SID"S"
(media.scored.co)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Blacks also have some of the highest “SIDS” rates: https://injepijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40621-022-00377-7
wtf is this retarded post? Is it saying Sid’s is caused by the mother sneaking into the baby’s room and killing them?
That or the ridiculous infant vaccine doses.
In what way are you not a communist? In what ways are you not exactly what you claim to oppose? Educate yourself or shut the fuck up about topics on which you know nothing.
My kids have never had Sid’s ? What’s your education on children you fucking loser
Have all of your accounts been hijacked by paid shills or something? You weren’t all this fucking subhumanly retarded before.
That’s the most human response I’ve ever seen from you
No one cares. Fuck off, coward.
Yeah literally no one cares, drop the hero act
Cool; hijacked account confirmed. Thanks for admitting that SIDS is postpartum depressed mothers killing their children.
Nooo, read the 2nd last part
what?
I dont quite get it either. My first thought was the same, you think moms are killing their babies out of post partum depression?
Then I thought maybe you mean the medications they put someone on for post partum depression.
But that dont really make sense to me.
But I just had to point out, we all have prolly known someone who has lost a kid this way, more than likely. I have known a few.
It's no ones fault bro, shit just happens sometimes.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8833374/sudden-infant-death-syndrome-explanation-research/
They have been saying for a few years it has something to do with the part of the brain responsible for making you breath.
Whether its true or not? :shrugs
The top political issue women care about is being able to kill their kids before birth. Considering that, is it really that unbelievable that sometimes they might change their mind after birth and grab a pillow when nobody's looking?
Yes! It's such a common and well known phenomenon that in many countries a mother killing her baby is not considered a murder. It's considered infanticide, which is a lesser crime:
In New Zealand [...] Where a woman causes the death of any child of hers under the age of 10 years in a manner that amounts to culpable homicide [...] she is guilty of infanticide, and not of murder or manslaughter, and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years
In Canada [...] The maximum sentence for infanticide is five years' imprisonment; by contrast, the maximum sentence for manslaughter is life, and the mandatory sentence for murder is life.
Are you fucking kidding me? We are in such a cucked society that we allow women to murder their babies with little to no repercussions.
5 years is a repercussion
Brought to you by Pfizer.
Infancy implies during the process of adulteration, hence inception implicating death of life. The word "sudden" (unforeseen) tempts one to ignore that. Ones consent to the suggested word "sudden" implies a syndrome (running together), which inverts the infancy of an OFF-SPRING (setting apart).
The label SIDS tempts one to want to hold onto it (labels are sticky), while ignoring that an off-spring needs to be let go of...doing that shapes postpartum depression.
Analysis implies real; synthesis implies fiction. Off-spring implies a separation during an analytical process; the label SIDS implies a synthesis.