I noticed one interesting thing. In all english-speaking "alternative" media (!'m not even talking about official MSM) new war of US/Israel with Iran is heavily discussed. They discuss every possible development, discuss vulnerabilites of participants, discuss how participants could be defeated, but with one exception - noone discuss Israel in that ways. There are tons of hour long discussions and interviws and long articles, but none about how Israel could be defeated and destroyed, what vulnerabilites it have and where it could be struck with maximum damage.
And there is a lot to discuss. Strikes on desalination plants, killing top politicians, say all knesset or whatever, destruction of Dimona nuclear site, turning off electricity or destruction of Israel banks datacenters, cutting Israel from internet, strikes at all places of Satan worshipping in Israel and so on. There could be hours of discussions and megabytes of analitics. But there is none.
May be I missed something, if so, please point me to something of "Redacted" or "simplicius" views level where I could see a discussion or analysis of how Israel could be defeated and destroyed in this war.
Either all "alternative" media is under kikes control, either there is already full and complete internet censorship.
You see examples of this from time to time. There is, of course, no accepted term for it, but I think of it as an "informational black hole". That is, somehow "They" steer discussion and analysis around an area. It becomes something that "it just so happens no one talks about".
(BTW, "They" =/= "Jews". It extends far beyond them.)
This is certainly not done by forbidding discussion, because that act literally gives everyone something to point at. It's more subtle than that, like being enveloped in a haze and trying to fight it. There is nothing to throw a punch at.
I have never studied the technique, nor has anyone else, but I do have some thoughts on it. I believe it's based on the fundamental human reaction of... reacting.
In this instance, look around and the vast majority of people live in an information sphere of their own creation. There is a flow of data: news articles, Instagram posts, offhand comments at the water cooler, etc, etc.
And what people do is--you got it--react to those things. Love, hate, agree, disagree, fear, anticipate, whatever. It does not matter, in this context. The "mode" is the matter.
What virtually no one does is to reach outside that information sphere, to ask the fundamental question, "What is really going on out there?" The goal is to build up a model of the world outside, not just by receiving information but actively seeking it out when discernment prescribes.
In this instance, discernment prescribes that one should wonder just what is going on is Israel. Gotta be something, right? You just have to go looking for what it is. And the mere fact that nothing came automatically down the pipe means there is probably something someone wants to hide.
I finally had to admit to myself that while that all seems so rational and natural and automatic to me, almost no one else seems to do that. They don't wonder what's going on "out there", in its totality. Their mode holds that if something is important, it will come to them.
So I think what's going on with control of both mainstream and alternative outlets is, to keep them from discussing that which should not be discussed, keep the pipeline filled with something for their audiences to love or hate. Doesn't matter which.
Around as in circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason)...a circle implies the beginning and end of a line put together aka a synthesis...not an analysis.
It's talking (articulation of natural sound into words) which confines thinking into circles.
Extension implies singularity aka cause extending into effect inwardly. A chosen one (singular) shapes they/jews/them (plural) to restrict the extension of ones choice outwardly.
Aka outwardly fighting (reasoning) the inward haze (logic). That's circular confinement aka kike/kikel (circle) con (together) trol (to roll).
Notice that an envelope is used to conceal a letter, and that ones choice LETS a chosen one artificially conceal what nature reveals.
If God implies everything, then throwing a punch at one another implies ones denial of God...that de-nial/nihilo represents "nothing".
Nature throws being apart from one another...beings tempt each other to turn against one another within artificial conflict.
Believing implies choosing to hold onto what another suggests, while ignoring to react (perception) to what nature enacts (perceivable).
If it's flow, then why is it called inFORMation?
Plural (people) restricts singular (person) reaction...nature implies singularity internally separating each unit of being from one another.
Only within motion can matter be modified...
Aka adapt to perceivable inspiration from within the confines of suggested information...the latter confining ones mind to think circular (logic) while turning against others (reason).
Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" aka he (matter) that strives (momentum) with God (motion). Israel implies each ones struggle to live within the process of dying...not the jewish home within the levant/levare (to rise).
Right/reg (to move in a straight line)...everything (motion) moves each thing (matter) within a straight line (momentum)...a jew suggests a sum of things (something) to tempt gentiles together.
One (singular) cannot be a some/sum (plural)...only join together with one another, while pretending to be a sum like consensus; groups; bands; assemblies; collections; families; friends; nations; societies; civilizations etc.
Some hides all from one. How? All sets one apart from one another; some tempts one together with one another. The closer together; the less space to discern self as a part within whole.
Not both...singularity. Mainstream (inception towards death) lets in alternation (life). Life alternates in-between perceivable origin and suggested outcome, while in the process of dying.
A jew suggests dualism (both); progressivism (mainstream); alternativism (alternative) and escapism (outlet) to distract gentiles from singularity.
Singularity implies sound...a jew articulates natural sound into words to bind gentiles with spells. Any word is shaped by LETTERS aka by a gentile LETTING a jew shape...letting another contradicts singularity by establishing a dual bond.
Discussing together keeps one from discerning dis (apart) cuss (to shake)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/discuss
The word discuss implies analysis; a jew suggesting it to gentiles establishes consensual discussions aka a synthesis.
I've learned since COVID that alternative media is almost as captured as the mainstream media, or it exists for limited hang outs. It's purpose is like a valve to relieve pressure.
The Sampson Option is the issue, really, with taking out Israel. They'd do it too, they've crazy that way. That said, I don't think the arab countries that would attack Israel have the military capacity to do more than make things difficult for them when they would blow up infrastructure. At most, it would lead to another dysphoria of Jews moving away to other countries again, like they did after the Romans destroyed the place.
I thought about it, and the thing is that if Israel have an ability to nuke something, it could only be US soil. Hidden charges in the foundations of skyscrapers or whatever. US is the only country in the world where jews could deliver a huge cargo without any questions and any inspections. Israel have a bomb, but they have no means of delivery for their nuclear weapons. Israel have inferior own weapons, only weapons that more or less useable is what US gifted them. But there are no missiles able to deliver Israel nuclear warhead among that weapons. Israel need something that could allow payload of few tons. Their best Jeriho III is only 1300kg which is not enough. Jewish nukes are old design and extremely heavy due to necessity of additional thick lead shield to hide them from foreing surveillance. Also their nukes never tested with their Jeriho missiles line. But there is absolutely no any problem to move a 5-10 ton container with nuke to USA, and then bury device under some fancy skyscraper during construction. Who knows, may be one of them is under Trump Tower, it was built few years after Israel got nuke tech from South Africa. :)
Theoretically, jews could put a nuclear warhead on the cargo plane and try to play kamikaze, but cargo plain is an easy target, and jews are too coward to really play kamikaze.
So, only USA will be harmed. And something tell me that most of the world won't give a fuck if Israel will nuke US. Especially Iran.
Persians have nothing to do with semites, not even close. Iran is not arab country. And it have more than enough military power to destroy Israel completely. The question is if they want that. They are amasingly tolerant to the jews as etnicity. Iranians mostly hate zionism, because it have claims on Persian lands, not jews as a whole, for whatever reason.
I disagree highly with the idea that Israel has hidden nukes in skyscrapers. That's fantastical.
It wouldn't take that many nukes for a nuclear winter, which would be the problem if India and Pakistan go at it.
Arab, Persian, whatever...Israel's neighbors. Unless they all attacked at the same time, they don't have the capacity. They are low IQ barely functional barbarian tribal societies.
Exactly. I agree that it sound fantastical. That's make this method the best and the most obvious and easy way they could implement their Samson Option if you think a little. And this perfectly explain why US is so obedient to any Israel orders. It is not only Epstein files that is the reason for such servitude.
Look - simple questions:
Could Israel deliver any cargo into US without any questions and control? Obviously - yes. Jews are untoucheable. Israel is best friend. No need for all that customs and shit for the best friend. Otherwise it would be antisemitism.
Does many developer enterprises owned by jews or those who owe jews a lot? Of course. You don't need to be a genius to find that out.
What is the best place to hide a nuclear bomb in country where nobody will ever try to check and where it will be completely safe? It is a foundation of a huge building in center of town that is belong to some jew or shabbesgoy. Even if somebody find out that there is something in foundation, nobody will ever allow and be able to check that, because you can't disturb some oligarch on fantastic accusations. They could level your house for whatever reason, but they never do anything for Trump Tower f.e. And even if somebody undeniably prove that there is a nuke in a foundation to the administration - make a guess, would anybody allow that information to go public?
There is no place for "whatever". It is completely different civilisations. Completely different level of society, different ancestry, different way of thinking. Semites and aryans.
Iran have more than enough missiles and drones to make Israel unhabitable for years. Desalination plants, ports, and nuclear facilities. And you could wipe Israel from political map.
Question is not "can they?", question is "do they want".
Whole world use persian math. :) Shia muslim have to study how God's creation works. Iran have more engineers than US.
This "barbarains" have a continous ethnic state for more than 3000 years. USA is only 250 years old and have no ethnic pillar of state at all.
If you need low IQ barbarians - look at Israel. Full of offsprings of jewish mothers and who knows which father or totally inbred in some strata. Cowards without courage who worship Satan. Absolute nazis (not as NS, but in a hate for others), who account all others as animals and slaves. Shizophrenics thinking they are "choosen". Destroyed as many cultures as they was ablle to sneak into. That's barbarians. Not Persians.
Do you know what the average IQ is for Mohammadian countries that practice cousin marriage?
I know that jews are the most dumb, slippery and arrogant people I ever met. But they always think they are smarter than me, and always fuck themselves up with that. Because they are dumb and arrogant.
Also, I'm sure the publication where you get your IQ rates for different etnicities, have few Jewish surnames in the title.
Jews are good in lies and cheating, but that does not make them smarter.
Genetically Jews and Arabs are from the same tribe. So there are no any objective reasons for Jews to be smarter than Arabs. And Persians are smarter than Semites.
I don’t disagree with you about dishonest Jews.
Now, answer the question about what the average IQ is of Mohammadian counties that practice cousin marriage?
I don't know what publication you used.
From Russian statisitcs IQ of Muslim population from Tatarstan, Bashkiria and other developed regions is not any different from average for whole country which is 105. Caucasian region is slightly lower, 103-104.
Meanwhile Iran have same average IQ of 105.
Cousin marriage is prohibited in Russiaт Orthodox Cristianity, and in all Muslim regions too. There is no direct legal prohibition for cousin marriage, but nobody will actually do that.
Interesting, that cousin marriage narrative among Muslims of Russia was pushed by some "freedom and democracy" NGOs with jewish financing around decade ago, but when religious leaders strongly denied that, this topic disappeared. Last time I heard about cousin marriage for muslims here, was few years ago, when some ISIS or whatever CIA/Mossad puppet tried to influence Dagestan region in the hope to somehow mitigate losing in Ukraine.
Interesting, isn't it? All sources of attempts to push this stupid cousine marriage narrative over Muslims of Russia have clear jewish roots. How is that?
No, i think you aren't considering the NATO bases around the world.
I heard multiple reports of italy having 100 atomic bombs "on" land and all belonging to US bases.
Israel using even single US/UK/France nuke for Samson Option will be the complete end of US and NATO. Either all nukes of the world will be unleashed on the US for that, Either nobody will ever take US as a sovereign country with all consequences.
On the other side, if Israel depended on the foreign controlled nukes, and not on their own, then it would have been much less insolent. Because Israel perfectly know that western puppets are not much different than their own and will betray Israel at the first opportunity. And destruction of Israel is exactly that opportunity, obviously.
Nobody would ever protect Israel if Israel have only some pedo blackmail. Pedophilia of Western elites is useful only for some internal politics manupulation of respective countries, but hardly it could be used for forcing them to die in nuclear suicide for Israel. There is something much more than Epstein files, like, as I told earlier - Israel controlled nukes under US towns. Or something worse, that could lead not just to few resignations that will change nothing, but to complete destruction of a country political system and elite, such, that current elite will have no any chance to survive it, including physically.
PS: Notice - you avoid direct discussion about how exactly Israel could be destroyed in current war with Iran, f.e. what Iran can do to completely and forever destroy Israel. :) You are trying to find a reason why Israel should not be destroyed. Is it some subconscious mental block or something? :) If it is a case even among people on that forum, then now I understand why "alternative" media refuse to discuss it too.
This one. It's already decided, they are simply telling the story in the manner instructed.