Don't ask me what it is because it's basic and everyone knows it
And I'm the sophist here lol.
Just because people take something for granted and self evident doesn't mean shit. Definitions tend to get very technical when you delve seriously in the subject. If I ask some rando person what existence is, he'd probably answer me the way you did. If I asked someone who has studied philosophy it's a different story. Same applies to economics and money. Your non-answer told me which person you are of the two.
Just because people take something for granted and self evident doesn't mean shit.
Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.
Definitions tend to get very technical when you delve seriously in the subject.
Translation: “I totally think a man can become a woman if he tries hard enough!”
If I ask some rando person what existence is, he'd probably answer me the way you did.
Because you’d be an idiot for not being able to distinguish the difference between something that exists and something that does not, yes.
If I asked someone who has studied philosophy it's a different story.
The only distinction an ideologist would make is whether “the becoming” of an idea counts as the idea being “made real.” A layman wouldn’t think to make the distinction.
Your non-answer told me which person you are of the two.
Are you genuinely mentally ill? Or are you just jewish (but I repeat myself)? Go print infinity jew confetti and then wonder why everything is so expensive, economist. Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.
You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.
The only distinction an ideologist would make is whether “the becoming” of an idea counts as the idea being “made real.” A layman wouldn’t think to make the distinction.
Wow, that's very deep. You sounded like the free-will-of-choice bot here.
Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.
That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.
Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.
Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.
Lol I'm not the one who loves fiat. I explained why that's the worst system. You hate fiat alternatives like Bitcoin and want to keep your Fed magic paper.
Hmm; who insulted whom first?
Are you kidding? You're a schizo dude, of course you started it jut like every time.
And I'm the sophist here lol.
Just because people take something for granted and self evident doesn't mean shit. Definitions tend to get very technical when you delve seriously in the subject. If I ask some rando person what existence is, he'd probably answer me the way you did. If I asked someone who has studied philosophy it's a different story. Same applies to economics and money. Your non-answer told me which person you are of the two.
Yes. Learn what money is or die enslaved to jews.
Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.
Translation: “I totally think a man can become a woman if he tries hard enough!”
Because you’d be an idiot for not being able to distinguish the difference between something that exists and something that does not, yes.
The only distinction an ideologist would make is whether “the becoming” of an idea counts as the idea being “made real.” A layman wouldn’t think to make the distinction.
Are you genuinely mentally ill? Or are you just jewish (but I repeat myself)? Go print infinity jew confetti and then wonder why everything is so expensive, economist. Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.
You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.
Wow, that's very deep. You sounded like the free-will-of-choice bot here.
That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.
Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.
Beautiful. Reply again, fiat enjoyer.
Hmm; who insulted whom first?
Lol I'm not the one who loves fiat. I explained why that's the worst system. You hate fiat alternatives like Bitcoin and want to keep your Fed magic paper.
Are you kidding? You're a schizo dude, of course you started it jut like every time.