I was listening to Dave Collum the other day, and dude makes a self-evident point:
The definition of a Ponzi Scheme, requires attracting new people into the scheme to keep it going.
We think about it in terms of a financial scheme, but if you think about it in terms of the endless immigration invasion going on, it's apparent, that it's a ponzi, by definition.
On logical grounds, this is a great takedown on the immigration debate, and we should stop immediately, because in the long term, theres absolutely no winning outcome given current population growth trends. Growing the population ponzi through immigration only guarantees a larger crash.
🧠
Like drinking to cure a hangover
a) Being alive implies sentenced towards point of death...the point of ones life cannot be plainly seen (evident) by self.
b) Others suggest points to tempt one to ignore ones life sentence aka ones life sensing.
Definite; adjective - "fixed; defined; bounded; limited; ended"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/definite
The scheme...while nature goes on; those within can be tricked to keep holding onto definitions.
Being implies within...attractions tempt one out.
Scheme (figure of speech) aka schema (a shape) aka segh (to hold)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scheme
Few tricking many to hold onto figures of speech; shaped as suggested words within perceivable sound...that's what scheme implies.
Ponzi implies the sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...PONDERING SEEING (pon-zi). If one ponders what one perceives; then holding onto suggestions would distort what one sees.
COL-ONY (collecting one) aka colonization implies luring separated ones together, while ignoring the above described process. This establishes constipation aka bottlenecks...
not really, because the recipients dying is part of the scheme
A Ponzi scheme is paying old investors from the contributions of new investors.
I mean, civilization itself is sort of a ponzi scheme, but compared to what I suppose.
But yes, they are importing foreigners into the West to replace the population and it won't end well.
It will end very well...for the jew.
I notice you use "they"
Who are "they", fren?
"they" are Jews, often enough. It won't end well for them in the long run, the golem always gets out of control.
Sorry if I am hard for you to pin down in your nice little boxes, mon ami.
fren I have no issues.
You name the jew.
You are mon ami.
Unexpected, but I can't complain. Bonjour.
Comparisons drawn from suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration, from which one draws resistance to sustain self.
If one draws comparisons from one another, then consent binds one to another ones suggestions, hence the more comparisons one draws, the less free will of choice for self.
Your word salad sounds like Kamala.
Utilitarianism.
Utility implies being used by nature...suggested utilitarianism tempts one to consent to being abused by others in the name of "the greatest number".
Yea, I know it's some dude using an AI text generator, likely one of those post modern text generators. Occasionally he breaks character.
I reply with a one or two work reply, letting the air out of the balloon.
Common good
All current debt based monetary financial systems are a ponzi schemes, thus so are the economies built on top of them, which by themselves require a certain kind of population pyramid exponential growth (not just population growth ).
The direction of causation is reversed to what you think and populatiom growth by itself is not enough, it needs to be certain kind of population dependency ratio (hence pyramid ) growth.
If the primary driver was simply population size, and not the debt based monetary system , then purely available resources would self limit population max size and growth delta, regardless of economics. And size self limiting systems are not ponzis (feedback is negative, not positive ). Now the requirements of the actual growth driver (debt based money economics) try to remove the resource constraints on the population. Economics drives the population growth , not the other way around.
Collum is usually on the money, but here he has forgotten basic population dynamics biology.
Think it through before answering , it is pretty clear.