Today I learned: Age of Consent = Prepubescent Child. Thanks Reddit!
(media.conspiracies.win)
Politics
Comments (40)
sorted by:
I dont know if Matt Gaetz is a pedophile or not. It's important to note the context of the allegations: Matt Gaetz's friend Joel Greenberg (Jewish) was the connection between Matt and the alleged sex with a minor.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/gaetz-associate-sentenced-11-years-sources-probe-florida/story?id=94225875
Why was this not pursued further? Probably because Greenberg acted as an Epstein-like Mossad operative to honeypot American politicians and once you start getting close to Mossad / sex-trafficking / honeypots the trail abruptly ends.
So, blackmail attempt?
probably
Legal definition of child in most states is a person under the age of majority. That´s under 18.
Definition of pedophile is an adult who has sex or wants to have sex with children.
So now that I have educated you, what´s an adult man who has sex with a 17 year old?
These are allegations that have not led to civil or criminal prosecution hence "I don't know if he is a pedophile" because these allegations have NOT been proven true in a court of law. I'm clearly aware of the definition of pedophilia - are you aware of the difference between allegations and criminal prosecution?
I DO know his (Jewish) accomplice Joel Greenberg DID go to jail for sex trafficking minors so I KNOW Joel Greenberg is a pedophile. It's odd that the US has two (Jewish) individuals (Epstein, Greenberg) running sex-trafficking rings for US politicians - what are the coincidences? So odd.
Now we do know Israeli was caught installing cellphone towers around the white house / DC. (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report) so Israel has a history of spying on US politicians. So you have the Israeli government spying on politicians and (Jews) running sex-tracking for US politicians - suddenly a picture of control/entrapment begins to emerge.
If Gaetz had sex with that 17 year old, does that make him a pedo as per the legal definition or not?
The legal definition can change tomorrow and require you to consider children 28y old guys if it so rules.
Clown.
So you'd refuse to prosecute someone for a crime because laws can change?
I'm not a prosecutor, and i can follow laws while finding them as clownish as your clownish assumed implications.
So, do you think it's ok for an adult to pay a 17 year old money for sex?
I see much worse stuff going on to worry about that. A symptom as many
Why won't you answer the question?
Maybe not a pedophile per se but it's definitely ethically questionable
So i’m not the only one that started puberty at 17 and a half!!
Normal Male behavior, isn't being a vegan. Also, have you seen his wife?
https://x.com/GingerLGaetz/status/1609612237689294848
What facts? The fact that you are vegan? What connections? Which Man?
And I am connecting that to you how? So, is it normal or not? Because you seem very offended at those connection that you are making yourself.
Well, you only know of your own education, so I can assume you speak of yourself, and your own publicly funded education.
Now is 'Jesús' the unlicensed foreign worker that fries your vegan banana samiches? Or am I to assume, you know how to topic?
Meanwhile if you dare even mention drawing NSFW of fictional children, perceived or real, there will be a crusade launched on your head.
You simply cannot stop wanting to look at child porn, can you?
That´s literally all you are obsessing about here.
Fucking degenerate.
Actually, he makes a point. As the C.I.A doesn't want you to look at images that don't harm people, as they can't run their blackmail racket if no one is being harmed.
Dramatically missing the point; You can trip those boundaries on complete mistake and lose everything while the actual pedophiles get away with harems of kids. Unless the elites don't like them like they do with Epstein.
It's like in the Medieval era where you accuse the priests of raping kids you will die of heresy, but the landlord can kidnap and marry your daughter for no reason other than he wants to and has probably done it a bunch of times.
Fucking pedo.
Don't pretend to have some ulterior motive.
You just don't want to lose easy access to child porn.
The projection is real, do not cry next time when you get arrested for being a pedophile just because you have the word "child porn" in your comments.
Yes they really do this when all the villains are gone.
You're the one constantly whining that people try to take away your degenerate comics.
That's literally all you post about.
Fucking pedo.
According to your logic, Epstein wasn't a pedo.
Well, he was a human trafficker, a racketeer and a rapist, among other things that I am to tired to list. As for 'my logic', I only presented a fallacious claim out of jest, in an effort to expose the current zeitgeist and psyop that is the Reddit's front page narrative in relation to Matt Gaetz. I'm sorry, I have no idea what you are trying to claim. Feel free to elaborate on your statement.
I was just joking
That's your fucking excuse?
How utterly pathetic.
So, was Epstein a pedo or not?
The topic is whether or not and adult who has sex with a child is a pedo.
So, is an adult who has sex with a child a pedo or not?
If you wish to choose the topic. Go make your own thread. What's that? You did? Congratulations on typing out a whole fifteen words!
The topic of the thread is your assertion that an adult who has sex with a child isn´t necessarily a pedophile.
Did I get that wrong?
So you have no problems with the the AG banging underage hookers?
You have no problem believing reddit, and a deep state operatives? And are calling a trafficked girl as a hooker? Are you controlled opposition? Because if so, you can simply present these theories instead of prompting me to state them through Questions that make you seem, 'of low intelligence'.
No, I don´t. Now what?
Oh, now you address my second statement and explain to me why you are calling a trafficked young person a hooker. Actually that's my third point, my second was on deep state operatives, but, I'll assume good faith on your part, and move past that.