Shut it down!
(media.scored.co)
Comments (50)
sorted by:
When they spoke the truth outloud and had to shut it down because goyim knows too much.
https://archive.is/2022.07.25-220550/https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/to-dislike-certain-ethnicities-is-racist-to-see-jews-as-equal-is-antisemitic/
Wow, that sounds exactly like that Critical Race Theory stuff that's been adopted by all levels of all governments...
Consenting to any suggestion implies ONES CHOICE assigning a CHOSEN ONE.
Gentiles giving consent to any jewish suggestion equalizes consensus among gentiles, while permitting each jew differential status.
Special implies apart from one another, understanding implies standing under one another. Each jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consensus among gentiles into understanding, which in return protects the special status of each jew.
Only implies singular; people implies plural...a jew suggests pluralism to tempt gentiles into ignoring singularity.
Aka being divided (life) within natural order (inception towards death). Another word for ordained is "appointed" aka inception sentencing life towards point of death.
Task/taxare/tax - "to evaluate"...being within nature implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable). A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consensus among gentiles into a self imposed burden (tax).
If one permits another to evaluate, then the suggested value becomes a burden for one to carry. A jew suggests prices to trick gentiles to burden themselves willingly with any product bought into, while selling self out to a jew.
Ambactus/ambhi/ag - "to drive out" aka being (life) driven out (inception towards death).
A jew sets up embassies to direct the traffic of living gentiles from inception towards death through for example progressivism. A gentiles consent to any jewish suggestion implies "following the leader".
Notice the jewish use of G_d without an O, and good with double OO. GOD doesn't forward within a circle, but forwards potential (life) within linear progression (inception towards death).
A jew tempts gentiles with suggested words (logos) into a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle. Logic implies circular thinking, which turns into a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Logic + reason represent the double OO's.
Meaning isn't natural, but artificially articulated by speech within natural sound aka jewish spell-craft tempting consenting gentiles to hold onto words (logos), which establishes a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle (kikel/kike) of confinement.
Sameness (all perceivable) generates difference (ones perception)...a jew uses suggestion to tempt gentiles into alike consensus. Why? To remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Political-History-1789-1939/dp/0199246815
Gentiles consenting to any jewish suggestion implies holding onto mentally (ideas) and physically (idols), while ignoring that perceivable moves through perception and cannot be held onto.
Being (life) implies within a way (inception towards death), hence being moved away unless resisting temptation.
A jew utilizes adjustment aka joining the minds of gentiles together; norms aka suggesting a standard for gentiles to follow; integration aka tempting gentiles to hold suggested information within instead of expressing oneself outwards within perceivable inspiration, and assimilation aka mixing artificially together what nature sets apart from one another.
Okay retard.
This Sunday happens to be the day that the The Parable of the Wedding Feast from Mathew 22 is read during divine liturgy. It has to do with the guests (the jews) refusing to go to the banquet that was prepared for them (by the OT prophets) and the groom (Christ) inviting people from the town and the streets (gentiles) instead to feast with Him.
Do you now understand why jews hate Christianity so much and how retarded people who claim Christianity to be a jewish psy op sound?
I agree with your reading of that passage but I'd like to pointout that today's Gospel at the true Church of Christ was the following:
Gospel of the day
From the Gospel according to Matthew 11:2-11
When John the Baptist heard in prison of the works of the Christ, he sent his disciples to Jesus with this question, "Are you the one who is to come, or should we look for another?" Jesus said to them in reply, "Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind regain their sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the poor have the good news proclaimed to them. And blessed is the one who takes no offense at me."
As they were going off, Jesus began to speak to the crowds about John, "What did you go out to the desert to see? A reed swayed by the wind? Then what did you go out to see? Someone dressed in fine clothing? Those who wear fine clothing are in royal palaces. Then why did you go out? To see a prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. This is the one about whom it is written: Behold, I am sending my messenger ahead of you; he will prepare your way before you. Amen, I say to you, among those born of women there has been none greater than John the Baptist; yet the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."
You mean the Church that supports and promotes socialism, skittles, globalism, stabbies, climate change and which has Popes praying in mosques towards Mecca and which claims Muslims worship the same God as Christians? That can't be right.
No, I mean the Church founded by Jesus Christ himself, and not some rebel schismatic.
The true Church lies in the hearts of the believers in Christ, as scripture explicitely states.
No hierarchy, be it Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox, is valid. All of these are political entities.
Usually I would agree with you then I have an entire thread coming down from this of jews attacking a Catholic, and I think of all churches the Catholic must be closer to Him otherwise they would leave us alone.
You obviously don't know much about the Early Church history then because it had synodal structure and papal supremacy wasn't a thing. It surely wasn't a geopolitical entity with an army and a bank. You literally updated the Nicene creed that was dogmatized at the first and second ecumenical councils and you have the balls to call the Orthodox schismatics?
But I don't even have to go to debating history because it's the RCC after Vatican II is in obvious contradiction with prior papal teachings. This is a defeater for the entire system.
Oh the irony. Who do you think the Apostle St. Peter the rock upon which Jesus Christ founded his church was? The first Pope. You think you're somehow better than or superior to most Catholics when in fact you're just like most of them as you don't believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Let me know the day you decide to follow Christ, not some schismatic punk.
Lol, Peter is the rock but he's nothing like the RC Pope figure. The rest of the apostles were given the same authority as Peter two chapters later in Mathew.
You realize if papal supremacy was a thing in the first millennium, there would be no need for ecumenical councils because the Petrine See alone would determine what the right doctrines and dogma is. Not to mention Alexandria and Antioch are also Petrine Sees. So if Peter is what makes Rome special how come the rest aren't up there?
What? You have no clue what the Eastern Orthodox Church (which is identical to the Early Church) teaches. Have you red the Church Fathers? Why do you argue over things you don't have knowledge of?
You updated your original post in this chain and completely changed its meaning to realiagn the conversation to make like you are winning the point. You criticized jews while pulling exactly the same tricks as them. Theres no point in debating another dishonest internet random such as you.
pops some popcorn to go with the Frankfurter theses that Luther's students roasted