Because on a conspiracy forum we generally believe that free speech is important and censorship is inherently wrong (especially when the censorship being enforced is the same as the "regime", however you want to define that, is enforcing). It's not just about being able to use slurs.
I just don't understand how you can hold the belief that we need to clamp down on this speech because it's going to get us shutdown and people literally jackbooted, but then say, "eh I'll allow it in some places so people stop being mad". I do think it's good that you're considering how to handle other viewpoints (though I disagree with the handling) and am trying to keep a measured head about this. But I just cannot understand how you can hold these two ideas at once. It's cognitive disonnence to the extreme
Without rule 1 this community would be conpro esque, no offense to them but it's not how I prefer to argue, we all still need to adhere to site wide rules.
And yea, I think the global surveillance state is becoming a prison planet, have I switched timelines again or I have I just been screaming into the void here for years?
So you agree that censorship is bad. Maybe I'm a time traveler that's here to warn you of the disastrous consequences about to be inflicted from this new direction! As you say the world may never know, or perhaps it shall...
Because on a conspiracy forum we generally believe that free speech is important and censorship is inherently wrong (especially when the censorship being enforced is the same as the "regime", however you want to define that, is enforcing). It's not just about being able to use slurs.
I just don't understand how you can hold the belief that we need to clamp down on this speech because it's going to get us shutdown and people literally jackbooted, but then say, "eh I'll allow it in some places so people stop being mad". I do think it's good that you're considering how to handle other viewpoints (though I disagree with the handling) and am trying to keep a measured head about this. But I just cannot understand how you can hold these two ideas at once. It's cognitive disonnence to the extreme
We reached the thread limit so I started here because it's relevant.
VeilOfReality:
Me:
Sure, what I'm saying tho is that it's mostly infighting and not outfighting, make sense?
Infighting as in people of this community fighting amongst themselves? That seems fair, we should be able to fight and challenge each other
Without rule 1 this community would be conpro esque, no offense to them but it's not how I prefer to argue, we all still need to adhere to site wide rules.
And yea, I think the global surveillance state is becoming a prison planet, have I switched timelines again or I have I just been screaming into the void here for years?
So you agree that censorship is bad. Maybe I'm a time traveler that's here to warn you of the disastrous consequences about to be inflicted from this new direction! As you say the world may never know, or perhaps it shall...
π¦π
How many licks indeed, over 200 in this thread so far