The booster catch is such a ridiculous feat compared to the moon landing missions they supposedly did a six times 50+ years ago. How are people cheering for that boggles the mind.
For some reason, they will need to refuel 20+ times in flight to get to the moon this time. But I guess we aren't supposed to pay attention to that. For some reason. Though we got to the moon using slide rulers and a calculator.
I just don't understand why it pisses people off so much. Like, who the fuck cares? Lots of people believe lots of stupid shit and don't catch anywhere near the flak the flat-earthers do.
I don't think it actually pisses people off. I think people like to act pissed off about it because it's like virtue signaling. It allows them to feel superior.
You're probably right about most people. But I've legitimately seen people get enraged over it before and I just can't figure it out. I know a dude who told me with a straight face that, "flat-earthers belong in a concentration camp".
"We live in a simulation or maybe some type of computer, possibly inter dimensional reptilians are communicating with humans through emerald tablets"
Yeah totally bro I think that might be it, like if you think about it would make sense.
"I think we live on a stationary plane instead of a globe"
BRO WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SERIOS??! YOU'RE ONe of those flat earthers smh!! Bro thinks we live on a pancake in space lmaoo, don't fall off the Edge! 🫵🤣🤣🤣.
This post is designed to find people like me. So they can shadow ban the "flat earth"
It's ok, I know I can't wake people up anyway, but they are still totally scared of 2016 happening again, when Flat earth was the most popular search term on google.
Then they rushed in trump and got everything distracted
You know why this post gets so many upvotes, because this site is a anti flat earth psy op. Conspiracy theorists these days are retarded, because you fuckers are so gullible for space and globe science.
This site is psy op garbage, and flat earth is too...but true earth.
.ya.
It's not a globe, God is fake, space is fake, this is a human farm, all these sovereign countries have always been bullshit. Like evolution. Explain how evolution made all these races of people! No one can. It's retarded to keep believing the same educational institution that is lying about viruses, moon landings, etc etc
The fact there is a still a debate about if the earth is flat or round means there has to be some truth to it. It should be a closed case with no question or speculation. Countless real photos of the earth etc., nothing can be proven confidently.
It is so easy. Just don't be paranoid to look for yourself. Most scientifics look on the surface, find flat earth psy op, and give up.
It's obvious we are not on a globe in space. You can't be afraid to take that seriously and see for yourself. Look with common sense and don't believe any dogma
Implication (if/then) is based on balance; circular logic aka reason (yes vs no) is based on imbalance.
from who?
TION (action) implicates...reactions, hence motion being the base of implication (if/then) for any reaction within.
of what?
Implication out of motion aka if motion (inception towards death) then matter (life)...
None of this is grounded in logic
Motion implies a linear foundation for ground to balance within aka for ones choice to utilize balance as the ground to plant seeds within.
Logic (conflict of reason) is based on an affixed ground (suggested information)...like for example suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting you into a conflict of reason (some vs none); within which you choose to hold onto a side, hence affixing it within your mind.
"None of this is grounded in logic" implies your statement aka your state of mind, which is affixed by your free will of choice to NONE aka nothing; nihilism; denial; ignorance etc. which you willingly hold onto...otherwise you would be ABLE to QUESTION this...
These were really easy Questions to answer. This reply addresses none of which. Are you going to answer the Questions, or just sit 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 making a fool of yourself?
Aka real vs fictional + easy vs hard....doesn't matter which side one chooses, one lands in the same conflict of reason. That's circular logic....implied in your response. From who? You! Of what? Your ignorance of implication for your choice of reason!
Questions to answer
"tion to" implies action (inception towards death) sending reactions (life) towards death. Your quest towards answers tempts you to ignore this implication, and waiting for answers wastes life.
This reply addresses none of which
a) Any reply/reaction addresses action, since that's where it originates from, hence each reaction addressed going "return to sender".
a) Does free will of choice require one to answer the questions of others?
b) Are you able to question anything not addressed as answers?
making a fool of yourself
How could one do that to self if the label "fool" is being suggested by others? Why would one label self? What for? Why label anything if a moving nature contradicts any label attached to it?
What about labeling and idolatry? Isn't it considered a sin to hold onto idols? Have I sinned by not making the label "fool" for myself?
It's some trolls but mostly well-poisoning kike faggots.
These are the same people saying Elon's booster catch didn't happen. They will say anything no matter how outrageous.
The booster catch is such a ridiculous feat compared to the moon landing missions they supposedly did a six times 50+ years ago. How are people cheering for that boggles the mind.
For some reason, they will need to refuel 20+ times in flight to get to the moon this time. But I guess we aren't supposed to pay attention to that. For some reason. Though we got to the moon using slide rulers and a calculator.
As NASA director Don Pettit puts it: "We've lost the technology". At this point only morons continue to believe this shit.
A critique of Elon's booster catch. Trust science.
I just don't understand why it pisses people off so much. Like, who the fuck cares? Lots of people believe lots of stupid shit and don't catch anywhere near the flak the flat-earthers do.
What's infuriating is that they run a psy-op like that on us.
Because it's true. Not flat earth, but the earth is flat, just not floating in space. Because space and the concept of the universe is a psy op.
It's really easy to figure out, but you have to wade through a sea of psy op flat earth to find the actual truth.
Truth is easy to determine yourself. No believe required
I don't think it actually pisses people off. I think people like to act pissed off about it because it's like virtue signaling. It allows them to feel superior.
You're probably right about most people. But I've legitimately seen people get enraged over it before and I just can't figure it out. I know a dude who told me with a straight face that, "flat-earthers belong in a concentration camp".
"We live in a simulation or maybe some type of computer, possibly inter dimensional reptilians are communicating with humans through emerald tablets"
Yeah totally bro I think that might be it, like if you think about it would make sense.
"I think we live on a stationary plane instead of a globe"
BRO WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SERIOS??! YOU'RE ONe of those flat earthers smh!! Bro thinks we live on a pancake in space lmaoo, don't fall off the Edge! 🫵🤣🤣🤣.
Who are you Quoting? He didn't say any of that.
It's O.K. to be white.
😐
It's okay, I totally understood what you were getting at.
I thought the sins would be offending the LGBTQP+ cult.
This post is designed to find people like me. So they can shadow ban the "flat earth"
It's ok, I know I can't wake people up anyway, but they are still totally scared of 2016 happening again, when Flat earth was the most popular search term on google.
Then they rushed in trump and got everything distracted
Flat earth is a psy op, but so is the globe.
Retards are usually the scientific community. Speaking as one of them
You know why this post gets so many upvotes, because this site is a anti flat earth psy op. Conspiracy theorists these days are retarded, because you fuckers are so gullible for space and globe science.
This site is psy op garbage, and flat earth is too...but true earth. .ya.
It's not a globe, God is fake, space is fake, this is a human farm, all these sovereign countries have always been bullshit. Like evolution. Explain how evolution made all these races of people! No one can. It's retarded to keep believing the same educational institution that is lying about viruses, moon landings, etc etc
Forget the argument, it's just funny!
Downvoted. Ha! 🤣
The fact there is a still a debate about if the earth is flat or round means there has to be some truth to it. It should be a closed case with no question or speculation. Countless real photos of the earth etc., nothing can be proven confidently.
No. Stupid kike.
Yes, lazy institutionalized sheep
It is so easy. Just don't be paranoid to look for yourself. Most scientifics look on the surface, find flat earth psy op, and give up.
It's obvious we are not on a globe in space. You can't be afraid to take that seriously and see for yourself. Look with common sense and don't believe any dogma
As in...standing on a flat surface, as far as the eye can see, while pretending to believe its round just outside ones perception?
Notice that reasoning against others implies "circular" logic...
Implication of circular logic? From who? Of what? None of this is grounded in logic.
Implication of circular logic?
Implication (if/then) is based on balance; circular logic aka reason (yes vs no) is based on imbalance.
TION (action) implicates...reactions, hence motion being the base of implication (if/then) for any reaction within.
Implication out of motion aka if motion (inception towards death) then matter (life)...
Motion implies a linear foundation for ground to balance within aka for ones choice to utilize balance as the ground to plant seeds within.
Logic (conflict of reason) is based on an affixed ground (suggested information)...like for example suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting you into a conflict of reason (some vs none); within which you choose to hold onto a side, hence affixing it within your mind.
"None of this is grounded in logic" implies your statement aka your state of mind, which is affixed by your free will of choice to NONE aka nothing; nihilism; denial; ignorance etc. which you willingly hold onto...otherwise you would be ABLE to QUESTION this...
These were really easy Questions to answer. This reply addresses none of which. Are you going to answer the Questions, or just sit 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 making a fool of yourself?
Aka real vs fictional + easy vs hard....doesn't matter which side one chooses, one lands in the same conflict of reason. That's circular logic....implied in your response. From who? You! Of what? Your ignorance of implication for your choice of reason!
"tion to" implies action (inception towards death) sending reactions (life) towards death. Your quest towards answers tempts you to ignore this implication, and waiting for answers wastes life.
a) Any reply/reaction addresses action, since that's where it originates from, hence each reaction addressed going "return to sender".
b) How could "none" be addressed?
c) Address/ad directiare - "towards making straight"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/address sounds like motion to me?
a) Does free will of choice require one to answer the questions of others?
b) Are you able to question anything not addressed as answers?
How could one do that to self if the label "fool" is being suggested by others? Why would one label self? What for? Why label anything if a moving nature contradicts any label attached to it?
What about labeling and idolatry? Isn't it considered a sin to hold onto idols? Have I sinned by not making the label "fool" for myself?
Not addressing the topic of the thread.
Choosing not to support your own statements with sound replies.
Spamming absurdity and nonsense.
Derailing the threads topic.
ᴳᵒᵗ ᶦᵗ!
Didn't my last sentence address "sin"?
a) A reply can only be made within sound, hence re-son-ance.
b) Choosing not implies denying choice.
c) Sound supports states of mind...both resonance and dissonance.
Do you think implication is illogical?
Sensus (perception) + Sentire (to perceive)...how does one perceive nothing?
De-rail implies division of rail...aren't most rails divided from one another? Are you trying to sell a monorail?
What if circular reasoning thread/tere - "to twist; turn" linear implication into a conflict?
Is conflict a sin?