Being asked to look up one hoax about Jews reveals many more. A long outlier pattern of circulating false stories about Jews with racial implications, when demonstrations of their falsity create sympathy for the Jews by contrast, suggests that two paths are taken by opponents of truth: circulating a bald lie about a perceived enemy, and circulating a bald lie that one's enemy circulates bald lies. Simple dedication to truth defeats both enemies undifferentiated. Consider this theme, reviewing evidence just from Scored presentations I looked into and always found needed debunking.
-
Bible misquotes: Too many to review here. Bible speaks for itself and is appealed to when someone doesn't take it in its intended grammaticohistorical sense. This category is mentioned first simply because frequent narratives flatly say the Bible says in context what it doesn't say. Most notably, it says the synagogue of satan is not composed of Jews, but is quoted as if saying the opposite. Nor does it apply negative titles to the Jews as a whole, but applies a number of positive titles to them.
-
Talmud misquotes: Too many to review here. Nicholas Donin converted from Judaism to Catholicism in the 13th century and got the ball rolling, exposing Christianity to Talmud without benefit of understanding the context. This led to continuing notion of blasphemous Talmud (e.g., it does contain one dirty joke using a nickname that might apply to Jesus, which was misquoted here 45+ times). Peak in 19th-century Germany: several authors attempted to quote Jewish sources as despicable, when quotations themselves were so poorly translated and sourced they are often unrecognizable to Jews. This telephone game continues today. One misquote kept getting rephrased to sound more evil about "power over" "blood", except its ultimate origin was merely the Christian-accepted verse Ps. 105:44!
-
Foreknowledge of 6 million deaths: Renegade Tribune: "Ancient Jewish prophecy had promised the Jews their return to the Promised Land after a loss of 6 million of their people. According to the book Breaking the Spell by Nicholas Kollerstrom, publications and speakers had referred to the death or persecution of 6 million Jews on at least 166 occasions before the end of World War II." That claim is false. The first sentence is sourced from Benjamin Blech, The Secret of Hebrew Words; what Blech actually says is that "tashuvu" (the last "ye shall return" in Lev. 25:10) is a variant lacking a central waw. After 1948 it was noticed that the gematria for this word, 708, corresponds currently to 1947-1948, and that the missing waw, 6, to a missing 6 million. This is not a prophecy that promised anything, this is a mathematical synchrony found after the fact that is not specific enough to give the detail stated in advance to anyone. Secondly, cherry-picking of text searches prior to 1945 for "six million" and "Jews" together cannot indicate foreknowledge of Holocaust death toll. "Six million" was arbitrarily selected whether it meant: estimate of Bar Kochba deaths; total world Jewish population; Russian Jewish population; Russian Jewish family count; European Jewish population; Jewish population represented at a global conference; or dollar size of a Jewish fund (yes, reference to the Jews in proximity with six million dollars was included as proof of foreknowledge). Germar Rudolf in intro to Don Heddesheimer's First Holocaust gives actual results of searches for millions of Jews from 1 to 7: "three million" is the most common number cited, despite Rudolf backpedaling by treating the data differently even though the generic nature of the data remains constant.
-
Star of Remphan: Many sources propose "star of Remphan" is a hexagram or star of David. That claim is false. There were no hexagrams for another 250 years in that region after the term "star of Remphan" was reported, but those words translate a text from Amos 750 years earlier that calls it the star of gods like Chiun (Saturn). So Remphan simply means Rephaim (Titans, sons of Saturn); the star in question, given Amos's context, is most likely the spirit associated with the bronze serpent Nehushtan that had become an idol. So the "star of David" cannot be called the unique star of Remphan. However because of recent association it may be considered one of many stars of Remphan of varying historical quality, including T-and-O symbol, pentagram, uroboros, tinseled trees, and most notably the poled snake incorporated in logos and in the modern dollar sign.
-
1,030 Jewish expulsions: An anon called 'Lord Molyneaux' (including the apostrophes) published the samizdat The Complete List of the One Thousand and Thirty Jewish Expulsions in Human History. Misleading claim, perhaps intentionally so, because after this bold analytical title he immediately backpedals in the first expulsion, "This first entry may in fact need to be omitted due to the fact that it is largely mythological." I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't 1,030 after all. #2 and #3 are the same captivity, the partial and the full wave in Assyria; #5 under Haman wasn't carried out at all and wasn't because of Jewish criminality. If we compared this to expulsions of Roma people or Christians, or the national curses of Amos 1-2, there'd be nothing special about the list. It also has several severe methodology problems. The author engaged many hours of research in a poorly conceived project that led to an excessively ineffective data set. On many pages the same action in ten cities described by one source was counted as ten expulsions (other actions in many cities were counted as single expulsions for lack of lists). The author must not have liked the Holocaust, because he felt he had to include it but said nothing more about it than the generic "Jewish expulsion" description he used a hundred times. The work sure doesn't lead to the conclusion that racism is right, that the Jews have been justly judged en masse by a competent formal authority, or that these selective windows in history prove a conclusion beyond the Jews getting in trouble a whole lot with no control comparison.
-
Edom is Jewry: "Esau-Edom is modern Jewry" is said to be found in The Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. 5, p. 41. That claim is false. The image of this page is public and does not contain this text. The closest to the alleged quote is the historically accurate statement, "The Edomites ... by John Hyrcanus ... were then incorporated with the Jewish nation," far different from that claimed. It appears that the version above is a corruption of vol. 5, p. 208, which says, "'Esau' (=Edom) later represents Rome." I saw intermediate links suggesting that this short form evolved into the form allegedly quoted, via the unproven idea that Rome is controlled by modern Jewry; and this original stylizing explains the oddity of phrasing when punctuation is simplified.
-
Baruch Levy: La Revue de Paris (June 1, 1928) stated it had obtained an 1879 letter to Karl Marx from "Baruch Levy", a "Neo-Messianist" who was quoted as saying that the Jewish people would attain world dominion by a detailed plan. That claim is unsupported. No other evidence indicates that such a one ever existed; article is completely consistent with fabrication of an identity to propagate an idealistic narrative. Sure, satan does plan to attain world dominion through whomever he can use of any race, and that plan is carried out along the same lines as the alleged letter, but that is not related to race but to satan's career as Biblically described; so, no, the system is not intrinsic to a particular people.
-
Rabbi Reichorn: A quote from "Rabbi Reichorn" at a funeral of "Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah", allegedly 1869, states, "We have forced the Christians into wars without number." That is a fiction. Interesting tracking, but it ultimately arises from Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (pen name John Retcliffe), 1868. Goedsche novelizes the idea of Jewish representatives meeting secretly in the Prague cemetery in 1860. The text appears in The Jew in the Modern World, 1995, and includes the reference to the tomb of "Grand ... rabbi Simeon ben Jehuda" and the concept, "how to turn to the advantage of our cause the great errors and sins which our enemies the Christians never cease to commit." This was echoed and modified by French periodicals Le Contemporain (1880) and then La Vieille France (1920-1921) until it reached the "Reichorn" form. (Some versions say Emanuel Reichhorn was chief rabbi of France, which is also untrue.) So, no, this claim arises from an exaggerated fiction, though the satanic plans are relatively accurately stated.
-
Schneersohn in Slavyanin: A long article (meme-quoted), apparently from the obscure Russian "newspaper" Slavyanin in 2001 but not citable until a 2014 blog, has Rabbi Schneersohn saying Khazaria is Israel. This appears a minor tabloid found running "anti-Semitist" articles generally with little evidence of its existence online. The meme matches the 2014 translation except for minor grammar; it appears to cite uncritically publishers with no journalistic duty to accurately quote the dead. It says it quotes a letter published 2001, though Schneersohn died in 1994, indicating the problem. It is prefaced with a note that despite authenticity debate it's indisputable that the goals described are accurate (implying that concepts are more important than source veracity). The Slavyanin editor and sometime city duma candidate, Vladimir F. Popov, was tried for incitement, and the paper was shut down as uncharted in early 2002.
-
Abe Finkelstein: The tale of a particular unfindable "Abraham 'Abe' Finkelstein" (also the birth name of singer Arthur Fields) comes from a 2006 "interview" by James Wickstrom, who was also jailed for a year for making up invalid titles for himself and others. Wickstrom and the guest never elaborate beyond "Abe" having a synagogue somewhere in New York, which has zero independent evidence. Early in the transcript is, "'I have a guest by the name Rabbi Abe Finkelstein .... You are a lying Jew.' 'Eh, you could say that, but even when we lie we tell the truth!'" Later the guest adds, "Remember, there has never been a Jew in the history of the world that ever told a lie. We always tell the truth." These two indicate the "guest" knows he's deliberately lying, consistent with Wickstrom's MO, and with deceptive nominal "disclosure" of the lie. Some errors: The alleged "rabbi" quotes include both "A good goyim" (four times), "The goyim does all the work, the goyim makes all the stuff", "There is a goyim", and "They are good-and-paid-for shabbos goy .... The rest of them are good bought-and-paid-for shabbos goy", showing that he knows both singular and plural but uses them both wrong (often in place of each other). Wickstrom also uses goyim as a singular, indicating the same error. The "rabbi" also doesn't know the word "sheqalim" and always says "shekels". The quote "We've been doing this for thousands and thousands of years, since down to Adam's time" kind of implicates 2,000 years of Gentile involvement in child sacrifice before Judah, namesake of the Jews, came along in 1797 BC. Someone intending to speak historically might have said Abraham's time. The guest says (perhaps sarcastically) Episcopalian Charlton Heston was Jewish, but the JPost obituary rejected this. At 17 minutes he says, "Oh, Silverman, who's a good friend of mine there, Larry, he got a twofer," referring to Larry Silverstein. Yet he knows enough to paraphrase Silverstein as saying "They pulled the plug, and pulled it as they say, and so the buildings came down." A paid actor is the explanation best fitting the evidence.
-
109 countries: Another circulating meme says Jews were expelled from 109 countries. There is no such list. a probable origin of "109" lists 108 expulsions on 109 rows, with many admitted duplicate countries or regions. Its ultimate source Anti-Semitism (Grosser and Halperin, 1979 ed.) lists only 81 expulsions pp. 35-38 (250-1948). If we merely said that, it'd be accurate, and comparable to persecution of Christians, Roma, or Muslims; as is, "109" now has taken on a life of its own as a false gospel. More.
-
Chamorro and Ussuf: Two letters in these names have circulated since the 16th century in various redactions. They are most certainly forgeries; the version placing the action in Arles is clearly a later forgery of the version placing it in Toledo. More.
-
"Jew from 2000BC": It was the Gentile, Enannatum I of Lagash, ca. 24th century BC. Maybe satanists had big noses before Jews came along. Repeats, 1 2.
-
Harold W. Rosenthal interview on Lucifer worship: Another postmortem invention free from libel law, without proof of any assertion, created by "Western Front".
Who does not pursue truth and accuracy pursues the work of the enemy, by wit or not.
Every single word of this submission is a known and proven falsehood and you need to be permanently banned for intentionally spreading lies.
I wonder how many jews assembled in board conference rooms to try to come up with some spiel about them not really being the Synagogue of Satan even though it is fucking obvious.
"Oh tell the goys the synagogue of satan was just a small group of irrelevant people from 2000 years ago that don't exist anymore. Because God would find an insignificant forgotten people so important as to dedicate several verses about them in the second chapter of the final book of the New Testament. They will ignore the fact our lie doesn't line up with anything else in the book."
SwampRangers already has no credibility here. Don't let his blocks of texts and many annoying comments fool you. There's lying jews just like him in all the American Universities, devoted full time to spreading lies and misinformation and planting poison seeds in otherwise good movements. Constantly sabotaging the body of knowledge of White People.
Nothing to do with boardrooms, Vlad, it was my own discovery, which is why I don't reference anyone else.
I appealed to your basis where truth and social mores don't matter because of the alleged greater morality of an imperial impaler, and if you've answered that question then great.
But from the standpoint of truth, in 96 AD Jesus reappeared and dictated seven letters that seven churches preserved because they were about the current events in their churches. When Ignatius reviewed those same problems in 108 AD it's natural that his letters should align. The fact that people made up a meaning of the phrase "synagogue of satan" later that has some connection to Jesus's plaintext meaning to the churches is as irrelevant as people making up a new meaning for "chosen people" and misusing that.
The entirety of Rev. 2-3 is about seven Asian churches and many obscure individuals being used as both local advice and archetypes for larger patterns. But from the standpoint of truth, a valid archetype has to fit the original. The synagogue of satan were not Jews because they weren't circumcised and didn't assimilate. Khazarian theory is about people who got circumcised and assimilated, so it's not a match. I recognize that some people find it to be a metaphorical match, but this isn't a useful rhetoric, and still isn't meaningful because people use Khazarian theory to justify attack against all Jews, attacking the innocent with the guilty. And nobody answers that, they just continue the immoral attack.
You honor me by denying my credibility and dissuading people from me.
But you dishonor white people by upholding for them a persona of attack and immorality in the name of heroism.
Why Do They Hate Us So Much?
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1AR0ivHKOE/why-do-they-hate-us-so-much--we-/c
Glad to have your unqualified support!
Did you like how I anticipated you by pointing out that those who protest illogically are indistinguishable from those who support the Jews and advocate for sympathy with them?
Hope I can earn you some sheqalim, I don't earn any for myself. I'm getting paid by One Jew (Jesus) and it's in eternal securities. So I hope even more that you're getting paid by that One Jew too.
I didn’t read it.
You, yes.
You, yes.
You, yes.
No one will ever believe you.
Of the fire to which you're headed.
Neat; don’t care. The lists you quoted were 100% accurate and individually cited repeatedly. The book in question about the holocaust was, indeed, written in reference to the longstanding numerological claim that is proven to have existed before WWII. Everything you said was either a blatant and obvious direct falsehood or a circumstantial falsehood–such as claiming the actions taken by the fake rabbi on the radio don’t exist merely because the rabbi himself was fake.
Actual human beings already know all this. Nothing you post here will ever be believed.
You don't get people believing events are true by having a fake rabbi claim them, you don't get people believing in 81 expulsions by telling everyone 109 countries without a source, you don't get people believing that someone predicted 6 million by citing 100 pages that didn't predict that. I didn't claim the actions described by the fake rabbi didn't happen, I claimed he's fake and it hurts the case to cite him.
Actual human beings rely on evidence, if you want to evidence the realities you cite please go ahead. If you don't care whether people believe you then you have nothing to change. But some days I have hope for you because you act like you do care, in spite of yourself.
That’s nice; repeating the same lies you said yesterday (hmm, that sounds familiar), every date, even after being blown the fuck out, won’t work.
I implied that people here routinely refer to 109 countries without a source, which is easily shown to be true by search. I gave a source and demonstrated that there is no list of 109 countries and the original count is 81 expulsions from a smaller number of countries.
You tell me: Does Germany 1938-1945 count as two countries just because it's listed on two lines?
I also said that repeating the claim "109 countries" backfires when it has no source: even if it could be proven true in retrospect, it poisons the well against belief that 81 expulsions are real or deserved, which creates sympathy for Jewish narrative.
You held the lists "were 100% accurate", but it was inaccurate for the list to say 109, and this casts doubt on whether its additions to Grosser were scholarly or arbitrary. You say solecistically I held "the actions taken by the fake rabbi on the radio don’t exist"; well, of course the fake rabbi didn't take those actions, but even if you mean the actions described are taken by others, there is no evidence for the most outrageous of them, and the ones that there is evidence for are well-poisoned by mixing them up with the fake rabbi and the outrageous claims. This casts doubt on whether these things are motivated by truth or by a desire to confuse the narrative and divert away from the truth. This forum knows many examples where powers release a false narrative to distract from a similar-sounding true narrative that would discredit them. If you preach blood in burgers you distract from MBP.
TLDR: Your implication that accuracy is optional for whitists seems to undermine your stated cause. Your statement that my true statements are false because your false statement is true (as if I claimed the actions didn't exist) is the height of untruth. I do love demonstrating when you are logically mistaken, but I don't always do it; maybe next time I'll find something to agree with you about. God bless.
All anyone has to do is go to the links in question and see that every single item on either list is, in fact, cited and sourced.
You’re. Just. Lying.
Yes but if anyone were to engage their brain they would quickly find that the cited numbers (109, 1030) are mostly repetitions of the same events so since the document lies so flagrantly about that, it suggests that the rest is also nothing more than lies.
Are you too stupid to think of that, or just too dishonest?
Not true. Both are methologically flawed in their counts. The list of 109 rows of 108 entries gives one source, which gives Grosser as its source, which lists 81 entries; the meme does not indicate where it got the other entries. The list of 1,030 (sometimes given as 1,031) does have many entries that are not cited and sourced, starting with "3 B.C. - Egypt Jews Expelled." on the second page. So you're baiting me by telling me I'm lying and being so bald about it.
More interesting, Grosser's methodology is also problematic because, though we presume he did good historical research, he has been criticized for some of the misspellings and/or typos on his published list, casting doubt on a few entries. However, counting them as 81 valid historical events, and doing the very interesting tracing of which nations were involved, we find there were only 20 actual national expulsions, from 12 nations, rather than municipal or regional, as seen below. (Grosser properly emphasizes that the list includes "towns, principalities, dioceses, regions and sometimes whole countries and empires".) The total number of modern countries for the expulsions is only 22, though depending how we identify past countries that could be increased. The 81 are analytically (and I may still be erring seeing as everyone else is):
Algeria 1: Oran; America 1: Confederacy (Grant); Austria 3: 2 plus Vienna; Britain 1: England; Czechia 4: Bohemia 2, Moravia, Prague; Egypt 1: Alexandria; France 13: 3 plus Alsace 2, Bordeaux, Bremes, Metz (Clement), Savoy ("Savory"), Sens, Strasbourg 2, Uzes; Germany 23: 3 plus Augsburg, Bavaria 3, Brandenburg, Brunswick, Cologne, Franconia 2, Frankfurt (Frankfort), Hamburg, Heilbronn ("Hielbronn"), Lubeck, Mainz 2 (Mayence), Regensburg, Worms, Wurttemburg ("Wurtemburg"), Wurzburg 2; Hungary 1; Italy 7: 1 plus Cremona, Genoa, Naples, Papal, Pesaro, Vicenza ("Vincenza"); Latvia 1 (Livonia); Lithuania 3: 2 plus Kaunas ("Kovad"); Morocco 1 (Arab); Netherlands 1; Poland 3: Sandomierz (Sandomir), Warsaw, Wroclaw (Breslau); Portugal 1; Romania 1: Galati (Galatz); Russia 5: 3 plus Villages 2; Spain 3: 1 plus Visigothic 2; Switzerland 2: 1 plus Zurich; Tunisia 1: Carthage: Ukraine 4: 1 plus Kyiv (Kiev), Malorussia 2 (Rus).
Imagine someone says 109 countries and is asked to list them and the list of countries includes "Diocese of Clement", "Savory", "Kovad", "Depor Pale", "Countrysid", and "Gen. Grant's Jurisdiction". That would make the real expulsions get laughed off too. And that's my point.
My body of posts on this forum the last several years debunks whatever nonsense you invented as poor excuses for the crimes obviously committed by satanic anti-Christ jews.
Supreme White Christians are under no obligation to host jews in their nations or to ally or protect jews. You have been hostile toward our people and the pogroms and shoahs coming in the near future will be RIGHTEOUS JUDGEMENT against the jews who preyed upon Beautiful Supreme White Christian people. The satanic jews' own blood will be upon him. This means jews will be responsible for their own bloodshed as a consequence for their generations of satanic behavior toward non-jews.
You will have to find an attic to hide in.
Will you do this same post for the “definitely not hoaxes” topics like the sinking of the USS Liberty, the 9/11 attacks, the Mossad childrape blackmail ring, the genociding of the native population of Palestine, the subversion of western values and the promulgation of communism/feminism/homoism/transgenderism and every other -ism lethal to the healthy operation of a society?
I eagerly await
The claim that Israel even wants to genocide Palestine while their population has exploded is the very definition of hoax.
All sorts of ordnance has been sent from "the land of palestine" into Israel since 1948. In all that time there has never been a military base on any parcel of land referred to as "palestine." Instead, they launch these attacks from civilian areas including private homes, hospitals, mosques and schools. The fact that these launch cities will necessarily be destroyed is an incredibly transparent strategy to get mental simpletons like you to sympathize with their evil cause to try to "drive Israel into the sea." Unlike your impotent comrades, if Israel wanted to do that they could've done so before 1955. Instead, Israel air drops leaflets on civilians before targeting the area, even though they know doing so simultaneously notifies the militants that are the problem - since about 2007 that's been Hamas.
That's not how genocide works. In fact, no military in history has done nearly as much to reduce collateral damage as the modern state of Israel. By contrast, ordnance sent from "palestine" is usually either completely arbitrary about where it lands in Israel, or deliberately targets civilian areas. A separate category is forests and farmland set ablaze since 10/7.
On this item you're wrekt, making it foolishly inappropriate to include it in a list with the USS Liberty and 9/11.
They’ve murdered 40,000 kids in 2 years
That’s more than 10x all child fatalities in all wars on earth over that period.
The fact you don’t know what the word genocide means is inconsequential. The jew’s population is larger now than before their “genocide”, yet I never see you getting your panties into a bunch over that claim. Interesting…
We've demonstrated that "murder" doesn't apply, that "40,000" is highly inflated and includes obesity deaths and imagined deaths, and that "kids" includes a number of belligerents over 16. Your continuing to use such inflammatory language shows you don't yet understand how to report accurately.
I hear around here that abortion is a war on Christians and white people and has killed millions of babies in the last two years. So your focus is also imbalanced.
Nobody here claims the Holocaust was a genocide, so I don't have occasion to rebut that; but if someone did I'd be happy to point out the word is newspeak there too. I don't know why it would be a problem that a people recovered from a genocide later, so that too is off. Sorry, I don't see anything redeeming in your comment.
Fuck off faggot, let your dog fight his own battles.
Nothing in that comment is even relevant.
You have the intelligence of chatGPT 2.0
Notice that you cannot speak to either of the topics you've raised here.
Notice that you = 🤡
I bow to your skillful argumentation.
Graph, these are the ones I looked into and found easy problems.
We already have posts on the Liberty being a failed attempt to involve the US in the Six-Day War, 9/11 being controlled demolition, Ehud Barak and cronies raping minors, the ICJ investigation of Medinat Israel for Gaza war crimes, and more than enough variations of subversion. Those are not areas where I have expertise or study, or where a narrative clearly arises from the known data that can be demonstrated in a single paragraph.
The group of narratives presented all have in common that their presentation theme is "bad Jews". Your group of narratives have the theme "bad things" and their conspiracy theme is "bad Jews". I have no problem with, and have sometimes participated in, the listing of bad actors in each of these, and the noticing of the disproportion of Jews among them. When we can catch a Jew creating a false narrative, such as when Nathan Rothschild traded deceptively to corner British market assets by having advance knowledge of Wellington's victory, then I am happy to pull aside that false narrative too.
The difference is that if I say the evidence is that Vladimir Popov or James Wickstrom lied, we don't have people maimed and dead about it (directly), but if I say the evidence is that Zelenskyy or Wallensky lied then we do have death and calls for justice, and all your categories (except the last of general subversion, unless indirectly) do relate to measurable death that calls for justice. They are complex enough to need more detailed review than I can offer in an hour's time. Even though I'm a 9/11 truther from way back, I recognize that I can't pin down the murderers simply without supernatural help, and I can only speak what I know and trust that the truth will direct the systems of justice to act (on penalty of having Jesus act at a time and place of his choosing in the event of their continued injustice). Because of this, I usually don't consider my data sufficient for an OP on hard topics; I find it enough to support those who are doing good research by promoting its goodness, and to assist with weeding out bad research when it's obvious given my own experience.
Incidentally, your list of hoaxes includes one weak research point, namely the use of the Jewish-invented newspeak word "genocide", and the characterization of Palestinian Arabs as "native" when Arab families and Jewish families both go back in the land over a thousand years. "Native Palestinian Jews" are now called Israelis because "Palestinian" has always been a misnomer; the Jews had to choose in the false dilemma between either getting called Philistines by exonym, or getting told they can't live in a land called Philistia by exonym. So if the subject were "the war deaths of the Arab population of the Gaza Strip" then it'd be neutral, and also discussed many times between us. See, that's easy to pick out. But feel free to quote Ilana Mercer at length here and I'll have nothing easy to pick out.
Well maybe those subjects deserve some of your time, if you can find space in your schedule of making blanket defenses for the malfeasance of israel/rabbinic judaism. For example, on 9/11 only one nation’s intelligence operatives were caught openly celebrating over the destruction.
My main issue with your OP is that even if you find “easy problems” (i.e. the existence of some fabricated talmud quotes, posted somewhere, at some time), your entire framing neglects the actual issue, which is that the talmud contains anti-human, anti-Christian, blasphemous filth, and it is the widely-acknowledged center of their entire group existence. Well, that and Holocaustianity. It also neglects the existence of many people, including one who just commented here (u/TallestSkil) who do the work of fact checking claims like that without turning it into a jew suck-fest appologia.
That's not what the Talmud is to Jews, at least in the US; to think it is is sheer ignorance.
Shirley you jest! That individual can in no way be conflated with "facts." Bias, yes. Propaganda, most definitely. Pure hatred and evil, always.
Tell that to Wikipedia, the repository of human knowledge:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud
Wickedpedia is nothing more than a collection of articles they've paid huge sums to make as leftarded as possible. You should know this by now.
You could start by learning the relationship between the law of Moses and the talmud, or you could drop the talmud entirely. Persisting in your temper tantrum over it won't yield anything good.
Name a better site for general information about a subject then, faggot
You think you get to control people like that?!? Shirley you can't be this stupid.
Further, thinking there must be a "site for general information about a subject" is equally as stupid as assuming you know anything about the talmud at all. The talmud is incredibly specific, not a topic about which "general information" even pertains. Many subjects are specific rather than general, and you'll ALWAYS get better information from experts in that field than you will from something as blatantly corrupt as wickedpedia.
To turn "nearly always centerpiece of cultural life" into "center of entire group existence" is not as bad a twist as your others, but it still is unjustified by your source. More important, the Talmud being foundational to thought doesn't mean every off-color joke in the Talmud is foundational to every person as it's often inferred here. The Bible is foundational to Christian thought, but most Christians don't know a thing about the porno jokes in Ezekiel 23:20.
No one fucking cares Schlomo
See, that's a hasty generalization. I know Muslims were celebrating, including filmmaker Osama bin Laden, who was an intel op for (checks dynamic notes) Columbia. So I also see that Paul and Sivan Kurzberg were also celebrating and were accused by the FBI of being Mossad. So I don't generalize.
In the link from this OP I go into great detail about where the Talmud can be criticized levelly. But to criticize the Talmud for a joke about (what might be) Jesus in hell is equivalent to criticizing Jesus for a joke about (what might be) Caiaphas in hell, Luke 16. It contains exactly one unequivocal report of a testimony directly against Jesus of Nazareth. It is not "the acknowledged center of their entire group existence" anymore than the totality of all thoughts on Scored is an acknowledged center of our entire group existence when we are on its site. Jews disagree with each other and with the Talmud all the time, it's as if they all agree on that. So your characterization is again immoderate, and you have had a habit of not realizing it, and my work with you often focuses on helping you realize it.
Here's some of the criticisms I quoted there: On superstition: "Another manifestation of Divine immanence .... the Bath Kol was not always accepted as final." "The tide of sorcery .... in the later period even Rabbis succumbed [to], and credulity prevailed over faith." "Many customs are condemned .... perhaps evidence that they had been assimilated by members of the Jewish Community. Among these 'Amorite ways' are the following: 'A woman drags her child among the dead.'" On exclusivism: "We do occasionally meet with dicta which breathe a very different spirit [from universalism]. Typical examples are: 'A Gentile who occupies himself with the study of Torah is deserving of death ....'" "Harsh sayings ... with respect to non-Jews often spring from the conviction that 'Gentiles are addicted to licentiousness' (Yevamot 98a). The Rabbis were revolted by the low standards of conduct they saw practised around them." "Some of the bitter sayings were wrung from anguished lips under extreme provocation. The most criticized utterance of this type is: 'Kill the best of the Gentiles! Crush the head of the best of snakes!' .... His words expressed his personal feelings; but to quote them as illustrative of Talmudic ethics is grossly unjust." On unscrupulousness: "With regard to a girl it was urged that the father's duty was to secure a husband for her at an early age .... She was considered to have arrived at this stage when she was twelve and a half, although she ceased to be a minor when she passed her twelfth birthday." "Figures are, of course, exaggerated."
So of course when you overcriticize I point that out, and if someone undercriticizes I point out that it's too uncritical.
I have no idea what this means or how it applies to me. There are a number of easily shown hoaxes here where a Jew claims Holocaust experience and then recants, and usually I just upvote those because there's little to add. I don't know that those need a separate post, because their status is pretty well agreed, whereas OP is not but it appears ought to be. Which leads to:
I was trying to think of whom else to ping, and Skil would've been good, but he saw it anyway. What he does isn't often "fact-checking". His habit of declaring presumptive victory every other sentence doesn't appeal to the truth seeker, and he has never been able to form a cogent "supersession" doctrine of some people or covenant in the Bible removing entirely and taking the place of some other. He said nothing specific when he could have. In each of the cases of OP I am the equal time and the fact checker. I'll be happy to see what specific errors people find in OP, but they're not advanced with namecalling and intemperate misstatement.
Reported for kikery.
And also spam.
I'll be happy not to ping you next time. I trust then you want a moderation team?
I don't actually report you, I'm just mocking you trying to tattle to the teacher all the time. The votes speak for themselves, and I just answer with more posts to show you're lying.
"you want to ban me goy? So this means you want a kike moderation team?"
Always slithering, like a snake
You cannot defy your nature, jew boy. You are vile.
haha
Easily debunked. There's only one hateful lying racist genocidal murderous people who still assemble in a synagogue every week. They behave and speak just like we'd expect satan's children to behave. SwampRangers blabbers about some silly conspiracy theory that Revelation 2:9 is talking about an irrelevant group of people from 2000 years ago who were insignificant. Hahaha fucking liar.
The Talmud is full of hypocritical hateful filth no matter how many times you quote it. You could open it to random pages and find offensive racist hateful hypocritical satanic filth anywhere in their ridiculous fake scriptures. There's a reason jews never try to spread the Talmud, never try to translate it to English, never want you to read it.
jews keep make believing that their bullshit satanic prophecies came true. This indeed included pretending six million jews died over again and over again. In my posts i have proven these devil worshipers are obsessed with the number six. With satanic jews you get SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX of this and SIX feet distance and dead dinosaurs 66 million years ago and 6 million jews dying over again and over again in fake headlines. They are devils and they communicate in sixes.
I don't care if the current jewish star is the same star called star of Remphan in Acts 13. The star should be used as a gun target and a bullseye.
Expelling jews is a historical past time that's been around longer than baseball. We must expel jews again and again until we finally initiate a FINAL SOLUTION.
jews calls America Edom and repeatedly cheer for its destruction. I don't care what jews call America while they curse it. Exterminate the jews who hate America.
It's obvious jews are predatory on all non-jew nations and they do indeed strive for power that they can corrupt, and for fortune which they hoard. Karl Marx is another kike whose existence led to the suffering of millions of non-jews. Even though it may seem mean for me to want to kill kikes like Karl Marx, think of the MILLIONS of White People who would have been saved by such an extermination, and the NATIONS of people that could have been saved from misery and suffering. Because of one dirty, unshaven, fat lazy kike who let his own children starve, whose wife was depressed she married a lazy ugly old miserable kike who didn't provide for their children.
Everyone alive in America today can obviously tell that the endless wars in the middle east are because jews provoke and threaten and agitate everyone. Jews behave like dishonest criminal swine and everyone eventually has to kill jews for self defense and survival from these satanic predatory goblin kikes.
Palestinians are more Semitic than the immigrant fraudsters occupying Palestine who call themselves jews today. I don't care which one of these lying occupying kikes traces his lineage to Khazaria. Exterminate them.
Finkelstein - exterminate him and every other kike named Finklestein.
108 109 110 who cares. Make it every nation on the planet that ever existed. Expel jews from everywhere.
Vlad, I like trying to get into your brain because it helps widen my experience. I characterize you as working from the perspective of (1) ordinary social conventions against collectivism and informal warfare should be suspended because of your moral cause, (2) factuality is less relevant because false narratives that impel action are more pragmatic.
My immediate thought is that it's not so much Orthodoxy as a separatist demand for a radical Church with simplified court-martial judgments. My appeals to you that such an org should reach out to the larger social morality of recognizing the divine image in man and pursuit of truth at all costs haven't registered.
So instead of going sequentially (since most salient points have already been made), let me dialogue with you about how you wish to change society beyond merely roleplaying a violent character in a data-only forum. Is there any real future to the idea that every Jewish man, woman, and child should be exterminated? If it's impossible for an overt organization to survive with such a charter (except in Arab countries), what good would it do to propose it either as an individual or as a secret org? And you do believe in exterminating innocent children and babies, right, since you offer no plan for exempting them (Scripture gives a very narrow window to countenance such an activity in the past, really in only 2 passages)? How could any such thing have any meaning IRL other than manifesting as a criminally antisocial individual, a masonic secret society, or a Muslim death cult? And it appears to me you want some other org, i.e. the Orthodox Church, to survive and cause all to submit to itself: how is that different from the endgame you say the Jews want for themselves? When I realized that all three Abrahamics were triumphalist and equally demand ultimate allegiance from all humanity, I saw that I couldn't pit my own triumphalism against another's on level ground because there is no value in such a fight: my triumphalism can only win if it takes the high moral ground of demonstrating better virtues so much that all humanity will want to become its slaves.
So I'd appreciate if we could use this opportunity to review whether you have any real plans for the future, or whether you just like to call for the deaths of other humans even if it runs you up against concrete authority enforcing pretty good moral codes against collectivism and attack.
haha
You pretend as though Supreme White Christians have any obligation to host or tolerate or welcome anti-Christ kike jews.
Your standards are ridiculous. jews are vile people and i don't care about any proposed good jews you think you found. I have witnessed many jews in my lifetime and i don't like them. Why is that a fucking problem? Why must jews try to force people to like them? Their behavior is reprehensible and insulting to my culture. jews insult my intelligence. They are not like my people and can never assimilate and have never even pretended to want to. They don't like to perform genuine manual labor. They generally reject Jesus Christ. jews try to fuck White people over in every transaction. jews over-complicate the legal and government systems and play money tricks and are generally deceitful and degenerate in everything they do.
This doesn't take some PHD dissertation. Most of us were naive of the jews and then merely learned how much jews HATE US. White people NOTICE that their own government and their own media and the people in power INSULT THEM DAILY and then they look to see who it is in charge and it is always jews. EVERY SINGLE TIME!!!
So you can try to write paragraphs about how the jew is innocent and we all know THE JEW STRIKES US AS HE CALLS OUT IN PAIN. We all know the jew cries innocense and cries victimhood while they stab us in the back and whore out our White women on their jew porn sites. jews deserve death and a Righteous Honorable Supreme White Christian Man brings His Sword.
The Noticing is spreading and jews better make sure they have their passports because a shoah is imminent once enough White Men realize jews took everything from them. White people are really nice and always try to compromise but when you put their backs against the wall they thrive in these life or death scenarios
Also who are you to intervene? The curse against jews is God's curse against them. You're a jackass trying to make excuses for a guilty group of unrepentant anti-Christs.
Thank you for keeping a more level tone.
We do have an obligation to preach the gospel to every creature by any means by which we might save some.
Are Jewish children guilty of something? Are adults guilty of something they didn't do but some other person of the same race did?
"but what about the children?"
A question asked to a jew woman. See her response. https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARczCTOAm/how-many-civilians-have-died-in-/c
“How many civilians have died in Gaza”?
“Who gives a shit?” - jewess
“What about children?”
“Children grow up to be Arabs”. -jewess wishing death upon children
You model your misandry after that of a Jewess? Interesting ....
You still don't get it.
None of us gathered and assembled with a mission to go out and HATE JEWS!!!!!
We all naively believed in the holohoax and other jewish lies. Then we researched and found out WE WERE BEING LIED TO!!!! And through extensive research we discovered how much JEWS HATE US!!!!!
So everything you see in these forums is us NOTICING that it is the JEW WHO HATES US. And if we want to survive as a people we have to fight back.
The jew was the aggressor. The jew is the predator upon every other race of human being. The jew is the wicked race that only seeks to enslave all other human races. And you don't have to take my word for it. The evidence is everywhere. And once you see this truth, you can't unsee it.
Supplement: The searchable number of times "Finkelstein" has been credibly quoted on Scored:
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12jJs8ioFd/can-anyone-tell-me-if-this-is-re/c
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12jcvUxvpD/pastor-james-wickstrom-and-rabbi/c
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/13zMnQNmmF/rabbi-finkelstein-explains-how-t/c
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/15IETHFoGL/rabbi-abe-finkelstein-interview-/c
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15JAF0NTI0/dr-wickstrom-interviews-zionist-/c
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/16ZqmvxeYZ/1-hr-interview-with-rabi-finkels/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16aTQcC34r/the-reason-human-meat-is-found-i/c
https://communities.win/c/conspiracy/p/16an0oDBGn/warning-disturbing-child-confirm/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16an0oDBGo/warning-disturbing-child-confirm/c
https://communities.win/c/SynagogueOfSatan/p/17s5tl2lDM/rabbi-finkelstein-admits-the-hol/c
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/17sibyqgrw/rabbi-abraham-finkelstein-shocki/c
IMPALE FINKELSTEIN!!!!
Just letting you know this comment was removed by scoredinternal
Thanks! It was too vulgar for automoderation.