Why can't you? If you're going to have "NSFW" zones simply to placate users, while having true cause to believe the content posted there is so dangerous we have to worry about intelligence agencies shutting us down and users potentially being grabbed from their homes by boots on the ground, you are acting in a way that is INCREDIBLY foolish. So either you are not mentally sound to be moderating this board or that point was not material to this discussion. There really isn't a middle ground here
The whole internet is public and we should act accordingly, free will also exists. For some reason rule 1 is too difficult a task for some people so I'm not sure what else I should do.
Maybe I am a crazy paranoid conspiracy theorist or maybe I'm a time traveler, the world may never know..
Because on a conspiracy forum we generally believe that free speech is important and censorship is inherently wrong (especially when the censorship being enforced is the same as the "regime", however you want to define that, is enforcing). It's not just about being able to use slurs.
I just don't understand how you can hold the belief that we need to clamp down on this speech because it's going to get us shutdown and people literally jackbooted, but then say, "eh I'll allow it in some places so people stop being mad". I do think it's good that you're considering how to handle other viewpoints (though I disagree with the handling) and am trying to keep a measured head about this. But I just cannot understand how you can hold these two ideas at once. It's cognitive disonnence to the extreme
Without rule 1 this community would be conpro esque, no offense to them but it's not how I prefer to argue, we all still need to adhere to site wide rules.
And yea, I think the global surveillance state is becoming a prison planet, have I switched timelines again or I have I just been screaming into the void here for years?
So you agree that censorship is bad. Maybe I'm a time traveler that's here to warn you of the disastrous consequences about to be inflicted from this new direction! As you say the world may never know, or perhaps it shall...
Maybe I am a crazy paranoid conspiracy theorist or maybe I'm a time traveler, the world may never know.
I know, it's both, and the world will know. I'm patiently waiting for my signal to release the next Official Disclosure. Your steering clear of responsibility for threads containing stopwords is eminently sensible.
Why can't you? If you're going to have "NSFW" zones simply to placate users, while having true cause to believe the content posted there is so dangerous we have to worry about intelligence agencies shutting us down and users potentially being grabbed from their homes by boots on the ground, you are acting in a way that is INCREDIBLY foolish. So either you are not mentally sound to be moderating this board or that point was not material to this discussion. There really isn't a middle ground here
The whole internet is public and we should act accordingly, free will also exists. For some reason rule 1 is too difficult a task for some people so I'm not sure what else I should do.
Maybe I am a crazy paranoid conspiracy theorist or maybe I'm a time traveler, the world may never know..
Because on a conspiracy forum we generally believe that free speech is important and censorship is inherently wrong (especially when the censorship being enforced is the same as the "regime", however you want to define that, is enforcing). It's not just about being able to use slurs.
I just don't understand how you can hold the belief that we need to clamp down on this speech because it's going to get us shutdown and people literally jackbooted, but then say, "eh I'll allow it in some places so people stop being mad". I do think it's good that you're considering how to handle other viewpoints (though I disagree with the handling) and am trying to keep a measured head about this. But I just cannot understand how you can hold these two ideas at once. It's cognitive disonnence to the extreme
We reached the thread limit so I started here because it's relevant.
VeilOfReality:
Me:
Sure, what I'm saying tho is that it's mostly infighting and not outfighting, make sense?
Infighting as in people of this community fighting amongst themselves? That seems fair, we should be able to fight and challenge each other
Without rule 1 this community would be conpro esque, no offense to them but it's not how I prefer to argue, we all still need to adhere to site wide rules.
And yea, I think the global surveillance state is becoming a prison planet, have I switched timelines again or I have I just been screaming into the void here for years?
So you agree that censorship is bad. Maybe I'm a time traveler that's here to warn you of the disastrous consequences about to be inflicted from this new direction! As you say the world may never know, or perhaps it shall...
I know, it's both, and the world will know. I'm patiently waiting for my signal to release the next Official Disclosure. Your steering clear of responsibility for threads containing stopwords is eminently sensible.