuck off, mom.
Removed for rule 1, will be approved with edit of ending sentence.
Deist?
Throw out such bibles and punch such clergy in a face. They are not bibles and clergy at all, but some enterpreneurs, artists or sects. At least in normal Christianity God is unknowable by definition, so nobody could say you "l know what God is." :) Those who say you that they know what God is are liars. Avoid them.
I agree. I don't follow any religion's dictation. "God" is something for each of us to define from our own experience with our own spirituality
Feeling refers to the emotions in-between the material, while spiritual implies the animation (zoe) of each material (bio) from one another.
Phenomenon (that which can be seen) can be manipulated as artificial (suggestion) within natural (perception).
God WAS before anyone within can suggest what IS...what is requires trust; what was doesn't. Trust implies holding onto one another aka ones consent to any suggestion of another. God implies all separating each one within from one another.
"In God we trust" implies within (in) singularity (god) plurality (we) is held together (trust)...
Before one can claim self as "me; myself or I"...all separates one from one another. All implies procession; each one within implies potential..."I" implies possession, which diminishes potential if held onto.
a) No (nihilo; nothing) implies suggested nihilism tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
b) Own implies taking into possession what procession gives.
c) Fucking/fuck (from German Fuge) implies "masonic joint" and it's being used as a rhetorical profanity to artificially join together potential within the process of nature. That's why the English (angular; by angles) language uses masonic joints for manipulation.
d) To know implies each ones perception within all perceivable, which among one another's suggestions, puts one at the edge of knowing.
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
Shit makes no sense but sounds beautiful
a) NO (aka nothing) can't be sensed, yet using it to discredit the senses of others seems to be fair game. Why is that?
b) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder aka the being holding onto it aka the one who chooses to take a measure of another into mental possession as a measurement.
That's not how sound works. Sound moves through each instrument and cannot be taken. Any instrument responds to given sound.
c) An edge implies a separation of for example everything perceivable and each ones perception thereof. Only in-between flow (inception towards death) can form (life) come into being, hence living on the edge.
What's the difference between EDGE and LEDGE? Edge implies the being in-between; ledge/leggen (to place; lay) implies nature laying being. That's how knowledge works.
d) Notice that you began with ugly (shit) and ended with beautiful...
a) Bridging the gap between rendering (suggestion) and reality (perception)...oneself represents the gap; ones consent to another represents the bridge.
b) Notice that "photo-realistic lightning" uses light twice (lightning + photo). Why? Because photo-realism represents the fictitious filter shaped within real light.
c) DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling)...a sample aka "something which confirms a proposition or statement, an instance serving as an illustration" represents a beings consent to the suggested illustrations of another, which in return permits another the deep learning from above (super) each sampled one.
d) What's "visual fidelity"? Ones faithfulness; devotion; trust in suggested visuals by another, which implies a "breakthrough" of perception by suggestion.
e) Requiem aka "mass for repose of the soul of the dead". Soul implies the process of dying animating each life within...few are amassing many by reposing each into consenting to join a consensus with one another.
f) What's a "resident"? An inhabitant. How could one inhabit "evil"? Inversion permits one to LIVE within EVIL...
h) What's "bio"? To live! What's "hazard"? To take a chance in life! Taking a chance inverts being given choice, which is how evil resides within live/life.