"But muh imaginary numbers on a screen!"
(nitter.net)
Comments (38)
sorted by:
half truths many there
Where’s the half?
Nage fot pound
https://media.scored.co/scale/euIFwqdbiXhGtiNY.jpeg
Exactly the reason you diversify. Those who are going to thrive in a happening scenario are those who live in a fortified homestead, with a large family and friend group, who have access to vehicles, arms, bullets, tools and raw materials, not just gold or silver, but copper and iron too.
Those who put ALL their portfolio into virtual bullshit that can disappear at the stroke of an EMP are going to find themselves wearing lipstick and riding bitch super fucking quick.
Natalists are genuinely retarded.
Were massive buildings like the Empire State building built by one person or multiple hundreds/thousands?
4chan idiot not knowing how money works. Owning stuff and holding money isn't an either/or. Money serves a specific function that commodities can't serve. Maybe learn economics 101.
Crypto and FRNs aren’t money.
Why? What's the definition of money and how does BTC fail to meet the criteria for being money?
The fact that it isn't real, dipshit. It's fake numbers on a screen. Might as well invest in upvotes ffs.
As you said this and you're always wrong...BTC to 200,000 this year.
I can't believe we agree on something.
That's called dropping your mask.
As opposed to what - fake numbers on a piece of paper or fake numbers on your bank account? Come on, we've been through this bs. The medium for money doesn't have to have intrinsic value as a commodity.
For money to be sound, it has to be hard, scarce, durable, portable, divisible, and resistant to manipulation, with a high stock-to-flow ratio that enables it to function as a reliable store of value across generations. Bitcoin fulfills all of those better than any other currency in history, including the gold standard. Government fiat is not even worth mentioning, it's literally the worst debt-slave inflationary system ever devised, yet all the Bitcoin haters would rather have that than crypto.
You have no comprehension of this topic.
Because words have definitions, sophist.
If you don’t know, then shut the absolute fuck up about this topic. It’s the most basic, fundamental thing you need to know before you can opine in any capacity.
Same leftist bullshit.
And I'm the sophist here lol.
Just because people take something for granted and self evident doesn't mean shit. Definitions tend to get very technical when you delve seriously in the subject. If I ask some rando person what existence is, he'd probably answer me the way you did. If I asked someone who has studied philosophy it's a different story. Same applies to economics and money. Your non-answer told me which person you are of the two.
Yes. Learn what money is or die enslaved to jews.
Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.
Translation: “I totally think a man can become a woman if he tries hard enough!”
Because you’d be an idiot for not being able to distinguish the difference between something that exists and something that does not, yes.
The only distinction an ideologist would make is whether “the becoming” of an idea counts as the idea being “made real.” A layman wouldn’t think to make the distinction.
Are you genuinely mentally ill? Or are you just jewish (but I repeat myself)? Go print infinity jew confetti and then wonder why everything is so expensive, economist. Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.
You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.
Wow, that's very deep. You sounded like the free-will-of-choice bot here.
That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.
Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.
Beautiful. Reply again, fiat enjoyer.
Hmm; who insulted whom first?
Com (together) + modus/med (to measure)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/commodity
Reality implies entity...commodity implies fiction.
How could one own and hold a moving current while being within it?
Putting 0 in-between 1 and 1 implies one sharing nothing with one another.
They can't understand it because stormfaggots are broke, jobless retards who hate "muh joos" because their life was a failure and they needed an external factor to blame.
It's an either/or because they're too poor to hold both with the allowance mommy gives them. Just like their idol, they are retards with daddy issues.
Why aren’t you telling jewish women to hold crypto?
Each jew operates from within gentiles, while using blame to hide externally from being discovered. Animating externally to control an anthropomorphic being internally is called Golem (gollum/goylem/goyim)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
"The golem is a highly mutable metaphor with seemingly limitless symbolism. It can be a victim or villain, man or woman—or sometimes both. Over the centuries, it has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair." ~ Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel
The oldest stories of golems date to early Judaism. In the Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin 38b), Adam is initially created as a golem (גולם) when his dust is "kneaded into a shapeless husk". Like Adam, all golems are created from mud by those close to divinity, but no anthropogenic golem is fully human.
Shocker that your usual bot posts aren't as incoherent when you're writing about your owner's favorite topic.
a) Free-will-of-choice cannot be owned.
b) A topic can only be applied upon a perishable.
c) Nature favors (attracts) evenly, which each odd being within needs to resist the wanted temptation thereof...a jew suggests favoritism to tempt gentiles at odds with one another.
a) About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0)
b) Coherence implies "sticking together"...free-will-of-choice needs to resist that to remain free.
My ass. Whoever runs this account has the world's most obnoxious LLM.
a) Model aka mod/med (to take measure) + el (God)...if one takes measures, then one ignores God given. Others suggest languages to trick one to measure God by words (logos). LLM implies a large database of words regurgitating suggestible information to willing slaves, who measure the world in words.
Free-will-of-choice adapts to perceivable inspiration...no LLM required.
b) Obnoxious aka ob (towards) + noxa/nek (death) implies life being moved from inception towards death. The opposite of obnoxious implies delightful aka fueled through division of light.
The excuses these people make for their lack of knowledge are incredible.
Inflation is not the result of a "cartel", but because of reckless government spending.
Money supply goes up, money loses value. Very simple. No conspiracy needed.
Thank the federal reserve.
Both. And the government is corrupt and controlled by evil.
Agreed. It's ridiculously easy for TPTB to sink and destroy the economy at whatever pace they choose. And no man will stop them.
Government spending doesn't necessitate increase of money supply. The conspiracy here is that the centralized banking system inflates the money supply by money printing and control of interest rates, thus robbing people of their savings and creating the boom-bust cycle which causes economic instability.
Which is total crap, because money is only printed by the Fed when Congress spends more than they have.
Interest rates should be higher, for longer, but the natalist regime wants to bring them down because their debt is about to roll over at 4.1%, creating a $1.6T bill.
But hey, you wanted the higher birth rate. Prepare for the consequences.
Lol. The fed doesn't print money the Treasury does.
There is no reason to believe this will do anything to any birth rate.
It's all women, acktchewally...