Yeah literally says it in the body of the article. The funny part is they are looking into the viewer end which, man thats some telescope that lets you see through the ground.
What got me more curious was the opening paragraph of this article. Must have been written with AI or something, talks about a transatlantic tunnel that was never built but only someones pipe dream. And turns out even that guy believed in globe earth.
Deep beneath the Atlantic Ocean, forgotten for the best part of a century, lies a tunnel linking London and New York.
It was built on the whim of a Victorian inventor with the aim of linking two great cities and developing the kind of friendship that still exists today.
He wanted to make a tunnel from britain to new york, but decided it would have been to much work so he wanted to make a tunnel underneath the seabed.
Was going to create a system of lenses and mirrors that would allow people from both sides to be able to write each other? Anyway, even managed some funding and got some workers but after a collapse which flooded the tunnel, killed most of the workers and then then rest gave up. He "supposedly" went crazy and ended up in a insane asylum.
This story left me with way more questions than answers.
b) All perceivable transfers through each ones perception without one being able to bear/carry it...instead its perceivable which carries forth perception.
c) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a tunnel, which conceals perceivable from one; while permitting others to pipe dreams into one, since ones perception is asleep.
Work implies energy (internal power)...all works so that each one within can become possible.
by trickery
Energy implies internal (effects) separation of external (cause)...others trick one to ignore that by mentally and physically joining together what nature sets apart from one another.
if it does
IF implies then within perceptible nature...IT implies an artificial suggestion tempting ones consent into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't).
Few suggest IT (artificial) in the name of IF (natural) to trick ones perception into ignoring perceivable for suggested.
TO (towards) implies the known ledge (inception towards death) for each enabled being (life) within to learn to teach/teach to learn self.
To experience is to understand
EX (out of) PER (forward) implies coming (inception towards death) into being (life)...to understand implies a being choosing to "stand-under" another being, while ignoring to ex-press self outwards, while being forwarded.
Understanding inverts knowledge. Understanding tempts one to hold onto suggested information; knowledge implies all perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception.
It doesn't matter what you say, your input means nothing because you don't distinguish/cant tell the difference between what the adversary is saying and what your brother is saying.
If this is the thing I think it is I'm pretty sure it's just a TV screen streaming from a camera in NY
Yeah literally says it in the body of the article. The funny part is they are looking into the viewer end which, man thats some telescope that lets you see through the ground.
What got me more curious was the opening paragraph of this article. Must have been written with AI or something, talks about a transatlantic tunnel that was never built but only someones pipe dream. And turns out even that guy believed in globe earth.
Found a better article about this guy.
https://www.devices-of-wonder.com/cn/story/index.html
He wanted to make a tunnel from britain to new york, but decided it would have been to much work so he wanted to make a tunnel underneath the seabed.
Was going to create a system of lenses and mirrors that would allow people from both sides to be able to write each other? Anyway, even managed some funding and got some workers but after a collapse which flooded the tunnel, killed most of the workers and then then rest gave up. He "supposedly" went crazy and ended up in a insane asylum.
This story left me with way more questions than answers.
It's just some modern art piece.
The funny thing is, if you read the first few paragraphs, it's actually supposed to go through the Earth, not over it.
If you look at the picture, you can see it's going into the ground not into the air.
DPS is just trolling.
Nature implies just; artifice does nature injustice...if one ignores natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
Or lazy
a) Trans-a-tlantic aka "transfer (trans) without (a) bearing (tlantic/tlenai)"...
b) All perceivable transfers through each ones perception without one being able to bear/carry it...instead its perceivable which carries forth perception.
c) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a tunnel, which conceals perceivable from one; while permitting others to pipe dreams into one, since ones perception is asleep.
Piping dreams like Hollywood...the dream factory.
If it does "work" then it would only be possible by trickery like what u suggested
Work implies energy (internal power)...all works so that each one within can become possible.
Energy implies internal (effects) separation of external (cause)...others trick one to ignore that by mentally and physically joining together what nature sets apart from one another.
IF implies then within perceptible nature...IT implies an artificial suggestion tempting ones consent into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't).
Few suggest IT (artificial) in the name of IF (natural) to trick ones perception into ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Globehead science always includes the words "pretty sure"
I wish I could be a 100% knowledgable about things I have only ever read about or contemplated.
Must be nice.
Wishing implies towards outcome; knowledge implies origin forwarding being.
Being implies able (life) within ledge (inception towards death) of known.
To learn is to know; To experience is to understand
TO (towards) implies the known ledge (inception towards death) for each enabled being (life) within to learn to teach/teach to learn self.
EX (out of) PER (forward) implies coming (inception towards death) into being (life)...to understand implies a being choosing to "stand-under" another being, while ignoring to ex-press self outwards, while being forwarded.
Understanding inverts knowledge. Understanding tempts one to hold onto suggested information; knowledge implies all perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception.
And FE "science" always reqires a video or article.
Edit: lol
It doesn't matter what you say, your input means nothing because you don't distinguish/cant tell the difference between what the adversary is saying and what your brother is saying.