"But muh imaginary numbers on a screen!"
(nitter.net)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.
Wow, that's very deep. You sounded like the free-will-of-choice bot here.
That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.
Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.
Beautiful. Reply again, fiat enjoyer.
Hmm; who insulted whom first?
Lol I'm not the one who loves fiat. I explained why that's the worst system. You hate fiat alternatives like Bitcoin and want to keep your Fed magic paper.
Are you kidding? You're a schizo dude, of course you started it jut like every time.
Why is it so easy to expose sophists? I don’t get it. Where’s the challenge? Where’s the effort? In a shooting war, will you really all just capitulate instantly? Holy shit, this should be embarrassing to you. But of course, it’s impossible to defeat someone by ridicule in an era where dignity doesn't exist.
Enjoy starving to death because no one will accept your promise of magnetic states on someone else’s hard drive in exchange for food, fiat worshipper.