How can anyone prove to anyone else's satisfaction that they don't have friends upvoting and downvoting? If you can tell me what standard of proof you would use, we can work with that. For instance, if I accused you of having friends upvoting and downvoting what you like, how would you disprove it to me? Golden Rule.
I never said the org isn't used for good, I never said it was used to push me to mod, in fact I've never invoked it in connecting with modding this community. Your brain must be pretty twisted to be shown that we started this five years ago with a plan, a website, an org, an accountability, an oath, an image, a campaign, and to imply it was primarily for the purpose of downvoting you once you came along? Why would we go to all that trouble to announce ourselves if our primary goal is website voting? Voting campaigns never announce themselves unless they're soliciting people they're offering to pay for their votes. Thinking to all the meetings I've had with Rangers about all topics, did we ever say hey let's break some forum rules and risk defaming ourselves and losing reputation forever in case we're caught by site IP just so we can vote twice instead of once? No, that never came up, the closest we said is that individual Rangers could use social media in accord with terms (which obviously exclude such campaigns), but no Ranger (except my wife, who doesn't frequent Conspiracies) has ever told me of being on Scored. No publicly accountable org in the body of Christ does that. Use your AP psych!
Claiming namespaces doesn't make one "divided". If you wanted to debate philosphically the theology of unspoiling all things that would be different, but you're not doing that, you're overreacting to discovering more about the person you befriended (last year and this year), and you keep tying it to your controlling assertions over who is to be a mod here.
So let me know how you would defend against a charge that you have secret friends coordinating by DM and offline to control votes, and we can talk. Ceasefire is still available.
So you can't prove that your "rangers" are not upvoting and downvoting what you liked, because you will admit fraud.
You also admitted that you have an organization behind your back that you never used for good, just to push yourself into the mod position.
And now, that you have failed, and ever lie of yours is revealed, you try to play it as if your organization never hurt anyone...
You say you're a Christian, and you created c/Satan; c/Satanism; c/Islam; c/LGBT; c/Porno... and many more forums where you can be a mod...
A house divided cannot stand... - Jesus said that. So your downfall is what is supposed to happen.
You will NEVER BE A MOD HERE.
How can anyone prove to anyone else's satisfaction that they don't have friends upvoting and downvoting? If you can tell me what standard of proof you would use, we can work with that. For instance, if I accused you of having friends upvoting and downvoting what you like, how would you disprove it to me? Golden Rule.
I never said the org isn't used for good, I never said it was used to push me to mod, in fact I've never invoked it in connecting with modding this community. Your brain must be pretty twisted to be shown that we started this five years ago with a plan, a website, an org, an accountability, an oath, an image, a campaign, and to imply it was primarily for the purpose of downvoting you once you came along? Why would we go to all that trouble to announce ourselves if our primary goal is website voting? Voting campaigns never announce themselves unless they're soliciting people they're offering to pay for their votes. Thinking to all the meetings I've had with Rangers about all topics, did we ever say hey let's break some forum rules and risk defaming ourselves and losing reputation forever in case we're caught by site IP just so we can vote twice instead of once? No, that never came up, the closest we said is that individual Rangers could use social media in accord with terms (which obviously exclude such campaigns), but no Ranger (except my wife, who doesn't frequent Conspiracies) has ever told me of being on Scored. No publicly accountable org in the body of Christ does that. Use your AP psych!
Claiming namespaces doesn't make one "divided". If you wanted to debate philosphically the theology of unspoiling all things that would be different, but you're not doing that, you're overreacting to discovering more about the person you befriended (last year and this year), and you keep tying it to your controlling assertions over who is to be a mod here.
So let me know how you would defend against a charge that you have secret friends coordinating by DM and offline to control votes, and we can talk. Ceasefire is still available.
You ran yourself into a ditch.
I wonder how can your organization help you now...