Being asked to look up one hoax about Jews reveals many more. A long outlier pattern of circulating false stories about Jews with racial implications, when demonstrations of their falsity create sympathy for the Jews by contrast, suggests that two paths are taken by opponents of truth: circulating a bald lie about a perceived enemy, and circulating a bald lie that one's enemy circulates bald lies. Simple dedication to truth defeats both enemies undifferentiated. Consider this theme, reviewing evidence just from Scored presentations I looked into and always found needed debunking.
-
Bible misquotes: Too many to review here. Bible speaks for itself and is appealed to when someone doesn't take it in its intended grammaticohistorical sense. This category is mentioned first simply because frequent narratives flatly say the Bible says in context what it doesn't say. Most notably, it says the synagogue of satan is not composed of Jews, but is quoted as if saying the opposite. Nor does it apply negative titles to the Jews as a whole, but applies a number of positive titles to them.
-
Talmud misquotes: Too many to review here. Nicholas Donin converted from Judaism to Catholicism in the 13th century and got the ball rolling, exposing Christianity to Talmud without benefit of understanding the context. This led to continuing notion of blasphemous Talmud (e.g., it does contain one dirty joke using a nickname that might apply to Jesus, which was misquoted here 45+ times). Peak in 19th-century Germany: several authors attempted to quote Jewish sources as despicable, when quotations themselves were so poorly translated and sourced they are often unrecognizable to Jews. This telephone game continues today. One misquote kept getting rephrased to sound more evil about "power over" "blood", except its ultimate origin was merely the Christian-accepted verse Ps. 105:44!
-
Foreknowledge of 6 million deaths: Renegade Tribune: "Ancient Jewish prophecy had promised the Jews their return to the Promised Land after a loss of 6 million of their people. According to the book Breaking the Spell by Nicholas Kollerstrom, publications and speakers had referred to the death or persecution of 6 million Jews on at least 166 occasions before the end of World War II." That claim is false. The first sentence is sourced from Benjamin Blech, The Secret of Hebrew Words; what Blech actually says is that "tashuvu" (the last "ye shall return" in Lev. 25:10) is a variant lacking a central waw. After 1948 it was noticed that the gematria for this word, 708, corresponds currently to 1947-1948, and that the missing waw, 6, to a missing 6 million. This is not a prophecy that promised anything, this is a mathematical synchrony found after the fact that is not specific enough to give the detail stated in advance to anyone. Secondly, cherry-picking of text searches prior to 1945 for "six million" and "Jews" together cannot indicate foreknowledge of Holocaust death toll. "Six million" was arbitrarily selected whether it meant: estimate of Bar Kochba deaths; total world Jewish population; Russian Jewish population; Russian Jewish family count; European Jewish population; Jewish population represented at a global conference; or dollar size of a Jewish fund (yes, reference to the Jews in proximity with six million dollars was included as proof of foreknowledge). Germar Rudolf in intro to Don Heddesheimer's First Holocaust gives actual results of searches for millions of Jews from 1 to 7: "three million" is the most common number cited, despite Rudolf backpedaling by treating the data differently even though the generic nature of the data remains constant.
-
Star of Remphan: Many sources propose "star of Remphan" is a hexagram or star of David. That claim is false. There were no hexagrams for another 250 years in that region after the term "star of Remphan" was reported, but those words translate a text from Amos 750 years earlier that calls it the star of gods like Chiun (Saturn). So Remphan simply means Rephaim (Titans, sons of Saturn); the star in question, given Amos's context, is most likely the spirit associated with the bronze serpent Nehushtan that had become an idol. So the "star of David" cannot be called the unique star of Remphan. However because of recent association it may be considered one of many stars of Remphan of varying historical quality, including T-and-O symbol, pentagram, uroboros, tinseled trees, and most notably the poled snake incorporated in logos and in the modern dollar sign.
-
1,030 Jewish expulsions: An anon called 'Lord Molyneaux' (including the apostrophes) published the samizdat The Complete List of the One Thousand and Thirty Jewish Expulsions in Human History. Misleading claim, perhaps intentionally so, because after this bold analytical title he immediately backpedals in the first expulsion, "This first entry may in fact need to be omitted due to the fact that it is largely mythological." I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't 1,030 after all. #2 and #3 are the same captivity, the partial and the full wave in Assyria; #5 under Haman wasn't carried out at all and wasn't because of Jewish criminality. If we compared this to expulsions of Roma people or Christians, or the national curses of Amos 1-2, there'd be nothing special about the list. It also has several severe methodology problems. The author engaged many hours of research in a poorly conceived project that led to an excessively ineffective data set. On many pages the same action in ten cities described by one source was counted as ten expulsions (other actions in many cities were counted as single expulsions for lack of lists). The author must not have liked the Holocaust, because he felt he had to include it but said nothing more about it than the generic "Jewish expulsion" description he used a hundred times. The work sure doesn't lead to the conclusion that racism is right, that the Jews have been justly judged en masse by a competent formal authority, or that these selective windows in history prove a conclusion beyond the Jews getting in trouble a whole lot with no control comparison.
-
Edom is Jewry: "Esau-Edom is modern Jewry" is said to be found in The Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. 5, p. 41. That claim is false. The image of this page is public and does not contain this text. The closest to the alleged quote is the historically accurate statement, "The Edomites ... by John Hyrcanus ... were then incorporated with the Jewish nation," far different from that claimed. It appears that the version above is a corruption of vol. 5, p. 208, which says, "'Esau' (=Edom) later represents Rome." I saw intermediate links suggesting that this short form evolved into the form allegedly quoted, via the unproven idea that Rome is controlled by modern Jewry; and this original stylizing explains the oddity of phrasing when punctuation is simplified.
-
Baruch Levy: La Revue de Paris (June 1, 1928) stated it had obtained an 1879 letter to Karl Marx from "Baruch Levy", a "Neo-Messianist" who was quoted as saying that the Jewish people would attain world dominion by a detailed plan. That claim is unsupported. No other evidence indicates that such a one ever existed; article is completely consistent with fabrication of an identity to propagate an idealistic narrative. Sure, satan does plan to attain world dominion through whomever he can use of any race, and that plan is carried out along the same lines as the alleged letter, but that is not related to race but to satan's career as Biblically described; so, no, the system is not intrinsic to a particular people.
-
Rabbi Reichorn: A quote from "Rabbi Reichorn" at a funeral of "Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah", allegedly 1869, states, "We have forced the Christians into wars without number." That is a fiction. Interesting tracking, but it ultimately arises from Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (pen name John Retcliffe), 1868. Goedsche novelizes the idea of Jewish representatives meeting secretly in the Prague cemetery in 1860. The text appears in The Jew in the Modern World, 1995, and includes the reference to the tomb of "Grand ... rabbi Simeon ben Jehuda" and the concept, "how to turn to the advantage of our cause the great errors and sins which our enemies the Christians never cease to commit." This was echoed and modified by French periodicals Le Contemporain (1880) and then La Vieille France (1920-1921) until it reached the "Reichorn" form. (Some versions say Emanuel Reichhorn was chief rabbi of France, which is also untrue.) So, no, this claim arises from an exaggerated fiction, though the satanic plans are relatively accurately stated.
-
Schneersohn in Slavyanin: A long article (meme-quoted), apparently from the obscure Russian "newspaper" Slavyanin in 2001 but not citable until a 2014 blog, has Rabbi Schneersohn saying Khazaria is Israel. This appears a minor tabloid found running "anti-Semitist" articles generally with little evidence of its existence online. The meme matches the 2014 translation except for minor grammar; it appears to cite uncritically publishers with no journalistic duty to accurately quote the dead. It says it quotes a letter published 2001, though Schneersohn died in 1994, indicating the problem. It is prefaced with a note that despite authenticity debate it's indisputable that the goals described are accurate (implying that concepts are more important than source veracity). The Slavyanin editor and sometime city duma candidate, Vladimir F. Popov, was tried for incitement, and the paper was shut down as uncharted in early 2002.
-
Abe Finkelstein: The tale of a particular unfindable "Abraham 'Abe' Finkelstein" (also the birth name of singer Arthur Fields) comes from a 2006 "interview" by James Wickstrom, who was also jailed for a year for making up invalid titles for himself and others. Wickstrom and the guest never elaborate beyond "Abe" having a synagogue somewhere in New York, which has zero independent evidence. Early in the transcript is, "'I have a guest by the name Rabbi Abe Finkelstein .... You are a lying Jew.' 'Eh, you could say that, but even when we lie we tell the truth!'" Later the guest adds, "Remember, there has never been a Jew in the history of the world that ever told a lie. We always tell the truth." These two indicate the "guest" knows he's deliberately lying, consistent with Wickstrom's MO, and with deceptive nominal "disclosure" of the lie. Some errors: The alleged "rabbi" quotes include both "A good goyim" (four times), "The goyim does all the work, the goyim makes all the stuff", "There is a goyim", and "They are good-and-paid-for shabbos goy .... The rest of them are good bought-and-paid-for shabbos goy", showing that he knows both singular and plural but uses them both wrong (often in place of each other). Wickstrom also uses goyim as a singular, indicating the same error. The "rabbi" also doesn't know the word "sheqalim" and always says "shekels". The quote "We've been doing this for thousands and thousands of years, since down to Adam's time" kind of implicates 2,000 years of Gentile involvement in child sacrifice before Judah, namesake of the Jews, came along in 1797 BC. Someone intending to speak historically might have said Abraham's time. The guest says (perhaps sarcastically) Episcopalian Charlton Heston was Jewish, but the JPost obituary rejected this. At 17 minutes he says, "Oh, Silverman, who's a good friend of mine there, Larry, he got a twofer," referring to Larry Silverstein. Yet he knows enough to paraphrase Silverstein as saying "They pulled the plug, and pulled it as they say, and so the buildings came down." A paid actor is the explanation best fitting the evidence.
-
109 countries: Another circulating meme says Jews were expelled from 109 countries. There is no such list. a probable origin of "109" lists 108 expulsions on 109 rows, with many admitted duplicate countries or regions. Its ultimate source Anti-Semitism (Grosser and Halperin, 1979 ed.) lists only 81 expulsions pp. 35-38 (250-1948). If we merely said that, it'd be accurate, and comparable to persecution of Christians, Roma, or Muslims; as is, "109" now has taken on a life of its own as a false gospel. More.
-
Chamorro and Ussuf: Two letters in these names have circulated since the 16th century in various redactions. They are most certainly forgeries; the version placing the action in Arles is clearly a later forgery of the version placing it in Toledo. More.
-
"Jew from 2000BC": It was the Gentile, Enannatum I of Lagash, ca. 24th century BC. Maybe satanists had big noses before Jews came along. Repeats, 1 2.
-
Harold W. Rosenthal interview on Lucifer worship: Another postmortem invention free from libel law, without proof of any assertion, created by "Western Front".
Who does not pursue truth and accuracy pursues the work of the enemy, by wit or not.
Well maybe those subjects deserve some of your time, if you can find space in your schedule of making blanket defenses for the malfeasance of israel/rabbinic judaism. For example, on 9/11 only one nation’s intelligence operatives were caught openly celebrating over the destruction.
My main issue with your OP is that even if you find “easy problems” (i.e. the existence of some fabricated talmud quotes, posted somewhere, at some time), your entire framing neglects the actual issue, which is that the talmud contains anti-human, anti-Christian, blasphemous filth, and it is the widely-acknowledged center of their entire group existence. Well, that and Holocaustianity. It also neglects the existence of many people, including one who just commented here (u/TallestSkil) who do the work of fact checking claims like that without turning it into a jew suck-fest appologia.
That's not what the Talmud is to Jews, at least in the US; to think it is is sheer ignorance.
Shirley you jest! That individual can in no way be conflated with "facts." Bias, yes. Propaganda, most definitely. Pure hatred and evil, always.
Tell that to Wikipedia, the repository of human knowledge:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud
Wickedpedia is nothing more than a collection of articles they've paid huge sums to make as leftarded as possible. You should know this by now.
You could start by learning the relationship between the law of Moses and the talmud, or you could drop the talmud entirely. Persisting in your temper tantrum over it won't yield anything good.
Name a better site for general information about a subject then, faggot
To turn "nearly always centerpiece of cultural life" into "center of entire group existence" is not as bad a twist as your others, but it still is unjustified by your source. More important, the Talmud being foundational to thought doesn't mean every off-color joke in the Talmud is foundational to every person as it's often inferred here. The Bible is foundational to Christian thought, but most Christians don't know a thing about the porno jokes in Ezekiel 23:20.
No one fucking cares Schlomo
See, that's a hasty generalization. I know Muslims were celebrating, including filmmaker Osama bin Laden, who was an intel op for (checks dynamic notes) Columbia. So I also see that Paul and Sivan Kurzberg were also celebrating and were accused by the FBI of being Mossad. So I don't generalize.
In the link from this OP I go into great detail about where the Talmud can be criticized levelly. But to criticize the Talmud for a joke about (what might be) Jesus in hell is equivalent to criticizing Jesus for a joke about (what might be) Caiaphas in hell, Luke 16. It contains exactly one unequivocal report of a testimony directly against Jesus of Nazareth. It is not "the acknowledged center of their entire group existence" anymore than the totality of all thoughts on Scored is an acknowledged center of our entire group existence when we are on its site. Jews disagree with each other and with the Talmud all the time, it's as if they all agree on that. So your characterization is again immoderate, and you have had a habit of not realizing it, and my work with you often focuses on helping you realize it.
Here's some of the criticisms I quoted there: On superstition: "Another manifestation of Divine immanence .... the Bath Kol was not always accepted as final." "The tide of sorcery .... in the later period even Rabbis succumbed [to], and credulity prevailed over faith." "Many customs are condemned .... perhaps evidence that they had been assimilated by members of the Jewish Community. Among these 'Amorite ways' are the following: 'A woman drags her child among the dead.'" On exclusivism: "We do occasionally meet with dicta which breathe a very different spirit [from universalism]. Typical examples are: 'A Gentile who occupies himself with the study of Torah is deserving of death ....'" "Harsh sayings ... with respect to non-Jews often spring from the conviction that 'Gentiles are addicted to licentiousness' (Yevamot 98a). The Rabbis were revolted by the low standards of conduct they saw practised around them." "Some of the bitter sayings were wrung from anguished lips under extreme provocation. The most criticized utterance of this type is: 'Kill the best of the Gentiles! Crush the head of the best of snakes!' .... His words expressed his personal feelings; but to quote them as illustrative of Talmudic ethics is grossly unjust." On unscrupulousness: "With regard to a girl it was urged that the father's duty was to secure a husband for her at an early age .... She was considered to have arrived at this stage when she was twelve and a half, although she ceased to be a minor when she passed her twelfth birthday." "Figures are, of course, exaggerated."
So of course when you overcriticize I point that out, and if someone undercriticizes I point out that it's too uncritical.
I have no idea what this means or how it applies to me. There are a number of easily shown hoaxes here where a Jew claims Holocaust experience and then recants, and usually I just upvote those because there's little to add. I don't know that those need a separate post, because their status is pretty well agreed, whereas OP is not but it appears ought to be. Which leads to:
I was trying to think of whom else to ping, and Skil would've been good, but he saw it anyway. What he does isn't often "fact-checking". His habit of declaring presumptive victory every other sentence doesn't appeal to the truth seeker, and he has never been able to form a cogent "supersession" doctrine of some people or covenant in the Bible removing entirely and taking the place of some other. He said nothing specific when he could have. In each of the cases of OP I am the equal time and the fact checker. I'll be happy to see what specific errors people find in OP, but they're not advanced with namecalling and intemperate misstatement.