Yeah literally says it in the body of the article. The funny part is they are looking into the viewer end which, man thats some telescope that lets you see through the ground.
What got me more curious was the opening paragraph of this article. Must have been written with AI or something, talks about a transatlantic tunnel that was never built but only someones pipe dream. And turns out even that guy believed in globe earth.
Deep beneath the Atlantic Ocean, forgotten for the best part of a century, lies a tunnel linking London and New York.
It was built on the whim of a Victorian inventor with the aim of linking two great cities and developing the kind of friendship that still exists today.
He wanted to make a tunnel from britain to new york, but decided it would have been to much work so he wanted to make a tunnel underneath the seabed.
Was going to create a system of lenses and mirrors that would allow people from both sides to be able to write each other? Anyway, even managed some funding and got some workers but after a collapse which flooded the tunnel, killed most of the workers and then then rest gave up. He "supposedly" went crazy and ended up in a insane asylum.
This story left me with way more questions than answers.
b) All perceivable transfers through each ones perception without one being able to bear/carry it...instead its perceivable which carries forth perception.
c) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a tunnel, which conceals perceivable from one; while permitting others to pipe dreams into one, since ones perception is asleep.
Work implies energy (internal power)...all works so that each one within can become possible.
by trickery
Energy implies internal (effects) separation of external (cause)...others trick one to ignore that by mentally and physically joining together what nature sets apart from one another.
if it does
IF implies then within perceptible nature...IT implies an artificial suggestion tempting ones consent into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't).
Few suggest IT (artificial) in the name of IF (natural) to trick ones perception into ignoring perceivable for suggested.
TO (towards) implies the known ledge (inception towards death) for each enabled being (life) within to learn to teach/teach to learn self.
To experience is to understand
EX (out of) PER (forward) implies coming (inception towards death) into being (life)...to understand implies a being choosing to "stand-under" another being, while ignoring to ex-press self outwards, while being forwarded.
Understanding inverts knowledge. Understanding tempts one to hold onto suggested information; knowledge implies all perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception.
It doesn't matter what you say, your input means nothing because you don't distinguish/cant tell the difference between what the adversary is saying and what your brother is saying.
Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
How can one see with ones own eyes...ones inception and ones death?
If all photographs of...are a hoax
a) One cannot photograph all. A photo can only be taken by one from within all.
b) One cannot write (graph) light (photo)...only within all light can each ray write to one another.
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
a) Body implies solid within fluid aka atmos/atmo - "spiritually arouse", hence motion generating momentum (inception towards death) to spiritually arouse matter (life).
A jew suggests shapes like "flat" and "sphere" to distract gentiles from being within the process of atmos (German atmen; breathing).
b) To maintain implies "taking into possession", hence man (hand) tenere (to hold)...being implies potential (life) set free within procession (inception towards death).
A jew suggests gentiles to maintain aka tainting self (perception) within main (perceivable) by holding onto suggested.
I couldn’t find any description of the crux of this device - the bee-hive shaped optical amplifier.
Also, this whole thing seems like a hoax. If the accompanying building was built at the same time as this art exhibit, it cost millions (likely 10’s of millions) to build. It is hard to imagine who would fund this, for an overgrown videocall without sound…
It is clear from the drawings, most likely made by the modern artist and not his supposed “insane great grandfather”, that they conceived the earth to be spherical. Though I’m certain that had any of this nonsense been real, like all other large tunnels and bridges, it was going to be constructed as flat as possible with no consideration for “curvature of the earth”.
In the (supposed; I personally think the entire thing is a hoax perpetrated by the artist and his investors) designs for the “telectroscope”, there is reportedly a beehive shaped collection of mirrors that is supposed to amplify the image so it can travel such a long distance and remain visible on the other end of the tunnel.
If this were a real device, such an amplifier (probably many of them over the length of the tunnel) would absolutely be needed. Although this amplifier is mentioned in passing, I couldn’t find a diagram or description of its inner workings. More evidence that this is a hoax.
Nothing can see around a curve. Luckily the world doesn't curve, but sadly, you still have to contend with Beers Law. There are too many particles between those two points for light from one point to get to the other. Which makes this article a total lie
Just learn some physics.
Take refraction for example, You're totally confused about what it is. But basically it's saying the light particles that reflect off of New York, then bounce on the water and the atmosphere over and over again hundreds of times, yet still produce a crisp image in London. It's absolutely mental gymnastic retardedness. And part of the globe earth space psyop for the gullible
I think most people don't understand anything about flat earth. Not that I am a flat earther. Just the most people think it's a thing. And my studies have never met a flat earther. Just people who say they've talked to them.
I have met others who tested and observed that we're not on a globe. They are not flat earthers. They're just people who use basic math and science and common sense to see that this is not a planet and we are not in space.
Also, technically refraction has nothing to do with reflecting.
the fact or phenomenon of light, radio waves, etc. being deflected in passing obliquely through the interface between one medium and another or through a medium of varying density.
change in direction of propagation of any wave as a result of its traveling at different speeds at different points along the wave front.
All it can do is bend it one way or the other, its not actually reflecting anything.
I don't get how the planet supposedly travels thousands of miles through space while spinning in circles being pulled by the sun which is also hurdling through space yet Polaris is always fixed in the same location.
Insult all u want...I'm just asking questions because that defies logic. I'll trust my senses over what a bunch of masons changed a couple hundred years ago.
You ever sit in a car and look out the window? Ever notice how the road signs go by quickly while the trees across the field seem to go slower, even though they're travelling the exacr same speed relative to the car?
Imagine the trees are a couple billion light years away. How fast do you think they would seem to move?
Good job proving that you are literally a paid shill, subhuman kike! Why would anyone believe anything you say when you do the one thing that only paid jewish shills do?
Space is very very large, and the time we are alive is very very small.
Although Polaris is almost directly above the North Pole today, it has been known for over two thousand years that the orientation of the Earth’s axis is not fixed with respect to the background stars. Instead, it slowly rotates in a circle, completing one revolution every 25 800 years. This causes the position of the North Celestial Pole to gradually change.
The Earth's axis wobbles, a phenomenon called precession, causing the North Celestial Pole to shift, and the North Star to change over thousands of years, with the current North Star, Polaris, being replaced by Vega in roughly 12,000 years
This movement is called stellar precession. In 3000 BC, a faint star called Thuban in the constellation of Draco was the North Star. Polaris did not become the North Star until about AD 500.
If this is the thing I think it is I'm pretty sure it's just a TV screen streaming from a camera in NY
Yeah literally says it in the body of the article. The funny part is they are looking into the viewer end which, man thats some telescope that lets you see through the ground.
What got me more curious was the opening paragraph of this article. Must have been written with AI or something, talks about a transatlantic tunnel that was never built but only someones pipe dream. And turns out even that guy believed in globe earth.
Found a better article about this guy.
https://www.devices-of-wonder.com/cn/story/index.html
He wanted to make a tunnel from britain to new york, but decided it would have been to much work so he wanted to make a tunnel underneath the seabed.
Was going to create a system of lenses and mirrors that would allow people from both sides to be able to write each other? Anyway, even managed some funding and got some workers but after a collapse which flooded the tunnel, killed most of the workers and then then rest gave up. He "supposedly" went crazy and ended up in a insane asylum.
This story left me with way more questions than answers.
It's just some modern art piece.
The funny thing is, if you read the first few paragraphs, it's actually supposed to go through the Earth, not over it.
If you look at the picture, you can see it's going into the ground not into the air.
DPS is just trolling.
Nature implies just; artifice does nature injustice...if one ignores natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
Or lazy
a) Trans-a-tlantic aka "transfer (trans) without (a) bearing (tlantic/tlenai)"...
b) All perceivable transfers through each ones perception without one being able to bear/carry it...instead its perceivable which carries forth perception.
c) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a tunnel, which conceals perceivable from one; while permitting others to pipe dreams into one, since ones perception is asleep.
Piping dreams like Hollywood...the dream factory.
If it does "work" then it would only be possible by trickery like what u suggested
Work implies energy (internal power)...all works so that each one within can become possible.
Energy implies internal (effects) separation of external (cause)...others trick one to ignore that by mentally and physically joining together what nature sets apart from one another.
IF implies then within perceptible nature...IT implies an artificial suggestion tempting ones consent into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't).
Few suggest IT (artificial) in the name of IF (natural) to trick ones perception into ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Globehead science always includes the words "pretty sure"
I wish I could be a 100% knowledgable about things I have only ever read about or contemplated.
Must be nice.
Wishing implies towards outcome; knowledge implies origin forwarding being.
Being implies able (life) within ledge (inception towards death) of known.
To learn is to know; To experience is to understand
TO (towards) implies the known ledge (inception towards death) for each enabled being (life) within to learn to teach/teach to learn self.
EX (out of) PER (forward) implies coming (inception towards death) into being (life)...to understand implies a being choosing to "stand-under" another being, while ignoring to ex-press self outwards, while being forwarded.
Understanding inverts knowledge. Understanding tempts one to hold onto suggested information; knowledge implies all perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception.
And FE "science" always reqires a video or article.
Edit: lol
It doesn't matter what you say, your input means nothing because you don't distinguish/cant tell the difference between what the adversary is saying and what your brother is saying.
Alright, you got me. I thought you were serious about this whole FE thing but you're clearly just trolling.
There was no thinking nor observations on your part
You were told.
How can one see with ones own eyes...ones inception and ones death?
a) One cannot photograph all. A photo can only be taken by one from within all.
b) One cannot write (graph) light (photo)...only within all light can each ray write to one another.
a) Body implies solid within fluid aka atmos/atmo - "spiritually arouse", hence motion generating momentum (inception towards death) to spiritually arouse matter (life).
A jew suggests shapes like "flat" and "sphere" to distract gentiles from being within the process of atmos (German atmen; breathing).
b) To maintain implies "taking into possession", hence man (hand) tenere (to hold)...being implies potential (life) set free within procession (inception towards death).
A jew suggests gentiles to maintain aka tainting self (perception) within main (perceivable) by holding onto suggested.
I thought this was the week you picked not to be gay? Oh well maybe next week.
Every thread until you stop, jew.
Thanks bot. You're doing exactly as you were programmed, such a good jewbot. They must be sooooo proud of you!!!!
you must be new here
It's still relevant for keeping the two sides from joining together
Wow!! Great focus!!! You'll prolly get to the truth in like 4 to 5 lifetimes!!! Congrats
Fascinating.
I couldn’t find any description of the crux of this device - the bee-hive shaped optical amplifier.
Also, this whole thing seems like a hoax. If the accompanying building was built at the same time as this art exhibit, it cost millions (likely 10’s of millions) to build. It is hard to imagine who would fund this, for an overgrown videocall without sound…
It is clear from the drawings, most likely made by the modern artist and not his supposed “insane great grandfather”, that they conceived the earth to be spherical. Though I’m certain that had any of this nonsense been real, like all other large tunnels and bridges, it was going to be constructed as flat as possible with no consideration for “curvature of the earth”.
It's a camera
In this art exhibit, yes.
In the (supposed; I personally think the entire thing is a hoax perpetrated by the artist and his investors) designs for the “telectroscope”, there is reportedly a beehive shaped collection of mirrors that is supposed to amplify the image so it can travel such a long distance and remain visible on the other end of the tunnel.
If this were a real device, such an amplifier (probably many of them over the length of the tunnel) would absolutely be needed. Although this amplifier is mentioned in passing, I couldn’t find a diagram or description of its inner workings. More evidence that this is a hoax.
Oh my god you're far behind.
Nothing can see around a curve. Luckily the world doesn't curve, but sadly, you still have to contend with Beers Law. There are too many particles between those two points for light from one point to get to the other. Which makes this article a total lie
Just learn some physics.
Take refraction for example, You're totally confused about what it is. But basically it's saying the light particles that reflect off of New York, then bounce on the water and the atmosphere over and over again hundreds of times, yet still produce a crisp image in London. It's absolutely mental gymnastic retardedness. And part of the globe earth space psyop for the gullible
Yep, if the Sun is blocked by atmosperic particles when it's too far away, this distance is too far to see as well.
No one ever accused FE enthusiasts of consistency.
I think most people don't understand anything about flat earth. Not that I am a flat earther. Just the most people think it's a thing. And my studies have never met a flat earther. Just people who say they've talked to them.
I have met others who tested and observed that we're not on a globe. They are not flat earthers. They're just people who use basic math and science and common sense to see that this is not a planet and we are not in space.
Damn son, flatearthception.
Also, technically refraction has nothing to do with reflecting.
All it can do is bend it one way or the other, its not actually reflecting anything.
a) Life being moved from inception towards death implies a curvature (growth) within a straight line (loss).
b) To use a slavic proverb...KURVA
I don't get how the planet supposedly travels thousands of miles through space while spinning in circles being pulled by the sun which is also hurdling through space yet Polaris is always fixed in the same location.
That defies common logic.
You clearly failed elementary school geometry.
Insult all u want...I'm just asking questions because that defies logic. I'll trust my senses over what a bunch of masons changed a couple hundred years ago.
You have no idea what logic is and you’re not trusting your senses. No one changed anything a hundred years ago. Get the fuck out of here, yid.
Sure thing t-shill...I guess I should go back and get my grade 4 Jesuit/Rockefeller indoctrination "education" for the facts...🤣
You clearly failed elementary school geometry. Fuck off back to Reddit, jew. You’re literally defending an art installation as being real. Shoot yourself.
Oh did accelerate in grade 4 Jesuit geometry?
Hey maybe those masons that pushed the heliocentric model were telling the truth that time...
we should trust those jesuits eh t-shill?
Fuxk off
Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat.
sigh
You ever sit in a car and look out the window? Ever notice how the road signs go by quickly while the trees across the field seem to go slower, even though they're travelling the exacr same speed relative to the car?
Imagine the trees are a couple billion light years away. How fast do you think they would seem to move?
Every other star supposedly moves except that one...sigh
Does the city directly in front of you on the straight road on which you’re driving move as you move along the road? Shut up, yid.
Oh and stick that mental gymnastics bullshit up your ass u copy and paste anytime someone brings up legit questions.
Fucken Gate keeper.
Thanks for admitting the Earth isn’t flat, that there are no legitimate questions, that I am not a gate keeper, and that
YOU ARE PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE OF ANSWERING EVEN A SINGLE QUESTION I POSTED.
Every ancient society says the earth is flat. This includes the )ews and the talmoud yet they teach the goyim the heliocentric model.
WONDER WHY THEY WOULD DO THAT?
They literally don’t. You know nothing.
Good job proving that you are literally a paid shill, subhuman kike! Why would anyone believe anything you say when you do the one thing that only paid jewish shills do?
They don’t.
Space is very very large, and the time we are alive is very very small.
Thats a shit Ton of written mental gymnastics when there is a simple explanation that doesn't go against your own senses.
U know the "scientists" that changed it to heliocentric model were masons right?
I guess u can trust them on that tho........... .........