Tikkun olam is the concept of perfect establishment in the Christian Bible in such passages as Ps. 89:37 KJV where the related yikkun olam is translated "established for ever". It's a Christian covenant concept. If Jews have mishandled it that's not the fault of the concept.
Psa 89:37 - Here is the Hebrew text "זרעו לעולם יהיה וכסאו כשׁמשׁ נגדי" and this is an online translator result "His seed will be forever and his throne as the sun against me"
My KJV says "It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah."
I just don't see how this refers to Tikkun olam? I always thought Tikkun olam is a concept in Judaism meaning "to repair, or to heal, the World".
In the Hebrew text, Ps. 89:37 is what the KJV calls Ps. 89:36. If you look at the Hebrew "Ps. 89:38" you'll see KJV 37 and the term yikkun olam. The root kun is most often translated prepare or establish, and the Jewish notion included older English "fix", meaning establish or set firmly, but has migrated into the newer meaning of "fix" that focuses on healing breaches as a subset of that. Olam refers to any spacetime cosmic system and so can mean world, age, cosmos, or forever, but has the same concept cluster of preparing the whole world, eternally or for eternity.
Obviously Ethan, the psalmist, says literally that tikkun olam cannot happen without David's seed being the one established forever. The greater concept is that this Messianic establishment forever informs the establishment of the whole world in its time.
There is some Rabbinical manipulation of this concept that puts it more in the hands of other humans without direct reference to the Messianic work, and in comparative religion this is identical to Christian manipulation of dominionism that purports to put the Messianic work in Christian hands without significant reference to Christ's part in it (and in Islam it's even bolder). That is indeed to be lamented in both religions, but it's not as if every Jewish man, woman, and child has a theology of getting their fingers into the whole world without reference to God's will. The thing OP complains about is just a wing that seizes upon a balanced Scriptural concept and imbalances it.
In short, to criticize the Jews more accurately one must learn that a subset of Rabbinism has hijacked the covenant and Christian principle that our brother Ethan described with the verbal form of the noun tikkun olam. The assumption that this is related to Moloch is entirely inaccurate and external and has nothing to do with learning how to criticize more accurately.
Aka ever forwarding (inception towards death) each temporal establish-ment (life)...a process of separation. Tikkun olam inverts this process by tempting the established (life) forwards (inception towards death) by artificially putting together what nature separates.
Christian covenant concept
Christ implies "anointed one" aka the process of anointing each one during separation from one another...covenants and concepts imply a suggested synthesis.
a) Chosen one implies singular..."jews" implies a suggested plurality inverting ones singular perception.
b) Nature sets each being apart from one another (to christen)...a jew tempts gentiles with concepts and covenants to come and take together. It's a gentiles consent to concepts and covenants which mishandles the natural state of being.
not the fault of the concept
Concept implies suggested temptation...consenting to it puts one at fault for falling for a temptation.
Only during failure/fault/fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
Covenant implies coming together. Chrism aka christening implies each separated anointed one. Anointing is unique (one), oil aka olive is specific (each). What does each imply?
Rise during fall? Inhale and exhale alternate, each within one spirating. Strange!
Aka oil/all, hence s-oil implying the split of all into each seed (seeing division)...
What does each imply?
One (partial) within oneness (whole) aka each unit.
Addition implies ones inception; subtraction implies ones death; multiplication implies ones intercourse with one another; division implies being one within oneness.
Measuring isn't necessary for nature to work, yet each native within tempts each other to ignore that.
What if nature offers each being choice during linear progression? Notice that any -ism a jew suggests tempts gentiles to alternate between two, while ignoring that there's only one alternative.
Example: moralism (good vs bad alternation). The alternative...all offering one free will of choice.
Strange
Breathing implies nature moving through each native...resuscitation represents strange (foreign).
EVANGELION means THE TRUTH. Also translated as “The Gospel.” ✝️✝️✝️
5 years, yet only 10k upvotes. Weirder still, this account originally supported Jews.
There's not a single account more sus than you bud. You glow like St Elmo's fire on a clear night at sea.
I'm just saying what I can see in their history.
It's like someone took over the account after it went inactive two years ago.
u/DresdenFirebomber at +3/-17 with only 2 comments...
Yeah, the botting is insane. JG5 needs purging.
Update:
u/DresdenFirebomber at +4/-19 with 3 comments (that's only based on the reply you just wrote)
Pretty sure no non-shill would miss you if you're banned.
Tikkun olam is the concept of perfect establishment in the Christian Bible in such passages as Ps. 89:37 KJV where the related yikkun olam is translated "established for ever". It's a Christian covenant concept. If Jews have mishandled it that's not the fault of the concept.
Psa 89:37 - Here is the Hebrew text "זרעו לעולם יהיה וכסאו כשׁמשׁ נגדי" and this is an online translator result "His seed will be forever and his throne as the sun against me"
My KJV says "It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah."
I just don't see how this refers to Tikkun olam? I always thought Tikkun olam is a concept in Judaism meaning "to repair, or to heal, the World".
In the Hebrew text, Ps. 89:37 is what the KJV calls Ps. 89:36. If you look at the Hebrew "Ps. 89:38" you'll see KJV 37 and the term yikkun olam. The root kun is most often translated prepare or establish, and the Jewish notion included older English "fix", meaning establish or set firmly, but has migrated into the newer meaning of "fix" that focuses on healing breaches as a subset of that. Olam refers to any spacetime cosmic system and so can mean world, age, cosmos, or forever, but has the same concept cluster of preparing the whole world, eternally or for eternity.
Obviously Ethan, the psalmist, says literally that tikkun olam cannot happen without David's seed being the one established forever. The greater concept is that this Messianic establishment forever informs the establishment of the whole world in its time.
There is some Rabbinical manipulation of this concept that puts it more in the hands of other humans without direct reference to the Messianic work, and in comparative religion this is identical to Christian manipulation of dominionism that purports to put the Messianic work in Christian hands without significant reference to Christ's part in it (and in Islam it's even bolder). That is indeed to be lamented in both religions, but it's not as if every Jewish man, woman, and child has a theology of getting their fingers into the whole world without reference to God's will. The thing OP complains about is just a wing that seizes upon a balanced Scriptural concept and imbalances it.
In short, to criticize the Jews more accurately one must learn that a subset of Rabbinism has hijacked the covenant and Christian principle that our brother Ethan described with the verbal form of the noun tikkun olam. The assumption that this is related to Moloch is entirely inaccurate and external and has nothing to do with learning how to criticize more accurately.
Shortsighted.
Established forever without healing?
Funny how the terms don’t mean the same thing at all, though, isn’t it.
Aka ever forwarding (inception towards death) each temporal establish-ment (life)...a process of separation. Tikkun olam inverts this process by tempting the established (life) forwards (inception towards death) by artificially putting together what nature separates.
Christ implies "anointed one" aka the process of anointing each one during separation from one another...covenants and concepts imply a suggested synthesis.
Concept and Covenant imply anti-christ...
a) Chosen one implies singular..."jews" implies a suggested plurality inverting ones singular perception.
b) Nature sets each being apart from one another (to christen)...a jew tempts gentiles with concepts and covenants to come and take together. It's a gentiles consent to concepts and covenants which mishandles the natural state of being.
Concept implies suggested temptation...consenting to it puts one at fault for falling for a temptation.
Only during failure/fault/fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
Covenant implies coming together. Chrism aka christening implies each separated anointed one. Anointing is unique (one), oil aka olive is specific (each). What does each imply?
Rise during fall? Inhale and exhale alternate, each within one spirating. Strange!
Aka oil/all, hence s-oil implying the split of all into each seed (seeing division)...
One (partial) within oneness (whole) aka each unit.
Addition implies ones inception; subtraction implies ones death; multiplication implies ones intercourse with one another; division implies being one within oneness.
Measuring isn't necessary for nature to work, yet each native within tempts each other to ignore that.
Living potential during process of dying.
Check this out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/alternate
What if nature offers each being choice during linear progression? Notice that any -ism a jew suggests tempts gentiles to alternate between two, while ignoring that there's only one alternative.
Example: moralism (good vs bad alternation). The alternative...all offering one free will of choice.
Breathing implies nature moving through each native...resuscitation represents strange (foreign).
So, one process of haling (healing), one breath (inspiration), one resistance (of diverse temptations).
And thine ears shall hear a word behind thee, saying, This is the way, walk ye in it, when ye turn to the right hand, and when ye turn to the left.
That's a word a being left behind and chose not to hold onto.
That's the sound moving through each ones mind structured within (in-stru-ment).
...then ye ignore linear progression.
I have no idea, but it's probably JG5 caught lying AGAIN.