Where does this lead, who stands to gain?
(media.scored.co)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
In the image we see Zionist traitor Lindsey Graham and Catholic Matt Walsh. The same pattern I've been pointing out.
So who benefits from all the blatant and distasteful Zionist crap going on? Catholic power, which is on the rise.
The image isn't loading, not sure if this was a problem the whole time, sorry I just now caught it.
Maybe add a link from an image site like imgur.com or catbox.moe?
Edit: I could sticky the comment.
Darn it.
And thanks https://files.catbox.moe/o853gr.webp
link to OP Image: https://files.catbox.moe/o853gr.webp
I could have sworn we had a sticky option for comments but now it's not available..
I tried to redo the link to see I could sticky my comment but I can only add Mod flair
Edit: added as a new top sticky comment
You should be able to sticky your own top-level comment (not another's, and not a response to a comment). Try a new top-level comment and see if the option is there.
hehe, that works, thanks
OY VEY GOYIM IT’S THE CAT LICKS
You need to be banned.
I haven't seen any rule violations.
Differing opinions are frequent and normal.
I guess that’s technically true.
Nowhere in here does it say you can’t OPENLY ADVOCATE AND PROMOTE THE VERY CONSPIRACIES THEMSELVES, so sure, he “hasn’t broken any rules.”
What even is the issue? You think it's Jews and he thinks it's Catholics? Try to find some common ground maybe.
I never said "It's Jews" or "It's Catholics". If we are going to reduce the plot down to a singular entity I would say "it's the devil at work".
He uses Jews and he uses Catholics, Freemasons, etc
I know it’s jews and he’s lying that it’s Catholics. It’s just a lie. They fucking admit it publicly and he’s lying about it.
So when Catholics are doing things, they aren't Catholics? We have to call them Jews too?
Brilliant.
So when jews are doing things, we don’t call them names they’re not. Get it through your jewish head.
You both have different views and theories, this is the place to talk those things out.
I can even see a theory that combines them, if yous were both so inclined.
Differing from the norm is seen as abnormal. Following a norm stagnates frequency. Opinion (conclusion reached) contradicts option (frequency of choice).
I implies taking possession over self. Rule implies being moved within a straight line. Possession violates potential during procession.
Thanks for proving I'm over the target.
It’s the jews. Fuck off.
Lol
I see you didn't call me a liar.
I didn't call you anything. Lmao
My point exactly. Nothing to say other than vague derision.
I'm sorry. 🤣🤣
Link to OP image:
https://files.catbox.moe/o853gr.webp
Here. There cannot be anywhere else. Notice that HE(re) + HER(e) implies both male/female...
HE does (action) which allows HER (reaction) to redo.
Lead/leit - "to go forth"...only while going forth can there be a differentiation between this or that aka unisex.
To stand implies within motion, hence balancing. Resisting motion implies gain; falling for the temptation to ignore resisting implies loss.
As for who...if one gains, then another looses and vice versa. Few trick many to gamble (sacrifice gain for loss) to relocate the sacrificed gain of many onto few.
If ones choice joins a consensus, then the collective loss of ones choice to the consensus becomes each chosen ones gain.