Citation needed. I played the game and edited my last comment as you asked for, but I find it very distasteful and do not believe people are being thrown from their homes for calling other people retards on the Internet
So people posting violent threats against public figures is somehow akin to non-violent banter against pseudo-anonymous people? No one is coming to anyone's door over someone using a bad word online. And if they eventually do use AI to catch us, you're just as fucked as the rest of us simply by being here. If you're concerned about AI it should be due to its capabilities in sentiment analysis - prior algorithms had to flag no-no words as wrong speak but this is not so any longer now that an idea can be somewhat reasonably extracted from a large series of text
Ya trump admin is about to pardon Israeli queen Maxwellhill so they are going door to door. They will jail you if you boycott Israel. But that's not an excuse to take away first amendment. If they try to imprison you for boycotting then you can always go to court and eventually you will be let go, usually.
But I agree with harassment part. Harassment is illegal. But where did you draw the line? I am not clear about the line in this forum. If I am having a conversation with you and i call you a derogatory name then it might be a harassment but what if I call somebody else a name who isn't in this forum?
What if I call ehud, mileikovsky, trump or Biden a derogatory name?? You never dated that you won't delete them...
Most importantly is this even a free speech forum? If it isn't then let me know
So the idea is don't say no-no words because AI might come after us?
They are going after people, literally showing up at people's doors, I think we can be smarter.
Citation needed. I played the game and edited my last comment as you asked for, but I find it very distasteful and do not believe people are being thrown from their homes for calling other people retards on the Internet
Not retards no but that is a rule 1 thing.
I was watching videos of people recording law enforcement at their doors asking about internet content.
So people posting violent threats against public figures is somehow akin to non-violent banter against pseudo-anonymous people? No one is coming to anyone's door over someone using a bad word online. And if they eventually do use AI to catch us, you're just as fucked as the rest of us simply by being here. If you're concerned about AI it should be due to its capabilities in sentiment analysis - prior algorithms had to flag no-no words as wrong speak but this is not so any longer now that an idea can be somewhat reasonably extracted from a large series of text
Ya trump admin is about to pardon Israeli queen Maxwellhill so they are going door to door. They will jail you if you boycott Israel. But that's not an excuse to take away first amendment. If they try to imprison you for boycotting then you can always go to court and eventually you will be let go, usually.
But I agree with harassment part. Harassment is illegal. But where did you draw the line? I am not clear about the line in this forum. If I am having a conversation with you and i call you a derogatory name then it might be a harassment but what if I call somebody else a name who isn't in this forum?
What if I call ehud, mileikovsky, trump or Biden a derogatory name?? You never dated that you won't delete them...
Most importantly is this even a free speech forum? If it isn't then let me know
Rule 1 includes attacking users.
The 2 words I want avoided are included in the filters but instead of engaging those I'm asking people to watch themselves.
I will say I really think intelligences are in real life policing attacks on public figures, for what that's worth..
Sounds like you don't have the stomach to go up against tyranny...
"I read it in the controlled media"