Oh, I missed this one, written before you asked me to stop talking to you again. If you want proof that I and Swamp Rangers are not manipulating votes, you'll need to state what kind of proof you accept, because due to admin's high respect for privacy there is hardly any way anyone can offer proof of that assertion except via character based on public statement. So I don't know how I would "prove" it to you. You're free to drop the question (and join me in beginning a ceasefire) or to press it.
The organization isn't focused on capturing the forum, the Swamp Rangers exist to help Jesus Christ conquer the world. The forum will capitulate to Jesus in good time. You're either in favor of Jesus conquering the world, or you're getting conquered by Jesus, pretty simple.
I told you that to get proof you'd need to state terms of acceptable proof. However, it's pretty good prima facie evidence that the purposes of Swamp Rangers are consistent with those republished by Scott last year. We are after the Potomac Swamp, primarily. For you to twist that into concern about Conspiracies is pretty self-inserting. Ceasefire is still available.
How can anyone prove to anyone else's satisfaction that they don't have friends upvoting and downvoting? If you can tell me what standard of proof you would use, we can work with that. For instance, if I accused you of having friends upvoting and downvoting what you like, how would you disprove it to me? Golden Rule.
I never said the org isn't used for good, I never said it was used to push me to mod, in fact I've never invoked it in connecting with modding this community. Your brain must be pretty twisted to be shown that we started this five years ago with a plan, a website, an org, an accountability, an oath, an image, a campaign, and to imply it was primarily for the purpose of downvoting you once you came along? Why would we go to all that trouble to announce ourselves if our primary goal is website voting? Voting campaigns never announce themselves unless they're soliciting people they're offering to pay for their votes. Thinking to all the meetings I've had with Rangers about all topics, did we ever say hey let's break some forum rules and risk defaming ourselves and losing reputation forever in case we're caught by site IP just so we can vote twice instead of once? No, that never came up, the closest we said is that individual Rangers could use social media in accord with terms (which obviously exclude such campaigns), but no Ranger (except my wife, who doesn't frequent Conspiracies) has ever told me of being on Scored. No publicly accountable org in the body of Christ does that. Use your AP psych!
Claiming namespaces doesn't make one "divided". If you wanted to debate philosphically the theology of unspoiling all things that would be different, but you're not doing that, you're overreacting to discovering more about the person you befriended (last year and this year), and you keep tying it to your controlling assertions over who is to be a mod here.
So let me know how you would defend against a charge that you have secret friends coordinating by DM and offline to control votes, and we can talk. Ceasefire is still available.
the Swamp Rangers exist to help Jesus Christ conquer the world. The forum will capitulate to Jesus in good time. You're either in favor of Jesus conquering the world, or you're getting conquered by Jesus, pretty simple.
Wow. Tell me you're usurping the name of Jesus Christ for your own temporal gain without telling me...
It's a standard triumphalist eschatology. Christians believe Jesus is Lord, there is no other eschatological option. He's the one who said you're for or against him. I'm his body but it's got nothing to do with me personally because he may use anyone else or he may wait until the forum collapses of itself; but it will be his one way or another.
Oh, I missed this one, written before you asked me to stop talking to you again. If you want proof that I and Swamp Rangers are not manipulating votes, you'll need to state what kind of proof you accept, because due to admin's high respect for privacy there is hardly any way anyone can offer proof of that assertion except via character based on public statement. So I don't know how I would "prove" it to you. You're free to drop the question (and join me in beginning a ceasefire) or to press it.
u/Neo1 I've been upvoting SwampRangers sporadically and I've downvoted your posts.
That's perfect.
I thought exposing shills would be hard on this forum, but you make it so easy.
Like I've told others, you can call me whatever you'd like but it doesn't make it true.
Are you part of his group, too?
I thought you wanted to "talk yourself out of this", but I see no proof of your claims still.
Just a shadow organization that couldn't capture this forum...
How sad for you...
The organization isn't focused on capturing the forum, the Swamp Rangers exist to help Jesus Christ conquer the world. The forum will capitulate to Jesus in good time. You're either in favor of Jesus conquering the world, or you're getting conquered by Jesus, pretty simple.
I told you that to get proof you'd need to state terms of acceptable proof. However, it's pretty good prima facie evidence that the purposes of Swamp Rangers are consistent with those republished by Scott last year. We are after the Potomac Swamp, primarily. For you to twist that into concern about Conspiracies is pretty self-inserting. Ceasefire is still available.
So you can't prove that your "rangers" are not upvoting and downvoting what you liked, because you will admit fraud.
You also admitted that you have an organization behind your back that you never used for good, just to push yourself into the mod position.
And now, that you have failed, and ever lie of yours is revealed, you try to play it as if your organization never hurt anyone...
You say you're a Christian, and you created c/Satan; c/Satanism; c/Islam; c/LGBT; c/Porno... and many more forums where you can be a mod...
A house divided cannot stand... - Jesus said that. So your downfall is what is supposed to happen.
You will NEVER BE A MOD HERE.
How can anyone prove to anyone else's satisfaction that they don't have friends upvoting and downvoting? If you can tell me what standard of proof you would use, we can work with that. For instance, if I accused you of having friends upvoting and downvoting what you like, how would you disprove it to me? Golden Rule.
I never said the org isn't used for good, I never said it was used to push me to mod, in fact I've never invoked it in connecting with modding this community. Your brain must be pretty twisted to be shown that we started this five years ago with a plan, a website, an org, an accountability, an oath, an image, a campaign, and to imply it was primarily for the purpose of downvoting you once you came along? Why would we go to all that trouble to announce ourselves if our primary goal is website voting? Voting campaigns never announce themselves unless they're soliciting people they're offering to pay for their votes. Thinking to all the meetings I've had with Rangers about all topics, did we ever say hey let's break some forum rules and risk defaming ourselves and losing reputation forever in case we're caught by site IP just so we can vote twice instead of once? No, that never came up, the closest we said is that individual Rangers could use social media in accord with terms (which obviously exclude such campaigns), but no Ranger (except my wife, who doesn't frequent Conspiracies) has ever told me of being on Scored. No publicly accountable org in the body of Christ does that. Use your AP psych!
Claiming namespaces doesn't make one "divided". If you wanted to debate philosphically the theology of unspoiling all things that would be different, but you're not doing that, you're overreacting to discovering more about the person you befriended (last year and this year), and you keep tying it to your controlling assertions over who is to be a mod here.
So let me know how you would defend against a charge that you have secret friends coordinating by DM and offline to control votes, and we can talk. Ceasefire is still available.
Wow. Tell me you're usurping the name of Jesus Christ for your own temporal gain without telling me...
It's a standard triumphalist eschatology. Christians believe Jesus is Lord, there is no other eschatological option. He's the one who said you're for or against him. I'm his body but it's got nothing to do with me personally because he may use anyone else or he may wait until the forum collapses of itself; but it will be his one way or another.