Usually I would agree with you then I have an entire thread coming down from this of jews attacking a Catholic, and I think of all churches the Catholic must be closer to Him otherwise they would leave us alone.
You obviously don't know much about the Early Church history then because it had synodal structure and papal supremacy wasn't a thing. It surely wasn't a geopolitical entity with an army and a bank. You literally updated the Nicene creed that was dogmatized at the first and second ecumenical councils and you have the balls to call the Orthodox schismatics?
But I don't even have to go to debating history because it's the RCC after Vatican II is in obvious contradiction with prior papal teachings. This is a defeater for the entire system.
Oh the irony. Who do you think the Apostle St. Peter the rock upon which Jesus Christ founded his church was? The first Pope. You think you're somehow better than or superior to most Catholics when in fact you're just like most of them as you don't believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Let me know the day you decide to follow Christ, not some schismatic punk.
Lol, Peter is the rock but he's nothing like the RC Pope figure. The rest of the apostles were given the same authority as Peter two chapters later in Mathew.
You realize if papal supremacy was a thing in the first millennium, there would be no need for ecumenical councils because the Petrine See alone would determine what the right doctrines and dogma is. Not to mention Alexandria and Antioch are also Petrine Sees. So if Peter is what makes Rome special how come the rest aren't up there?
You think you're somehow better than or superior to most Catholics when in fact you're just like most of them as you don't believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
What? You have no clue what the Eastern Orthodox Church (which is identical to the Early Church) teaches. Have you red the Church Fathers? Why do you argue over things you don't have knowledge of?
You updated your original post in this chain and completely changed its meaning to realiagn the conversation to make like you are winning the point. You criticized jews while pulling exactly the same tricks as them. Theres no point in debating another dishonest internet random such as you.
No, I mean the Church founded by Jesus Christ himself, and not some rebel schismatic.
The true Church lies in the hearts of the believers in Christ, as scripture explicitely states.
No hierarchy, be it Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox, is valid. All of these are political entities.
Usually I would agree with you then I have an entire thread coming down from this of jews attacking a Catholic, and I think of all churches the Catholic must be closer to Him otherwise they would leave us alone.
You obviously don't know much about the Early Church history then because it had synodal structure and papal supremacy wasn't a thing. It surely wasn't a geopolitical entity with an army and a bank. You literally updated the Nicene creed that was dogmatized at the first and second ecumenical councils and you have the balls to call the Orthodox schismatics?
But I don't even have to go to debating history because it's the RCC after Vatican II is in obvious contradiction with prior papal teachings. This is a defeater for the entire system.
Oh the irony. Who do you think the Apostle St. Peter the rock upon which Jesus Christ founded his church was? The first Pope. You think you're somehow better than or superior to most Catholics when in fact you're just like most of them as you don't believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Let me know the day you decide to follow Christ, not some schismatic punk.
Lol, Peter is the rock but he's nothing like the RC Pope figure. The rest of the apostles were given the same authority as Peter two chapters later in Mathew.
You realize if papal supremacy was a thing in the first millennium, there would be no need for ecumenical councils because the Petrine See alone would determine what the right doctrines and dogma is. Not to mention Alexandria and Antioch are also Petrine Sees. So if Peter is what makes Rome special how come the rest aren't up there?
What? You have no clue what the Eastern Orthodox Church (which is identical to the Early Church) teaches. Have you red the Church Fathers? Why do you argue over things you don't have knowledge of?
You updated your original post in this chain and completely changed its meaning to realiagn the conversation to make like you are winning the point. You criticized jews while pulling exactly the same tricks as them. Theres no point in debating another dishonest internet random such as you.
pops some popcorn to go with the Frankfurter theses that Luther's students roasted