We are to believe this loose woman who lied to her boyfriend in order to do coke with a celebrity, who is seen all over CCTV kissing him (and others), was not going to have sex with him? A woman like that would give it up to a 6/10 nobody with a bag of drugs, let alone a celebrity.
This video explains the evidence against her -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8s33jaioVY
They also have witnesses (one of her co-workers) who saw her right after the alleged event and said she was fine. So if she got beat up, that was all set up later for a payday.
Yes I agree Conor McGregor is an immoral person, but for reasons other than rape.
The reason is he speaks out for his community and nation.
He did tons of bs.
That's a reason, the other is he does a lot of bs and if he didn't do it for real then everyone is going to suspect he did thanks to him being a psycho dickhead.
And i think he might aswell have done it after what he did in the past.
He definitely nuked his own reputation. Still for him to be smeared as a rapist for this is an injustice. There is simply no way her story adds up.
She must have faked the injuries for a pay day.
A being cannot have/own/possess inwards...only express potential outwards.
You'll eventually notice that changing sides within a conflict of reason (for vs against) doesn't impact the outcome of a suggestion (Connor McGregor).
A jew suggests Connor McGregor fighting within a ring, to tempt consenting gentiles to reason from outside whose gonna win or lose. Simultaneously a jew suggests narratives including Connor McGregor to establish a ring (circular logic) within each consenting gentiles mind/memory, as to manipulate both sides within the resulting conflict of reason (for vs against) among gentiles.
A gentile is being tricked to believe that consent given (to buy) implies possession gained over suggested (to sell)...while ignoring that perception (life) within perceivable (inception towards death) cannot hold onto anything.
WE implies ones (singular) belief in suggested pluralism. Holding onto such an -ism tempts one to ignore the implication of TO aka being (life) moved from inception TOWARDS death.
Be-lieve implies BEING LEAVING...the state of being.
A lie can only be shaped within the natural order moving life from inception TOWARDS death. A shaped lie or truth tempts one to believe aka to hold onto the suggested shape, while fighting (reason) within a ring (circular logic) about the meaning thereof.
The ongoing natural order doesn't stop for the temporary chaos within choosing to fight each other over fiction, while ignoring reality.
a) If it's a CLOSED CIRCUIT telling a vision, then how did ones sight get in it?
b) How could such a closed circuit represent ALL if each ONEs sight operates outside of it?
c) Is it ones sight when looking at visions told (TV) in shapes within a closed circuit by another?
How could one have/own/possess...sex/seco/divide...if it implies a separation from one another?
Implies tethering self to the following conflicts of reason...YES vs NO; I vs YOU, and AGREE vs DISAGREE.
What a commitment for one to fight in three different conflicts simultaneously...would Connor McGregor commit to such odds?
So inceldom?
a) IN (being within) CELIBATE (unbound aka free) DOM (dominance aka in-between boundary)...being implies free (life) withing dominance (inception towards death).
b) Suggested inceldom hides "involuntary" aka by ones own free will of choice. Why? Because ones consent to a suggestion implies shirking ones free will of choice to another, hence binding self to another.
c) To bring this back to male/female balance aka giving/taking...male needs to resist taking; female needs to resist giving. Neither can abstain the temptation of the other. Hence self sustenance implying a struggle.
A jew inverts this by suggesting males to "give it all you got" and females "you can take it...you are just as strong as them". This is how you'll get incels and sluts...the former draining themselves in isolation, and the latter getting filled up in company.
tl;dr: An ongoing division cannot be possessed by parts within, and pretending to be free from boundaries to one another (inceldom) only distracts from the original division of whole into partials...a division (inception towards death) which inspires resistance (life).
That's spot on.