Citation needed. I played the game and edited my last comment as you asked for, but I find it very distasteful and do not believe people are being thrown from their homes for calling other people retards on the Internet
So people posting violent threats against public figures is somehow akin to non-violent banter against pseudo-anonymous people? No one is coming to anyone's door over someone using a bad word online. And if they eventually do use AI to catch us, you're just as fucked as the rest of us simply by being here. If you're concerned about AI it should be due to its capabilities in sentiment analysis - prior algorithms had to flag no-no words as wrong speak but this is not so any longer now that an idea can be somewhat reasonably extracted from a large series of text
Intelligences are looking for excuses, admin is also aware of this and that's probably why certain words are included in the filter settings. Instead of enacting filter settings here I'm asking people to watch themselves.
Really? And their excuse isn't going to be any of the useful information shared here, any of the suggestions of violence, it's going to be us calling each other retards and faggots that's going to get them to do what exactly?
Ok so now we're getting away from that facetious argument - rule 1 has always been here - and as a community we came to an understanding of what "respectful" was. When I'm with my friends we call each other all sorts of things that would apparently get me thrown in a gulag, this community was the same way. All sanitizing this place is going to do is make it like anywhere else
Citation needed. I played the game and edited my last comment as you asked for, but I find it very distasteful and do not believe people are being thrown from their homes for calling other people retards on the Internet
Not retards no but that is a rule 1 thing.
I was watching videos of people recording law enforcement at their doors asking about internet content.
So people posting violent threats against public figures is somehow akin to non-violent banter against pseudo-anonymous people? No one is coming to anyone's door over someone using a bad word online. And if they eventually do use AI to catch us, you're just as fucked as the rest of us simply by being here. If you're concerned about AI it should be due to its capabilities in sentiment analysis - prior algorithms had to flag no-no words as wrong speak but this is not so any longer now that an idea can be somewhat reasonably extracted from a large series of text
Intelligences are looking for excuses, admin is also aware of this and that's probably why certain words are included in the filter settings. Instead of enacting filter settings here I'm asking people to watch themselves.
Seperately, rule 1 has always been here.
Really? And their excuse isn't going to be any of the useful information shared here, any of the suggestions of violence, it's going to be us calling each other retards and faggots that's going to get them to do what exactly?
Ok so now we're getting away from that facetious argument - rule 1 has always been here - and as a community we came to an understanding of what "respectful" was. When I'm with my friends we call each other all sorts of things that would apparently get me thrown in a gulag, this community was the same way. All sanitizing this place is going to do is make it like anywhere else